- 12 Aug, 2015 6 commits
-
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
In some corner cases, it is possible for the BRIN index relation to be extended by brin_getinsertbuffer but the new page not be used immediately for anything by its callers; when this happens, the page is initialized and the FSM is updated (by brin_getinsertbuffer) with the info about that page, but these actions are not WAL-logged. A later index insert/update can use the page, but since the page is already initialized, the initialization itself is not WAL-logged then either. Replay of this sequence of events causes recovery to fail altogether. There is a related corner case within brin_getinsertbuffer itself, in which we extend the relation to put a new index tuple there, but later find out that we cannot do so, and do not return the buffer; the page obtained from extension is not even initialized. The resulting page is lost forever. To fix, shuffle the code so that initialization is not the responsibility of brin_getinsertbuffer anymore, in normal cases; instead, the initialization is done by its callers (brin_doinsert and brin_doupdate) once they're certain that the page is going to be used. When either those functions determine that the new page cannot be used, before bailing out they initialize the page as an empty regular page, enter it in FSM and WAL-log all this. This way, the page is usable for future index insertions, and WAL replay doesn't find trying to insert tuples in pages whose initialization didn't make it to the WAL. The same strategy is used in brin_getinsertbuffer when it cannot return the new page. Additionally, add a new step to vacuuming so that all pages of the index are scanned; whenever an uninitialized page is found, it is initialized as empty and WAL-logged. This closes the hole that the relation is extended but the system crashes before anything is WAL-logged about it. We also take this opportunity to update the FSM, in case it has gotten out of date. Thanks to Heikki Linnakangas for finding the problem that kicked some additional analysis of BRIN page assignment code. Backpatch to 9.5, where BRIN was introduced. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150723204810.GY5596@postgresql.org
-
Andres Freund authored
Reported-By: Gurjeet Singh
-
Andres Freund authored
In ff27db5d I missed that PQresultErrorField() may return NULL if there's no sqlstate associated with an error. Spotted-By: Coverity Reported-By: Michael Paquier Discussion: CAB7nPqQ3o10SY6NVdU4pjq85GQTN5tbbkq2gnNUh2fBNU3rKyQ@mail.gmail.com Backpatch: 9.5, like ff27db5d
-
Andres Freund authored
In 4b4b680c I passed a buffer index number (starting from 0) instead of a proper Buffer id (which start from 1 for shared buffers) in two places. This wasn't noticed so far as one of those locations isn't compiled at all (PrintPinnedBufs) and the other one (InvalidBuffer) requires a unlikely, but possible, set of circumstances to trigger a symptom. To reduce the likelihood of such incidents a bit also convert existing open coded mappings from buffer descriptors to buffer ids with BufferDescriptorGetBuffer(). Author: Qingqing Zhou Reported-By: Qingqing Zhou Discussion: CAJjS0u2ai9ooUisKtkV8cuVUtEkMTsbK8c7juNAjv8K11zeCQg@mail.gmail.com Backpatch: 9.5 where the private ref count infrastructure was introduced
-
Tom Lane authored
newnfa() failed to set the regex error state when malloc() fails. Several places in regcomp.c failed to check for an error after calling subre(). Each of these mistakes could lead to null-pointer-dereference crashes in memory-starved backends. Report and patch by Andreas Seltenreich. Back-patch to all branches.
-
Tom Lane authored
Until now we computed these Param ID sets at the end of subquery_planner, but that approach depends on subquery_planner returning a concrete Plan tree. We would like to switch over to returning one or more Paths for a subquery, and in that representation the necessary details aren't fully fleshed out (not to mention that we don't really want to do this work for Paths that end up getting discarded). Hence, refactor so that we can compute the param ID sets at the end of planning, just before set_plan_references is run. The main change necessary to make this work is that we need to capture the set of outer-level Param IDs available to the current query level before exiting subquery_planner, since the outer levels' plan_params lists are transient. (That's not going to pose a problem for returning Paths, since all the work involved in producing that data is part of expression preprocessing, which will continue to happen before Paths are produced.) On the plus side, this change gets rid of several existing kluges. Eventually I'd like to get rid of SS_finalize_plan altogether in favor of doing this work during set_plan_references, but that will require some complex rejiggering because SS_finalize_plan needs to visit subplans and initplans before the main plan. So leave that idea for another day.
