- 27 Sep, 2019 10 commits
-
-
Andres Freund authored
When compiling postgres using gcc -O3, there are false-positive warnings about the now initialized variables. Silence them. Author: Peter Eisentraut, Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15fb2350-b8b8-e188-278f-0b34fdee5210@2ndquadrant.com
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
If we don't do this, the rewind fails if the server wasn't cleanly shut down, which seems unhelpful serving no purpose. Also provide a new option --no-ensure-shutdown to suppress this behavior, for alleged advanced usage that prefers to avoid the crash recovery. Authors: Paul Guo, Jimmy Yih, Ashwin Agrawal Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEET0ZEffUkXc48pg2iqARQgGRYDiiVxDu+yYek_bTwJF+q=Uw@mail.gmail.com
-
Andres Freund authored
For some reason at least gcc-9 warns about the fallthrough, even though it otherwise recognizes that elog(ERROR, ...) doesn't return. Author: Andres Freund
-
Tom Lane authored
We've noted certain EXPLAIN queries on these tables occasionally showing unexpected plan choices. This seems to happen because VACUUM sometimes fails to update relpages/reltuples for one of these single-page tables, due to bgwriter or checkpointer holding a pin on the lone page at just the wrong time. To ensure those values get set, insert explicit ANALYZE operations on these tables after we finish populating them. This doesn't seem to affect any other test cases, so it's a usable fix. Back-patch to v12. In principle the issue exists further back, but we have not seen it before v12, so I won't risk back-patching further. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/24480.1569518042@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Tom Lane authored
This removes the last of the temporary debugging queries added to the regression tests by commit f03a9ca4. We've pretty much convinced ourselves that the plan instability we were seeing is due to VACUUM sometimes failing to update relpages/reltuples for a single-page table, due to bgwriter or checkpointer holding a pin on that page at just the wrong time. I'll push a workaround for that separately. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKG+0CxrKRWRMf5ymN3gm+BECHna2B-q1w8onKBep4HasUw@mail.gmail.com
-
Tom Lane authored
The markup for optional parameters was neither correct nor consistent. In passing, fix a spelling mistake. Per report from Alex Macy. Some of these mistakes are old, so back-patch as appropriate. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/156953522258.1204.12736099368284950578@wrigleys.postgresql.org
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
The documentation states that no target settings will be used when standby.signal is present, but this is not quite the case since recovery_target_timeline is a valid recovery target for a standby. Update the documentation with this exception. Author: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/e445616d-023e-a268-8aa1-67b8b335340c%40pgmasters.net
-
Michael Paquier authored
Author: Justin Pryzby Reviewed-by: Tatsuro Yamada Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190927022051.GC24334@telsasoft.com Backpatch-through: 12
-
Amit Kapila authored
The test name and the following test cases suggest the index created should be hash index, but it forgot to add 'using hash' in the test case. This in itself won't improve code coverage as there were some other tests which were covering the corresponding code. However, it is better if the added tests serve their actual purpose. Reported-by: Paul A Jungwirth Author: Paul A Jungwirth Reviewed-by: Mahendra Singh Backpatch-through: 9.4 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+renyV=Us-5XfMC25bNp-uWSj39XgHHmGE9Rh2cQKMegSj52g@mail.gmail.com
-
Michael Paquier authored
The code was enforcing AccessExclusiveLock for all custom relation options, which is incorrect as the APIs allow a custom lock level to be set. While on it, fix a couple of inconsistencies in the tests and the README of dummy_index_am. Oversights in commit 773df883. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190925234152.GA2115@paquier.xyz
-
- 26 Sep, 2019 6 commits
-
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Author: Liudmila Mantrova <l.mantrova@postgrespro.ru> Reported-by: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAMkU%3D1wP-SO4KpiLxHJuPezTJCmK%3DJqefLXrr3eXFO7Qku%2BtMg%40mail.gmail.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Update the note about why not to use // comments, even though it's now technically supported. The note about variable declarations was dropped here because it's addressed more properly later in the chapter. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/156924954640.1117.6309209869705522549%40wrigleys.postgresql.org
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Put the description of the SQL/JSON path language after the description of the general JSON functions and operators, instead of before. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/16968.1569189812@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Michael Paquier authored
This has been introduced by 709d003f, that has moved readSegNo, readOff and readPageTLI into a new structure called WALOpenSegment initialized separately. Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190926.110809.248342687.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
-
- 25 Sep, 2019 15 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
