- 11 Jul, 2018 2 commits
-
-
Thomas Munro authored
Use FreeBSD 11.2's new support for detecting parent process death to make PostmasterIsAlive() very cheap, as was done for Linux in an earlier commit. Author: Thomas Munro Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7261eb39-0369-f2f4-1bb5-62f3b6083b5e@iki.fi
-
Thomas Munro authored
Linux provides a way to ask for a signal when your parent process dies. Use that to make PostmasterIsAlive() very cheap. Based on a suggestion from Andres Freund. Author: Thomas Munro, Heikki Linnakangas Reviewed-By: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7261eb39-0369-f2f4-1bb5-62f3b6083b5e%40iki.fi Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180411002643.6buofht4ranhei7k%40alap3.anarazel.de
-
- 10 Jul, 2018 5 commits
-
-
Michael Paquier authored
Such replication slots are physical slots freshly created without WAL being reserved, which is the default behavior, which have not been used yet as WAL consumption resources to retain WAL. This prevents advancing a slot to a position older than any WAL available, which could falsify calculations for WAL segment recycling. This also cleans up a bit the code, as ReplicationSlotRelease() would be called on ERROR, and improves error messages. Reported-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Álvaro Herrera, Kyotaro Horiguchi Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180626071305.GH31353@paquier.xyz
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
We fail to handle polymorphic types properly when they are used as partition keys: we were unnecessarily adding a RelabelType node on top, which confuses code examining the nodes. In particular, this makes predtest.c-based partition pruning not to work, and ruleutils.c to emit expressions that are uglier than needed. Fix it by not adding RelabelType when not needed. In master/11 the new pruning code is separate so it doesn't suffer from this problem, since we already fixed it (in essentially the same way) in e5dcbb88, which also added a few tests; back-patch those tests to pg10 also. But since UPDATE/DELETE still uses predtest.c in pg11, this change improves partitioning for those cases too. Add tests for this. The ruleutils.c behavior change is relevant in pg11/master too. Co-authored-by: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> Co-authored-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/54745d13-7ed4-54ac-97d8-ea1eec95ae25@lab.ntt.co.jp
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
PostgreSQL nowadays offers some kind of dynamic shared memory feature on all supported platforms. Having the choice of "none" prevents us from relying on DSM in core features. So this patch removes the choice of "none". Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
-
Heikki Linnakangas authored
The EEOP_INNER_SYSVAR and EEOP_OUTER_SYSVAR executor opcodes are not exercised by normal queries, because setrefs.c will resolve the references to system columns in the scan nodes already. Join nodes refer to them by their position in the child node's target list, like user columns. The only place where those opcodes are used, is in evaluating a trigger's WHEN condition that references system columns. Trigger evaluation abuses the INNER/OUTER Vars to refer to the OLD and NEW tuples. The code to handle the opcodes is pretty straightforward, but it seems like a good idea to have some test coverage for them, anyway, so that they don't get removed or broken by accident. Author: Ashutosh Bapat, with some changes by me. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFjFpRerUFX=T0nSnCoroXAJMoo-xah9J+pi7+xDUx86PtQmew@mail.gmail.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
-
- 09 Jul, 2018 9 commits
-
-
Michael Paquier authored
This is an option consistent with what pg_dump and pg_basebackup provide which is useful for leveraging the I/O effort when testing things, not to be used in a production environment. Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180325122607.GB3707@paquier.xyz
-
Michael Paquier authored
The previous sync logic relied on looking for and then launching externally initdb -S, which is a simple wrapper on top of fsync_pgdata. There is nothing preventing pg_rewind to directly call this routine, so remove the dependency to initdb and just call it directly. Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180325122607.GB3707@paquier.xyz
-
Tom Lane authored
Commit fafa374f caused _bt_getbuf() to possibly emit a WAL record for a page that it was about to recycle. However, it failed to distinguish all-zero pages from dead pages, which is important because only the latter have valid btpo.xact values, or indeed any special space at all. Recycling an all-zero page with XLogStandbyInfoActive() enabled therefore led to an Assert failure, or to emission of a WAL record containing a bogus cutoff XID, which might lead to unnecessary query cancellations on hot standby servers. Per reports from Antonin Houska and 自己. Amit Kapila was first to propose this fix, and Robert Haas, myself, and Kyotaro Horiguchi reviewed it at various times. This is an old bug, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2628.1474272158@localhost Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/48875502.f4a0.1635f0c27b0.Coremail.zoulx1982@163.com
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
Commit fc49e24f added an input argument after the existing output argument. Flip those. Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180708182345.imdgovmkffgtihhk@alvherre.pgsql
-
Tom Lane authored
Commit 716ea626 attempted to fix the problem of building 1-D zero-size arrays once and for all. But it turns out that contrib/intarray has some code that doesn't use construct_array() but just builds arrays by hand, so it didn't get the memo. This appears to affect all of subarray(), intset_subtract(), inner_int_union(), inner_int_inter(), and intarray_concat_arrays(). Back-patch into v11. In the past we've not back-patched this type of change, but since v11 is still in beta it seems all right to include this fix in it. Besides it's more consistent to make the fix in v11 where 716ea626 appeared. Report and patch by Alexey Kryuchkov, some cosmetic adjustments by me Report: https://postgr.es/m/153053285112.13258.434620894305716755@wrigleys.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAN85JcYphDLYt4CpMDLZjjNVqGDrFJ5eS3YF=wLAhFoDQuBsyg@mail.gmail.com
-
Bruce Momjian authored
Reported-by: Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180525010025.GT30060@telsasoft.com Backpatch-through: 10
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
This ensures that prepared statements for CALL can return tuples.
