- 17 Jun, 2020 8 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
This absorbs a leap-second-related bug fix in localtime.c, and teaches zic to handle an expiration marker in the leapseconds file. Neither are of any interest to us (for the foreseeable future anyway), but we need to stay more or less in sync with upstream. Also adjust some over-eager changes in the README from commit 95733841. I have no intention of making changes that require C99 in this code, until such time as all the live back branches require C99. Otherwise back-patching will get too exciting. For the same reason, absorb assorted whitespace and other cosmetic changes from HEAD into the back branches; mostly this reflects use of improved versions of pgindent. All in all then, quite a boring update. But I figured I'd get it done while I was looking at this code.
-
Peter Geoghegan authored
Oversight in commit 0d861bbb.
-
Andres Freund authored
Once the counter goes negative we ended up with spinlocks that errored out on first use (due to check in tas_sema). Author: Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Robert Haas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200606023103.avzrctgv7476xj7i@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 9.5-
-
Andres Freund authored
On platforms without support for 64bit atomic operations where we also cannot rely on 64bit reads to have single copy atomicity, such atomics are implemented using a spinlock based fallback. That means it's not safe to even read such atomics from within a signal handler (since the signal handler might run when the spinlock already is held). To avoid this issue defer global barrier processing out of the signal handler. Instead of checking local / shared barrier generation to determine whether to set ProcSignalBarrierPending, introduce PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER and always set ProcSignalBarrierPending when receiving such a signal. Additionally avoid redundant work in ProcessProcSignalBarrier if ProcSignalBarrierPending is unnecessarily. Also do a small amount of other polishing. Author: Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Robert Haas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200609193723.eu5ilsjxwdpyxhgz@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 13-, where the code was introduced.
-
Robert Haas authored
Don't use fread(), since that doesn't necessarily set errno. We could use read() instead, but it's even better to use pg_pread(), which allows us to avoid some extra calls to seek to the desired location in the file. Also, advertise a wait event while reading from a file, as we do for most other places where we're reading data from files. Patch by me, reviewed by Hamid Akhtar. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmobBw-3573vMosGj06r72ajHsYeKtksT_oTxH8XvTL7DxA@mail.gmail.com
-
Robert Haas authored
Merge two calls to sendDir() that are exactly the same except for the fifth argument. Adjust comments to match. Also, don't bother checking whether tblspc_map_file is NULL. We initialize it in all cases, so it can't be. Patch by me, reviewed by Amit Kapila and Kyotaro Horiguchi. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYq+59SJ2zBbP891ngWPA9fymOqntqYcweSDYXS2a620A@mail.gmail.com
-
Robert Haas authored
Commit 72d422a5 made xlog.c call sendTablespace() with the 'sizeonly' argument set to true, which required basebackup.c to export sendTablespace(). However, that's kind of ugly, so instead defer the call to sendTablespace() until basebackup.c regains control. That way, it can still be a static function. Patch by me, reviewed by Amit Kapila and Kyotaro Horiguchi. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYq+59SJ2zBbP891ngWPA9fymOqntqYcweSDYXS2a620A@mail.gmail.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Add a separate enum for use in the locking APIs, which were the only user. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/a6f91ead-0ce4-2a34-062b-7ab9813ea308%402ndquadrant.com
-
- 16 Jun, 2020 9 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
The synopsis for PGTYPESinterval_free() used the wrong name. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/159231203030.679.3061023914894071953@wrigleys.postgresql.org
-
Tom Lane authored
Per POSIX this case should produce +0, but buildfarm member fossa (with icc (ICC) 19.0.5.281 20190815) is reporting -0. icc has a boatload of unsafe floating-point optimizations, with a corresponding boatload of not-too-well-documented compiler switches, and it seems our default use of "-mp1" isn't whacking it hard enough to keep it from misoptimizing the stanza in dpow() that checks whether y is odd. There's nothing wrong with that code (seeing that no other buildfarm member has trouble with it), so I'm content to blame this on the compiler. But without access to the compiler I'm not going to guess at what switches might be needed to fix it. For now, tweak the test case so it will accept either -0 or +0 as a correct answer. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1jkyFX-0005RR-1Q@gemulon.postgresql.org
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Broken by move of fe_archive.c to fe_utils.
