- 28 Oct, 2020 3 commits
-
-
Michael Paquier authored
This makes use of CheckBuffer() introduced in c780a7a9, adding a SQL wrapper able to do checks for all the pages of a relation. By default, all the fork types of a relation are checked, and it is possible to check only a given relation fork. Note that if the relation given in input has no physical storage or is temporary, then no errors are generated, allowing full-database checks when coupled with a simple scan of pg_class for example. This is not limited to clusters with data checksums enabled, as clusters without data checksums can still apply checks on pages using the page headers or for the case of a page full of zeros. This function returns a set of tuples consisting of: - The physical file where a broken page has been detected (without the segment number as that can be AM-dependent, which can be guessed from the block number for heap). A relative path from PGPATH is used. - The block number of the broken page. By default, only superusers have an access to this function but execution rights can be granted to other users. The feature introduced here is still minimal, and more improvements could be done, like: - Addition of a start and end block number to run checks on a range of blocks, which would apply only if one fork type is checked. - Addition of some progress reporting. - Throttling, with configuration parameters in function input or potentially some cost-based GUCs. Regression tests are added for positive cases in the main regression test suite, and TAP tests are added for cases involving the emulation of page corruptions. Bump catalog version. Author: Julien Rouhaud, Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada, Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOBaU_aVvMjQn=ge5qPiJOPMmOj5=ii3st5Q0Y+WuLML5sR17w@mail.gmail.com
-
Michael Paquier authored
CheckBuffer() is designed to be a concurrent-safe function able to run sanity checks on a relation page without loading it into the shared buffers. The operation is done using a lock on the partition involved in the shared buffer mapping hashtable and an I/O lock for the buffer itself, preventing the risk of false positives due to any concurrent activity. The primary use of this function is the detection of on-disk corruptions for relation pages. If a page is found in shared buffers, the on-disk page is checked if not dirty (a follow-up checkpoint would flush a valid version of the page if dirty anyway), as it could be possible that a page was present for a long time in shared buffers with its on-disk version corrupted. Such a scenario could lead to a corrupted cluster if a host is plugged off for example. If the page is not found in shared buffers, its on-disk state is checked. PageIsVerifiedExtended() is used to apply the same sanity checks as when a page gets loaded into shared buffers. This function will be used by an upcoming patch able to check the state of on-disk relation pages using a SQL function. Author: Julien Rouhaud, Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOBaU_aVvMjQn=ge5qPiJOPMmOj5=ii3st5Q0Y+WuLML5sR17w@mail.gmail.com
-
Amit Kapila authored
Per a suggestion by Justin Pryzby. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+fd4k5_pPAYRTDrO2PbtTOe0eHQpBvuqmCr8ic39uTNmR49Eg@mail.gmail.com
-
- 27 Oct, 2020 11 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
The reference to running "make coverage" in a subdirectory was a bit obscure, so clarify what happens when you do that. Do a little desultory copy-editing, too. Per a question from Peter Smith. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+Pu0r3AjRSyu5E0v2-zRj8r24OSrkWs3fEBxOuaw1i8DKA@mail.gmail.com
-
Bruce Momjian authored
You can't compile thread_test alone anymore, and the location moved too. Reported-by: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1062278.1603819969@sss.pgh.pa.us Backpatch-through: 9.5
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
Now that LOCK TABLE can take any relation type, acquire lock on all relations that are to be dumped. This prevents schema changes or deadlock errors that could cause a dump to fail after expending much effort. The server is tested to have the capability and the feature disabled if it doesn't, so that a patched pg_dump doesn't fail when connecting to an unpatched server. Backpatch to 9.5. Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reported-by: Wells Oliver <wells.oliver@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201021200659.GA32358@alvherre.pgsql
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
This accompanies select_common_type() and select_common_collation(). Typmods were previously combined using hand-coded logic in several places. The logic in select_common_typmod() isn't very exciting, but it makes the code more compact and readable in a few locations, and in the future we can perhaps do more complicated things if desired. As a small enhancement, the type unification of the direct and aggregate arguments of hypothetical-set aggregates now unifies the typmod as well using this new function, instead of just dropping it. Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/97df3af9-8b5e-fb7f-a029-3eb7e80d7af9@2ndquadrant.com
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
The restriction that only tables and views can be locked by LOCK TABLE is quite arbitrary, since the underlying mechanism can lock any relation type. Drop the restriction so that programs such as pg_dump can lock all relations they're interested in, preventing schema changes that could cause a dump to fail after expending much effort. Backpatch to 9.5. Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reported-by: Wells Oliver <wells.oliver@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201021200659.GA32358@alvherre.pgsql
-
Bruce Momjian authored
This directory and the ability to build the thread test independently were removed in commit 8a212118. Reported-by: e.indrupskaya@postgrespro.ru Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/160379609706.24746.7506163279454026608@wrigleys.postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 9.5
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
The enum label length is in terms of bytes, not charactes. Author: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAB8KJ=itZEJ7C9BacTHSYgeUysH4xx8wDiOnyppnSLyn6-g+Bw@mail.gmail.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
The JDBC driver sends OUT parameters with type void. This makes sense when calling a function, so that the parameters are ignored in ParseFuncOrColumn(). For a procedure call we want to treat them as unknown. Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/d7e49540-ea92-b4e2-5fff-42036102f968%402ndquadrant.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Move GSSENCRequest to the correct alphabetical position.