-
Michael Paquier authored
This is an oversight from c55de5e5. Author: Julien Rouhaud
-
Michael Paquier authored
A critical failure in some of the end-of-recovery actions before the end-of-recovery record is written can cause PostgreSQL to react inconsistently with the rest of the cluster in the event of a crash before the final record is written. Two such failures are for example an error while processing a two-phase state files or when operating on recovery.conf. With this commit, the failures are still considered FATAL, but the write of the timeline history file is delayed as much as possible so as the window between the moment the file is written and the end-of-recovery record is generated gets minimized. This way, in the event of a crash or a failure, the new timeline decided at promotion will not seem taken by other nodes in the cluster. It is not really possible to reduce to zero this window, hence one could still see failures if a crash happens between the history file write and the end-of-recovery record, so any future code should be careful when adding new end-of-recovery actions. The original report from Magnus Hagander mentioned a renamed recovery.conf as original end-of-recovery failure which caused a timeline to be seen as taken but the subsequent processing on the now-missing recovery.conf cause the startup process to issue stop on FATAL, which at follow-up startup made the system inconsistent because of on-disk changes which already happened. Processing of two-phase state files still needs some work as corrupted entries are simply ignored now. This is left as a future item and this commit fixes the original complain. Reported-by: Magnus Hagander Author: Heikki Linnakangas Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov, Michael Paquier, David Steele Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABUevEz09XY2EevA2dLjPCY-C5UO4Hq=XxmXLmF6ipNFecbShQ@mail.gmail.com
-
- 08 Jul, 2018 3 commits
-
-
Jeff Davis authored
If a view references a foreign table, and the foreign table has a BEFORE INSERT trigger, then it's possible for a tuple inserted or updated through the view to be changed such that it violates the view's WITH CHECK OPTION constraint. Before this commit, postgres_fdw handled this case inconsistently. A RETURNING clause on the INSERT or UPDATE statement targeting the view would cause the finally-inserted tuple to be read back, and the WITH CHECK OPTION violation would throw an error. But without a RETURNING clause, postgres_fdw would not read the final tuple back, and WITH CHECK OPTION would not throw an error for the violation (or may throw an error when there is no real violation). AFTER ROW triggers on the foreign table had a similar effect as a RETURNING clause on the INSERT or UPDATE statement. To fix, this commit retrieves the attributes needed to enforce the WITH CHECK OPTION constraint along with the attributes needed for the RETURNING clause (if any) from the remote side. Thus, the WITH CHECK OPTION constraint is always evaluated against the final tuple after any triggers on the remote side. This fix may be considered inconsistent with CHECK constraints declared on foreign tables, which are not enforced locally at all (because the constraint is on a remote object). The discussion concluded that this difference is reasonable, because the WITH CHECK OPTION is a constraint on the local view (not any remote object); therefore it only makes sense to enforce its WITH CHECK OPTION constraint locally. Author: Etsuro Fujita Reviewed-by: Arthur Zakirov, Stephen Frost Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7eb58fab-fd3b-781b-ac33-f7cfec96021f%40lab.ntt.co.jp
-
Peter Geoghegan authored
Commit bc292937 failed to update a comment about unique index checking. _bt_insertonpg() is no longer responsible for finding an insertion location while preventing conflicting insertions.
-
Michael Paquier authored
Previous code used BasicOpenFile() and close() just to check for a file collision, while there is no need to hold open a file descriptor but that's an overkill here. Author: Paul Guo Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABQrizcUtiHaquxK=d4etBX8GF9kbZB50Nt1gO9_aN-e9SptyQ@mail.gmail.com
-
- 07 Jul, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
While we probably don't want to split up all error messages into function and procedure variants, this one is a very prominent one, so it's helpful to be more specific here.