-
Tom Lane authored
I failed to notice that we don't really need to check for y being an integer in the code path where x = -inf; we already did. Also make some further cosmetic rearrangements in that spot in hopes of dodging the seeming compiler bug that buildfarm member fossa is hitting. And be consistent about declaring variables as "float8" not "double", since the pre-existing variables in this function are like that. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1jkyFX-0005RR-1Q@gemulon.postgresql.org
-
Thomas Munro authored
-
Thomas Munro authored
It now either returns after it wrote all the data you gave it, or raises an error. Not done in back-branches, because it might cause problems for external code. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJE04G%3D8TLK0DLypT_27D9dR8F1RQgNp0jK6qR0tZGWOw%40mail.gmail.com
-
Thomas Munro authored
Convert buffile.c error handling to use ereport. This fixes cases where I/O errors were indistinguishable from EOF or not reported. Also remove "%m" from error messages where errno would be bogus. While we're modifying those strings, add block numbers and short read byte counts where appropriate. Back-patch to all supported releases. Reported-by: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJE04G%3D8TLK0DLypT_27D9dR8F1RQgNp0jK6qR0tZGWOw%40mail.gmail.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
This has existed for a very long time, equivalent to the ! and !! operators, but it was never documented. Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/6ce1df0e-86a3-e544-743a-f357ff663f68%402ndquadrant.com
-
Bruce Momjian authored
Non-zero vacuum_defer_cleanup_age values cause pg_upgrade freezing of the system catalogs to be incomplete, or do nothing. This will cause the upgrade to fail in confusing ways. Reported-by: Laurenz Albe Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7d6f6c22ba05ce0c526e9e8b7bfa8105e7da45e6.camel@cybertec.at Backpatch-through: 9.5
-
- 15 Jun, 2020 8 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
Buildfarm results for commit e532b1d5 reveal the error in my thinking about the unexpected-EDOM case. I'd supposed this was no longer really a live issue, but it seems the fix for glibc's bug #3866 is not all that old, and we still have at least one buildfarm animal (lapwing) with the bug. Hence, resurrect essentially the previous logic (but, I hope, less opaquely presented), and explain what it is we're really doing here. Also, blindly try to fix fossa's failure by tweaking the logic that figures out whether y is an odd integer when x is -inf. This smells a whole lot like a compiler bug, but I lack access to icc to try to pin it down. Maybe doing division instead of multiplication will dodge the issue. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1jkU7H-00024V-NZ@gemulon.postgresql.org
-
Robert Haas authored
Introduce TAR_BLOCK_SIZE and replace many instances of 512 with the new constant. Introduce function tarPaddingBytesRequired and use it to replace numerous repetitions of (x + 511) & ~511. Add preprocessor guards against multiple inclusion to pgtar.h. Reformat the prototype for tarCreateHeader so it doesn't extend beyond 80 characters. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmobWbfReO9-XFk8urR1K4wTNwqoHx_v56t7=T8KaiEoKNw@mail.gmail.com
-
Tom Lane authored
Buildfarm results for commit decbe2bf show that AIX and illumos have non-POSIX-compliant pow() functions, as do ancient NetBSD and HPUX releases. While it's dubious how much we should care about the latter two platforms, the former two are probably enough reason to put in manual handling of infinite-input cases. Hence, do so, and clean up the post-pow() error handling to reflect its now-more-limited scope. (Notably, while we no longer expect to ever see EDOM from pow(), report it as a domain error if we do. The former coding had the net effect of expensively converting the error to ERANGE, which seems highly questionable: if pow() wanted to report ERANGE, it would have done so.) Patch by me; thanks to Michael Paquier for review. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1jkU7H-00024V-NZ@gemulon.postgresql.org
-
Michael Paquier authored
Timestamp can only be an int64 since b9d092c9, and support for WITH OIDS has been removed as of 578b2297. Author: Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200612023709.GC14879@telsasoft.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Recently broken by d9fa17aa.
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Take some untranslatable things out of the message and replace by format placeholders, to reduce translatable strings and reduce translation mistakes.
