This was bothering some people because it's not the intended use of
application_name and it makes the default view of pg_stat_activity
bulky.

There was a grammar ambiguity between SET PUBLICATION name REFRESH and
SET PUBLICATION SKIP REFRESH, because SKIP is not a reserved word.  To
resolve that, fold the refresh choice into the WITH options.  Refreshing
is the default now.
Reported-by: tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>

Otherwise code that uses this will abort with an assertion failure,
because postmaster_alive_fds are not initialized.
Reported-by: tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>

The current method of computing the record length (excluding the
lenght of full-page images) has been wrong since the WAL format has
been revamped in 2c03216d.  Only the
main record's length was counted, but that can be significantly too
little if there's data associated with further blocks.

Fix by computing the record length as total_lenght - fpi_length.

Reported-By: Chen Huajun
Bug: #14687
Reviewed-By: Heikki Linnakangas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170603165939.1436.58887@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch: 9.5-

Declare the toc_nentry field as uint32 not Size.  Since shm_toc_lookup()
reads the field without any lock, it has to be atomically readable, and
we do not assume that for fields wider than 32 bits.  Performance would
be impossibly bad for entry counts approaching 2^32 anyway, so there is
no need to try to preserve maximum width here.

This is probably an academic issue, because even if reading int64 isn't
atomic, the high order half would never change in practice.  Still, it's
a coding rule violation, so let's fix it.

Adjust some other not-terribly-well-chosen data types too, and copy-edit
some comments.  Make shm_toc_attach's Asserts consistent with
shm_toc_create's.

None of this looks to be a live bug, so no need for back-patch.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16984.1496679541@sss.pgh.pa.us

Some openssl builds put their lib files in a VC subdirectory, others do
not. Cater for both cases.

Backpatch to all live branches.

From an offline discussion with Leonardo Cecchi.

Given the possibility of race conditions and so on, it seems entirely
unsafe to just assume that shm_toc_lookup() always finds the key it's
looking for --- but that was exactly what all but one call site were
doing.  To fix, add a "bool noError" argument, similarly to what we
have in many other functions, and throw an error on an unexpected
lookup failure.  Remove now-redundant Asserts that a rather random
subset of call sites had.

I doubt this will throw any light on buildfarm member lorikeet's
recent failures, because if an unnoticed lookup failure were involved,
you'd kind of expect a null-pointer-dereference crash rather than the
observed symptom.  But you never know ... and this is better coding
practice even if it never catches anything.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9697.1496675981@sss.pgh.pa.us

Daniele Varrazzo

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+mi_8bqY5THP8hLKKSdMEr5GCz6M=hD6_uLbvFeyEBfwqUxeA@mail.gmail.com

Jeff Janes and me.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMkU=1zYnniLYg+W9itL93DXebCjx6Uk6m_=Xa8p_zM65X3S0Q@mail.gmail.com

get_partition_parent felt that it could simply Assert that systable_getnext
found a tuple.  This is unlike any other caller of that function, and it's
unsafe IMO --- in fact, the reason I noticed it was that the Assert failed.
(OK, I was working with known-inconsistent catalog contents, but I wasn't
expecting the DB to fall over quite that violently.  The behavior in a
non-assert-enabled build wouldn't be very nice, either.)  Fix it to do what
other callers do, namely an actual runtime-test-and-elog.

Also, standardize the wording of elog messages that are complaining about
unexpected failure of systable_getnext.  90% of them say "could not find
tuple for <object>", so make the remainder do likewise.  Many of the
holdouts were using the phrasing "cache lookup failed", which is outright
misleading since no catcache search is involved.

I'd always assumed that backend/optimizer/geqo/'s remarkably poor
showing on code coverage metrics was because we weren't exercising
it much in the regression tests.  But it turns out that a good chunk
of the problem is that there's a bunch of code that is physically
unreachable (because the calls to it are #ifdef'd out in geqo_main.c)
but is being built anyway.  Making the called code have #if guards
similar to the calling code saves a couple of kilobytes of executable
size and should make the coverage numbers more reflective of reality.

It's arguable that we should just delete all the unused recombination
mechanisms altogether, but I didn't feel a need to go that far today.

If we allow this, whatever outer command has the table open will not know
about the new index and may fail to update it as needed, as shown in a
report from Laurenz Albe.  We already had such a prohibition in place for
ALTER TABLE, but the CREATE INDEX syntax missed the check.

Fixing it requires an API change for DefineIndex(), which conceivably
would break third-party extensions if we were to back-patch it.  Given
how long this problem has existed without being noticed, fixing it in
the back branches doesn't seem worth that risk.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/A737B7A37273E048B164557ADEF4A58B53A4DC9A@ntex2010i.host.magwien.gv.at

Mark our rusage reportage string translatable; remove quotes from type
names; unify formatting of very similar messages.