-
Amit Kapila authored
This is to make the description of spilled counters clear. Author: Amit Kapila Reviewed-by: Sawada Masahiko Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+fd4k5_pPAYRTDrO2PbtTOe0eHQpBvuqmCr8ic39uTNmR49Eg@mail.gmail.com
-
Bruce Momjian authored
Reported-by: bob.henkel@gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/160324449781.693.8298142858847611071@wrigleys.postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 9.5
-
- 26 Oct, 2020 4 commits
-
-
Bruce Momjian authored
Parallel execution changed the way bloom queries are executed, so update the EXPLAIN output, and restructure the docs to be clearer and more accurate. Reported-by: Daniel Westermann Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZR0P278MB0122119FAE78721A694C30C8D2340@ZR0P278MB0122.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM Author: Daniel Westermann and me Backpatch-through: 9.6
-
Tom Lane authored
Previously, ExecInitModifyTable relied on ExecInitJunkFilter, and thence ExecCleanTypeFromTL, to build the target descriptor from the query tlist. While we just checked (in ExecCheckPlanOutput) that the tlist produces compatible output, this is not a great substitute for the relation's actual tuple descriptor that's available from the relcache. For one thing, dropped columns will not be correctly marked attisdropped; it's a bit surprising that we've gotten away with that this long. But the real reason for being concerned with this is that using the table's descriptor means that the slot will have correct attrmissing data, allowing us to revert the klugy fix of commit ba9f18ab. (This commit undoes that one's changes in trigger.c, but keeps the new test case.) Thus we can solve the bogus-trigger-tuple problem with fewer cycles rather than more. No back-patch, since this doesn't fix any additional bug, and it seems somewhat more likely to have unforeseen side effects than ba9f18ab's narrow fix. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16644-5da7ef98a7ac4545@postgresql.org
-
Heikki Linnakangas authored
These are old enough that they'll cause more confusion and distraction to new readers, than they could help anyone upgrade from very old servers. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/fd93f1c5-7818-a02c-01e5-1075ac0d4def%40iki.fi
-
Michael Paquier authored
This is useful for checks of relation pages without having to load the pages into the shared buffers, and two cases can make use of that: page verification in base backups and the online, lock-safe, flavor. Compatibility is kept with past versions using a macro that calls the new extended routine with the set of options compatible with the original version. Extracted from a larger patch by the same author. Author: Anastasia Lubennikova Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Julien Rouhaud Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/608f3476-0598-2514-2c03-e05c7d2b0cbd@postgrespro.ru
-
- 25 Oct, 2020 2 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
If the old row has any "missing" attributes that are supposed to be retrieved from an associated tuple descriptor, the wrong things happened because the trigger result is shoved directly into an executor slot that lacks the missing-attribute data. Notably, CHECK-constraint verification would incorrectly see those columns as NULL, and so would RETURNING-list evaluation. Band-aid around this by forcibly expanding the tuple before passing it to the trigger function. (IMO it was a fundamental misdesign to put the missing-attribute data into tuple constraints, which so much of the system considers to be optional. But we're probably stuck with that now, and will have to continue to apply band-aids as we find other places with similar issues.) Back-patch to v12. v11 would also have the issue, except that commit 920311ab1 already applied a similar band-aid. That forced expansion in more cases than seem really necessary, though, so this isn't a directly equivalent fix. Amit Langote, with some cosmetic changes by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16644-5da7ef98a7ac4545@postgresql.org
-
David Rowley authored
Author: Zhijie Hou Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/14cd74ea00204cc8a7ea5d738ac82cd1@G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local Backpatch-through: 12, where the mistake was introduced
-
- 24 Oct, 2020 3 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
We must not set the "done" flag until after we've executed the initialization function. Otherwise, other threads can fall through the initial unlocked test before initialization is really complete. This has been seen to cause rare failures of ecpg's thread/descriptor test, and it could presumably cause other sorts of misbehavior in threaded ECPG-using applications, since ecpglib relies on pthread_once() in several places. Diagnosis and patch by me, based on investigation by Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported branches (the bug dates to 2007). Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16685-d6cd241872c101d3@postgresql.org
-
Michael Paquier authored