-
Michael Paquier authored
Oversight in cc072641. Reported-by: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1098356.1592196242@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Thomas Munro authored
Our documentation failed to point out that REPEATABLE READ is really snapshot isolation, which might be important to some users. Point to the standard reference paper for this complicated topic. Likewise, add a reference to the VLDB paper about PostgreSQL SSI, for technical information about our SSI implementation and how it compares to S2PL. While here, add a note about catalog access using a lower isolation level, per recent user complaint. Back-patch to all releases. Reported-by: Kyle Kingsbury <aphyr@jepsen.io> Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> Reviewed-by: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/db7b729d-0226-d162-a126-8a8ab2dc4443%40jepsen.io Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16454-9408996bb1750faf%40postgresql.org
-
- 14 Jun, 2020 3 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
Previously, these functions tended to throw underflow errors for negative-infinity exponents. The correct thing per POSIX is to return 0, so let's do that instead. (Note that the SQL standard is silent on such issues, as it lacks the concepts of either Inf or NaN; so our practice is to follow POSIX whenever a corresponding C-library function exists.) Also, add a bunch of test cases verifying that exp() and power() actually do follow POSIX for Inf and NaN inputs. While this patch should guarantee that exp() passes the tests, power() will not unless the platform's pow(3) is fully POSIX-compliant. I already know that gaur fails some of the tests, and I am suspicious that the Windows animals will too; the extent of compliance of other old platforms remains to be seen. We might choose to drop failing test cases, or to work harder at overriding pow(3) for these cases, but first let's see just how good or bad the situation is. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/582552.1591917752@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
The variants for time and timetz had zero test coverage, the variant for interval only very little. This adds practically full coverage for those functions. Reviewed-by: Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/c3306ac7-fcae-a1b8-1e30-6a379d605bcb%402ndquadrant.com
-
Michael Paquier authored
This patch removes the hardcoded check for superuser privileges when executing replication origin functions. Instead, execution is revoked from public, meaning that those functions can be executed by a superuser and that access to them can be granted. Author: Martín Marqués Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Michael Paquier, Masahiko Sawada Discussion: https:/postgr.es/m/CAPdiE1xJMZOKQL3dgHMUrPqysZkgwzSMXETfKkHYnBAB7-0VRQ@mail.gmail.com
-
- 13 Jun, 2020 8 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
var_samp(numeric) and stddev_samp(numeric) disagreed with their float cousins about what to do for a single non-null input value that is NaN. The float versions return NULL on the grounds that the calculation is only defined for more than one non-null input, which seems like the right answer. But the numeric versions returned NaN, as a result of dealing with edge cases in the wrong order. Fix that. The patch also gets rid of an insignificant memory leak in such cases. This inconsistency is of long standing, but on the whole it seems best not to back-patch the change into stable branches; nobody's complained and it's such an obscure point that nobody's likely to complain. (Note that v13 and v12 now contain test cases that will notice if we accidentally back-patch this behavior change in future.) Report and patch by me; thanks to Dean Rasheed for review. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/353062.1591898766@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Tom Lane authored
When there is just one non-null input value, and it is infinity or NaN, aggregates such as stddev_pop and covar_pop should produce a NaN result, because the calculation is not well-defined. They used to do so, but since we adopted Youngs-Cramer aggregation in commit e954a727, they produced zero instead. That's an oversight, so fix it. Add tests exercising these edge cases. Affected aggregates are var_pop(double precision) stddev_pop(double precision) var_pop(real) stddev_pop(real) regr_sxx(double precision,double precision) regr_syy(double precision,double precision) regr_sxy(double precision,double precision) regr_r2(double precision,double precision) regr_slope(double precision,double precision) regr_intercept(double precision,double precision) covar_pop(double precision,double precision) corr(double precision,double precision) Back-patch to v12 where the behavior change was accidentally introduced. Report and patch by me; thanks to Dean Rasheed for review. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/353062.1591898766@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Peter Geoghegan authored
Reported-By: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/841649.1592065060@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Make use of the general object support already used by COMMENT, DROP, and SECURITY LABEL. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/163c00a5-f634-ca52-fc7c-0e53deda8735%402ndquadrant.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Unify the grammar of COMMENT, DROP, and SECURITY LABEL further. They all effectively just take an object address for later processing, so we can make the grammar more generalized. Some extra checking about which object types are supported can be done later in the statement execution. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/163c00a5-f634-ca52-fc7c-0e53deda8735%402ndquadrant.com
