Before 9.1, PL/Python functions returning composite types could return
a string and it would be parsed using record_in.  The 9.1 changes made
PL/Python only expect dictionaries, tuples, or objects supporting
getattr as output of composite functions, resulting in a regression
and a confusing error message, as the strings were interpreted as
sequences and the code for transforming lists to database tuples was
used.  Fix this by treating strings separately as before, before
checking for the other types.

The reason why it's important to support string to database tuple
conversion is that trigger functions on tables with composite columns
get the composite row passed in as a string (from record_out).
Without supporting converting this back using record_in, this makes it
impossible to implement pass-through behavior for these columns, as
PL/Python no longer accepts strings for composite values.

A better solution would be to fix the code that transforms composite
inputs into Python objects to produce dictionaries that would then be
correctly interpreted by the Python->PostgreSQL counterpart code.  But
that would be too invasive to backpatch to 9.1, and it is too late in
the 9.2 cycle to attempt it.  It should be revisited in the future,
though.

Reported as bug #6559 by Kirill Simonov.

Jan Urbański

Add/complete support for:

- ALTER DOMAIN / VALIDATE CONSTRAINT
- ALTER DOMAIN / RENAME
- ALTER DOMAIN / RENAME CONSTRAINT
- ALTER TABLE / RENAME CONSTRAINT

We have been seeing intermittent buildfarm failures due to a query
sometimes not using an index-only scan plan, because a background
auto-ANALYZE prevented the table's all-visible bits from being set
immediately, thereby causing the estimated cost of an index-only scan
to go up considerably.  Adjust the test case so that a bitmap index scan is
preferred instead, which serves equally well for the purpose the test case
is actually meant for.  (Of course, it would be better to eliminate the
interference from auto-ANALYZE, but I see no low-risk way to do that,
so any such fix will have to be left for 9.3 or later.)

setrefs.c failed to do "rtoffset" adjustment of Vars in RETURNING lists,
which meant they were left with the wrong varnos when the RETURNING list
was in a subquery.  That was never possible before writable CTEs, of
course, but now it's broken.  The executor fails to notice any problem
because ExecEvalVar just references the ecxt_scantuple for any normal
varno; but EXPLAIN breaks when the varno is wrong, as illustrated in a
recent complaint from Bartosz Dmytrak.

Since the eventual rtoffset of the subquery is not known at the time
we are preparing its plan node, the previous scheme of executing
set_returning_clause_references() at that time cannot handle this
adjustment.  Fortunately, it turns out that we don't really need to do it
that way, because all the needed information is available during normal
setrefs.c execution; we just have to dig it out of the ModifyTable node.
So, do that, and get rid of the kluge of early setrefs processing of
RETURNING lists.  (This is a little bit of a cheat in the case of inherited
UPDATE/DELETE, because we are not passing a "root" struct that corresponds
exactly to what the subplan was built with.  But that doesn't matter, and
anyway this is less ugly than early setrefs processing was.)

Back-patch to 9.1, where the problem became possible to hit.

Due to rather sloppy thinking (on my part, I'm afraid) about the
appropriate behavior for boundary conditions, pg_next_dst_boundary() gave
undefined, platform-dependent results when the input time is exactly the
last recorded DST transition time for the specified time zone, as a result
of fetching values one past the end of its data arrays.

Change its specification to be that it always finds the next DST boundary
*after* the input time, and adjust code to match that.  The sole existing
caller, DetermineTimeZoneOffset, doesn't actually care about this
distinction, since it always uses a probe time earlier than the instant
that it does care about.  So it seemed best to me to change the API to make
the result=1 and result=0 cases more consistent, specifically to ensure
that the "before" outputs always describe the state at the given time,
rather than hacking the code to obey the previous API comment exactly.

Per bug #6605 from Sergey Burladyan.  Back-patch to all supported versions.

Predominant standard is two spaces, so adjust outliers to that.

A few simplifications and stylistic improvements, found while grepping
around for makefile problems elsewhere.

Prohibiting this outright would break dumps taken from older versions
that contain such casts, which would create far more pain than is
justified here.

Per report by Jaime Casanova and subsequent discussion.

Noted by Guillaume Smet.

Josh Kupershmidt

We must set the visibility map bit before releasing our exclusive lock
on the heap page; otherwise, someone might clear the heap page bit
before we set the visibility map bit, leading to a situation where the
visibility map thinks the page is all-visible but it's really not.

This problem has existed since 8.4, but it wasn't critical before we
had index-only scans, since the worst case scenario was that the page
wouldn't get vacuumed until the next scan_all vacuum.

Along the way, a couple of minor, related improvements: (1) if we
pause the heap scan to do an index vac cycle, release any visibility
map page we're holding, since really long-running pins are not good
for a variety of reasons; and (2) warn if we see a page that's marked
all-visible in the visibility map but not on the page level, since
that should never happen any more (it was allowed in previous
releases, but not in 9.2).

The size is only a hint, but a big hint chews up a lot of memory without
apparently improving performance much.

Analysis and patch by Noah Misch.

Fix typo spotted by Thom Brown, and improve wording in another area
where Thom spotted a typo.

Josh Kupershmidt

Instead of an exact cost comparison, use a fuzzy comparison with 1e-10
delta after all other path metrics have proved equal.  This is to avoid
having platform-specific roundoff behaviors determine the choice when
two paths are really the same to our cost estimators.  Adjust the
recently-added test case that made it obvious we had a problem here.