genhtml has been generating the following warning with this new code: WARNING: function data mismatch at /path/src/common/unicode_norm.c:102 HTML coverage reports care about the uniqueness of functions defined in source files, ignoring any assumptions around CFLAGS. 783f0cc6 introduced a duplicated definition of get_code_entry(), leading to a warning and potentially some incorrect data generated in the reports. This refactors the code so as the code has only one function declaration, fixing the warning. Oversight in 783f0cc6. Reported-by: Tom Lane Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/207789.1603469272@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Michael Paquier authored
This completes both the FORCE and NO FORCE options, NO INHERIT needing a small adjustment. Author: Li Japin Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15B10F9F-5847-4F5E-BD66-8E25AA473C95@hotmail.com
-
- 23 Oct, 2020 10 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
verify_heapam() wasn't being careful to sanity-check tuple line pointers before using them, resulting in SIGBUS on alignment-picky architectures. Fix that, add some more test coverage. Mark Dilger, some tweaking by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30B8E99A-2D9C-48D4-A55C-741C9D5F1563@enterprisedb.com
-
Tom Lane authored
Instead of immediately PQfinish'ing a dead connection, save it aside so that we can still extract its parameters for \connect attempts. (This works because PQconninfo doesn't care whether the PGconn is in CONNECTION_BAD state.) This allows developers to reconnect with just \c after a database crash and restart. It's tempting to use the same approach instead of closing the old connection after a failed non-interactive \connect command. However, that would not be very safe: consider a script containing \c db1 user1 live_server \c db2 user2 dead_server \c db3 The script would be expecting to connect to db3 at dead_server, but if we re-use parameters from the first connection then it might successfully connect to db3 at live_server. This'd defeat the goal of not letting a script accidentally execute commands against the wrong database. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/38464.1603394584@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Tom Lane authored
The tests added by commit 866e24d4 failed on big-endian machines due to lack of attention to endianness considerations. Fix that. While here, improve a few small cosmetic things, such as running it through perltidy. Mark Dilger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30B8E99A-2D9C-48D4-A55C-741C9D5F1563@enterprisedb.com
-
Tom Lane authored
The ExplainCloseGroup arguments for incremental sort usage data didn't match the corresponding ExplainOpenGroup. This only matters for XML-format output, which is probably why we'd not noticed. Daniel Gustafsson, per bug #16683 from Frits Jalvingh Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16683-8005033324ad34e9@postgresql.org
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
The order of AuthenticationGSSContinue and AuthenticationSSPI was swapped, based on the other Authentication* protocol messages being listed in subcode order.
-
Heikki Linnakangas authored
The behavioural change in the -t/--table option happened around 15 years ago and there seems little point in keeping it around. Author: Ian Barwick Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB8KJ%3Dh-XALik4M7gv-pX48%3D%2BSPWexfaYwa%2ByTnPwD3DxceXrg%40mail.gmail.com
-
Heikki Linnakangas authored
Thinko in commit 1375422c. EvalPlanQualStart() was mistakenly resetting the parent EState's es_result_relations, when it should initialize the field in the child EPQ EState it just created. That was clearly wrong, but it didn't cause any ill effects, because es_result_relations is currently not used after the ExecInit* phase. Author: Amit Langote Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BHiwqFEuq8AAAmxXsTDVZ1r38cHbfYuiPQx_%3DYyKe2DC-6q4A%40mail.gmail.com
-
Michael Paquier authored
This replaces the existing binary search with two perfect hash functions for the composition and the decomposition in the backend code, at the cost of slightly-larger binaries there (35kB in libpgcommon_srv.a). Per the measurements done, this improves the speed of the recomposition and decomposition by up to 30~40 times for the NFC and NFKC conversions, while all other operations get at least 40% faster. This is not as "good" as what libicu has, but it closes the gap a lot as per the feedback from Daniel Verite. The decomposition table remains the same, getting used for the binary search in the frontend code, where we care more about the size of the libraries like libpq over performance as this gets involved only in code paths related to the SCRAM authentication. In consequence, note that the perfect hash function for the recomposition needs to use a new inverse lookup array back to to the existing decomposition table. The size of all frontend deliverables remains unchanged, even with --enable-debug, including libpq. Author: John Naylor Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFBsxsHUuMFCt6-pU+oG-F1==CmEp8wR+O+bRouXWu6i8kXuqA@mail.gmail.com
-
Tom Lane authored
DST law changes in Palestine, with a whopping 120 hours' notice. Also some historical corrections for Palestine.
