This commit improves the ecpg's error message that commit f576de1db1 updated,
so that it gets rid of trailing period and uppercases the command name
in the error message.

Back-patch to v14 where the error message exists.

Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210819.170315.1413060634876301811.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com

There are two identical error messages about valid value of modulus for
hash partition, in PostgreSQL source code. Commit 0e1275fb07 improved
only one of them so that ambiguous word "positive" was avoided there,
and forgot to improve the other. This commit improves the other.
Which would reduce translator burden.

Back-pach to v11 where the error message exists.

Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210819.170315.1413060634876301811.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com

The distance in phrase operator must be an integer value between zero
and MAXENTRYPOS inclusive. But previously the error message about
its valid value included the information about its upper limit
but not lower limit (i.e., zero). This commit improves the error message
so that it also includes the information about its lower limit.

Back-patch to v9.6 where full-text phrase search was supported.

Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210819.170315.1413060634876301811.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com

Regexps like "(.){0}...\1" drew an "invalid backreference number".
That's not unreasonable on its face, since the capture group will
never be matched if it's iterated zero times.  However, other engines
such as Perl's don't complain about this, nor do we throw an error for
related cases such as "(.)|\1", even though that backref can never
succeed either.  Also, if the zero-iterations case happens at runtime
rather than compile time --- say, "(x)*...\1" when there's no "x" to
be found --- that's not an error, we just deem the backref to not
match.  Making this even less defensible, no error was thrown for
nested cases such as "((.)){0}...\2"; and to add insult to injury,
those cases could result in assertion failures instead.  (It seems
that nothing especially bad happened in non-assert builds, though.)

Let's just fix it so that no error is thrown and instead the backref
is deemed to never match, so that compile-time detection of no
iterations behaves the same as run-time detection.

Per report from Mark Dilger.  This appears to be an aboriginal error
in Spencer's library, so back-patch to all supported versions.

Pre-v14, it turns out to also be necessary to back-patch one aspect of
commits cb76fbd7e/00116dee5, namely to create capture-node subREs with
the begin/end states of their subexpressions, not the current lp/rp
of the outer parseqatom invocation.  Otherwise delsub complains that
we're trying to disconnect a state from itself.  This is a bit scary
but code examination shows that it's safe: in the pre-v14 code, if we
want to wrap iteration around the subexpression, the first thing we do
is overwrite the atom's begin/end fields with new states.  So the
bogus values didn't survive long enough to be used for anything, except
if no iteration is required, in which case it doesn't matter.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/A099E4A8-4377-4C64-A98C-3DEDDC075502@enterprisedb.com

The current refresh behavior tries to just refresh added/dropped
publications but that leads to removing wrong tables from subscription. We
can't refresh just the dropped publication because it is quite possible
that some of the tables are removed from publication by that time and now
those will remain as part of the subscription. Also, there is a chance
that the tables that were part of the publication being dropped are also
part of another publication, so we can't remove those.

So, we decided that by default, add/drop commands will also act like
REFRESH PUBLICATION which means they will refresh all the publications. We
can keep the old behavior for "add publication" but it is better to be
consistent with "drop publication".

Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 14, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB5716935D4C2CC85A6143073F94EF9@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com

The recursion in cdissect() was careless about clearing match data
for capturing parentheses after rejecting a partial match.  This
could allow a later back-reference to succeed when by rights it
should fail for lack of a defined referent.

To fix, think a little more rigorously about what the contract
between different levels of cdissect's recursion needs to be.
With the right spec, we can fix this using fewer rather than more
resets of the match data; the key decision being that a failed
sub-match is now explicitly responsible for clearing any matches
it may have set.

There are enough other cross-checks and optimizations in the code
that it's not especially easy to exhibit this problem; usually, the
match will fail as-expected.  Plus, regexps that are even potentially
vulnerable are most likely user errors, since there's just not much
point in writing a back-ref that doesn't always have a referent.
These facts perhaps explain why the issue hasn't been detected,
even though it's almost certainly a couple of decades old.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/151435.1629733387@sss.pgh.pa.us

WAL records may span multiple segments, but XLogWrite() does not
wait for the entire record to be written out to disk before
creating archive status files.  Instead, as soon as the last WAL page of
the segment is written, the archive status file is created, and the
archiver may process it.  If PostgreSQL crashes before it is able to
write and flush the rest of the record (in the next WAL segment), the
wrong version of the first segment file lingers in the archive, which
causes operations such as point-in-time restores to fail.