-
- 06 Jul, 2018 6 commits
-
-
Michael Paquier authored
When performing pg_rewind, the presence of a read-only file which is not accessible for writes will cause a failure while processing. This can cause the control file of the target data folder to be truncated, causing it to not be reusable with a successive run. Also, when pg_rewind fails mid-flight, there is likely no way to be able to recover the target data folder anyway, in which case a new base backup is the best option. A note is added in the documentation as well about. Reported-by: Christian H. Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180104200633.17004.16377%40wrigleys.postgresql.org
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
When executing CALL in PL/pgSQL, we need to set a snapshot before invoking the to-be-called procedure. Otherwise, the to-be-called procedure might end up running without a snapshot. For LANGUAGE SQL procedures, this would result in an assertion failure. (For most other languages, this is usually not a problem, because those use SPI and SPI sets snapshots in most cases.) Setting the snapshot restores the behavior of how CALL worked when it was handled as a generic SQL statement in PL/pgSQL (exec_stmt_execsql()). This change revealed another problem: In SPI_commit(), we popped the active snapshot before committing the transaction, to avoid "snapshot %p still active" errors. However, there is no particular reason why only at most one snapshot should be on the stack. So change this to pop all active snapshots instead of only one.
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
In order to be able to resolve polymorphic types, we need to set fn_expr before invoking the procedure.
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
Starting with commit 9915de6c, replication slot drop uses a condition variable sleep to wait until the current user of the slot goes away. This is more user friendly than the previous behavior of erroring out if the slot is in use, but it fails with a not-for-user-consumption error message in single-user mode; plus, if you're using single-user mode because you don't want to start the server in the regular mode (say, disk is full and WAL won't recycle because of the slot), it's inconvenient. Fix by skipping the cond variable sleep in single-user mode, since there can't be anybody to wait for anyway. Reported-by: tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com> Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3b2f809f-326c-38dd-7a9e-897f957a4eb1@enterprisedb.com
-
Andrew Dunstan authored
DEBUG is an alias for DEBUG2, but we want DEBUG2 to show in the settings no matter how it was spelled. Takeshi Ideriha Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4E72940DA2BF16479384A86D54D0988A5678EC03@G01JPEXMBKW04
-
Jeff Davis authored
Author: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKcux6ky5YeZAY74qSh-ayPZZEQchz092g71iXXbC0%2BE3xoscA%40mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKcux6kOQ85Xtzxu3tM1mR7Vk%3D7Z2e4rG7dL1iMZqPgLMpxQYg%40mail.gmail.com
-
- 05 Jul, 2018 7 commits
-
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
Coverity complains that there is no protection in the code (at least in non-assertion-enabled builds) against speculative insertion failing to follow the expected protocol. Add an elog(ERROR) for the case.
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Prefer to use phrases like "child" instead of "partition" when describing the legacy inheritance-based partitioning. The word "partition" now has a fixed meaning for the built-in partitioning, so keeping it out of the documentation of the old method makes things clearer. Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
Change a whole-database VACUUM into doing just pg_attribute, which is the portion that verifies what we want it to do. The original formulation wastes a lot of CPU time, which leads the test to fail when runtime exceeds isolationtester timeout when it's super-slow, such as under CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS. Per buildfarm member friarbird. It turns out that the previous shape of the test doesn't always detect the condition it is supposed to detect (on unpatched reorderbuffer code): the reason is that there is a good chance of encountering a xl_running_xacts record (logged every 15 seconds) before the checkpoint -- and because we advance the xmin when we receive that WAL record, and we *don't* advance the xmin twice consecutively without receiving a client message in between, that means the xmin is not advanced enough for the tuple to be pruned from pg_attribute by VACUUM. So the test would spuriously pass. The reason this test deficiency wasn't detected earlier is that HOT pruning removes the tuple anyway, even if vacuum leaves it in place, so the test correctly fails (detecting the coding mistake), but for the wrong reason. To fix this mess, run the s0_get_changes step twice before vacuum instead of once: this seems to cause the xmin to be advanced reliably, wreaking havoc with more certainty. Author: Arseny Sher Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87h8lkuxoa.fsf@ars-thinkpad
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
-
Michael Paquier authored
