- 22 Jun, 2017 11 commits
-
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
There was a logic error in a formula, reported by Atsushi Torokoshi. Ashutosh Bapat furthermore recommended to change notation for a variable that was re-using a letter from a previous formula, though his proposed patch contained a small error in attributing what the new letter is for. Also, instead of his proposed d' I ended up using e, to avoid confusing the reader with quotes which are used differently in the explaining prose. Bugs appeared in commit 2686ee1b. Reported-by: Atsushi Torikoshi, Ashutosh Bapat Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFjFpRd03YojT4wyuDcjhCfYuygfWfnt68XGn2CKv=rcjRCtTA@mail.gmail.com
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
Once upon a time, WAL pointers could be NULL, but no longer. We talk about "valid" now. Reported-by: Amit Langote Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/33e9617d-27f1-eee8-3311-e27af98eaf2b@lab.ntt.co.jp
-
Robert Haas authored
Etsuro Fujita, slightly adjusted by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/e87c4a6d-23d7-5e7c-e8db-44ed418eb5d1@lab.ntt.co.jp
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
The autovacuum launcher doesn't actually do anything with its DSA other than creating it and attaching to it, but it's been observed that after longjmp'ing to the standard error handling block (for example after getting SIGINT) the autovacuum enters an infinite loop reporting that it cannot attach to its DSA anymore (which is correct, because it's already attached to it.) Fix by only attempting to attach if not already attached. I introduced this bug together with BRIN autosummarization in 7526e102. Reported-by: Yugo Nagata. Author: Thomas Munro. I added the comment to go with it. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170621211538.0c9eae73.nagata@sraoss.co.jp
-
Robert Haas authored
Commit 15c121b3 seems to have overlooked the need to trim this part of the comment. Pavan Deolasee Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CABOikdPq_9+cWRNZ0RLKTwuZyj=uL85X=Usifa-CbPee1ZCM5A@mail.gmail.com
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
I misplaced the IF NOT EXISTS clause in commit 7b504eb2, before the word STATISTICS. Put it where it belongs. Patch written independently by Amit Langote and myself. I adopted his submitted test case with a slight edit also. Reported-by: Bruno Wolff III Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170621004237.GB8337@wolff.to
-
Robert Haas authored
Etsuro Fujita, reviewed by Ashutosh Bapat. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/93a9c487-9920-a38f-da96-503422c50f59@lab.ntt.co.jp
-
Robert Haas authored
Rushabh Lathia Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAGPqQf3yKG0Eo04ePfLPG_-KTo=7ZkxbGDVUWfSGN35Y3SG+PA@mail.gmail.com
-
Robert Haas authored
Ashutosh Bapat and Amit Langote Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFjFpRcG_NaAv6cDHD-9VfGdvB8maAtSfB=fTQr5+kxP2_sXzg@mail.gmail.com
-
Magnus Hagander authored
Author: Masahiko Sawada
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Author: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
-
- 21 Jun, 2017 12 commits
-
-
Andres Freund authored
When promoting a standby just after a XLOG_SWITCH record was replayed, and next segment(s) are already are locally available (via walsender, restore_command + trigger/recovery target), that segment could accidentally be recycled onto the past of the new timeline. Later checkpointer would create a .ready file for it, assuming there was an error during creation, and it would get archived. That causes trouble if another standby is later brought up from a basebackup from before the timeline creation, because it would try to read the segment, because XLogFileReadAnyTLI just tries all possible timelines, which doesn't have valid contents. Thus replay would fail. The problem, if already occurred, can be fixed by removing the segment and/or having restore_command filter it out. The reason for the creation of such "phantom" segments was, that after an XLOG_SWITCH record the EndOfLog variable points to the beginning of the next segment, and RemoveXlogFile() used XLByteToPrevSeg(). Normally RemoveXlogFile() doing so is harmless, because the last segment will still exist preventing InstallXLogFileSegment() from causing harm, but just after promotion there's no previous segment on the new timeline. Fix that by using XLByteToSeg() instead of XLByteToPrevSeg(). Author: Andres Freund Reported-By: Greg Burek Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170619073026.zcwpe6mydsaz5ygd@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 9.2-, bug older than all supported versions
-
Tom Lane authored
These will no longer get re-split by pgindent runs, so it's worth cleaning them up now. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Tom Lane authored
We don't need this anymore, because pg_bsd_indent has been taught to follow the same tab-vs-space rules that entab used to enforce. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Also add a comment on its new member PartitionRoot. Reported-by: Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
-
Tom Lane authored
