Instead of doing a lot of list_nth() accesses to es_range_table,
create a flattened pointer array during executor startup and index
into that to get at individual RangeTblEntrys.

This eliminates one source of O(N^2) behavior with lots of partitions.
(I'm not exactly convinced that it's the most important source, but
it's an easy one to fix.)

Amit Langote and David Rowley

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/468c85d9-540e-66a2-1dde-fec2b741e688@lab.ntt.co.jp

Create an array estate->es_relations[] paralleling the es_range_table,
and store references to Relations (relcache entries) there, so that any
given RT entry is opened and closed just once per executor run.  Scan
nodes typically still call ExecOpenScanRelation, but ExecCloseScanRelation
is no more; relation closing is now done centrally in ExecEndPlan.

This is slightly more complex than one would expect because of the
interactions with relcache references held in ResultRelInfo nodes.
The general convention is now that ResultRelInfo->ri_RelationDesc does
not represent a separate relcache reference and so does not need to be
explicitly closed; but there is an exception for ResultRelInfos in the
es_trig_target_relations list, which are manufactured by
ExecGetTriggerResultRel and have to be cleaned up by
ExecCleanUpTriggerState.  (That much was true all along, but these
ResultRelInfos are now more different from others than they used to be.)

To allow the partition pruning logic to make use of es_relations[] rather
than having its own relcache references, adjust PartitionedRelPruneInfo
to store an RT index rather than a relation OID.

Amit Langote, reviewed by David Rowley and Jesper Pedersen,
some mods by me

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/468c85d9-540e-66a2-1dde-fec2b741e688@lab.ntt.co.jp

When using the CREATE TABLE .. PARTITION OF syntax, it's possible to
cause a partition to get two primary keys if the parent already has one.
Tighten the check to disallow that.

Reported-by: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
Author: Amul Sul
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKcux6=OnSV3-qd8Gb6W=KPPwcCz6Fe_O_MQYjTa24__Xn8XxA@mail.gmail.com

This moves the system administration functions for signalling backends
from backend/utils/adt/misc.c into a separate file dedicated to backend
signalling.  No new functionality is introduced in this commit.

Author: Daniel Gustafsson
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/C2C7C3EC-CC5F-44B6-9C78-637C88BD7D14@yesql.se

When specified, this option allows VACUUM to skip the work on a relation
if there is a conflicting lock on it when trying to open it at the
beginning of its processing.

Similarly to autovacuum, this comes with a couple of limitations while
the relation is processed which can cause the process to still block:
- when opening the relation indexes.
- when acquiring row samples for table inheritance trees, partition trees
or certain types of foreign tables, and that a lock is taken on some
leaves of such trees.

Author: Nathan Bossart
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Andres Freund, Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9EF7EBE4-720D-4CF1-9D0E-4403D7E92990@amazon.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171201160907.27110.74730@wrigleys.postgresql.org

Reported-By: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/527.1538598263@sss.pgh.pa.us

This isn't actually a live bug, as the output happens to be the
same.  But it upsets tools like UBSan, which makes it worthwhile to
fix.

As it's an issue without practical consequences, don't backpatch.

Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180928001121.hhx5n6dsygqxr5wu@alap3.anarazel.de

Instead of locking tables during executor startup, just Assert that
suitable locks were obtained already during the parse/plan pipeline
(or re-obtained by the plan cache).  This must be so, else we have a
hazard that concurrent DDL has invalidated the plan.

This is pretty inefficient as well as undercommented, but it's all going
to go away shortly, so I didn't try hard.  This commit is just another
attempt to use the buildfarm to see if we've missed anything in the plan
to simplify the executor's table management.

Note that the change needed here in relation_open() exposes that
parallel workers now really are accessing tables without holding any
lock of their own, whereas they were not doing that before this commit.
This does not give me a warm fuzzy feeling about that aspect of parallel
query; it does not seem like a good design, and we now know that it's
had exactly no actual testing.  I think that we should modify parallel
query so that that change can be reverted.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/468c85d9-540e-66a2-1dde-fec2b741e688@lab.ntt.co.jp

I (Andres) was more than a bit hasty in committing 33001fd7
after last minute changes, leading to a number of problems (jit output
was only shown for JIT in parallel workers, and just EXPLAIN without
ANALYZE didn't work).  Lukas luckily found these issues quickly.

Instead of combining instrumentation in in standard_ExecutorEnd(), do
so on demand in the new ExplainPrintJITSummary().

Also update a documentation example of the JIT output, changed in
52050ad8.