The original syntax wasn't universally loved, and it didn't allow its
usage in CREATE TABLE, only ALTER TABLE.  It now works everywhere, and
it also allows using ALTER TABLE ONLY to add an uninherited CHECK
constraint, per discussion.

The pg_constraint column has accordingly been renamed connoinherit.

This commit partly reverts some of the changes in
61d81bd2, particularly some pg_dump and
psql bits, because now pg_get_constraintdef includes the necessary NO
INHERIT within the constraint definition.

Author: Nikhil Sontakke
Some tweaks by me

For an initial relation that lacks any join clauses (that is, it has to be
cartesian-product-joined to the rest of the query), we considered only
cartesian joins with initial rels appearing later in the initial-relations
list.  This creates an undesirable dependency on FROM-list order.  We would
never fail to find a plan, but perhaps we might not find the best available
plan.  Noted while discussing the logic with Amit Kapila.

Improve the comments a bit in this area, too.

Arguably this is a bug fix, but given the lack of complaints from the
field I'll refrain from back-patching.

This patch adjusts the treatment of parameterized paths so that all paths
with the same parameterization (same set of required outer rels) for the
same relation will have the same rowcount estimate.  We cache the rowcount
estimates to ensure that property, and hopefully save a few cycles too.
Doing this makes it practical for add_path_precheck to operate without
a rowcount estimate: it need only assume that paths with different
parameterizations never dominate each other, which is close enough to
true anyway for coarse filtering, because normally a more-parameterized
path should yield fewer rows thanks to having more join clauses to apply.

In add_path, we do the full nine yards of comparing rowcount estimates
along with everything else, so that we can discard parameterized paths that
don't actually have an advantage.  This fixes some issues I'd found with
add_path rejecting parameterized paths on the grounds that they were more
expensive than not-parameterized ones, even though they yielded many fewer
rows and hence would be cheaper once subsequent joining was considered.

To make the same-rowcounts assumption valid, we have to require that any
parameterized path enforce *all* join clauses that could be obtained from
the particular set of outer rels, even if not all of them are useful for
indexing.  This is required at both base scans and joins.  It's a good
thing anyway since the net impact is that join quals are checked at the
lowest practical level in the join tree.  Hence, discard the original
rather ad-hoc mechanism for choosing parameterization joinquals, and build
a better one that has a more principled rule for when clauses can be moved.
The original rule was actually buggy anyway for lack of knowledge about
which relations are part of an outer join's outer side; getting this right
requires adding an outer_relids field to RestrictInfo.

Like with SGML files, using tabs in these files is confusing and
unnecessary.

This has been wrong for a really long time.  We don't use two-phase
locking to protect against serialization anomalies.

Per discussion on pgsql-hackers about 2011-03-07; original report
by Dan Ports.

Commit 8e5ac74c tried to do this renaming,
but I relied on gcc to tell me where I needed to make changes, instead of
grep.

Noted by Jeff Davis.

The previous code could cause a backend crash after BEGIN; SAVEPOINT a;
LOCK TABLE foo (interrupted by ^C or statement timeout); ROLLBACK TO
SAVEPOINT a; LOCK TABLE foo, and might have leaked strong-lock counts
in other situations.

Report by Zoltán Böszörményi; patch review by Jeff Davis.

Noah Misch spotted the fact that the old comment is in fact incorrect, due
to memory ordering hazards.

Previously, we used SetBufferCommitInfoNeedsSave, but that's really
intended for dirty-marks we can theoretically afford to lose, such as
hint bits.  As for 9.2, the PD_ALL_VISIBLE mustn't be lost in this
way, since we could then end up with a heap page that isn't
all-visible and a visibility map page that is all visible, causing
index-only scans to return wrong answers.

Noah Misch

Mostly, this consists of adding support for fields which exist in the
structure but aren't handled by copy/equal/outfuncs; but the create
foreign table case can actually produce garbage output.

Noah Misch

Fujii Masao

Previously, the use of the optional key word WITH was not supported.

Josh Kupershmidt

A number of utility programs were rather careless about paremeters
that can be set via both an option argument and a positional
argument. This leads to results which can violate the Principal
Of Least Astonishment. These changes refuse to use positional
arguments to override settings that have been made via positional
arguments. The changes are backpatched to all live branches.

When using synchronous replication, we waited for the commit record to be
replicated, but if we our transaction didn't write any other WAL records,
that's not required because we don't even flush the WAL locally to disk in
that case. This lead to long waits when committing a transaction that only
modified a temporary table. Bug spotted by Thom Brown.

Kyotaro HORIGUCHI

The header file is needed by any module that wants to use the PL/pgSQL
instrumentation plugin interface. Most notably, the pldebugger plugin needs
this. With this patch, it can be built using pgxs, without having the full
server source tree available.

Clarify that nrows() is the number of rows processed, versus the
number of rows returned, which can be obtained using len.  Also add
tests about that.

The result object methods colnames() etc. would crash when called
after a command that did not produce a result set.  Now they throw an
exception.

discovery and initial patch by Jean-Baptiste Quenot

message. They are already implemented in the source code.
Suggestions about the message formatting from Tom Lane.