-
Michael Paquier authored
Using --outputdir with a custom output repository has never created by default the sql/ and expected/ paths generated with contents from respectively input/ and output/ if they don't exist, while the base output directory gets created if it does not exist. If sql/ and expected/ are not present, pg_regress would fail with the path missing, requiring test scripts to create those extra paths by themselves. This commit changes pg_regress so as both get created by default if they do not exist, removing the need for external test scripts to do so. This cleans up two code paths in the tree for pg_upgrade tests in MSVC and environments able to use test.sh. sql/ and expected/ were created as part of each test script, but this is not needed anymore as pg_regress handles the work now. Author: Roman Zharkov, Daniel Gustafsson Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16484-4d89e9cc11241996@postgresql.org
-
Michael Paquier authored
This adds two tests for --extra-float-digits and --rows-per-insert, similar to what exists for --compress. Author: Dong Wook Lee Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAcByaJsgrB-qc-ALb0mALprRGLAdmcBap7SZxO4kCAU-JEHcQ@mail.gmail.com
-
David Rowley authored
Core by no means makes excessive use of these functions, but quite a large number of those usages do require the caller to call strlen() on the returned string. This is quite wasteful since these functions do already have a good idea of the length of the string, so we might as well just have them return that. Reviewed-by: Andrew Gierth Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrm2A5x2uHYxsqriO2cUaGcFvND%2BksC9e7Tjep0t2RK_A%40mail.gmail.com
-
- 12 Jun, 2020 4 commits
-
-
David Rowley authored
In passing, also remove a few surplus empty lines from pg_ltoa and pg_ulltoa_n in numutils.c Reported-by: Andrew Gierth Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87y2ou3xuh.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk Backpatch-through: 13, where these changes were introduced
-
Tom Lane authored
plpgsql has always executed the query given in a RETURN QUERY command by opening it as a cursor and then fetching a few rows at a time, which it turns around and dumps into the function's result tuplestore. The point of this was to keep from blowing out memory with an oversized SPITupleTable result (note that while a tuplestore can spill tuples to disk, SPITupleTable cannot). However, it's rather inefficient, both because of extra data copying and because of executor entry/exit overhead. In recent versions, a new performance problem has emerged: use of a cursor prevents use of a parallel plan for the executed query. We can improve matters by skipping use of a cursor and having the executor push result tuples directly into the function's result tuplestore. However, a moderate amount of new infrastructure is needed to make that idea work: * We can use the existing tstoreReceiver.c DestReceiver code to funnel executor output to the tuplestore, but it has to be extended to support plpgsql's requirement for possibly applying a tuple conversion map. * SPI needs to be extended to allow use of a caller-supplied DestReceiver instead of its usual receiver that puts tuples into a SPITupleTable. Two new API calls are needed to handle both the RETURN QUERY and RETURN QUERY EXECUTE cases. I also felt that I didn't want these new API calls to use the legacy method of specifying query parameter values with "char" null flags (the old ' '/'n' convention); rather they should accept ParamListInfo objects containing the parameter type and value info. This required a bit of additional new infrastructure since we didn't yet have any parse analysis callback that would interpret $N parameter symbols according to type data supplied in a ParamListInfo. There seems to be no harm in letting makeParamList install that callback by default, rather than leaving a new ParamListInfo's parserSetup hook as NULL. (Indeed, as of HEAD, I couldn't find anyplace that was using the parserSetup field at all; plpgsql was using parserSetupArg for its own purposes, but parserSetup seemed to be write-only.) We can actually get plpgsql out of the business of using legacy null flags altogether, and using ParamListInfo instead of its ad-hoc PreparedParamsData structure; but this requires inventing one more SPI API call that can replace SPI_cursor_open_with_args. That seems worth doing, though. SPI_execute_with_args and SPI_cursor_open_with_args are now unused anywhere in the core PG distribution. Perhaps someday we could deprecate/remove them. But cleaning up the crufty bits of the SPI API is a task for a different patch. Per bug #16040 from Jeremy Smith. This is unfortunately too invasive to consider back-patching. Patch by me; thanks to Hamid Akhtar for review. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16040-eaacad11fecfb198@postgresql.org
-
Michael Paquier authored
Author: Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200612023709.GC14879@telsasoft.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Make use of RELKIND_HAS_STORAGE() where appropriate, instead of listing out the relkinds individually. No behavior change intended. Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/7a22bf51-2480-d999-1794-191ba67ff47c%402ndquadrant.com
-