Author: Lukas Fittl, with minor changes by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAP53PkxmgJht69pabxBXJBM+0oc6kf3KHMborLP7H2ouJ0CCtQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 11, where JIT compilation was introduced

Although all known platforms define "long long" as 64 bits, it still feels
a bit shaky to be using "va_arg(args, int64)" to pull out an argument that
the caller thought was declared "long long".  The reason it was coded like
this, way back in commit 3311c766, was to work around the possibility that
the compiler had no type named "long long" --- and, at the time, that it
maybe didn't have 64-bit ints at all.  Now that we're requiring compilers
to support C99, those concerns are moot.  Let's make the code clearer and
more bulletproof by writing "long long" where we mean "long long".

This does introduce a hazard that we'd inefficiently use 128-bit arithmetic
to convert plain old integers.  The way to tackle that would be to provide
two versions of fmtint(), one for "long long" and one for narrower types.
Since, as of today, no platforms require that, we won't bother with the
extra code for now.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1680.1538587115@sss.pgh.pa.us

This case occurs often enough (around 45% of conversion specs executed
in our regression tests are just "%s") that it's worth an extra test
per conversion spec to allow skipping all the logic associated with
field widths and padding when it happens.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/26193.1538582367@sss.pgh.pa.us

In combination, these changes make our version of snprintf as fast
or faster than most platforms' native snprintf, except for cases
involving floating-point conversion (which we still delegate to
the native sprintf).  The speed penalty for a float conversion
is down to around 10% though, much better than before.

Notable changes:

* Rather than always parsing the format twice to see if it contains
instances of %n$, do the extra scan only if we actually find a $.
This obviously wins for non-localized formats, and even when there
is use of %n$, we can avoid scanning text before the first % twice.

* Use strchrnul() if available to find the next %, and emit the
literal text between % escapes as strings rather than char-by-char.

* Create a bespoke function (dopr_outchmulti) for the common case
of emitting N copies of the same character, in place of writing
loops around dopr_outch.

* Simplify construction of the format string for invocations of sprintf
for floats.

* Const-ify some internal functions, and avoid unnecessary use of
pass-by-reference arguments.

Patch by me, reviewed by Andres Freund

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/11787.1534530779@sss.pgh.pa.us

The API (EOH_flatten_into) that flattens the expanded value representation
expects the target address to be maxaligned.  All it's usage adhere to that
principle except when serializing datums for parallel query.  Fix that
usage.

Diagnosed-by: Tom Lane
Author: Tom Lane and Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/11629.1536550032@sss.pgh.pa.us

Cygwin has been building and linking against static libraries. Although
a bug this has been relatively harmless until now, when this has caused
errors due to changes in the way we build certain libraries. So this
patch makes things work the way we always intended, namely that we would
link against the dynamic libraries (cygpq.dll etc.) and just not build
the static libraries. The downstream packagers have been doing this for
some time, so this just aligns with their practice.

Extracted from a patch by Marco Atzeri, with a suggestion from Tom Lane.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1056.1538235347@sss.pgh.pa.us

Instead of recomputing the required lock levels in all these places,
just use what commit fdba460a made the parser store in the RTE fields.
This already simplifies the code measurably in these places, and
follow-on changes will remove a bunch of no-longer-needed infrastructure.

In a few cases, this change causes us to acquire a higher lock level
than we did before.  This is OK primarily because said higher lock level
should've been acquired already at query parse time; thus, we're saving
a useless extra trip through the shared lock manager to acquire a lesser
lock alongside the original lock.  The only known exception to this is
that re-execution of a previously planned SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE query,
for a table that uses ROW_MARK_REFERENCE or ROW_MARK_COPY methods, might
have gotten only AccessShareLock before.  Now it will get RowShareLock
like the first execution did, which seems fine.

While there's more to do, push it in this state anyway, to let the
buildfarm help verify that nothing bad happened.

Amit Langote, reviewed by David Rowley and Jesper Pedersen,
and whacked around a bit more by me

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/468c85d9-540e-66a2-1dde-fec2b741e688@lab.ntt.co.jp

It's inefficient to use a single slot for mapping between tuple
descriptors for multiple tuples, as previously done when using
ConvertPartitionTupleSlot(), as that means the slot's tuple descriptors
change for every tuple.

Previously we also, via ConvertPartitionTupleSlot(), built new tuples
after the mapping even in cases where we, immediately afterwards,
access individual columns again.

Refactor the code so one slot, on demand, is used for each
partition. That avoids having to change the descriptor (and allows to
use the more efficient "fixed" tuple slots). Then use slot->slot
mapping, to avoid unnecessarily forming a tuple.

