- 03 Feb, 2021 2 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
Now that commit 62f34097 attached BKI_LOOKUP annotation to all the namespace and role OID columns in the catalogs, there's no real reason to have the magic PGNSP and PGUID symbols. Get rid of them in favor of implementing those lookups according to genbki.pl's normal pattern. This means that in the catalog headers, BKI_DEFAULT(PGNSP) becomes BKI_DEFAULT(pg_catalog), which seems a lot more transparent. BKI_DEFAULT(PGUID) becomes BKI_DEFAULT(POSTGRES), which is perhaps less so; but you can look into pg_authid.dat to discover that POSTGRES is the nonce name for the bootstrap superuser. This change also means that if we ever need cross-references in the initial catalog data to any of the other built-in roles besides POSTGRES, or to some other built-in schema besides pg_catalog, we can just do it. No catversion bump here, as there's no actual change in the contents of postgres.bki. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3240355.1612129197@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Generation expressions of generated columns are always inherited, so there is no need to set them separately in child tables, and there is no syntax to do so either. The code previously used the code paths for the handling of default values, for which different rules apply; in particular it might want to set a default value explicitly for an inherited column. This resulted in unrestorable dumps. For generated columns, just skip them in inherited tables. Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/15830.1575468847%40sss.pgh.pa.us
-
- 02 Feb, 2021 7 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
In the wake of commit 62f34097, we no longer need this tool. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3240355.1612129197@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Tom Lane authored
This follows in the spirit of commit dfb75e47, which created primary key and uniqueness constraints to improve the visibility of constraints imposed on the system catalogs. While our catalogs contain many foreign-key-like relationships, they don't quite follow SQL semantics, in that the convention for an omitted reference is to write zero not NULL. Plus, we have some cases in which there are arrays each of whose elements is supposed to be an FK reference; SQL has no way to model that. So we can't create actual foreign key constraints to describe the situation. Nonetheless, we can collect and use knowledge about these relationships. This patch therefore adds annotations to the catalog header files to declare foreign-key relationships. (The BKI_LOOKUP annotations cover simple cases, but we weren't previously distinguishing which such columns are allowed to contain zeroes; we also need new markings for multi-column FK references.) Then, Catalog.pm and genbki.pl are taught to collect this information into a table in a new generated header "system_fk_info.h". The only user of that at the moment is a new SQL function pg_get_catalog_foreign_keys(), which exposes the table to SQL. The oidjoins regression test is rewritten to use pg_get_catalog_foreign_keys() to find out which columns to check. Aside from removing the need for manual maintenance of that test script, this allows it to cover numerous relationships that were not checked by the old implementation based on findoidjoins. (As of this commit, 217 relationships are checked by the test, versus 181 before.) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3240355.1612129197@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Tom Lane authored
Not all OID-reference columns that can contain zeroes (indicating "no reference") were explicitly marked in catalogs.sgml. Fix that, and try to make the style a little more consistent while at it --- for example, consistently write "zero" not "0" for these cases. Joel Jacobson and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4ed9a372-7bf9-479a-926c-ae8e774717a8@www.fastmail.com
-
Tom Lane authored
This left gaps in the internal statement numbering, which is not terribly harmful (else we'd have noticed sooner), but it's not great either. Oversight in bbd5c207; backpatch to v12 where that came in. Pavel Stehule Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFj8pRDXyQaJmpotNTQVc-t-WxdWZC35V2PnmwOaV1-taidFWA@mail.gmail.com
-
Tom Lane authored
The ExecutorEnd hook is invoked in a context that could be quite long-lived, not the executor's own per-query context as I think we were sort of assuming. Thus, any cruft generated while producing the EXPLAIN output could accumulate over multiple queries. This can result in spectacular leakage if log_nested_statements is on, and even without that I'm surprised nobody complained before. To fix, just switch into the executor's context so that anything we allocate will be released when standard_ExecutorEnd frees the executor state. We might as well nuke the code's retail pfree of the explain output string, too; that's laughably inadequate to the need. Japin Li, per report from Jeff Janes. This bug is old, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1wCVtbeRn0s9gt12KwQ7PLXovbpM8eg25SYocKW3BT4hg@mail.gmail.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
The prototype calls the second argument of pgstat_progress_update_multi_param() "index", and some callers name their local variable that way. But when the surrounding code deals with index relations, this is confusing, and in at least one case shadowed another variable that is referring to an index relation. Adjust those call sites to have clearer local variable naming, similar to existing callers in indexcmds.c.
