- 01 Mar, 2018 9 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
Since 9.5, it's possible that some but not all columns of an index support returning the indexed value for index-only scans. If the same indexed column appears in index columns that behave both ways, check_index_only() supposed that it'd be OK to do an index-only scan testing that column; but that fails if we have to recheck the indexed condition on one of the columns that doesn't support this. In principle we could make this work by remapping the recheck expressions to pull the value from a column that does support returning the indexed value. But such cases are so weird and rare that, at least for now, it doesn't seem worth the trouble. Instead, just teach check_index_only that a value is returnable only if all the index columns containing it are returnable, rather than any of them. Per report from David Pereiro Lagares. Back-patch to 9.5 where the possibility of this situation appeared. Kyotaro Horiguchi Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1516210494.1798.16.camel@nlpgo.com
-
Tom Lane authored
formrdesc's comment listed the specific catalogs it is called for, but the list was out of date. Rather than jumping back onto that maintenance treadmill, let's just remove the list. It tells the reader nothing that can't be learned quickly and more reliably by searching relcache.c for callers of formrdesc(). Oversight noted by Kyotaro Horiguchi. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180214.105314.138966434.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
-
Tom Lane authored
Commit a26116c6 accidentally changed the behavior of the SQL format_type() function while refactoring. For the reasons explained in that function's comment, a NULL typemod argument should behave differently from a -1 argument. Since we've managed to break this, add a regression test memorializing the intended behavior. In passing, be consistent about the type of the "flags" parameter. Noted by Rushabh Lathia, though I revised the patch some more. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGPqQf3RB2q-d2Awp_-x-Ur6aOxTUwnApt-vm-iTtceZxYnePg@mail.gmail.com
-
Andres Freund authored
A few isolationtester tests with reasonable names are too wide to nicely align. Increase space. Author: Thomas Munro Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=2v7+EHs6zsJzFn+zJOT4F4Kb69Z1xJ7Zf5kgwLr1n=VA@mail.gmail.com
-
Andres Freund authored
Author: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180217140305.GB31338@paquier.xyz
-
Andres Freund authored
Commit 924bcf4f added WaitForBackgroundWorkerShutdown, but didn't add it to the documentation. Fix that and two small spelling errors in the WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup paragraph. Author: Daniel Gustafsson Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/C8738949-0350-4999-A1DA-26E209FF248D@yesql.se
-
Andres Freund authored
Author: Ildar Musin Reviewed-By: Fabian Coelho Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6376ed81-3ce8-14f4-4758-099872f4ce7d@postgrespro.ru
-
Andres Freund authored
Author: Doug Rady Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6323D83C-9FDA-4EE1-B0ED-6971E585066A@amazon.com
-
Tom Lane authored
Use IndexTupleSize everywhere, instead. Also, remove IndexTupleSize's internal typecast, as that's not really needed and might mask coding errors. Change some pointer variable datatypes in the call sites to compensate for that and make it clearer what we're assuming. Ildar Musin, Robert Haas, Stephen Frost Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0274288e-9e88-13b6-c61c-7b36928bf221@postgrespro.ru
-
- 28 Feb, 2018 10 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
Commit ff963b39 added two identical copies of this row. Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d8j8tdevb7x.fsf@dalvik.ping.uio.no
-
Tom Lane authored
Solaris 11.4 has built-in functions named b64_encode and b64_decode. Rename ours to something else to avoid the conflict (fortunately, ours are static so the impact is limited). One could wish for less duplication of code in this area, but that would be a larger patch and not very suitable for back-patching. Since this is a portability fix, we want to put it into all supported branches. Report and initial patch by Rainer Orth, reviewed and adjusted a bit by Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ydd372wk28h.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
-
Tom Lane authored
specscanner.l had a fixed limit of 1024 bytes on the length of individual SQL stanzas in an isolation test script. People are starting to run into that, so fix it by making the buffer resizable. Once we allow this in HEAD, it seems inevitable that somebody will try to back-patch a test that exceeds the old limit, so back-patch this change as a preventive measure. Daniel Gustafsson Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8D628BE4-6606-4FF6-A3FF-8B2B0E9B43D0@yesql.se
-
Robert Haas authored