To fix this, keep track of records that span across segments and ensure
that segments are only marked ready-for-archival once such records have
been completely written to disk.

This has always been wrong, so backpatch all the way back.

Author: Nathan Bossart <bossartn@amazon.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryo Matsumura <matsumura.ryo@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CBDDFA01-6E40-46BB-9F98-9340F4379505@amazon.com

In a backup manifest, WAL-Ranges stores the range of WAL that is
required for the backup to be valid.  pg_verifybackup would then
internally use pg_waldump for the checks based on this data.

When the timeline where the backup started was more than 1 with a
history file looked at for the manifest data generation, the calculation
of the WAL range for the first timeline to check was incorrect.  The
previous logic used as start LSN the start position of the first
timeline, but it needs to use the start LSN of the backup.  This would
cause failures with pg_verifybackup, or any tools making use of the
backup manifests.

This commit adds a test based on a logic using a self-promoted node,
making it rather cheap.

Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210818.143031.1867083699202617521.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13

Improve two places in plpgsql, and one in spi.c, where an error
message would confusingly tell you that you couldn't use a SELECT
query, when what you had written *was* a SELECT query.  The actual
problem is that you can't use SELECT ... INTO in these contexts,
but the messages failed to make that apparent.  Special-case
SELECT INTO to make these errors more helpful.

Also, fix the same spots in plpgsql, as well as several messages
in exec_eval_expr(), to not quote the entire complained-of query or
expression in the primary error message.  That behavior very easily
led to violating our message style guideline about keeping the primary
error message short and single-line.  Also, since the important part
of the message was after the inserted text, it could make the real
problem very hard to see.  We can report the query or expression as
the first line of errcontext instead.

Per complaint from Roger Mason.  Back-patch to v14, since (a) some
of these messages are new in v14 and (b) v14's translatable strings
are still somewhat in flux.  The problem's older than that of
course, but I'm hesitant to change the behavior further back.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1914708.1629474624@sss.pgh.pa.us

After detecting a sub-match "dissect" failure (i.e., a backref match
failure) in the i'th sub-match of an iteration node, we should proceed
by adjusting the attempted length of the i'th submatch.  As coded,
though, these functions changed the attempted length of the *last*
sub-match, and only after exhausting all possibilities for that would
they back up to adjust the next-to-last sub-match, and then the
second-from-last, etc; all of which is wasted effort, since only
changing the start or length of the i'th sub-match can possibly make
it succeed.  This oversight creates the possibility for exponentially
bad performance.  Fortunately the problem is masked in most cases by
optimizations or constraints applied elsewhere; which explains why
we'd not noticed it before.  But it is possible to reach the problem
with fairly simple, if contrived, regexps.

Oversight in my commit 173e29aa.  That's pretty ancient now,
so back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1808998.1629412269@sss.pgh.pa.us

Using --quiet in combination with --no-strict-names didn't work as
documented, a warning message was still emitted. Since the --quiet
flag was working in an unconventional way to other utilities, fix
by removing the functionality instead.

Backpatch through 14 where pg_amcheck was introduced.

Bug: 17148
Reported-by: Chen Jiaoqian <chenjq.jy@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17148-b5087318e2b04fc6@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 14

The previous code wouldn't handle higher block numbers on systems
where sizeof(long) == 4.
Reviewed-by: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/6a10a211-872b-3c4c-106b-909ae5fefa61%40enterprisedb.com

transformLockingClause neglected to exclude the pseudo-RTEs for
OLD/NEW when processing a rule's query.  This led to odd errors
or even crashes later on.  This bug is very ancient, but it's
not terribly surprising that nobody noticed, since the use-case
for SELECT FOR UPDATE in a non-view rule is somewhere between
thin and non-existent.  Still, crashing is not OK.