Don't move parenthesized lines to the left, even if that means they flow past the right margin. By default, BSD indent lines up statement continuation lines that are within parentheses so that they start just to the right of the preceding left parenthesis. However, traditionally, if that resulted in the continuation line extending to the right of the desired right margin, then indent would push it left just far enough to not overrun the margin, if it could do so without making the continuation line start to the left of the current statement indent. That makes for a weird mix of indentations unless one has been completely rigid about never violating the 80-column limit. This behavior has been pretty universally panned by Postgres developers. Hence, disable it with indent's new -lpl switch, so that parenthesized lines are always lined up with the preceding left paren. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Tom Lane authored
Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments following #endif to not obey the general rule. Commit e3860ffa wasn't actually using the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after. Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else. That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent. This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Author: Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
-
Tom Lane authored
The new indent version includes numerous fixes thanks to Piotr Stefaniak. The main changes visible in this commit are: * Nicer formatting of function-pointer declarations. * No longer unexpectedly removes spaces in expressions using casts, sizeof, or offsetof. * No longer wants to add a space in "struct structname *varname", as well as some similar cases for const- or volatile-qualified pointers. * Declarations using PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY are formatted more nicely. * Fixes bug where comments following declarations were sometimes placed with no space separating them from the code. * Fixes some odd decisions for comments following case labels. * Fixes some cases where comments following code were indented to less than the expected column 33. On the less good side, it now tends to put more whitespace around typedef names that are not listed in typedefs.list. This might encourage us to put more effort into typedef name collection; it's not really a bug in indent itself. There are more changes coming after this round, having to do with comment indentation and alignment of lines appearing within parentheses. I wanted to limit the size of the diffs to something that could be reviewed without one's eyes completely glazing over, so it seemed better to split up the changes as much as practical. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Tom Lane authored
Update version-checking code and list of switches. Delete obsolete quasi-support for using GNU indent. Remove a lot of no-longer-needed workarounds for bugs of the old version, and improve comments for the hacks that remain. Update run_build() subroutine to fetch the pg_bsd_indent code from the newly established git repo for it. In passing, fix pgindent to not overwrite files that require no changes; this makes it a bit more friendly to run on a built tree. Adjust relevant documentation. Remove indent.bsd.patch; it's not relevant anymore (and was obsolete long ago anyway). Likewise remove pgcppindent, since we're no longer in the business of shipping C++ code. Piotr Stefaniak is responsible for most of the algorithmic changes to the pgindent script; I did the rest. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Tom Lane authored
This is just to have a clean basis for comparison with the results of the new version (which will indeed end up reverting some of these changes...) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Dean Rasheed authored
A table partition must be a table, not a view, so don't allow a "_RETURN" rule to be added that would convert an existing table partition into a view. Amit Langote Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCVzFcAjZwC1bTFvJ09skB_sgkF4SwPKMywev-XTnimp9Q%40mail.gmail.com
-
Heikki Linnakangas authored
Etsuro Fujita
-
- 20 Jun, 2017 7 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
Currently, there are no built-in functions that are SECURITY DEFINER. But we just found an instance where one was mistakenly marked that way, so it seems prudent to add a test about it. If we ever grow some functions that are intentionally SECURITY DEFINER, we can alter the expected output of this test, or adjust the query to filter out functions for which it's okay. Per suggestion from Robert Haas. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYXg7McY33+jbWmG=rS-HNUur0S6W8Q8kVNFf7epFimVA@mail.gmail.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
-
Tom Lane authored
Noplace in the documentation actually defined what these variables contain. Define them as lists of arguments for LOAD, and improve that command's documentation a bit. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAB-oJtxHVDc3H+Km3CjB9mY1VDzuyaVH_ZYSz7iXcRqCtb93Ew@mail.gmail.com
-
Bruce Momjian authored
When commit 0f33a719 removed the instructions to start/stop the new cluster before running rsync, it was now possible for pg_resetwal/pg_resetxlog to leave the final WAL record at wal_level=minimum, preventing upgraded standby servers from reconnecting. This patch fixes that by having pg_upgrade unconditionally start/stop the new cluster after pg_resetwal/pg_resetxlog has run. Backpatch through 9.2 since, though the instructions were added in PG 9.5, they worked all the way back to 9.2. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170620171844.GC24975@momjian.us Backpatch-through: 9.2
-
Tom Lane authored