LIKE INCLUDING DEFAULTS tried to copy the attrdef expression without copying the state of the attgenerated column. This is in fact wrong, because GENERATED and DEFAULT expressions are not the same kind of animal; one can contain Vars and the other not. We *must* copy attgenerated when we're copying the attrdef expression. Rearrange the if-tests so that the expression is copied only when the correct one of INCLUDING DEFAULTS and INCLUDING GENERATED has been specified. Per private report from Manuel Rigger. Tom Lane and Peter Eisentraut
-
Alexander Korotkov authored
This commit implements jsonpath .datetime() method as it's specified in SQL/JSON standard. There are no-argument and single-argument versions of this method. No-argument version selects first of ISO datetime formats matching input string. Single-argument version accepts template string as its argument. Additionally to .datetime() method itself this commit also implements comparison ability of resulting date and time values. There is some difficulty because exising jsonb_path_*() functions are immutable, while comparison of timezoned and non-timezoned types involves current timezone. At first, current timezone could be changes in session. Moreover, timezones themselves are not immutable and could be updated. This is why we let existing immutable functions throw errors on such non-immutable comparison. In the same time this commit provides jsonb_path_*_tz() functions which are stable and support operations involving timezones. As new functions are added to the system catalog, catversion is bumped. Support of .datetime() method was the only blocker prevents T832 from being marked as supported. sql_features.txt is updated correspondingly. Extracted from original patch by Nikita Glukhov, Teodor Sigaev, Oleg Bartunov. Heavily revised by me. Comments were adjusted by Liudmila Mantrova. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/fcc6fc6a-b497-f39a-923d-aa34d0c588e8%402ndQuadrant.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdsZgYEra_PeCLGNoXOWYx6iU-S3wF8aX0ObQUcZU%2B4XTw%40mail.gmail.com Author: Alexander Korotkov, Nikita Glukhov, Teodor Sigaev, Oleg Bartunov, Liudmila Mantrova Reviewed-by: Anastasia Lubennikova, Peter Eisentraut
-
Alexander Korotkov authored
SQL/JSON standard allows manipulation with datetime values. So, it appears to be convinient to allow datetime values to be represented in JsonbValue struct. These datetime values are allowed for temporary representation only. During serialization datetime values are converted into strings. SQL/JSON requires writing timestamps with timezone in the same timezone offset as they were parsed. This is why we allow storage of timezone offset in JsonbValue struct. For the same reason timezone offset argument is added to JsonEncodeDateTime() function. Extracted from original patch by Nikita Glukhov, Teodor Sigaev, Oleg Bartunov. Revised by me. Comments were adjusted by Liudmila Mantrova. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/fcc6fc6a-b497-f39a-923d-aa34d0c588e8%402ndQuadrant.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdsZgYEra_PeCLGNoXOWYx6iU-S3wF8aX0ObQUcZU%2B4XTw%40mail.gmail.com Author: Nikita Glukhov, Teodor Sigaev, Oleg Bartunov, Alexander Korotkov, Liudmila Mantrova Reviewed-by: Anastasia Lubennikova, Peter Eisentraut
-
Alexander Korotkov authored
Add support of error suppression in some date and time manipulation functions as it's required for jsonpath .datetime() method support. This commit doesn't use PG_TRY()/PG_CATCH() in order to implement that. Instead, it provides internal versions of date and time functions used, which support error suppression. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdsZgYEra_PeCLGNoXOWYx6iU-S3wF8aX0ObQUcZU%2B4XTw%40mail.gmail.com Author: Alexander Korotkov, Nikita Glukhov Reviewed-by: Anastasia Lubennikova, Peter Eisentraut
-
Alexander Korotkov authored
This commit adds parse_datetime() function, which implements datetime parsing with extended features demanded by upcoming jsonpath .datetime() method: * Dynamic type identification based on template string, * Support for standard-conforming 'strict' mode, * Timezone offset is returned as separate value. Extracted from original patch by Nikita Glukhov, Teodor Sigaev, Oleg Bartunov. Revised by me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/fcc6fc6a-b497-f39a-923d-aa34d0c588e8%402ndQuadrant.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdsZgYEra_PeCLGNoXOWYx6iU-S3wF8aX0ObQUcZU%2B4XTw%40mail.gmail.com Author: Nikita Glukhov, Teodor Sigaev, Oleg Bartunov, Alexander Korotkov Reviewed-by: Anastasia Lubennikova, Peter Eisentraut
-
Alexander Korotkov authored
SQL Standard 2016 defines rules for handling separators in datetime template strings, which are different to to_date()/to_timestamp() rules. Standard allows only small set of separators and requires strict matching for them. Standard applies to jsonpath .datetime() method and CAST (... FORMAT ...) SQL clause. We're not going to change handling of separators in existing to_date()/to_timestamp() functions, because their current behavior is familiar for users. Standard behavior now available by special flag, which will be used in upcoming .datetime() jsonpath method. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdsZgYEra_PeCLGNoXOWYx6iU-S3wF8aX0ObQUcZU%2B4XTw%40mail.gmail.com Author: Alexander Korotkov
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
Forgot to add the file in the previous commit.