-
Tom Lane authored
There's no functional change at all here, but I'm curious to see whether this change successfully shuts up Coverity's warning about a useless strcmp(), which appeared with the previous update. Discussion: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/2020-October/029370.html
-
- 22 Oct, 2020 7 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
ECPG's PREPARE ... FROM and EXECUTE IMMEDIATE can optionally take the target query as a simple literal, rather than the more usual string-variable reference. This was previously documented as being a C string literal, but that's a lie in one critical respect: you can't write a data double quote as \" in such literals. That's because the lexer is in SQL mode at this point, so it'll parse double-quoted strings as SQL identifiers, within which backslash is not special, so \" ends the literal. I looked into making this work as documented, but getting the lexer to switch behaviors at just the right point is somewhere between very difficult and impossible. It's not really worth the trouble, because these cases are next to useless: if you have a fixed SQL statement to execute or prepare, you might as well write it as a direct EXEC SQL, saving the messiness of converting it into a string literal and gaining the opportunity for compile-time SQL syntax checking. Instead, let's just document (and test) the workaround of writing a double quote as an octal escape (\042) in such cases. There's no code behavioral change here, so in principle this could be back-patched, but it's such a niche case I doubt it's worth the trouble. Per report from 1250kv. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/673825.1603223178@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Tom Lane authored
If you write the literal 'abc''def' in an EXEC SQL command, that will come out the other end as 'abc'def', triggering a syntax error in the backend. Likewise, "abc""def" is reduced to "abc"def" which is wrong syntax for a quoted identifier. The cause is that the lexer thinks it should emit just one quote mark, whereas what it really should do is keep the string as-is. Add some docs and test cases, too. Although this seems clearly a bug, I fear users wouldn't appreciate changing it in minor releases. Some may well be working around it by applying an extra doubling of affected quotes, as for example sql/dyntest.pgc has been doing. Per investigation of a report from 1250kv, although this isn't exactly what he/she was on about. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/673825.1603223178@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Robert Haas authored
Mark Dilger, with a couple of stray semicolons removed by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/2A7DA1A8-C4AA-43DF-A985-3CA52F4DC775@enterprisedb.com
-
Tom Lane authored
The check for whether to complain about not having an old connection to get parameters from was seriously out of date: it had not been rethought when we invented connstrings, nor when we invented the -reuse-previous option. Replace it with a check that throws an error if reuse-previous is active and we lack an old connection to reuse. While that doesn't move the goalposts very far in terms of easing reconnection after a server crash, at least it's consistent. If the user specifies a connstring plus additional parameters (which is invalid per the documentation), the extra parameters were silently ignored. That seems like it could be really confusing, so let's throw a syntax error instead. Teach the connstring code path to re-use the old connection's password in the same cases as the old-style-syntax code path would, ie if we are reusing parameters and the values of username, host/hostaddr, and port are not being changed. Document this behavior, too, since it was unmentioned before. Also simplify the implementation a bit, giving rise to two new and useful properties: if there's a "password=xxx" in the connstring, we'll use it not ignore it, and by default (i.e., except with --no-password) we will prompt for a password if the re-used password or connstring password doesn't work. The previous code just failed if the re-used password didn't work. Given the paucity of field complaints about these issues, I don't think that they rise to the level of back-patchable bug fixes, and in any case they might represent undesirable behavior changes in minor releases. So no back-patch. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/235210.1603321144@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Robert Haas authored
Mark Dilger, reviewed by Peter Geoghegan, Andres Freund, Álvaro Herrera, Michael Paquier, Amul Sul, and by me. Some last-minute cosmetic revisions by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/12ED3DA8-25F0-4B68-937D-D907CFBF08E7@enterprisedb.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
-
David Rowley authored
There is a handful of places where we called list_delete_ptr() to remove some element from a List. In many of these places we know, or with very little additional effort know the index of the ListCell that we need to remove. Here we change all of those places to instead either use one of; list_delete_nth_cell(), foreach_delete_current() or list_delete_last(). Each of these saves from having to iterate over the list to search for the element to remove by its pointer value. There are some small performance gains to be had by doing this, but in the general case, none of these lists are likely to be very large, so the lookup was probably never that expensive anyway. However, some of the calls are in fairly hot code paths, e.g process_equivalence(). So any small gains there are useful. Author: Zhijie Hou and David Rowley Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b3517353ec7c4f87aa560678fbb1034b@G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local
-