Ancient versions of Test::More don't support the note() function used in
some TAP tests, so we require the minimum version of the module that
does.

Per buildfarm, the "#ifdef F_SETFD" removed in that commit actually
is needed on Windows, because fcntl() isn't available at all on that
platform, unless using Cygwin.  We could perhaps spell it more like
"#ifdef HAVE_FCNTL", or "#ifndef WIN32", but it's not clear that
those choices are better.

It does seem that we don't need the bogus manual definition of
FD_CLOEXEC, though, so keep that change.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/26254.1492805635@sss.pgh.pa.us

The reference "That is the topic of the next section." has been
incorrect since the materialized views documentation got inserted
between the section "rules-views" and "rules-update".

Author: Zertrin <postgres_wiki@zertrin.org>

The POSIX standard does not say that the success return value for
fcntl(F_SETFD) and fcntl(F_SETFL) is zero; it says only that it's not -1.
We had several calls that were making the stronger assumption.  Adjust
them to test specifically for -1 for strict spec compliance.

The standard further leaves open the possibility that the O_NONBLOCK
flag bit is not the only active one in F_SETFL's argument.  Formally,
therefore, one ought to get the current flags with F_GETFL and store
them back with only the O_NONBLOCK bit changed when trying to change
the nonblock state.  In port/noblock.c, we were doing the full pushup
in pg_set_block but not in pg_set_noblock, which is just weird.  Make
both of them do it properly, since they have little business making
any assumptions about the socket they're handed.  The other places
where we're issuing F_SETFL are working with FDs we just got from
pipe(2), so it's reasonable to assume the FDs' properties are all
default, so I didn't bother adding F_GETFL steps there.

Also, while pg_set_block deserves some points for trying to do things
right, somebody had decided that it'd be even better to cast fcntl's
third argument to "long".  Which is completely loony, because POSIX
clearly says the third argument for an F_SETFL call is "int".

Given the lack of field complaints, these missteps apparently are not
of significance on any common platforms.  But they're still wrong,
so back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30882.1492800880@sss.pgh.pa.us

It doesn't make any immediate difference to PostgreSQL, but might as well
follow the standard, since one exists. (I looked at RFC 5803 earlier, but
didn't fully understand it back then.)

The new format uses Base64 instead of hex to encode StoredKey and
ServerKey, which makes the verifiers slightly smaller. Using the same
encoding for the salt and the keys also means that you only need one
encoder/decoder instead of two. Although we have code in the backend to
do both, we are talking about teaching libpq how to create SCRAM verifiers
for PQencodePassword(), and libpq doesn't currently have any code for hex
encoding.

Bump catversion, because this renders any existing SCRAM verifiers in
pg_authid invalid.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/351ba574-85ea-d9b8-9689-8c928dd0955d@iki.fi

SUSv2 mandates that <fcntl.h> provide both F_SETFD and FD_CLOEXEC,
so it seems pretty unlikely that any platforms remain without those.
Remove the #ifdef-ery installed by commit 7627b91c to see if the
buildfarm agrees.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/21444.1492798101@sss.pgh.pa.us

This way a failure to synchronize the table list will not leave an
unused slot on the publisher.

Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>

Oversight in commit 818fd4a6.  While at it, sync order of file list
in .gitignore with those in the Makefile.

Extended statistics commit 7b504eb2 did not include appropriate
documentation next to where we document regular planner statistics (I
ripped what was submitted before commit and then forgot to put it back),
and while later commit 2686ee1b added some material, it structurally
depended on what I had ripped out, so the end result wasn't proper.

Fix those problems by shuffling what was added by 2686ee1b and
including some additional material, so that now chapter 14 "Performance
Tips" now describes the types of multivariate statistics we currently
have, and chapter 68 "How the Planner Uses Statistics" shows some
examples.  The new text should be more in line with previous material,
in (hopefully) the appropriate depth.

While at it, fix a small bug in pg_statistic_ext docs: one column was
listed in the wrong spot.

Commit 05cd12ed ("pg_ctl: Change default to wait for all actions")
was a tad sloppy about updating the documentation to match.  The
documentation was also sorely in need of a copy-editing pass, having
been adjusted at different times by different people who took little
care to maintain consistency of style.

Give a more specific error message than "xyz is not a table".

Also document in CREATE PUBLICATION which kinds of relations are not
supported.

based on patch by Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>

Commit 7c4f5240 allowed walsender to execute normal SQL commands
to support table sync feature in logical replication. Previously
while log_statement caused such SQL commands to be logged,
log_replication_commands caused them to be logged, too.
That is, such SQL commands were logged twice unexpectedly
when those settings were both enabled.