As the naming between the tuple and slot mapping functions wasn't
consistent, rename them to execute_attr_map_{tuple,slot}.  It's likely
that we'll also rename convert_tuples_by_* to denote that these
functions "only" build a map, but that's left for later.

Author: Amit Khandekar and Amit Langote, editorialized by me
Reviewed-By: Amit Langote, Amit Khandekar, Andres Freund
Discussion:
    https://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9fR0wRNeAE8VqffNTyONS_UfFPRpqxhnD9Q42vZB+Jvpg@mail.gmail.com
    https://postgr.es/m/e4f9d743-cd4b-efb0-7574-da21d86a7f36%40lab.ntt.co.jp
Backpatch: -

Previously, we used the platform's NL_ARGMAX if any, otherwise 16.
The trouble with this is that the platform value is hugely variable,
ranging from the POSIX-minimum 9 to as much as 64K on recent FreeBSD.
Values of more than a dozen or two have no practical use and slow down
the initialization of the argtypes array.  Worse, they cause snprintf.c
to consume far more stack space than was the design intention, possibly
resulting in stack-overflow crashes.

Standardize on 31, which is comfortably more than we need (it looks like
no existing translatable message has more than about 10 parameters).
I chose that, not 32, to make the array sizes powers of 2, for some
possible small gain in speed of the memset.

The lack of reported crashes suggests that the set of platforms we
use snprintf.c on (in released branches) may have no overlap with
the set where NL_ARGMAX has unreasonably large values.  But that's
not entirely clear, so back-patch to all supported branches.

Per report from Mateusz Guzik (via Thomas Munro).

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=3VF=PUp2f8gU8fgZB22yPE_KBS0+e1AHAtQ=09schTHg@mail.gmail.com

The variants of these functions that take numeric inputs (OIDs or
column numbers) are supposed to return NULL rather than failing
on bad input; this rule reduces problems with snapshot skew when
queries apply the functions to all rows of a catalog.

has_column_privilege() had careless handling of the case where the
table OID didn't exist.  You might get something like this:
	select has_column_privilege(9999,'nosuchcol','select');
	ERROR:  column "nosuchcol" of relation "(null)" does not exist
or you might get a crash, depending on the platform's printf's response
to a null string pointer.

In addition, while applying the column-number variant to a dropped
column returned NULL as desired, applying the column-name variant
did not:
	select has_column_privilege('mytable','........pg.dropped.2........','select');
	ERROR:  column "........pg.dropped.2........" of relation "mytable" does not exist
It seems better to make this case return NULL as well.

Also, the OID-accepting variants of has_foreign_data_wrapper_privilege,
has_server_privilege, and has_tablespace_privilege didn't follow the
principle of returning NULL for nonexistent OIDs.  Superusers got TRUE,
everybody else got an error.

Per investigation of Jaime Casanova's report of a new crash in HEAD.
These behaviors have been like this for a long time, so back-patch to
all supported branches.

Patch by me; thanks to Stephen Frost for discussion and review

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJGNTeP=-6Gyqq5TN9OvYEydi7Fv1oGyYj650LGTnW44oAzYCg@mail.gmail.com

The example used in the documentation is outdated as well.  This is an
oversight from 0ac5ad51, which bumped up pgrowlocks but forgot some bits
of the documentation.

Reported-by: Chris Wilson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/153838692816.2950.12001142346234155699@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 9.3

Currently, we don't have an explicit test to pass expanded-value
representations to workers, so we don't know whether it works on all kind
of platforms.  We suspect that the current code won't work on
alignment-sensitive hardware.  This commit will test that aspect and can
lead to failure on some of the buildfarm machines which we will fix in the
later commit.

Author: Tom Lane and Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/11629.1536550032@sss.pgh.pa.us

VACUUM and ANALYZE share similar logic when it comes to opening a
relation to work on in terms of how the relation is opened, in which
order locks are tried and how logs should be generated when something
does not work as expected.

This commit refactors things so as both use the same code path to handle
the way a relation is opened, so as the integration of new options
becomes easier.

Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180927075152.GT1659@paquier.xyz

This was claimed to have been done in
0a63f996, but that actually only
changed the documentation and not the grammar.  (That commit did fully
change it for CREATE TRIGGER.)

Opening a relation with no lock at all is unsafe; there's no guarantee
that we'll see a consistent state of the relevant catalog entries.
While use of MVCC scans to read the catalogs partially addresses that
complaint, it's still possible to switch to a new catalog snapshot
partway through loading the relcache entry.  Moreover, whether or not
you trust the reasoning behind sometimes using less than
AccessExclusiveLock for ALTER TABLE, that reasoning is certainly not
valid if concurrent users of the table don't hold a lock corresponding
to the operation they want to perform.