Per bug #17151 from Zhiyong Wu.  Thanks to Masahiko Sawada
for analysis of the problem.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17151-c03a3e6e4ec9aadb@postgresql.org

Previously log messages late during shutdown could end up using either another
backend's PgBackendStatus (multi user) or segfault (single user) because
pgstat_get_my_query_id()'s check for !MyBEEntry didn't filter out use after
pgstat_beshutdown_hook().

This became a bug in 4f0b0966, but was a bit fishy before. But given
there's no known problematic cases before 14, it doesn't seem worth
backpatching further.

Also fixes a wrong filename in a comment, introduced in e1025044.
Reported-By: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-By: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Backpatch: 14-

The 'Stream Stop' message is misspelled as 'Stream End' in the docs.

Author: Masahiko Sawada
Backpatch-through: 14, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoDeScrsHhLyEPYqN3sydg6PxAPVBboK=30xJfUVihNZDA@mail.gmail.com

This is a combined revert of the following commits:
- c3826f83, a refactoring piece that moved the hex decoding code to
src/common/.  This code was cleaned up by aef8948f, as it originally
included no overflow checks in the same way as the base64 routines in
src/common/ used by SCRAM, making it unsafe for its purpose.
- aef8948f, a more advanced refactoring of the hex encoding/decoding code
to src/common/ that added sanity checks on the result buffer for hex
decoding and encoding.  As reported by Hans Buschmann, those overflow
checks are expensive, and it is possible to see a performance drop in
the decoding/encoding of bytea or LOs the longer they are.  Simple SQLs
working on large bytea values show a clear difference in perf profile.
- ccf4e277, a cleanup made possible by aef8948f.

The reverts of all those commits bring back the performance of hex
decoding and encoding back to what it was in ~13.  Fow now and
post-beta3, this is the simplest option.

Reported-by: Hans Buschmann
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1629039545467.80333@nidsa.net
Backpatch-through: 14

Recursion into the FILTER clause was mis-implemented, such that a
relevant Var or Aggref at the very top of the FILTER clause would
be ignored.  (Of course, that'd have to be a plain boolean Var or
boolean-returning aggregate.)  The consequence would be
mis-identification of the correct semantic level of the aggregate,
which could lead to not-per-spec query behavior.  If the FILTER
expression is an aggregate, this could also lead to failure to issue
an expected "aggregate function calls cannot be nested" error, which
would likely result in a core dump later on, since the planner and
executor aren't expecting such cases to appear.

The root cause is that commit b560ec1b blindly copied some code
that assumed it's recursing into a List, and thus didn't examine the
top-level node.  To forestall questions about why this call doesn't
look like the others, as well as possible future copy-and-paste
mistakes, let's change all three check_agg_arguments_walker calls in
check_agg_arguments, even though only the one for the filter clause
is really broken.

Per bug #17152 from Zhiyong Wu.  This has been wrong since we
implemented FILTER, so back-patch to all supported versions.
(Testing suggests that pre-v11 branches manage to avoid crashing
in the bad-Aggref case, thanks to "redundant" checks in ExecInitAgg.
But I'm not sure how thorough that protection is, and anyway the
wrong-behavior issue remains, so fix 9.6 and 10 too.)

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17152-c7f906cc1a88e61b@postgresql.org

The skip options set for all-visible and all-frozen were incorrect
as they used space rather than hyphen, causing a syntax error when
invoked. Also, the option for not skipping any pages at all, none,
was documented but not implemented.

Backpatch through 14 where pg_amcheck was introduced.

Bug: #17149
Reported-by: Chen Jiaoqian <chenjq.jy@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17149-5918ea748da36b15@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 14

If recordDependencyOnCurrentExtension is invoked on a pre-existing,
free-standing object during an extension update script, that object
will become owned by the extension.  In our current code this is
possible in three cases:

* Replacing a "shell" type or operator.
* CREATE OR REPLACE overwriting an existing object.
* ALTER TYPE SET, ALTER DOMAIN SET, and ALTER OPERATOR SET.