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
All our current in core relation options of type string (not many, admittedly) behave in reality like enums. But after seeing an implementation for enum reloptions, it's clear that strings are messier, so introduce the new reloption type. Switch all string options to be enums instead. Fortunately we have a recently introduced test module for reloptions, so we don't lose coverage of string reloptions, which may still be used by third-party modules. Authors: Nikolay Shaplov, Álvaro Herrera Reviewed-by: Nikita Glukhov, Aleksandr Parfenov Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/43332102.S2V5pIjXRx@x200m
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
... into a new file, fe_utils/recovery_gen.c. This can later be used by pg_rewind. Authors: Paul Guo, Jimmy Yih, Ashwin Agrawal. A few tweaks by Álvaro Herrera Reviewed-by: Michaël Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEET0ZEffUkXc48pg2iqARQgGRYDiiVxDu+yYek_bTwJF+q=Uw@mail.gmail.com
-
Michael Paquier authored
Append node has been removed in v12 when there would be only one subnode under it. Author: Amit Langote Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqHhS62w8zUFXF4NBjvMboCXYnD-jWoWp-tfo2aHvP3Gxg@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 12
-
Michael Paquier authored
Several buildfarm members (crake, loach and spurfowl) are complaining about two queries looking up at pg_class.reloptions which trigger the validation routines for string reloptions with default values. This commit limits the routines to be triggered only when building an index with all custom options set in CREATE INDEX, which is sufficient for the coverage. Introduced by 640c1986.
-
Michael Paquier authored
This includes more tests dedicated to relation options, bringing the coverage of this code close to 100%, and the module can be used for other purposes, like a base template for an index AM implementation. Author: Nikolay Sharplov, Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera, Dent John Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17071942.m9zZutALE6@x200m
-
Michael Paquier authored
Relation options can define a lock mode other than AccessExclusiveMode since 47167b79, but modules defining custom relation options did not really have a way to enforce that. Correct that by extending the current API set so as modules can define a custom lock mode. Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Kuntal Ghosh Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190920013831.GD1844@paquier.xyz
-
Michael Paquier authored
In-core relation options can use a custom lock mode since 47167b79, that has lowered the lock available for some autovacuum parameters. However it forgot to consider custom relation options. This causes failures with ALTER TABLE SET when changing a custom relation option, as its lock is not defined. The existing APIs to define a custom reloption does not allow to define a custom lock mode, so enforce its initialization to AccessExclusiveMode which should be safe enough in all cases. An upcoming patch will extend the existing APIs to allow a custom lock mode to be defined. The problem can be reproduced with bloom indexes, so add a test there. Reported-by: Nikolay Sharplov Analyzed-by: Thomas Munro, Michael Paquier Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Kuntal Ghosh Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190920013831.GD1844@paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: 9.6
- 24 Sep, 2019 5 commits
-
-
Alexander Korotkov authored
Our item contains only so->numberOfNonNullOrderBys of distances. Reflect that in the loop upper bound. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/53536807-784c-e029-6e92-6da802ab8d60%40postgrespro.ru Author: Nikita Glukhov Backpatch-through: 12
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
The state-tracking of WAL reading in various places was pretty messy, mostly because the ancient physical-replication WAL reading code wasn't using the XLogReader abstraction. This led to some untidy code. Make it prettier by creating two additional supporting structs, WALSegmentContext and WALOpenSegment which keep track of WAL-reading state. This makes code cleaner, as well as supports more future cleanup. Author: Antonin Houska Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera and (older versions) Robert Haas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/14984.1554998742@spoje.net
-
Tom Lane authored
Fix an oversight in commit 7266d099: as it stood, the code failed when a function-in-FROM returns composite and can be simplified to a composite constant. For the moment, just test for composite result and abandon pullup if we see one. To make it actually work, we'd have to decompose the composite constant into per-column constants; which is surely do-able, but I'm not convinced it's worth the code space. Per report from Raúl Marín Rodríguez. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAM6_UM4isP+buRA5sWodO_MUEgutms-KDfnkwGmryc5DGj9XuQ@mail.gmail.com
-
Fujii Masao authored
When a relation is truncated, shared_buffers needs to be scanned so that any buffers for the relation forks are invalidated in it. Previously, shared_buffers was scanned for each relation forks, i.e., MAIN, FSM and VM, when VACUUM truncated off any empty pages at the end of relation or TRUNCATE truncated the relation in place. Since shared_buffers needed to be scanned multiple times, it could take a long time to finish those commands especially when shared_buffers was large. This commit changes the logic so that shared_buffers is scanned only one time for those three relation forks. Author: Kirk Jamison Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada, Thomas Munro, Alvaro Herrera, Takayuki Tsunakawa and Fujii Masao Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/D09B13F772D2274BB348A310EE3027C64E2067@g01jpexmbkw24
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
This was working around a bug in ccache that was fixed in ccache 3.2.2 (released 2015-05-10). (Users of older ccache versions can continue to set CCACHE_DISABLE themselves.) Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190530191130.GA24528@alvherre.pgsql
-
- 23 Sep, 2019 4 commits
-
-
Andres Freund authored
This appears to have been an oversight in b8d7f053. As it's effectively harmless, though confusing, only fix in master. Author: Andres Freund
-
Jeff Davis authored
Allow clients to require channel binding to enhance security against untrusted servers. Author: Jeff Davis Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/227015d8417f2b4fef03f8966dbfa5cbcc4f44da.camel%40j-davis.com
-
Tom Lane authored
The array <@ and @> operators do not worry about duplicates: if every member of array X matches some element of array Y, then X is contained in Y, even if several members of X get matched to the same Y member. This was not explicitly stated in the docs though, so improve matters. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/156614120484.1310.310161642239149585@wrigleys.postgresql.org
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
-