-
- 11 Aug, 2015 7 commits
-
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
Trivial change to reduce exposure of rel.h.
-
Andrew Dunstan authored
-
Andres Freund authored
When creating a physical slot it's often useful to immediately reserve the current WAL position instead of only doing after the first feedback message arrives. That e.g. allows slots to guarantee that all the WAL for a base backup will be available afterwards. Logical slots already have to reserve WAL during creation, so generalize that logic into being usable for both physical and logical slots. Catversion bump because of the new parameter. Author: Gurjeet Singh Reviewed-By: Andres Freund Discussion: CABwTF4Wh_dBCzTU=49pFXR6coR4NW1ynb+vBqT+Po=7fuq5iCw@mail.gmail.com
-
Andres Freund authored
These make the code a bit easier to read, and make it easier to add a more explicit notion of a slot's type at some point in the future. Author: Gurjeet Singh Discussion: CABwTF4Wh_dBCzTU=49pFXR6coR4NW1ynb+vBqT+Po=7fuq5iCw@mail.gmail.com
-
Andres Freund authored
Fix a bunch of typos, and remove two superflous includes. Author: Gurjeet Singh Discussion: CABwTF4Wh_dBCzTU=49pFXR6coR4NW1ynb+vBqT+Po=7fuq5iCw@mail.gmail.com Backpatch: 9.4
-
Tom Lane authored
pg_dump produced fairly silly GRANT/REVOKE commands when dumping types from pre-9.2 servers, and when dumping functions or procedural languages from pre-7.3 servers. Those server versions lack the typacl, proacl, and/or lanacl columns respectively, and pg_dump substituted default values that were in fact incorrect. We ended up revoking all the owner's own privileges for the object while granting all privileges to PUBLIC. Of course the owner would then have those privileges again via PUBLIC, so long as she did not try to revoke PUBLIC's privileges; which may explain the lack of field reports. Nonetheless this is pretty silly behavior. The stakes were raised by my recent patch to make pg_dump dump shell types, because 9.2 and up pg_dump would proceed to emit bogus GRANT/REVOKE commands for a shell type if dumping from a pre-9.2 server; and the server will not accept GRANT/REVOKE commands for a shell type. (Perhaps it should, but that's a topic for another day.) So the resulting dump script wouldn't load without errors. The right thing to do is to act as though these objects have default privileges (null ACL entries), which causes pg_dump to print no GRANT/REVOKE commands at all for them. That fixes the silly results and also dodges the problem with shell types. In passing, modify getProcLangs() to be less creatively different about how to handle missing columns when dumping from older server versions. Every other data-acquisition function in pg_dump does that by substituting appropriate default values in the version-specific SQL commands, and I see no reason why this one should march to its own drummer. Its use of "SELECT *" was likewise not conformant with anyplace else, not to mention it's not considered good SQL style for production queries. Back-patch to all supported versions. Although 9.0 and 9.1 pg_dump don't have the issue with typacl, they are more likely than newer versions to be used to dump from ancient servers, so we ought to fix the proacl/lanacl issues all the way back.
-
- 10 Aug, 2015 7 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
Apparently some versions of gcc prefer __sparc_v7__ and __sparc_v8__. Per report from Waldemar Brodkorb.
-
Tom Lane authored
Commit 85e5e222 turns out not to have taken care of all cases of the partially-evaluatable-PlaceHolderVar problem found by Andreas Seltenreich's fuzz testing. I had set it up to check for risky PHVs only in the event that we were making a star-schema-based exception to the param_source_rels join ordering heuristic. However, it turns out that the problem can occur even in joins that satisfy the param_source_rels heuristic, in which case allow_star_schema_join() isn't consulted. Refactor so that we check for risky PHVs whenever the proposed join has any remaining parameterization. Back-patch to 9.2, like the previous patch (except for the regression test case, which only works back to 9.3 because it uses LATERAL). Note that this discovery implies that problems of this sort could've occurred in 9.2 and up even before the star-schema patch; though I've not tried to prove that experimentally.
-
Andrew Dunstan authored
Several versions of the perl that comes with the Msys DTK have been found to have a bug that fails to recognize a ' before a multiline $ in some circumstances. To work around the problem, use a character class for the '. Another solution would have been to use \n instead of $, but that would have changed the test semantics very slightly.