Hence, add some assertion-build-only checks that require any caller
of relation_open(x, NoLock) to hold at least AccessShareLock.  This
isn't a full solution, since we can't verify that the lock level is
semantically appropriate for the action --- but it's definitely of
some use, because it's already caught two bugs.

We can also assert that callers of addRangeTableEntryForRelation()
hold at least the lock level specified for the new RTE.

Amit Langote and Tom Lane

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16565.1538327894@sss.pgh.pa.us

contrib/pageinspect's tuple_data_split() function thought it could get
away with opening the referenced relation with NoLock.  In practice
there's no guarantee that the current session holds any lock on that
rel (even if we just read a page from it), so that this is unsafe.

Switch to using AccessShareLock.  Also, postpone closing the relation,
so that we needn't copy its tupdesc.  Also, fix unsafe use of
att_isnull() for attributes past the end of the tuple.

Per testing with a patch that complains if we open a relation without
holding any lock on it.  I don't plan to back-patch that patch, but we
should close the holes it identifies in all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2038.1538335244@sss.pgh.pa.us

If the column being modified is referenced by a foreign key constraint
of another table, ALTER TABLE would open the other table (to re-parse
the constraint's definition) without having first obtained a lock on it.
This was evidently intentional, but that doesn't mean it's really safe.
It's especially not safe in 9.3, which pre-dates use of MVCC scans for
catalog reads, but even in current releases it doesn't seem like a good
idea.

We know we'll need AccessExclusiveLock shortly to drop the obsoleted
constraint, so just get that a little sooner to close the hole.

Per testing with a patch that complains if we open a relation without
holding any lock on it.  I don't plan to back-patch that patch, but we
should close the holes it identifies in all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2038.1538335244@sss.pgh.pa.us

Be more specific about when and how to create the directory and what
permissions it should have.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/5ca60e1a-26f9-89fd-e912-021dd2b8afe2%40gmail.com

Add RangeTblEntry.rellockmode, which records the appropriate lock mode for
each RTE_RELATION rangetable entry (either AccessShareLock, RowShareLock,
or RowExclusiveLock depending on the RTE's role in the query).

This patch creates the field and makes all creators of RTE nodes fill it
in reasonably, but for the moment nothing much is done with it.  The plan
is to replace assorted post-parser logic that re-determines the right
lockmode to use with simple uses of rte->rellockmode.  For now, just add
Asserts in each of those places that the rellockmode matches what they are
computing today.  (In some cases the match isn't perfect, so the Asserts
are weaker than you might expect; but this seems OK, as per discussion.)

This passes check-world for me, but it seems worth pushing in this state
to see if the buildfarm finds any problems in cases I failed to test.

catversion bump due to change of stored rules.

Amit Langote, reviewed by David Rowley and Jesper Pedersen,
and whacked around a bit more by me

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/468c85d9-540e-66a2-1dde-fec2b741e688@lab.ntt.co.jp

The connection authorized message has quite a bit of useful information
in it, but didn't include the application_name (when provided), so let's
add that as it can be very useful.

Note that at the point where we're emitting the connection authorized
message, we haven't processed GUCs, so it's not possible to get this by
using log_line_prefix (which pulls from the GUC).  There's also
something to be said for having this included in the connection
authorized message and then not needing to repeat it for every line, as
having it in log_line_prefix would do.

The GUC cleans the application name to pure-ascii, so do that here too,
but pull out the logic for cleaning up a string into its own function
in common and re-use it from those places, and check_cluster_name which
was doing the same thing.

Author: Don Seiler <don@seiler.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHJZqBB_Pxv8HRfoh%2BAB4KxSQQuPVvtYCzMg7woNR3r7dfmopw%40mail.gmail.com

Give a specific error complaining about lack of posix_fadvise() when
someone tries to set effective_io_concurrency > 0 on platforms
without that.

This probably isn't worth extensive back-patching, but I (tgl) felt
cramming it into v11 was reasonable.

James Robinson

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/153771876450.14994.560017943128223619@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/A3942987-5BC7-4F05-B54D-2A0EC2914B33@jlr-photo.com

Looks like we need to pull in $libpgcommon in a couple more
places than before.

Per buildfarm.

Also try to make the comment suggesting that this might be needed
more intelligible.

Per buildfarm.

Build a third version of libpgcommon.a, with -fPIC and -DFRONTEND,
as commit ea53100d did for src/port.  Use that in libpq to avoid
symlinking+rebuilding source files retail.