The first of these cases is intentional behavior, as noted by the
existing comments for GenerateTypeDependencies.  It seems like
appropriate behavior for CREATE OR REPLACE too; at least, the obvious
alternatives are not better.  However, the fact that it happens during
ALTER is an artifact of trying to share code (GenerateTypeDependencies
and makeOperatorDependencies) between the CREATE and ALTER cases.
Since an extension script would be unlikely to ALTER an object that
didn't already belong to the extension, this behavior is not very
troubling for the direct target object ... but ALTER TYPE SET will
recurse to dependent domains, and it is very uncool for those to
become owned by the extension if they were not already.

Let's fix this by redefining the ALTER cases to never change extension
membership, full stop.  We could minimize the behavioral change by
only changing the behavior when ALTER TYPE SET is recursing to a
domain, but that would complicate the code and it does not seem like
a better definition.

Per bug #17144 from Alex Kozhemyakin.  Back-patch to v13 where ALTER
TYPE SET was added.  (The other cases are older, but since they only
affect the directly-named object, there's not enough of a problem to
justify changing the behavior further back.)

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17144-e67d7a8f049de9af@postgresql.org

that triggers the warning during regression tests.

In OpenSSL there are two types of BIO's (I/O abstractions):
source/sink and filters. A source/sink BIO is a source and/or
sink of data, ie one acting on a socket or a file. A filter
BIO takes a stream of input from another BIO and transforms it.
In order for BIO_find_type() to be able to traverse the chain
of BIO's and correctly find all BIO's of a certain type they
shall have the type bit set accordingly, source/sink BIO's
(what PostgreSQL implements) use BIO_TYPE_SOURCE_SINK and
filter BIO's use BIO_TYPE_FILTER. In addition to these, file
descriptor based BIO's should have the descriptor bit set,
BIO_TYPE_DESCRIPTOR.

The PostgreSQL implementation didn't set the type bits, which
went unnoticed for a long time as it's only really relevant
for code auditing the OpenSSL installation, or doing similar
tasks. It is required by the API though, so this fixes it.

Backpatch through 9.6 as this has been wrong for a long time.

Author: Itamar Gafni
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/SN6PR06MB39665EC10C34BB20956AE4578AF39@SN6PR06MB3966.namprd06.prod.outlook.com
Backpatch-through: 9.6

The backslash sequences, including \123 and \x12 escapes, are interpreted
after encoding conversion. The docs failed to mention that.

Backpatch to all supported versions.

Reported-by: Andreas Grob
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/17142-9181542ca1df75ab%40postgresql.org

This reverts the following commits:
1b5617eb Describe (auto-)analyze behavior for partitioned tables
0e69f705 Set pg_class.reltuples for partitioned tables
41badeab Document ANALYZE storage parameters for partitioned tables
0827e8af autovacuum: handle analyze for partitioned tables

There are efficiency issues in this code when handling databases with
large numbers of partitions, and it doesn't look like there isn't any
trivial way to handle those.  There are some other issues as well.  It's
now too late in the cycle for nontrivial fixes, so we'll have to let
Postgres 14 users continue to manually deal with ANALYZE their
partitioned tables, and hopefully we can fix the issues for Postgres 15.

I kept [most of] be280cda ("Don't reset relhasindex for partitioned
tables on ANALYZE") because while we added it due to 0827e8af, it is
a good bugfix in its own right, since it affects manual analyze as well
as autovacuum-induced analyze, and there's no reason to revert it.

I retained the addition of relkind 'p' to tables included by
pg_stat_user_tables, because reverting that would require a catversion
bump.
Also, in pg14 only, I keep a struct member that was added to
PgStat_TabStatEntry to avoid breaking compatibility with existing stat
files.

Backpatch to 14.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210722205458.f2bug3z6qzxzpx2s@alap3.anarazel.de

This commit ensures that the wait interval in the replay delay loop
waiting for an amount of time defined by recovery_min_apply_delay is
correctly handled on reload, recalculating the delay if this GUC value
is updated, based on the timestamp of the commit record being replayed.

The previous behavior would be problematic for example with replay
still waiting even if the delay got reduced or just cancelled.  If the
apply delay was increased to a larger value, the wait would have just
respected the old value set, finishing earlier.