-
Michael Paquier authored
The initial tablesync done by logical replication used a query to fetch the information of a relation's columns that included atttypmod, but it was left unused. This was added by 7c4f5240. Author: Euler Taveira Reviewed-by: Önder Kalacı, Amit Langote, Japin Li Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHE3wggb715X+mK_DitLXF25B=jE6xyNCH4YOwM860JR7HarGQ@mail.gmail.com
-
- 01 Feb, 2021 8 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
Writing unnecessary '.*' at start and end of a POSIX regex doesn't do much except confuse the reader about whether that might be necessary after all. Make the examples in table 9.16 a tad more realistic, and try to turn the next group of examples into something self-contained. Per gripe from rmzgrimes. Back-patch to v13 because it's easy. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/161215841824.14653.8969016349304314299@wrigleys.postgresql.org
-
Tom Lane authored
It turns out that the calculation of [Merge]AppendPath.partitioned_rels in allpaths.c is faulty and sometimes omits relevant non-leaf partitions, allowing an assertion added by commit a929e17e to trigger. Rather than fix that, it seems better to get rid of those fields altogether. We don't really need the info until create_plan time, and calculating it once for the selected plan should be cheaper than calculating it for each append path we consider. The preceding two commits did away with all use of the partitioned_rels values; this commit just mechanically removes the fields and the code that calculated them. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87sg8tqhsl.fsf@aurora.ydns.eu Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJKUy5gCXDSmFs2c=R+VGgn7FiYcLCsEFEuDNNLGfoha=pBE_g@mail.gmail.com
-
Tom Lane authored
It turns out that the calculation of [Merge]AppendPath.partitioned_rels in allpaths.c is faulty and sometimes omits relevant non-leaf partitions, allowing an assertion added by commit a929e17e to trigger. Rather than fix that, it seems better to get rid of those fields altogether. We don't really need the info until create_plan time, and calculating it once for the selected plan should be cheaper than calculating it for each append path we consider. This patch undoes a couple of very minor uses of the partitioned_rels values. createplan.c was testing for nil-ness to optimize away the preparatory work for make_partition_pruneinfo(). That is worth doing if the check is nigh free, but it's not worth going to any great lengths to avoid. create_append_path() was testing for nil-ness as part of deciding how to set up ParamPathInfo for an AppendPath. I replaced that with a check for the appendrel's parent rel being partitioned. That's not quite the same thing but should cover most cases. If we note any interesting loss of optimizations, we can dumb this down to just always use the more expensive method when the parent is a baserel. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87sg8tqhsl.fsf@aurora.ydns.eu Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJKUy5gCXDSmFs2c=R+VGgn7FiYcLCsEFEuDNNLGfoha=pBE_g@mail.gmail.com
-
Tom Lane authored
It turns out that the calculation of [Merge]AppendPath.partitioned_rels in allpaths.c is faulty and sometimes omits relevant non-leaf partitions, allowing an assertion added by commit a929e17e to trigger. Rather than fix that, it seems better to get rid of those fields altogether. We don't really need the info until create_plan time, and calculating it once for the selected plan should be cheaper than calculating it for each append path we consider. As a first step, teach make_partition_pruneinfo to collect the relevant partitioned tables for itself. It's not hard to do so by traversing from child tables up to parents using the AppendRelInfo links. While here, make some minor stylistic improvements; mainly, don't use the "Relids" alias for bitmapsets that are not identities of any relation considered by the planner. Try to document the logic better, too. No backpatch, as there does not seem to be a live problem before a929e17e. Also no new regression test; the code where the bug was will be gone at the end of this patch series, so it seems a bit pointless to memorialize the issue. Tom Lane and David Rowley, per reports from Andreas Seltenreich and Jaime Casanova. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87sg8tqhsl.fsf@aurora.ydns.eu Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJKUy5gCXDSmFs2c=R+VGgn7FiYcLCsEFEuDNNLGfoha=pBE_g@mail.gmail.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
This adds the SQL standard feature that adds the SEARCH and CYCLE clauses to recursive queries to be able to do produce breadth- or depth-first search orders and detect cycles. These clauses can be rewritten into queries using existing syntax, and that is what this patch does in the rewriter. Reviewed-by: Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org> Reviewed-by: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/db80ceee-6f97-9b4a-8ee8-3ba0c58e5be2@2ndquadrant.com
-
Alexander Korotkov authored
Current code allocates memory for JsonbValue, but it could be placed locally.