If a standby crashes after promotion before having completed its first post-recovery checkpoint, then the minimal recovery point which marks the LSN position where the cluster is able to reach consistency may be set to a position older than the first end-of-recovery checkpoint while all the WAL available should be replayed. This leads to the instance thinking that it contains inconsistent pages, causing a PANIC and a hard instance crash even if all the WAL available has not been replayed for certain sets of records replayed. When in crash recovery, minRecoveryPoint is expected to always be set to InvalidXLogRecPtr, which forces the recovery to replay all the WAL available, so this commit makes sure that the local copy of minRecoveryPoint from the control file is initialized properly and stays as it is while crash recovery is performed. Once switching to archive recovery or if crash recovery finishes, then the local copy minRecoveryPoint can be safely updated. Pavan Deolasee has reported and diagnosed the failure in the first place, and the base fix idea to rely on the local copy of minRecoveryPoint comes from Kyotaro Horiguchi, which has been expanded into a full-fledged patch by me. The test included in this commit has been written by Álvaro Herrera and Pavan Deolasee, which I have modified to make it faster and more reliable with sleep phases. Backpatch down to all supported versions where the bug appears, aka 9.3 which is where the end-of-recovery checkpoint is not run by the startup process anymore. The test gets easily supported down to 10, still it has been tested on all branches. Reported-by: Pavan Deolasee Diagnosed-by: Pavan Deolasee Reviewed-by: Pavan Deolasee, Kyotaro Horiguchi Author: Michael Paquier, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Pavan Deolasee, Álvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABOikdPOewjNL=05K5CbNMxnNtXnQjhTx2F--4p4ruorCjukbA@mail.gmail.com
-
Andres Freund authored
The query lifetime expression context created in hypothetical_dense_rank_final() was buggily allocated in the calling memory context. I (Andres) broke that in bf6c614a. Reported-By: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi Author: Amit Langote Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKcux6kmzWmur5HhA_aU6gYVFu0RLQdgJJ+aC9SLdcOvBSrpfA@mail.gmail.com Backpatch: 11-
-
- 04 Jul, 2018 4 commits
-
-
Andres Freund authored
When deleting pages the nbtree code has to walk through siblings of a tree node. When those sibling links are corrupted that can lead to endless loops - which are currently not interruptible. This is especially problematic if autovacuum is repeatedly blocked on such indexes, as it can be hard to get out of that situation without resorting to single user mode. Thus add interrupt checks to appropriate places in such loops. Unfortunately in one of the cases it's it's not easy to do so. Between 9.3 and 9.4 the page deletion (and page split) code changed significantly. Before it was significantly less robust against interruptions. Therefore don't backpatch to 9.3. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180627191629.wkunw2qbibnvlz53@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 9.4-
-
Fujii Masao authored
When multiple relations are deleted at the same transaction, the files of those relations are deleted by one call to smgrdounlinkall(), which leads to scan whole shared_buffers only one time. OTOH, previously, during recovery, smgrdounlink() (not smgrdounlinkall()) was called for each file to delete, which led to scan shared_buffers multiple times. Obviously this could cause to increase the WAL replay time very much especially when shared_buffers was huge. To alleviate this situation, this commit changes the recovery so that it also calls smgrdounlinkall() only one time to delete multiple relation files. This is just fix for oversight of commit 279628a0, not new feature. So, per discussion on pgsql-hackers, we concluded to backpatch this to all supported versions. Author: Fujii Masao Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Andres Freund, Thomas Munro, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Takayuki Tsunakawa Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwHVQkdfDqtvGVkty+19cQakAydXn1etGND3X0PHbZ3+6w@mail.gmail.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
This section once started out small but has now grown quite a bit and needs a bit of structure. Rewrite as list, add documentation of EXCLUDING, and improve the documentation of INCLUDING ALL instead of just listing all the options again. per report from Yugo Nagata that EXCLUDING was not documented, that part reviewed by Daniel Gustafsson, most of the rewrite was by me
-
Michael Paquier authored
Since recent commit 1c7c317c, temporary relations cannot be mixed with permanent relations within the same partition tree, and the same counts for temporary relations created by other sessions, which the planner simply discarded. Instead be paranoid and issue an error, as those should be blocked at definition time, at least for now. At the same time, a test case is added to stress what has been moved when expand_partitioned_rtentry gets called recursively but bumps on a partitioned relation with no partitions which should be handled the same way as the non-inheritance case. This code may be reworked in a close future, and covering this code path will limit surprises. Reported-by: David Rowley Author: David Rowley Reviewed-by: Amit Langote, Robert Haas, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f_HyV1txn_4XSdH5EOhBMYaCwsXyAj6bHXk9gOu4JKsbw@mail.gmail.com
-
- 03 Jul, 2018 2 commits
-
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
same as c4309f4a
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
-
- 02 Jul, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Michael Paquier authored
This has been visibly a forgotten spot in the first implementation of wait events for I/O added by 249cf070, and what has been missing is a fsync call for WAL segments which is a wrapper reacting on the value of GUC wal_sync_method. Reported-by: Konstantin Knizhnik Author: Konstantin Knizhnik Reviewed-by: Craig Ringer, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4a243897-0ad8-f471-aa40-242591f2476e@postgrespro.ru
-