1. 28 Oct, 2009 3 commits
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Fix \df to re-allow regexp special characters in the function name pattern. · be6899f1
      Tom Lane authored
      This has always worked, up until somebody's thinko here:
      http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2009-04/msg00233.php
      Per bug #5143 from Piotr Wolinski.
      be6899f1
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Fix AcquireRewriteLocks to be sure that it acquires the right lock strength · cbcd1701
      Tom Lane authored
      when FOR UPDATE is propagated down into a sub-select expanded from a view.
      Similar bug to parser's isLockedRel issue that I fixed yesterday; likewise
      seems not quite worth the effort to back-patch.
      cbcd1701
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      When FOR UPDATE/SHARE is used with LIMIT, put the LockRows plan node · 46e3a16b
      Tom Lane authored
      underneath the Limit node, not atop it.  This fixes the old problem that such
      a query might unexpectedly return fewer rows than the LIMIT says, due to
      LockRows discarding updated rows.
      
      There is a related problem that LockRows might destroy the sort ordering
      produced by earlier steps; but fixing that by pushing LockRows below Sort
      would create serious performance problems that are unjustified in many
      real-world applications, as well as potential deadlock problems from locking
      many more rows than expected.  Instead, keep the present semantics of applying
      FOR UPDATE after ORDER BY within a single query level; but allow the user to
      specify the other way by writing FOR UPDATE in a sub-select.  To make that
      work, track whether FOR UPDATE appeared explicitly in sub-selects or got
      pushed down from the parent, and don't flatten a sub-select that contained an
      explicit FOR UPDATE.
      46e3a16b
  2. 27 Oct, 2009 3 commits
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Fix AfterTriggerSaveEvent to use a test and elog, not just Assert, to check · 44956c52
      Tom Lane authored
      that it's called within an AfterTriggerBeginQuery/AfterTriggerEndQuery pair.
      The RI cascade triggers suppress that overhead on the assumption that they
      are always run non-deferred, so it's possible to violate the condition if
      someone mistakenly changes pg_trigger to mark such a trigger deferred.
      We don't really care about supporting that, but throwing an error instead
      of crashing seems desirable.  Per report from Marcelo Costa.
      44956c52
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Make FOR UPDATE/SHARE in the primary query not propagate into WITH queries; · 61e53282
      Tom Lane authored
      for example in
        WITH w AS (SELECT * FROM foo) SELECT * FROM w, bar ... FOR UPDATE
      the FOR UPDATE will now affect bar but not foo.  This is more useful and
      consistent than the original 8.4 behavior, which tried to propagate FOR UPDATE
      into the WITH query but always failed due to assorted implementation
      restrictions.  Even though we are in process of removing those restrictions,
      it seems correct on philosophical grounds to not let the outer query's
      FOR UPDATE affect the WITH query.
      
      In passing, fix isLockedRel which frequently got things wrong in
      nested-subquery cases: "FOR UPDATE OF foo" applies to an alias foo in the
      current query level, not subqueries.  This has been broken for a long time,
      but it doesn't seem worth back-patching further than 8.4 because the actual
      consequences are minimal.  At worst the parser would sometimes get
      RowShareLock on a relation when it should be AccessShareLock or vice versa.
      That would only make a difference if someone were using ExclusiveLock
      concurrently, which no standard operation does, and anyway FOR UPDATE
      doesn't result in visible changes so it's not clear that the someone would
      notice any problem.  Between that and the fact that FOR UPDATE barely works
      with subqueries at all in existing releases, I'm not excited about worrying
      about it.
      61e53282
    • Alvaro Herrera's avatar
      Fix documentation on the toast.fillfactor reloption: it doesn't exist. · b091b976
      Alvaro Herrera authored
      Per note from Zoltan Boszormenyi.
      b091b976
  3. 26 Oct, 2009 4 commits
    • Peter Eisentraut's avatar
      f1c52475
    • Peter Eisentraut's avatar
      Check errors in for loop · 3ceae479
      Peter Eisentraut authored
      3ceae479
    • Heikki Linnakangas's avatar
      Fix range check in date_recv that tried to limit accepted values to only · 2078e384
      Heikki Linnakangas authored
      those accepted by date_in(). I confused julian day numbers and number of
      days since the postgres epoch 2000-01-01 in the original patch.
      
      I just noticed that it's still easy to get such out-of-range values into
      the database using to_date or +- operators, but this patch doesn't do
      anything about those functions.
      