Also adjust ecpg to use the new src/port and src/common libraries.

Arrange to install these libraries, too, to simplify out-of-tree
builds of shared libraries that need any of these modules.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/13022.1538003440@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1g5Y8r-0006vs-QA@gemulon.postgresql.org

Client applications should get this function, if they need it, from
libpgport.

The fact that it's exported from libpq is a hack left over from before
we set up libpgport.  It's never been documented, and there's no good
reason for non-PG code to be calling it anyway, so hopefully this won't
cause any problems.  Moreover, with the previous setup it was not real
clear whether our clients that use the function were getting it from
libpgport or libpq, so this might actually prevent problems.

The reason for changing it now is that in the wake of commit ea53100d,
some linkers won't export the symbol, apparently because it's coming from
a .a library instead of a .o file.  We could get around that by continuing
to symlink pqsignal.c into libpq as before; but unless somebody complains
very hard, I don't want to adopt such a kluge.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/13022.1538003440@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1g5Y8r-0006vs-QA@gemulon.postgresql.org

When the checkpointer receives a SIGHUP signal to update its configuration,
it may need to update the shared memory for full_page_writes and need to
write a WAL record for it.  Now, it is quite possible that the XLOG
machinery has not been initialized by that time and it will lead to
assertion failure while doing that.  Fix is to allow the initialization of
the XLOG machinery outside critical section.

This bug has been introduced by the commit 2c03216d which added the XLOG
machinery initialization in RecoveryInProgress code path.

Reported-by: Dilip Kumar
Author: Dilip Kumar
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier and Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.5
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-u4BA8KXcQUWDPNgaKAjDXC=C2whnzBM8TAcv=stckYUw@mail.gmail.com

This patch attempts, although it's quite possible there are a few
holes, to properly detect and reported signed integer overflows in
pgbench.

Author: Fabien Coelho
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171212052943.k2hlckfkeft3eiio@alap3.anarazel.de

A restart point or a checkpoint recycling WAL segments treats segments
marked with neither ".done" (archiving is done) or ".ready" (segment is
ready to be archived) in archive_status the same way for archive_mode
being "on" or "always".  While for a primary this is fine, a standby
running a restart point with archive_mode = on would try to mark such a
segment as ready for archiving, which is something that will never
happen except after the standby is promoted.

Note that this problem applies only to WAL segments coming from the
local pg_wal the first time archive recovery is run.  Segments part of a
self-contained base backup are the most common case where this could
happen, however even in this case normally the .done markers would be
most likely part of the backup.  Segments recovered from an archive are
marked as .ready or .done by the startup process, and segments finished
streaming are marked as such by the WAL receiver, so they are handled
already.

Reported-by: Haruka Takatsuka
Author: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15402-a453c90ed4cf88b2@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 9.5, where archive_mode = always has been added.

It failed if passed a nonexistent relation OID, or one that was a non-heap
relation, because of blindly applying heap_open to a user-supplied OID.
This is not OK behavior for a SQL-exposed function; we have a project
policy that we should return NULL in such cases.  Moreover, since
pg_get_partition_constraintdef ought now to work on indexes, restricting
it to heaps is flat wrong anyway.

The underlying function generate_partition_qual() wasn't on board with
indexes having partition quals either, nor for that matter with rels
having relispartition set but yet null relpartbound.  (One wonders
whether the person who wrote the function comment blocks claiming that
these functions allow a missing relpartbound had ever tested it.)

Fix by testing relispartition before opening the rel, and by using
relation_open not heap_open.  (If any other relkinds ever grow the
ability to have relispartition set, the code will work with them
automatically.)  Also, don't reject null relpartbound in
generate_partition_qual.

Back-patch to v11, and all but the null-relpartbound change to v10.
(It's not really necessary to change generate_partition_qual at all
in v10, but I thought s/heap_open/relation_open/ would be a good
idea anyway just to keep the code in sync with later branches.)

Per report from Justin Pryzby.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180927200020.GJ776@telsasoft.com

Author: Mark Dilger
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/B2AEFCD0-836D-4654-9D59-3DF616E0A6F3%40gmail.com

The previous commit wasn't careful enough to remove all traces of
TupleDescGetSlot().

Besides fixing the oversight of not removing TupleDescGetSlot()'s
declaration, this also removes FuncCallContext->slot. That was
documented to be for use in combination with TupleDescGetSlot(), a
cursory search over extensions finds no users, and there doesn't seem
to be convincing reasons to keep it around. If we later in the v12
release cycle find users, we can re-consider this part of the commit.

Reported-By: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180926000413.GC1659@paquier.xyz