Commit 512c7356 left a couple of variables unused except for being set.
My compiler didn't whine about this, but some buildfarm members did.

\if and related commands were overlooked here, as were \dRp and \dRs
from the logical-replication patch, as was \?.

While here, reformat the list to put each new first command letter on
a separate line; perhaps that will limit the need to reflow the whole
list when we add more commands in future.

Masahiko Sawada (reformatting by me)

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoDW1QHtBsM33hV+Fg2mYEs+FWj4qtoCU72AwHAXQ3U6ZQ@mail.gmail.com

These estimators returned 1 minus the corresponding equality/match
estimate, which is incorrect: we need to subtract off the fraction
of nulls in the column, since those are neither equal nor not equal
to the comparison value.  The error only becomes obvious if the
nullfrac is large, but it could be very bad in a mostly-nulls
column, as reported in bug #14676 from Marko Tiikkaja.

To fix the <> case, refactor eqsel() and neqsel() to call a common
support routine, which can be made to account for nullfrac correctly.
The pattern-match cases were already factored that way, and it was
simply an oversight that patternsel() wasn't subtracting off nullfrac.

neqjoinsel() has a similar problem, but since we're elsewhere discussing
changing its behavior entirely, I left it alone for now.

This is a very longstanding bug, but I'm hesitant to back-patch a fix for
it.  Given the lack of prior complaints, such cases must not come up often,
so it's probably not worth the risk of destabilizing plans in stable
branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170529153847.4275.95416@wrigleys.postgresql.org

When costing a nestloop with stop-at-first-inner-match semantics, and a
non-indexscan inner path, final_cost_nestloop() wants to charge the full
scan cost of the inner rel at least once, with additional scans charged
at inner_rescan_run_cost which might be less.  However the logic for
doing this effectively assumed that outer_matched_rows is at least 1.
If it's zero, which is not unlikely for a small outer rel, we ended up
charging inner_run_cost plus N times inner_rescan_run_cost, as much as
double the correct charge for an outer rel with only one row that
we're betting won't be matched.  (Unless the inner rel is materialized,
in which case it has very small inner_rescan_run_cost and the cost
is not so far off what it should have been.)

The upshot of this was that the planner had a tendency to select plans
that failed to make effective use of the stop-at-first-inner-match
semantics, and that might have Materialize nodes in them even when the
predicted number of executions of the Materialize subplan was only 1.
This was not so obvious before commit 9c7f5229, because the case only
arose in connection with semi/anti joins where there's not freedom to
reverse the join order.  But with the addition of unique-inner joins,
it could result in some fairly bad planning choices, as reported by
Teodor Sigaev.  Indeed, some of the test cases added by that commit
have plans that look dubious on closer inspection, and are changed
by this patch.

Fix the logic to ensure that we don't charge for too many inner scans.
I chose to adjust it so that the full-freight scan cost is associated
with an unmatched outer row if possible, not a matched one, since that
seems like a better model of what would happen at runtime.

This is a longstanding bug, but given the lesser impact in back branches,
and the lack of field complaints, I won't risk a back-patch.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f-LzkUsFxdJ_-Luy38orQ+AdEXM5o+vANR+-pHAWPSecg@mail.gmail.com

We didn't accept any invalidation messages until the whole sync process
had finished (because it flattens all the remote transactions in the
single one).  So the sync worker didn't learn about subscription
changes/drop until it has finished.  This could lead to "orphaned" sync
workers.

Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Reported-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>

This avoids "orphaned" sync workers.

This was caused by a thinko in wait_for_sync_status_change.

Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Reported-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>

Previously this was not allowed, as copy.c didn't set the
CURSOR_OPT_PARALLEL_OK flag when planning the query. Set it.

While the lack of parallel query for COPY isn't strictly speaking a
bug, it does prevent parallelism from being used in a facility
commonly used to run long running queries. Thus backpatch to 9.6.

Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170531231958.ihanapplorptykzm@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 9.6, where parallelism was introduced.

Add some information about what to do when this fails.

When trying to access a replication slot that is supposed to already
exist, we don't need to check the naming rules again.  If the slot
does not exist, we will then get a "does not exist" error message, which
is generally more useful from the perspective of an end user.

The logical replication worker processes now use the normal die()
handler for SIGTERM and CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() instead of custom code.
One problem before was that the apply worker would not exit promptly
when a subscription was dropped, which could lead to deadlocks.

Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Reported-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>

Amit Langote

Masahiko Sawada

Move the walrcv_disconnect() calls into the before_shmem_exit handler.
This makes sure the call is always made even during exit by signal, it
saves some duplicate code, and it makes the logic more similar to
walreceiver.c.

Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>

If a FOR ALL TABLES publication was present, \d of a table would claim
for each table that it was part of the publication, even for tables that
are ignored for this purpose, such as system tables and unlogged tables.
Fix the query by using the function pg_get_publication_tables(), which
was intended for this purpose.
Reported-by: tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>

Reported by: Tim Goodaire
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170601182230.1487.26008@wrigleys.postgresql.org

This seems to have been broken in the commit (1753b1b0) that
moved the sequence definition into pg_sequence.

Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170601000716.qxg7c46ukkiljjb3@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: Bug is in master/v10 only

Previously the changes to the "data" part of the sequence, i.e. the
one containing the current value, were not transactional, whereas the
definition, including minimum and maximum value were.  That leads to
odd behaviour if a schema change is rolled back, with the potential
that out-of-bound sequence values can be returned.

To avoid the issue create a new relfilenode fork whenever ALTER
SEQUENCE is executed, similar to how TRUNCATE ... RESTART IDENTITY
already is already handled.

This commit also makes ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART transactional, as it
seems to be too confusing to have some forms of ALTER SEQUENCE behave
transactionally, some forms not.  This way setval() and nextval() are
not transactional, but DDL is, which seems to make sense.

This commit also rolls back parts of the changes made in 3d092fe5
and f8dc1985 as they're now not needed anymore.

Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170522154227.nvafbsm62sjpbxvd@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: Bug is in master/v10 only

On some platforms, -fpic fails for sufficiently large shared libraries.
We've mostly not hit that boundary yet, but there are some extensions
such as Citus and pglogical where it's becoming a problem.  A bit of
research suggests that the penalty for -fPIC is small, in the
single-digit-percentage range --- and there's none at all on popular
platforms such as x86_64.  So let's just default to -fPIC everywhere
and provide one less thing for extension developers to worry about.

Per complaint from Christoph Berg.  Back-patch to all supported branches.
(I did not bother to touch the recently-removed Makefiles for sco and
unixware in the back branches, though.  We'd have no way to test that
it doesn't break anything on those platforms.)

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170529155850.qojdfrwkkqnjb3ap@msg.df7cb.de

Using the client pid can easily be non-unique when used on different
hosts. Using the backend pid should be guaranteed unique, since the
temporary slot gets removed when the client disconnects so it will be
gone even if the pid is renewed.

Reported by Ludovic Vaugeois-Pepin

Commit 88e66d19 is to blame.

Masahiko Sawada

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoAXeb7O4hgg+efs8JT_SxpR4doAH5c5s-Z5WoRLstBZJA@mail.gmail.com

The GET/SET_n_BYTES macros are meant to be infrastructure for the
DatumGetFoo/FooGetDatum macros, which include a cast to the intended
target type.  Using them directly without a cast, as DatumGetFloat4
and friends previously did, can yield warnings when -Wconversion is on.
This is of little significance when building Postgres proper, because
there are such a huge number of such warnings in the server that nobody
would think -Wconversion is of any use.  But some extensions build with
-Wconversion due to outside constraints.  Commit 14cca1bf did a disservice
to those extensions by moving DatumGetFloat4 et al into postgres.h,
where they can now cause warnings in extension builds.

To fix, use DatumGetInt32 and friends in place of the low-level macros.
This is arguably a bit cleaner anyway.

Chapman Flack

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/592E4D04.1070609@anastigmatix.net

Not much point in having a convention about this if we don't enforce it.

Mark Dilger

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7F67FBEF-C3B3-404E-8EC6-E02ACB15D894@gmail.com

We were trying to free a pointer into a shared buffer, which never
works; and we were failing to release the buffer lock appropriately.
Fix those omissions.

While at it, improve documentation for brinGetTupleForHeapBlock, the
inadequacy of which evidently caused these bugs in the first place.

Reported independently by Zhou Digoal (bug #14668) and Alexander Sosna.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8c31c11b-6adb-228d-22c2-4ace89fc9209@credativ.de
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170524063323.29941.46339@wrigleys.postgresql.org

Remove some gratuituous message differences by making the AM name
previously embedded in each message be a %s instead.  While at it, get
rid of terminology that's unclear and unnecessary in one message.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170523001557.bq2hbq7hxyvyw62q@alvherre.pgsql

Some of the text was made nonsensical by commit
e9500240.  Fix that and make some other
minor changes.
Reported-by: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>