1. 03 Sep, 1998 1 commit
  2. 01 Sep, 1998 1 commit
  3. 10 Aug, 1998 1 commit
  4. 19 Jul, 1998 1 commit
    • Bruce Momjian's avatar
      1) Queries using the having clause on base tables should work well · 460b20a4
      Bruce Momjian authored
         now. Here some tested features, (examples included in the patch):
      
      1.1) Subselects in the having clause 1.2) Double nested subselects
      1.3) Subselects used in the where clause and in the having clause
           simultaneously 1.4) Union Selects using having 1.5) Indexes
      on the base relations are used correctly 1.6) Unallowed Queries
      are prevented (e.g. qualifications in the
           having clause that belong to the where clause) 1.7) Insert
      into as select
      
      2) Queries using the having clause on view relations also work
         but there are some restrictions:
      
      2.1) Create View as Select ... Having ...; using base tables in
      the select 2.1.1) The Query rewrite system:
      
      2.1.2) Why are only simple queries allowed against a view from 2.1)
      ? 2.2) Select ... from testview1, testview2, ... having...; 3) Bug
      in ExecMergeJoin ??
      
      
      Regards Stefan
      460b20a4
  5. 15 Apr, 1998 1 commit
  6. 26 Feb, 1998 1 commit
  7. 15 Jan, 1998 1 commit
  8. 20 Dec, 1997 1 commit
  9. 18 Dec, 1997 2 commits
  10. 26 Nov, 1997 1 commit
  11. 08 Sep, 1997 3 commits
  12. 07 Sep, 1997 1 commit
  13. 28 Aug, 1996 1 commit
  14. 09 Jul, 1996 1 commit