The previous code considered two tables to have the partition scheme if the underlying columns had the same collation, but what we actually need to compare is not the collations associated with the column but the collation used for partitioning. Fix that. Robert Haas and Amit Langote Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/0f95f924-0efa-4cf5-eb5f-9a3d1bc3c33d@lab.ntt.co.jp
-
Robert Haas authored
Thomas Munro Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=3g1hhbFzYkR_QT9RmBvsGX4UaeCtX-4Js8OOEMmFeaSQ@mail.gmail.com
-
Robert Haas authored
Parallel-aware plan nodes must be prepared to run without parallelism if it's not possible at execution time for whatever reason. Commit ab727167, which introduced Parallel Append, overlooked this. Rajkumar Raghuwanshi reported this problem, and I included his test case in this patch. The code changes are by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAKcux6=WqkUudLg1GLZZ7fc5ScWC1+Y9qD=pAHeqy32WoeJQvw@mail.gmail.com
-
Robert Haas authored
Commit 1bc0100d added this test, and commit 882ea509 tried to stabilize it. There were still failures, so commit 958e20e4 tried again to stabilize it. That approach is still failing on jaguarundi, though, so back it out and try something else. Specifically, instead of disabling remote estimates for the table in question, let's tell autovacuum to leave it alone. Etsuro Fujita Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/5A82DCCE.3060107@lab.ntt.co.jp
-
Robert Haas authored
Commits 6f6b99d1 and f3b0897a didn't properly update these comments. Etsuro Fujita, reviewed by Amit Langote Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/5A671FE1.6020305@lab.ntt.co.jp
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Turn off man.endnotes.are.numbered parameter, which we don't need, but which increases performance vastly if off. Also turn on man.output.quietly, which also makes things a bit faster, but which is also less useful now as a progress indicator because the build is so fast now.
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
The changes in the CREATE POLICY man page from commit 87c2a17f triggered a stylesheet bug that created some warning messages and incorrect output. This installs a workaround. Also improve the whitespace a bit so it looks better.
-
- 27 Feb, 2018 9 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
Although configure-based builds correctly define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT when appropriate (in both pg_config.h and ecpg_config.h), builds using the MSVC scripts failed to do so. This currently has no impact on the backend, since it uses that symbol nowhere; but it does prevent ecpg from supporting "long long int". Fix that. Also, adjust Solution.pm so that in the constructed ecpg_config.h file, the "#if (_MSC_VER > 1200)" covers only the LONG_LONG_INT-related #defines, not the whole file. AFAICS this was a thinko on somebody's part: ENABLE_THREAD_SAFETY should always be defined in Windows builds, and in branches using USE_INTEGER_DATETIMES, the setting of that shouldn't depend on the compiler version either. If I'm wrong, I imagine the buildfarm will say so. Per bug #15080 from Jonathan Allen; issue diagnosed by Michael Meskes and Andrew Gierth. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/151935568942.1461.14623890240535309745@wrigleys.postgresql.org
-
Tom Lane authored
Tom Kazimiers reported that transition tables don't work correctly when they are scanned by more than one executor node. That's because commit 18ce3a4a allocated separate read pointers for each executor node, as it must, but failed to make them active at the appropriate times. Repair. Thomas Munro Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180224034748.bixarv6632vbxgeb%40dewberry.localdomain
-
Tom Lane authored
This seemed like a good idea in commit be42eb9d, but it causes more trouble than it's worth for cross-branch upgrade testing. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/11927.1519756619@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Robert Haas authored
Michael Paquier Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/20180209135327.GC29003@paquier.xyz
-
Tom Lane authored
A before-update row trigger may choose to return the "new" or "old" tuple unmodified. ExecBRUpdateTriggers failed to consider the second possibility, and would proceed to free the "old" tuple even if it was the one returned, leading to subsequent access to already-deallocated memory. In debug builds this reliably leads to an "invalid memory alloc request size" failure; in production builds it might accidentally work, but data corruption is also possible. This is a very old bug. There are probably a couple of reasons it hasn't been noticed up to now. It would be more usual to return NULL if one wanted to suppress the update action; returning "old" is significantly less efficient since the update will occur anyway. Also, none of the standard PLs would ever cause this because they all returned freshly-manufactured tuples even if they were just copying "old". But commit 4b93f579 changed that for plpgsql, making it possible to see the bug with a plpgsql trigger. Still, this is certainly legal behavior for a trigger function, so it's ExecBRUpdateTriggers's fault not plpgsql's. It seems worth creating a test case that exercises returning "old" directly with a C-language trigger; testing this through plpgsql seems unreliable because its behavior might change again. Report and fix by Rushabh Lathia; regression test case by me. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGPqQf1P4pjiNPrMof=P_16E-DFjt457j+nH2ex3=nBTew7tXw@mail.gmail.com