-
Michael Paquier authored
This is a replacement for the existing --with-openssl, extending the logic to make easier the addition of new SSL libraries. The grammar is chosen to be similar to --with-uuid, where multiple values can be chosen, with "openssl" as the only supported value for now. The original switch, --with-openssl, is kept for compatibility. Author: Daniel Gustafsson, Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/FAB21FC8-0F62-434F-AA78-6BD9336D630A@yesql.se
-
Tom Lane authored
On machines where sizeof(Datum) > sizeof(Oid) (that is, any 64-bit platform), the previous coding would compute a misaligned workspace->index pointer if nupper is odd. Architectures where misaligned access is a hard no-no would then fail. This appears to explain why thorntail is unhappy but other buildfarm members are not.
-
- 31 Jan, 2021 5 commits
-
-
Alexander Korotkov authored
During the jsonb subscripting assignment, the provided path might assume an object or an array where the source jsonb has a scalar value. Initial subscripting assignment logic will skip such an update operation with no message shown. This commit makes it throw an error to indicate this type of situation. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2Bq6zcV8qvGcDXurwwgUbwACV86Th7G80pnubg42e-p9gsSf%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2Bq6zcX3mdxGCgdThzuySwH-ApyHHM-G4oB1R0fn0j2hZqqkLQ%40mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2Bq6zcVDuGBv%3DM0FqBYX8DPebS3F_0KQ6OVFobGJPM507_SZ_w%40mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2Bq6zcVovR%2BXY4mfk-7oNk-rF91gH0PebnNfuUjuuDsyHjOcVA%40mail.gmail.com Author: Dmitry Dolgov Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Arthur Zakirov, Pavel Stehule, Dian M Fay Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan, Chapman Flack, Merlin Moncure, Peter Geoghegan Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera, Jim Nasby, Josh Berkus, Victor Wagner Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev, Robert Haas, Oleg Bartunov
-
Alexander Korotkov authored
This commit introduces two new flags for jsonb assignment: * JB_PATH_FILL_GAPS: Appending array elements on the specified position, gaps are filled with nulls (similar to the JavaScript behavior). This mode also instructs to create the whole path in a jsonb object if some part of the path (more than just the last element) is not present. * JB_PATH_CONSISTENT_POSITION: Assigning keeps array positions consistent by preventing prepending of elements. Both flags are used only in jsonb subscripting assignment. Initially proposed by Nikita Glukhov based on polymorphic subscripting patch, but transformed into an independent change. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2Bq6zcV8qvGcDXurwwgUbwACV86Th7G80pnubg42e-p9gsSf%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2Bq6zcX3mdxGCgdThzuySwH-ApyHHM-G4oB1R0fn0j2hZqqkLQ%40mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2Bq6zcVDuGBv%3DM0FqBYX8DPebS3F_0KQ6OVFobGJPM507_SZ_w%40mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2Bq6zcVovR%2BXY4mfk-7oNk-rF91gH0PebnNfuUjuuDsyHjOcVA%40mail.gmail.com Author: Dmitry Dolgov Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Arthur Zakirov, Pavel Stehule, Dian M Fay Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan, Chapman Flack, Merlin Moncure, Peter Geoghegan Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera, Jim Nasby, Josh Berkus, Victor Wagner Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev, Robert Haas, Oleg Bartunov
-
Alexander Korotkov authored
Subscripting for jsonb does not support slices, does not have a limit for the number of subscripts, and an assignment expects a replace value to have jsonb type. There is also one functional difference between assignment via subscripting and assignment via jsonb_set(). When an original jsonb container is NULL, the subscripting replaces it with an empty jsonb and proceeds with an assignment. For the sake of code reuse, we rearrange some parts of jsonb functionality to allow the usage of the same functions for jsonb_set and assign subscripting operation. The original idea belongs to Oleg Bartunov. Catversion is bumped. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2Bq6zcV8qvGcDXurwwgUbwACV86Th7G80pnubg42e-p9gsSf%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2Bq6zcX3mdxGCgdThzuySwH-ApyHHM-G4oB1R0fn0j2hZqqkLQ%40mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2Bq6zcVDuGBv%3DM0FqBYX8DPebS3F_0KQ6OVFobGJPM507_SZ_w%40mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2Bq6zcVovR%2BXY4mfk-7oNk-rF91gH0PebnNfuUjuuDsyHjOcVA%40mail.gmail.com Author: Dmitry Dolgov Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Arthur Zakirov, Pavel Stehule, Dian M Fay Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan, Chapman Flack, Merlin Moncure, Peter Geoghegan Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera, Jim Nasby, Josh Berkus, Victor Wagner Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev, Robert Haas, Oleg Bartunov
-
Peter Geoghegan authored
The latestRemovedXid values used by nbtree deletion operations are determined by _bt_delitems_delete()'s caller, so there is no reason to pass a separate heapRel argument. Oversight in commit d168b666.