This commit forces log_replication_commands to log only replication
commands, to prevent normal SQL commands from being logged twice.

Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reported-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFDWh_Qr-q_GEMpD+qH=vYPMdVqw=ZOSY3kX_Pna9R9SA@mail.gmail.com

In pg_subscription, subconninfo, subslotname, subsynccommit and
subpublications are expected not to be NULL. Therefore this patch
adds BKI_FORCE_NOT_NULL markings to them.

This patch is basically unnecessary unless the code has a bug which
wrongly sets either of those columns to NULL. But it's good to have
this as a safeguard.

Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reported-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFDWh_Qr-q_GEMpD+qH=vYPMdVqw=ZOSY3kX_Pna9R9SA@mail.gmail.com

It's not safe to raise an error while holding spinlock. But previously
logical replication worker for table sync called the function which
reads the system catalog and may raise an error while it's holding
spinlock. Which could lead to the trouble where spinlock will never
be released and the server gets stuck infinitely.

Author: Petr Jelinek
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi and Fujii Masao
Reported-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFDWh_Qr-q_GEMpD+qH=vYPMdVqw=ZOSY3kX_Pna9R9SA@mail.gmail.com

Word "sends" was missing.

Jaime Casanova

is_parallel_safe() supposed that the only relevant property of a SubPlan
was the parallel safety of the referenced subplan tree.  This is wrong:
the testexpr or args subtrees might contain parallel-unsafe stuff, as
demonstrated by the test case added here.  However, just recursing into the
subtrees fails in a different way: we'll typically find PARAM_EXEC Params
representing the subplan's output columns in the testexpr.  The previous
coding supposed that any Param must be treated as parallel-restricted, so
that a naive attempt at fixing this disabled parallel pushdown of SubPlans
altogether.  We must instead determine, for any visited Param, whether it
is one that would be computed by a surrounding SubPlan node; if so, it's
safe to push down along with the SubPlan node.

We might later be able to extend this logic to cope with Params used for
correlated subplans and other cases; but that's a task for v11 or beyond.

Tom Lane and Amit Kapila

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7064.1492022469@sss.pgh.pa.us

Author: Masahiko Sawada, heavily modified by me
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwEKOw=SmPLxJzkBsH6wwDBgOnVz46QjHbtsiZ-d-2RGUg@mail.gmail.com

Since it appears that v10 is going to move the goalposts by some amount
in terms of where you can and can't invoke set-returning functions,
arrange for the executor's "set-valued function called in context that
cannot accept a set" errors to include a syntax position if possible,
pointing to the specific SRF that can't be called where it's located.

The main bit of infrastructure needed for this is to make the query source
text accessible in the executor; but it turns out that commit 4c728f38
already did that.  We just need a new function executor_errposition()
modeled on parser_errposition(), and we're ready to rock.

While experimenting with this, I noted that the error position wasn't
properly reported if it occurred in a plpgsql FOR-over-query loop,
which turned out to be because SPI_cursor_open_internal wasn't providing
an error context callback during PortalStart.  Fix that.

There's a whole lot more that could be done with this infrastructure
now that it's there, but this is not the right time in the development
cycle for that sort of work.  Hence, resist the temptation to plaster
executor_errposition() calls everywhere ... for the moment.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5263.1492471571@sss.pgh.pa.us

* Be sure to reset the launcher's pid (LogicalRepCtx->launcher_pid) to 0
  even when the launcher emits an error.

* Declare ApplyLauncherWakeup() as a static function because it's called
  only in launcher.c.

* Previously IsBackendPId() was used to check whether the launcher's pid
  was valid. IsBackendPid() was necessary because there was the bug where
  the launcher's pid was not reset to 0. But now it's fixed, so IsBackendPid()
  is not necessary and this patch removes it.

Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reported-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFDWh_Qr-q_GEMpD+qH=vYPMdVqw=ZOSY3kX_Pna9R9SA@mail.gmail.com

Previously DatumGetObjectId() was wrongly used for that.

Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reported-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFDWh_Qr-q_GEMpD+qH=vYPMdVqw=ZOSY3kX_Pna9R9SA@mail.gmail.com

Reported offlist by hubert depesz lubaczewski.

Discussion: <https://postgr.es/m/72335afb-969b-af84-3fcb-1739e3ed09a6@2ndQuadrant.com>

Per discussion, plain "scram" is confusing because we actually implement
SCRAM-SHA-256 rather than the original SCRAM that uses SHA-1 as the hash
algorithm. If we add support for SCRAM-SHA-512 or some other mechanism in
the SCRAM family in the future, that would become even more confusing.