      Per report from James Pye.
      2078e384
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Re-implement EvalPlanQual processing to improve its performance and eliminate · 9f2ee8f2
      Tom Lane authored
      a lot of strange behaviors that occurred in join cases.  We now identify the
      "current" row for every joined relation in UPDATE, DELETE, and SELECT FOR
      UPDATE/SHARE queries.  If an EvalPlanQual recheck is necessary, we jam the
      appropriate row into each scan node in the rechecking plan, forcing it to emit
      only that one row.  The former behavior could rescan the whole of each joined
      relation for each recheck, which was terrible for performance, and what's much
      worse could result in duplicated output tuples.
      
      Also, the original implementation of EvalPlanQual could not re-use the recheck
      execution tree --- it had to go through a full executor init and shutdown for
      every row to be tested.  To avoid this overhead, I've associated a special
      runtime Param with each LockRows or ModifyTable plan node, and arranged to
      make every scan node below such a node depend on that Param.  Thus, by
      signaling a change in that Param, the EPQ machinery can just rescan the
      already-built test plan.
      
      This patch also adds a prohibition on set-returning functions in the
      targetlist of SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE.  This is needed to avoid the
      duplicate-output-tuple problem.  It seems fairly reasonable since the
      other restrictions on SELECT FOR UPDATE are meant to ensure that there
      is a unique correspondence between source tuples and result tuples,
      which an output SRF destroys as much as anything else does.
      9f2ee8f2
  4. 23 Oct, 2009 1 commit
  5. 21 Oct, 2009 3 commits
  6. 20 Oct, 2009 3 commits
  7. 17 Oct, 2009 2 commits
  8. 16 Oct, 2009 2 commits
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Rewrite pam_passwd_conv_proc to be more robust: avoid assuming that the · 76c09dbe
      Tom Lane authored
      pam_message array contains exactly one PAM_PROMPT_ECHO_OFF message.
      Instead, deal with however many messages there are, and don't throw error
      for PAM_ERROR_MSG and PAM_TEXT_INFO messages.  This logic is borrowed from
      openssh 5.2p1, which hopefully has seen more real-world PAM usage than we
      have.  Per bug #5121 from Ryan Douglas, which turned out to be caused by
      the conv_proc being called with zero messages.  Apparently that is normal
      behavior given the combination of Linux pam_krb5 with MS Active Directory
      as the domain controller.
      
      Patch all the way back, since this code has been essentially untouched
      since 7.4.  (Surprising we've not heard complaints before.)
      76c09dbe
    • Heikki Linnakangas's avatar
      FREEZE and VERBOSE options were in wrong order in the VACUUM command that · c02350dc
      Heikki Linnakangas authored
      vacuumdb produces. Per report by Thom Brown.
      c02350dc
  9. 15 Oct, 2009 2 commits
  10. 14 Oct, 2009 6 commits
  11. 13 Oct, 2009 5 commits
  12. 12 Oct, 2009 4 commits
  13. 10 Oct, 2009 2 commits
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Improve similar_escape() in two different ways: · 05d24971
      Tom Lane authored
      * Stop escaping ? and {.  As of SQL:2008, SIMILAR TO is defined to have
      POSIX-compatible interpretation of ? as well as {m,n} and related constructs,
      so we should allow these things through to our regex engine.
      
      * Escape ^ and $.  It appears that our regex engine will treat ^^ at the
      beginning of the string the same as ^, and similarly for $$ at the end of
      the string, which meant that SIMILAR TO was effectively ignoring ^ at the
      start of the pattern and $ at the end.  Since these are not supposed to be
      metacharacters, this is a bug.
      
      The second part of this is arguably a back-patchable bug fix, but I'm
      hesitant to do that because it might break applications that are expecting
      something like "col SIMILAR TO '^foo$'" to work like a POSIX pattern.
      Seems safer to only change it at a major version boundary.
      
      Per discussion of an example from Doug Gorley.
      05d24971
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Split the processing of INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE operations out of execMain.c. · 8a5849b7
      Tom Lane authored
      They are now handled by a new plan node type called ModifyTable, which is
      placed at the top of the plan tree.  In itself this change doesn't do much,
      except perhaps make the handling of RETURNING lists and inherited UPDATEs a
      tad less klugy.  But it is necessary preparation for the intended extension of
      allowing RETURNING queries inside WITH.
      
      Marko Tiikkaja
      8a5849b7