Author: Soumyadeep Chakraborty, Ashwin Agrawal
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAE-ML+93zfr-HLN8OuxF0BjpWJ17O5dv1eMvSE5jsj9jpnAXZA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.6

Like the ARM case, just use gcc's __sync_lock_test_and_set();
that will compile into AMOSWAP.W.AQ which does what we need.

At some point it might be worth doing some work on atomic ops
for RISC-V, but this should be enough for a creditable port.

Back-patch to all supported branches, just in case somebody
wants to try them on RISC-V.

Marek Szuba

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/dea97b6d-f55f-1f6d-9109-504aa7dfa421@gentoo.org

After binding a statement to a connection with DECLARE STATEMENT the connection
was still not used for DEALLOCATE and DESCRIBE statements. This patch fixes
that, adds a missing warning and cleans up the code.

Author: Hayato Kuroda
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TYAPR01MB5866BA57688DF2770E2F95C6F5069%40TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com

The check for sslsni only checked for existence of the parameter
but not for the actual value of the param.  This meant that the
SNI extension was always turned on.  Fix by inspecting the value
of sslsni and only activate the SNI extension iff sslsni has been
enabled.  Also update the docs to be more in line with how other
boolean params are documented.

Backpatch to 14 where sslsni was first implemented.

Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Backpatch-through: 14, where sslni was added

This fixes a bug in simplehash.h which caused an incorrect size mask to be
used when the hash table grew to SH_MAX_SIZE (2^32).  The code was
incorrectly setting the size mask to 0 when the hash tables reached the
maximum possible number of buckets.  This would result always trying to
use the 0th bucket causing an  infinite loop of trying to grow the hash
table due to there being too many collisions.

Seemingly it's not that common for simplehash tables to ever grow this big
as this bug dates back to v10 and nobody seems to have noticed it before.
However, probably the most likely place that people would notice it would
be doing a large in-memory Hash Aggregate with something close to at least
2^31 groups.

After this fix, the code now works correctly with up to within 98% of 2^32
groups and will fail with the following error when trying to insert any
more items into the hash table:

ERROR:  hash table size exceeded

However, the work_mem (or hash_mem_multiplier in newer versions) settings
will generally cause Hash Aggregates to spill to disk long before reaching
that many groups.  The minimal test case I did took a work_mem setting of
over 192GB to hit the bug.

simplehash hash tables are used in a few other places such as Bitmap Index
Scans, however, again the size that the hash table can become there is
also limited to work_mem and it would take a relation of around 16TB
(2^31) pages and a very large work_mem setting to hit this.  With smaller
work_mem values the table would become lossy and never grow large enough
to hit the problem.

Author: Yura Sokolov
Reviewed-by: David Rowley, Ranier Vilela
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b1f7f32737c3438136f64b26f4852b96@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch-through: 10, where simplehash.h was added

It's hard to disable ASLR on current macOS releases, for testing with
-DEXEC_BACKEND.  You could already set the environment variable
PG_SHMEM_ADDR to something not likely to collide with mappings created
earlier in process startup.  Let's also provide a default value that
works on current releases and architectures, for developer convenience.

As noted in the pre-existing comment, this is a horrible hack, but
-DEXEC_BACKEND is only used by Unix-based PostgreSQL developers for
testing some otherwise Windows-only code paths, so it seems excusable.

Back-patch to all supported branches.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210806032944.m4tz7j2w47mant26%40alap3.anarazel.de

The FDW batching code was using the same tuple descriptor both for all
slots (regular and plan slots), but that's incorrect - the subplan may
use a different descriptor. Currently this is benign, because batching
is used only for INSERTs, and in that case the descriptors always match.
But that would change if we allow batching UPDATEs.

Fix by copying the appropriate tuple descriptor. Backpatch to 14, where
the FDW batching was implemented.

Author: Amit Langote
Backpatch-through: 14, where FDW batching was added
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BHiwqEWd5B0-e-RvixGGUrNvGkjH2s4m95%3DJcwUnyV%3Df0rAKQ%40mail.gmail.com

It's not sensible to re-evaluate a direct-modify Foreign Update or Delete
during EvalPlanQual. However, ExecInitForeignScan() can still get called
if a table mixes local and foreign partitions. EvalPlanQualStart() left
the es_result_relations array uninitialized in the child EPQ EState, but
ExecInitForeignScan() still expected to find it. That caused a segfault.