-
Robert Haas authored
Jeevan Chalke Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAM2+6=X9kxQoL2ZqZ00E6asBt9z+rfyWbOmhXJ0+8fPAyMZ9Jg@mail.gmail.com
-
Robert Haas authored
Commit 3bf05e09 sometimes uses the cheapest_partial_path variable in this function to mean the cheapest one from the input rel and at other times the cheapest one from the partially grouped rel, but it never resets it, so we can end up with bad plans, leading to "ERROR: Aggref found in non-Agg plan node". Jeevan Chalke, per a report from Andreas Joseph Krogh and a separate off-list report from Rajkumar Raghuwanshi Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAM2+6=X9kxQoL2ZqZ00E6asBt9z+rfyWbOmhXJ0+8fPAyMZ9Jg@mail.gmail.com
-
Tom Lane authored
It's a bit silly to have test functions that aren't tested, so test them. In passing, rename int44in/int44out to city_budget_in/_out so that they match how the regression tests use them. Also, fix city_budget_out so that it emits the format city_budget_in expects to read; otherwise we'd have dump/reload failures when testing pg_dump against the regression database. (We avoided that in the past only because no data of type city_budget was actually stored anywhere.) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/29322.1519701006@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Tom Lane authored
This patch removes five functions that presumably were once used in the regression tests, but haven't been so used in many years. Nonetheless we've been wasting maintenance effort on them (e.g., by converting them to V1 function protocol). I see no reason to think that reviving them would add any useful test coverage, so drop 'em. In passing, mark regress_lseg_construct static, since it's not called from outside this file. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/29322.1519701006@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
- 26 Feb, 2018 8 commits
-
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
Small review on edd44738. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180222165315.k27qfn4goskhoswj@alvherre.pgsql Reviewed-by: Robert Haas, Amit Langote
-
Tom Lane authored
This omission seems to be what is causing buildfarm failures on crake. Security: CVE-2018-1058
-
Tom Lane authored
Security: CVE-2018-1058
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
-
Noah Misch authored
The ability to create like-named objects in different schemas opens up the potential for users to change the behavior of other users' queries, maliciously or accidentally. When you connect to a PostgreSQL server, you should remove from your search_path any schema for which a user other than yourself or superusers holds the CREATE privilege. If you do not, other users holding CREATE privilege can redefine the behavior of your commands, causing them to perform arbitrary SQL statements under your identity. "SET search_path = ..." and "SELECT pg_catalog.set_config(...)" are not vulnerable to such hijacking, so one can use either as the first command of a session. As special exceptions, the following client applications behave as documented regardless of search_path settings and schema privileges: clusterdb createdb createlang createuser dropdb droplang dropuser ecpg (not programs it generates) initdb oid2name pg_archivecleanup pg_basebackup pg_config pg_controldata pg_ctl pg_dump pg_dumpall pg_isready pg_receivewal pg_recvlogical pg_resetwal pg_restore pg_rewind pg_standby pg_test_fsync pg_test_timing pg_upgrade pg_waldump reindexdb vacuumdb vacuumlo. Not included are core client programs that run user-specified SQL commands, namely psql and pgbench. PostgreSQL encourages non-core client applications to do likewise. Document this in the context of libpq connections, psql connections, dblink connections, ECPG connections, extension packaging, and schema usage patterns. The principal defense for applications is "SELECT pg_catalog.set_config('search_path', '', false)", and the principal defense for databases is "REVOKE CREATE ON SCHEMA public FROM PUBLIC". Either one is sufficient to prevent attack. After a REVOKE, consider auditing the public schema for objects named like pg_catalog objects. Authors of SECURITY DEFINER functions use some of the same defenses, and the CREATE FUNCTION reference page already covered them thoroughly. This is a good opportunity to audit SECURITY DEFINER functions for robust security practice. Back-patch to 9.3 (all supported versions). Reviewed by Michael Paquier and Jonathan S. Katz. Reported by Arseniy Sharoglazov. Security: CVE-2018-1058
-
Noah Misch authored