Most of the internal files and functions still use just "scram" as a
shorthand for SCRMA-SHA-256, but I did change PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM to
PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM_SHA_256, as that could potentially be used by 3rd
party extensions that hook into the password-check hook.

Michael Paquier did this in an earlier version of the SCRAM patch set
already, but I didn't include that in the version that was committed.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/fde71ff1-5858-90c8-99a9-1c2427e7bafb@iki.fi

Reported-by: Amit Langote

Complex crash bug all started with this failure.
Diagnosed and fixed by Nikhil Sontakke, reviewed by me.

Reported-by: Jeff Janes
Author: Nikhil Sontakke
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1xBP8cqdS5eK8APHL=X6RHMMM2vG5g+QamduuTsyCwv9g@mail.gmail.com

Doing so allows various crash possibilities. Fix by avoiding
having PrescanPreparedTransactions() increment
ShmemVariableCache->nextXid when it has no 2PC files

Bug found by Jeff Janes, diagnosis and patch by Pavan Deolasee,
then patch re-designed for clarity and full accuracy by
Michael Paquier.

Reported-by: Jeff Janes
Author: Pavan Deolasee, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1zMLnH_i1-PVQ-biZzvNx7VcuatriquEnh7HNk6K8Ss3Q@mail.gmail.com

Amit Langote

Yugo Nagata

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170417180921.3047f3b0.nagata@sraoss.co.jp

Document more explicitly that the target table can have more columns
than the source table.
Reported-by: Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>

CopyFrom() needs a range table for formatting certain errors for
constraint violations.

This changes the mechanism of how the range table is passed to the
CopyFrom() executor state.  We used to generate the range table and one
entry for the relation manually inside DoCopy().  Now we use
addRangeTableEntryForRelation() to setup the range table and relation
entry for the ParseState, which is then passed down by BeginCopyFrom().

Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Reported-by: Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>

The new catalog reused a column prefix "sta" from pg_statistic, but this
is undesirable, so change the catalog to use prefix "stx" instead.
Also, rename the column that lists enabled statistic kinds as "stxkind"
rather than "enabled".

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f_2t5jhSN7huYRFH3w3rrHfG2QU7hiUHsu-Vdjd1rYT3w@mail.gmail.com

We were accepting creation of extended statistics only for regular
tables, but they can usefully be created for foreign tables, partitioned
tables, and materialized views, too.  Allow those cases.

While at it, make sure all the rejected cases throw a consistent error
message, and add regression tests for the whole thing.

Author: David Rowley, Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f-BmGo410bh5RSPZUvOO0LhmHL2NYmdrC_Jm8pk_FfyCA@mail.gmail.com

We were applying the use_physical_tlist optimization to all relation
scan plans, even those implemented by custom scan providers.  However,
that's a bad idea for a couple of reasons.  The custom provider might
be unable to provide columns that it hadn't expected to be asked for
(for example, the custom scan might depend on an index-only scan).
Even more to the point, there's no good reason to suppose that this
"optimization" is a win for a custom scan; whatever the custom provider
is doing is likely not based on simply returning physical heap tuples.
(As a counterexample, if the custom scan is an interface to a column store,
demanding all columns would be a huge loss.)  If it is a win, the custom
provider could make that decision for itself and insert a suitable
pathtarget into the path, anyway.

Per discussion with Dmitry Ivanov.  Back-patch to 9.5 where custom scan
support was introduced.  The argument that the custom provider can adjust
the behavior by changing the pathtarget only applies to 9.6+, but on
balance it seems more likely that use_physical_tlist will hurt custom
scans than help them.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e29ddd30-8ef9-4da5-a50b-2bb7b8c7198d@postgrespro.ru

This addresses the new warning types -Wformat-truncation
-Wformat-overflow that are part of -Wall, via -Wformat, in GCC 7.

Either because of a previous ALTER TABLE .. SET STATISTICS 0 or because
of being invoked with a partial column list, ANALYZE could fail to
acquire sufficient data to build extended statistics.  Previously, this
would draw an ERROR and fail to collect any statistics at all (extended
and regular).  Change things so that we raise a WARNING instead, and
remove a hint that was wrong in half the cases.

Reported by: David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f9Kk0NF6Fg7TA=JUXsjpS9kX6NVu27pb5QDCpOYAvb-Og@mail.gmail.com

This is necessary to be able to reproduce publication membership
correctly if tables are involved in inheritance.

Author: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>