load_libraries(), which processes the various xxx_preload_libraries GUCs, was parsing them using SplitIdentifierString() which isn't really appropriate for values that could be path names: it downcases unquoted text, and it doesn't allow embedded whitespace unless quoted. Use SplitDirectoriesString() instead. That also allows us to simplify load_libraries() a bit, since canonicalize_path() is now done for it. While this definitely seems like a bug fix, it has the potential to break configuration settings that accidentally worked before because of the downcasing behavior. Also, there's an easy workaround for the bug, namely to double-quote troublesome text. Hence, no back-patch. QL Zhuo, tweaked a bit by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAB-oJtxHVDc3H+Km3CjB9mY1VDzuyaVH_ZYSz7iXcRqCtb93Ew@mail.gmail.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Viewing a table with \d in psql also shows the publications at table is in. If a publication is concurrently dropped, this shows an error, because the view pg_publication_tables internally uses pg_get_publication_tables(), which uses a catalog snapshot. This can be particularly annoying if a for-all-tables publication is concurrently dropped. To avoid that, write the query in psql differently. Expose the function pg_relation_is_publishable() to SQL and write the query using that. That still has a risk of being affected by concurrent catalog changes, but in this case it would be a table drop that causes problems, and then the psql \d command wouldn't be interesting anymore anyway. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
This was apparently a mistake in the original commit. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
-
- 19 Jun, 2017 6 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
When materialized views were added, psql's \d commands were made to treat them as a separate object category ... but not everyplace in the documentation or comments got the memo. Noted by David Johnston. Back-patch to 9.3 where matviews came in. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKFQuwb27M3VXRhHErjCpkWwN9eKThbqWb1=trtoXi9_ejqPXQ@mail.gmail.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Reported-by: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
-
Tom Lane authored
David Rowley found that the "use the smallest per-column selectivity" heuristic applied in some cases by get_foreign_key_join_selectivity() was badly off if the FK columns are independent, producing estimates much worse than we got before that code was added in 9.6. One case where that heuristic was used was for LEFT and FULL outer joins with the referenced rel on the outside of the join. But we should not really need to special-case those here. eqjoinsel() never has had such a special case; the correction is applied by calc_joinrel_size_estimate() instead. Let's just estimate such cases like inner joins and rely on that later adjustment. (I think there was something of a thinko here, in that the comments seem to be thinking about the selectivity as defined for semi/anti joins; but that shouldn't apply to left/full joins.) Add a regression test exercising such a case to show that this is sane in at least some cases. The other case where we used that heuristic was for SEMI/ANTI outer joins, either if the referenced rel was on the outside, or if it was on the inside but was part of a join within the RHS. In either case, the FK doesn't give us a lot of traction towards estimating the selectivity. To ensure that we don't have regressions from what happened before 9.6, let's punt by ignoring the FK in such cases and applying the traditional selectivity calculation. (We might be able to improve on that later, but for now I just want to be sure it's not worse than 9.5.) Report and patch by David Rowley, simplified a bit by me. Back-patch to 9.6 where this code was added. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f8NO8oCDcxrteohG6O72uU1saEVT9qX=R8pENr5QWerXw@mail.gmail.com
-
Tom Lane authored
The combination of -Z -Fp and output to stdout resulted in corrupted output data, because we left stdout in text mode, resulting in newline conversion being done on the compressed stream. Switch stdout to binary mode for this case, at the same place where we do it for non-text output formats. Report and patch by Kuntal Ghosh, tested by Ashutosh Sharma and Neha Sharma. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGz5QCJPvbBjXAmJuGx1B_41yVCetAJhp7rtaDf7XQGWuB1GSw@mail.gmail.com
-
Andres Freund authored
When, during logical decoding, a transaction gets too big, it's contents get spilled to disk. Not just the top-transaction gets spilled, but *also* all of its subtransactions, even if they're not that large themselves. Unfortunately we didn't clean up such small spilled subtransactions from disk. Fix that, by keeping better track of whether a transaction has been spilled to disk. Author: Andres Freund Reported-By: Dmitriy Sarafannikov, Fabrízio de Royes Mello Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1457621358.355011041@f382.i.mail.ru https://postgr.es/m/CAFcNs+qNMhNYii4nxpO6gqsndiyxNDYV0S=JNq0v_sEE+9PHXg@mail.gmail.com Backpatch: 9.4-, where logical decoding was introduced
-
Tatsuo Ishii authored
Author: Yugo Nagata
-
- 18 Jun, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
-
Magnus Hagander authored
Author: Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com>
-
- 17 Jun, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Author: Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com>
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Author: Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com>
-