-
Alexander Korotkov authored
When to_tsquery() or websearch_to_tsquery() meet a complex morph containing multiple words residing adjacent position, these words are connected with OP_AND operator. That leads to surprising results. For instace, both websearch_to_tsquery('"pg_class pg"') and to_tsquery('pg_class <-> pg') produce '( pg & class ) <-> pg' tsquery. This tsquery requires 'pg' and 'class' words to reside on the same position and doesn't match to to_tsvector('pg_class pg'). It appears to be ridiculous behavior, which needs to be fixed. This commit makes to_tsquery() or websearch_to_tsquery() connect words residing adjacent position with OP_PHRASE. Therefore, now those words are normally chained with other OP_PHRASE operator. The examples of above now produces 'pg <-> class <-> pg' tsquery, which matches to to_tsvector('pg_class pg'). Another effect of this commit is that complex morph word positions now need to match the tsvector even if there is no surrounding OP_PHRASE. This behavior change generally looks like an improvement but making this commit not backpatchable. Reported-by: Barry Pederson Bug: #16592 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16592-70b110ff9731c07d@postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdv0EzVhf6CWfB1_TTZqXV_2Sn-jSY3zSd7ePH%3D-%2B1V2DQ%40mail.gmail.com Author: Alexander Korotkov Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Neil Chen
-
- 30 Jan, 2021 7 commits
-
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
For those system catalogs that have a unique indexes, make a primary key and unique constraint, using ALTER TABLE ... PRIMARY KEY/UNIQUE USING INDEX. This can be helpful for GUI tools that look for a primary key, and it might in the future allow declaring foreign keys, for making schema diagrams. The constraint creation statements are automatically created by genbki.pl from DECLARE_UNIQUE_INDEX directives. To specify which one of the available unique indexes is the primary key, use the new directive DECLARE_UNIQUE_INDEX_PKEY instead. By convention, we usually make a catalog's OID column its primary key, if it has one. Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/dc5f44d9-5ec1-a596-0251-dadadcdede98@2ndquadrant.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
The documentation as well as source code comments weren't entirely clear whether SELECT INTO was truly deprecated (thus in theory destined to be removed eventually), or just a less recommended variant. After discussion, it appears that other implementations also use SELECT INTO in direct SQL in a way similar to PostgreSQL, so it seems worth keeping it for compatibility. Update the language in the documentation to that effect. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/96dc0df3-e13a-a85d-d045-d6e2c85218da%40enterprisedb.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
The SQL standard allows a GRANTED BY clause on GRANT and REVOKE (privilege) statements that can specify CURRENT_USER or CURRENT_ROLE. In PostgreSQL, both of these are the default behavior. Since we already have all the parsing support for this for the GRANT (role) statement, we might as well add basic support for this for the privilege variant as well. This allows us to check off SQL feature T332. In the future, perhaps more interesting things could be done with this, too. Reviewed-by: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/f2feac44-b4c5-f38f-3699-2851d6a76dc9@2ndquadrant.com
-
Noah Misch authored
Given a permanent relation rewritten in the current transaction, the old_snapshot_threshold mechanism assumed the relation had never been subject to early pruning. Hence, a query could fail to report "snapshot too old" when the rewrite followed an early truncation. ALTER TABLE SET TABLESPACE is probably the only rewrite mechanism capable of exposing this bug. REINDEX sets indcheckxmin, avoiding the problem. CLUSTER has zeroed page LSNs since before old_snapshot_threshold existed, so old_snapshot_threshold has never cooperated with it. ALTER TABLE ... SET DATA TYPE makes the table look empty to every past snapshot, which is strictly worse. Back-patch to v13, where commit c6b92041 broke this. Kyotaro Horiguchi and Noah Misch Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210113.160705.2225256954956139776.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
-
Noah Misch authored
CREATE PUBLICATION has failed spuriously when applied to a permanent relation created or rewritten in the current transaction. Make the same change to another site having the same semantic intent; the second instance has no user-visible consequences. Back-patch to v13, where commit c6b92041 broke this. Kyotaro Horiguchi Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210113.160705.2225256954956139776.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
-
Noah Misch authored
In a cluster having used CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY while having enabled prepared transactions, queries that use the resulting index can silently fail to find rows. Fix this for future CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY by making it wait for prepared transactions like it waits for ordinary transactions. This expands the VirtualTransactionId structure domain to admit prepared transactions. It may be necessary to reindex to recover from past occurrences. Back-patch to 9.5 (all supported versions). Andrey Borodin, reviewed (in earlier versions) by Tom Lane and Michael Paquier. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2E712143-97F7-4890-B470-4A35142ABC82@yandex-team.ru
-
Fujii Masao authored