This makes the client programs behave as documented regardless of the connect-time search_path and regardless of user-created objects. Today, a malicious user with CREATE permission on a search_path schema can take control of certain of these clients' queries and invoke arbitrary SQL functions under the client identity, often a superuser. This is exploitable in the default configuration, where all users have CREATE privilege on schema "public". This changes behavior of user-defined code stored in the database, like pg_index.indexprs and pg_extension_config_dump(). If they reach code bearing unqualified names, "does not exist" or "no schema has been selected to create in" errors might appear. Users may fix such errors by schema-qualifying affected names. After upgrading, consider watching server logs for these errors. The --table arguments of src/bin/scripts clients have been lax; for example, "vacuumdb -Zt pg_am\;CHECKPOINT" performed a checkpoint. That now fails, but for now, "vacuumdb -Zt 'pg_am(amname);CHECKPOINT'" still performs a checkpoint. Back-patch to 9.3 (all supported versions). Reviewed by Tom Lane, though this fix strategy was not his first choice. Reported by Arseniy Sharoglazov. Security: CVE-2018-1058
-
Tom Lane authored
Historically, pg_dump has "set search_path = foo, pg_catalog" when dumping an object in schema "foo", and has also caused that setting to be used while restoring the object. This is problematic because functions and operators in schema "foo" could capture references meant to refer to pg_catalog entries, both in the queries issued by pg_dump and those issued during the subsequent restore run. That could result in dump/restore misbehavior, or in privilege escalation if a nefarious user installs trojan-horse functions or operators. This patch changes pg_dump so that it does not change the search_path dynamically. The emitted restore script sets the search_path to what was used at dump time, and then leaves it alone thereafter. Created objects are placed in the correct schema, regardless of the active search_path, by dint of schema-qualifying their names in the CREATE commands, as well as in subsequent ALTER and ALTER-like commands. Since this change requires a change in the behavior of pg_restore when processing an archive file made according to this new convention, bump the archive file version number; old versions of pg_restore will therefore refuse to process files made with new versions of pg_dump. Security: CVE-2018-1058
-
Robert Haas authored
Up until now, we've abused grouped_rel->partial_pathlist as a place to store partial paths that have been partially aggregate, but that's really not correct, because a partial path for a relation is supposed to be one which produces the correct results with the addition of only a Gather or Gather Merge node, and these paths also require a Finalize Aggregate step. Instead, add a new partially_group_rel which can hold either partial paths (which need to be gathered and then have aggregation finalized) or non-partial paths (which only need to have aggregation finalized). This allows us to reuse generate_gather_paths for partially_grouped_rel instead of writing new code, so that this patch actually basically no net new code while making things cleaner, simplifying things for pending patches for partition-wise aggregate. Robert Haas and Jeevan Chalke. The larger patch series of which this patch is a part was also reviewed and tested by Antonin Houska, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi, David Rowley, Dilip Kumar, Konstantin Knizhnik, Pascal Legrand, Rafia Sabih, and me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmobrzFYS3+U8a_BCy3-hOvh5UyJbC18rEcYehxhpw5=ETA@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZyQEjdBNuoG9-wC5GQ5GrO4544Myo13dVptvx+uLg9uQ@mail.gmail.com
-
- 25 Feb, 2018 2 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
Commit b3f84012 changed pg_upgrade so that it'd actually drop and re-create the template1 and postgres databases in the new cluster. That works fine, serially. With the -j option it's not so fine, because other per-database jobs might be launched while the template1 database is dropped. Since they attempt to connect there to start up, kaboom. This is the cause of the intermittent failures buildfarm member jacana has been showing for the last month; evidently it is the only BF member configured to run the pg_upgrade test with parallelism enabled. Fix by processing template1 separately before we get into the parallel sub-job launch loop. (We could alternatively have made the postgres DB be the special case, but it seems likely that template1 will contain less stuff and so we lose less parallelism with this choice.)
-
Tom Lane authored
-
- 24 Feb, 2018 2 commits
-
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
The scripts were changed in c98c35cd, but the output files were not updated to reflect the script changes.
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Recent Perl versions don't have the current directory in the module include path anymore, so we need to add it here explicitly to make these scripts continue to work.
-