Fix by skipping the es_result_relations lookup during EvalPlanQual
processing. To make things a bit more robust, also skip the
BeginDirectModify calls, and add a runtime check that ExecForeignScan()
is not called on direct-modify foreign scans during EvalPlanQual
processing.

This is new in v14, commit 1375422c. Before that, EvalPlanQualStart()
copied the whole ResultRelInfo array to the EPQ EState. Backpatch to v14.

Report and diagnosis by Andrey Lepikhov.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cb2b808d-cbaa-4772-76ee-c8809bafcf3d%40postgrespro.ru

As a result of confusion about whether the "char" type is signed or
unsigned, scans for index searches like "col < 'x'" or "col <= 'x'"
would start at the middle of the index not the left end, thus missing
many or all of the entries they should find.  Fortunately, this
is not a symptom of index corruption.  It's only the search logic
that is broken, and we can fix it without unpleasant side-effects.

Per report from Jason Kim.  This has been wrong since btree_gin's
beginning, so back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210810001649.htnltbh7c63re42p@jasonk.me

Source-Git-URL: git://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git
Source-Git-Hash: 1234b3cdae465246e534cc4114129f18d3c04c38

In ec34040af I added a mention that there was no point in setting
maintenance_work_limit to anything higher than 1GB for vacuum, but that
was incorrect as ginInsertCleanup() also looks at what
maintenance_work_mem is set to during VACUUM and that's not limited to
1GB.

Here I attempt to make it more clear that the limitation is only around
the number of dead tuple identifiers that we can collect during VACUUM.

I've also added a note to autovacuum_work_mem to mention this limitation.
I didn't do that in ec34040af as I'd had some wrong-headed ideas about
just limiting the maximum value for that GUC to 1GB.

Author: David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpGwOAvunp-E-bN_rbAs3hmxMoasm5pzkYDbf36h73s7w@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.6, same as ec34040af

This saves a few lines of code.  Also add a comment to mention why we use
ExplainPropertyInteger instead of ExplainPropertyUInteger given that
queryid is a uint64 type.

Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvqhSLYpSU_EqUdN39w9Uvb8ogmHV7_3YhJ0S3aScGBjsg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14, where this code was originally added

Since commit e462856a7a, pg_upgrade automatically creates a script to
update extensions, so mention that instead of ALTER EXTENSION.

Backpatch-through: 9.6

Copy-and-pasteo in 665c5855e, evidently.  The 9.6 docs toolchain
whined about duplicate index entries, though our modern toolchain
doesn't.  In any case, these GUCs surely are not about the
default settings of these values.

I had committer's remorse almost immediately after pushing cb76fbd7e,
upon finding that removing capturing subexpressions' subREs from the
data structure broke my proposed patch for REG_NOSUB optimization.
Revert that data structure change.  Instead, address the concern
about not changing capturing subREs' endpoints by not changing the
endpoints.  We don't need to, because the point of that bit was just
to ensure that the atom has endpoints distinct from the outer state
pair that we're stringing the branch between.  We already made
suitable states in the parenthesized-subexpression case, so the
additional ones were just useless overhead.  This seems more
understandable than Spencer's original coding, and it ought to be
a shade faster too by saving a few state creations and arc changes.
(I actually see a couple percent improvement on Jacobson's web
corpus, though that's barely above the noise floor so I wouldn't
put much stock in that result.)

Also, fix the logic added by ea1268f6 to ensure that the subRE
recorded in v->subs[subno] is exactly the one with capno == subno.
Spencer's original coding recorded the child subRE of the capture
node, which is okay so far as having the right endpoint states is
concerned, but as of cb76fbd7e the capturing subRE itself always
has those endpoints too.  I think the inconsistency is confusing
for the REG_NOSUB optimization.

As before, backpatch to v14.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0203588E-E609-43AF-9F4F-902854231EE7@enterprisedb.com