-
Tom Lane authored
Commit 2834855c added a not-very-carefully-thought-out isolation test to check a BRIN index bug fix. The test depended on the availability of the pageinspect contrib module, which meant it did not work in several common testing scenarios such as "make check-world". It's not clear whether we want a core test depending on a contrib module like that, but in any case, failing to deal with the possibility that the module isn't present in the installation-under-test is not acceptable. Remove that test pending some better solution.
-
Andres Freund authored
There's no reason not to expose both restart_lsn and confirmed_flush since they have rather distinct meanings. The former is the oldest WAL still required and valid for both physical and logical slots, whereas the latter is the location up to which a logical slot's consumer has confirmed receiving data. Most of the time a slot will require older WAL (i.e. restart_lsn) than the confirmed position (i.e. confirmed_flush_lsn). Author: Marko Tiikkaja, editorialized by me Discussion: 559D110B.1020109@joh.to
-
Andres Freund authored
XLogRecPtr was compared with InvalidTransactionId instead of InvalidXLogRecPtr. As both are defined to the same value this doesn't cause any actual problems, but it's still wrong. Backpatch: 9.4-master, bug was introduced in 9.4
-
Andres Freund authored
Immediately starting to stream after --create-slot is inconvenient in a number of situations (e.g. when configuring a slot for use in recovery.conf) and it's easy to just call pg_receivexlog twice in the rest of the cases. Author: Michael Paquier Discussion: CAB7nPqQ9qEtuDiKY3OpNzHcz5iUA+DUX9FcN9K8GUkCZvG7+Ew@mail.gmail.com Backpatch: 9.5, where the option was introduced
-
- 09 Aug, 2015 5 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
The allowed syntax for OVERLAPS, viz "row OVERLAPS row", is sufficiently constrained that we don't actually need a precedence declaration for OVERLAPS; indeed removing this declaration does not change the generated gram.c file at all. Let's remove it to avoid confusion about whether OVERLAPS has precedence or not. If we ever generalize what we allow for OVERLAPS, we might need to put back a precedence declaration for it, but we might want some other level than what it has today --- and leaving the declaration there would just risk confusion about whether that would be an incompatible change. Likewise, remove OVERLAPS from the documentation's precedence table. Per discussion with Noah Misch. Back-patch to 9.5 where we hacked up some nearby precedence decisions.
-
Magnus Hagander authored
Reported by William Meitzen
-
Bruce Momjian authored
-
Tatsuo Ishii authored
commit 9043Fe390f4f0b4586cfe59cbd22314b9c3e2957 broke multibyte regression tests because the commit removes the warning message when temporary hash indexes is created, which has been added by commit 07af5238. Back patched to 9.5 stable tree.
-
Bruce Momjian authored
Report by Dean Rasheed Patch by Dean Rasheed Backpatch through 9.5
-
- 08 Aug, 2015 2 commits
-
-
Bruce Momjian authored
-
Bruce Momjian authored
Report by Robert Haas, Andres Freund Backpatch through 9.5
-
- 07 Aug, 2015 10 commits
-
-
Andres Freund authored
In de6fd1c8 I moved the the work around from 53f73879 into the aix template. The previous location was removed in the former commit, and I thought that it would be nice to emit a warning when running configure. That didn't turn out to work because at the point the template is included we don't know whether we're compiling a 32/64 bit binary and it's possible to install compilers for both on a 64 bit kernel/OS. So go back to a less ambitious approach and define PG_FORCE_DISABLE_INLINE in port/aix.h, without emitting a warning. We could try a more fancy approach, but it doesn't seem worth it. This requires moving the check for PG_FORCE_DISABLE_INLINE in c.h to after including the system headers included from therein which isn't perfect, as it seems slightly more robust to include all system headers in a similar environment. Oh well. Discussion: 20150807132000.GC13310@awork2.anarazel.de
-
Andres Freund authored
A removed check in ba3deeef made all threads but the main one busy-loop when -P was used. All threads computed the time to the next time the progress report should be printed, but only the main thread did so and re-scheduled it only for the future. Reported-By: Jesper Pedersen Discussion: 55C4E190.3050104@redhat.com
-
Tom Lane authored
A new test case from Andreas Seltenreich showed that we were still a bit confused about removing PlaceHolderVars during join removal. Specifically, remove_rel_from_query would remove a PHV that was used only underneath the removable join, even if the place where it's used was the join partner relation and not the join clause being deleted. This would lead to a "too late to create a new PlaceHolderInfo" error later on. We can defend against that by checking ph_eval_at to see if the PHV could possibly be getting used at some partner rel. Also improve some nearby LATERAL-related logic. I decided that the check on ph_lateral needed to take precedence over the check on ph_needed, in case there's a lateral reference underneath the join being considered. (That may be impossible, but I'm not convinced of it, and it's easy enough to defend against the case.) Also, I realized that remove_rel_from_query's logic for updating LateralJoinInfos is dead code, because we don't build those at all until after join removal. Back-patch to 9.3. Previous versions didn't have the LATERAL issues, of course, and they also didn't attempt to remove PlaceHolderInfos during join removal. (I'm starting to wonder if changing that was really such a great idea.)
