1. 04 Jun, 2020 1 commit
  2. 03 Jun, 2020 3 commits
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Don't call palloc() while holding a spinlock, either. · f88bd313
      Tom Lane authored
      Fix some more violations of the "only straight-line code inside a
      spinlock" rule.  These are hazardous not only because they risk
      holding the lock for an excessively long time, but because it's
      possible for palloc to throw elog(ERROR), leaving a stuck spinlock
      behind.
      
      copy_replication_slot() had two separate places that did pallocs
      while holding a spinlock.  We can make the code simpler and safer
      by copying the whole ReplicationSlot struct into a local variable
      while holding the spinlock, and then referencing that copy.
      (While that's arguably more cycles than we really need to spend
      holding the lock, the struct isn't all that big, and this way seems
      far more maintainable than copying fields piecemeal.  Anyway this
      is surely much cheaper than a palloc.)  That bug goes back to v12.
      
      InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots() not only did a palloc while
      holding a spinlock, but for extra sloppiness then leaked the memory
      --- probably for the lifetime of the checkpointer process, though
      I didn't try to verify that.  Fortunately that silliness is new
      in HEAD.
      
      pg_get_replication_slots() had a cosmetic violation of the rule,
      in that it only assumed it's safe to call namecpy() while holding
      a spinlock.  Still, that's a hazard waiting to bite somebody, and
      there were some other cosmetic coding-rule violations in the same
      function, so clean it up.  I back-patched this as far as v10; the
      code exists before that but it looks different, and this didn't
      seem important enough to adapt the patch further back.
      
      Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200602.161518.1399689010416646074.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
      f88bd313
    • Bruce Momjian's avatar
      doc: PG 13 relnotes: fix link for grouping sets hash overflow · 4d685f6d
      Bruce Momjian authored
      Use "guc-enable-groupingsets-hash-disk".
      
      Reported-by: TAKATSUKA Haruka
      
      Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16468-7939d39f1786516c@postgresql.org
      
      Backpatch-through: master
      4d685f6d
    • Fujii Masao's avatar
      doc: Move wal_init_zero and wal_recycle descriptions to proper section. · 43e592c7
      Fujii Masao authored
      The group of wal_init_zero and wal_recycle is WAL_SETTINGS in guc.c,
      but previously their documents were located in
      "Replication"/"Sending Servers" section. This commit moves them to
      the proper section "Write Ahead Log"/"Settings".
      
      Back-patch to v12 where wal_init_zero and wal_recycle parameters
      were introduced.
      
      Author: Fujii Masao
      Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b5190ab4-a169-6a42-0e49-aed0807c8976@oss.nttdata.com
      43e592c7
  3. 02 Jun, 2020 2 commits
  4. 01 Jun, 2020 4 commits
  5. 31 May, 2020 3 commits
  6. 29 May, 2020 1 commit
  7. 28 May, 2020 7 commits
  8. 27 May, 2020 1 commit
  9. 26 May, 2020 5 commits
  10. 25 May, 2020 3 commits
  11. 23 May, 2020 1 commit
  12. 22 May, 2020 7 commits
  13. 21 May, 2020 2 commits