-
Robert Haas authored
Spotted by Antonin Houska.
-
Andres Freund authored
Some frontend code like e.g. pg_xlogdump or pg_resetxlog, has to use backend headers. Unfortunately until now that code includes most of the locking code. It's generally not nice to expose such low level details, but de6fd1c8 made that a hard problem. We fall back to defining 'inline' away if the compiler doesn't support it - that can cause linker errors like on buildfarm animal pademelon if a inline function references backend only code. To fix that problem separate definitions from lock.h that are required from frontend code into lockdefs.h and use it in the relevant places. I've only removed the minimal amount of necessary definitions for now - it might turn out that we want more for other reasons. To avoid such details being exposed again put some checks against being included from frontend code into atomics.h, lock.h, lwlock.h and s_lock.h. It's otherwise fairly easy to indirectly include these headers. Discussion: 20150806070902.GE12214@awork2.anarazel.de
-
Andres Freund authored
Amit reviewed the replication origins patch and made some good points. Address them. This fixes typos in error messages, docs and comments and adds a missing error check (although in a should-never-happen scenario). Discussion: CAA4eK1JqUBVeWWKwUmBPryFaje4190ug0y-OAUHWQ6tD83V4xg@mail.gmail.com Backpatch: 9.5, where replication origins were introduced.
-
Bruce Momjian authored
Report by Andres Freund and Jeff Janes Backpatch through 9.5
-
Tom Lane authored
Commit 9e7e29c7 introduced an Assert that join removal didn't reduce the eval_at set of any PlaceHolderVar to empty. At first glance it looks like join_is_removable ensures that's true --- but actually, the loop in join_is_removable skips PlaceHolderVars that are not referenced above the join due to be removed. So, if we don't want any empty eval_at sets, the right thing to do is to delete any now-unreferenced PlaceHolderVars from the data structure entirely. Per fuzz testing by Andreas Seltenreich. Back-patch to 9.3 where the aforesaid Assert was added.
-
Bruce Momjian authored
Report by Peter Geoghegan Backpatch through 9.5
-
Tom Lane authored
Formerly, this function would always return "true" for an appendrel child relation, because it would think that the appendrel parent was a potential join target for the child. In principle that should only lead to some inefficiency in planning, but fuzz testing by Andreas Seltenreich disclosed that it could lead to "could not find pathkey item to sort" planner errors in odd corner cases. Specifically, we would think that all columns of a child table's multicolumn index were interesting pathkeys, causing us to generate a MergeAppend path that sorts by all the columns. However, if any of those columns weren't actually used above the level of the appendrel, they would not get added to that rel's targetlist, which would result in being unable to resolve the MergeAppend's sort keys against its targetlist during createplan.c. Backpatch to 9.3. In older versions, columns of an appendrel get added to its targetlist even if they're not mentioned above the scan level, so that the failure doesn't occur. It might be worth back-patching this fix to older versions anyway, but I'll refrain for the moment.
-
- 06 Aug, 2015 3 commits
-
-
Bruce Momjian authored
Report by Andres Freund Backpatch through 9.5
-
Bruce Momjian authored
Report by Andres Freund Backpatch through 9.5
-
Bruce Momjian authored
Report by Dean Rasheed Backpatch through 9.5
-