The regression tests added in commits 708d165d and 411ae649 caused buildfarm failures when CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS was enabled. This commit stabilizes those tests. The foreign server connections established by postgres_fdw behaves differently depending on whether CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS is enabled or not. If it's not enabled, those connections are cached. On the other hand, if it's enabled, when the connections are established outside transaction block, they are not cached (i.e., they are immediately closed at the end of query that established them). So the subsequent postgres_fdw_get_connections() cannot list those connections and postgres_fdw_disconnect() cannot close them (because they are already closed). When the connections are established inside transaction block, they are cached whether CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS was enabled or not. But if it's enabled, they are immediately marked as invalid, otherwise not. This causes the subsequent postgres_fdw_get_connections() to return different result in "valid" column depending on whether CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS was enabled or not. This commit prevents the above differences of behavior from affecting the regression tests. Per buildfarm failure on trilobite. Original patch by Bharath Rupireddy. I (Fujii Masao) extracted the regression test fix from that and revised it a bit. Reported-by: Tom Lane Author: Bharath Rupireddy Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2688508.1611865371@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
- 29 Jan, 2021 7 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
The corresponding functions set_config and current_setting were mostly not hyperlinked. Clarify their descriptions a tad, too. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/161183356250.4077.687338658090583892@wrigleys.postgresql.org
-
Alexander Korotkov authored
When the .** jsonpath accessor handles the array, it selects both array and each of its elements. When using lax mode, subsequent accessors automatically unwrap arrays. So, the content of each array element may be selected twice. Even though this behavior is counterintuitive, it's correct because everything works as designed. This commit documents it. Backpatch to 12 where the jsonpath language was introduced. Reported-by: Thomas Kellerer Bug: #16828 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16828-2b0229babfad2d8c%40postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdtS-nNidT%3DEqZbAYOPcnNOWh_sd6skVdu2CAQUGdvpT8Q%40mail.gmail.com Author: Alexandex Korotkov, revised by Tom Lane Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera, Thomas Kellerer, Tom Lane Backpatch-through: 12
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
-
Michael Paquier authored
This documentation has been added in 98681675, so no backpatch is needed. Author: Justin Pryzby, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201222041153.GK30237@telsasoft.com
-
Michael Paquier authored
4c9c359d, that introduced those two functions, has been overoptimistic on the point that only ShareUpdateExclusiveLock would be required when moving a relation to a new tablespace. AccessExclusiveLock is a requirement, but ShareUpdateExclusiveLock may be used under specific conditions like REINDEX CONCURRENTLY where waits on past transactions make the operation safe even with a lower-level lock. The current code does only the former, so update the existing comments to reflect that. Once a REINDEX (TABLESPACE) is introduced, those comments would require an extra refresh to mention their new use case. While on it, fix an incorrect variable name. Per discussion with Álvaro Herrera. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210127140741.GA14174@alvherre.pgsql
-
Thomas Munro authored
Following the removal of pg_standby, also remove the documentation section that describes how to write your own "waiting restore_command" along the same lines. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201029024412.GP5380%40telsasoft.comReviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
-
Thomas Munro authored
pg_standby was useful more than a decade ago, but now it is obsolete. It has been proposed that we retire it many times. Now seems like a good time to finally do it, because "waiting restore commands" are incompatible with a proposed recovery prefetching feature. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201029024412.GP5380%40telsasoft.com Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
-
- 28 Jan, 2021 4 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
Per buildfarm and local experimentation, bleeding-edge gcc isn't convinced that the MemSet in reorder_function_arguments() is safe. Shut it up by adding an explicit check that pronargs isn't negative, and by changing MemSet to memset. (It appears that either change is enough to quiet the warning at -O2, but let's do both to be sure.)
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
In trying to protect the user from inconsistent behavior, commit 487e9861 "Enable BEFORE row-level triggers for partitioned tables" tried to prevent BEFORE UPDATE FOR EACH ROW triggers from moving the row from one partition to another. However, it turns out that the restriction is wrong in two ways: first, it fails spuriously, preventing valid situations from working, as in bug #16794; and second, they don't protect from any misbehavior, because tuple routing would cope anyway. Fix by removing that restriction. We keep the same restriction on BEFORE INSERT FOR EACH ROW triggers, though. It is valid and useful there. In the future we could remove it by having tuple reroute work for inserts as it does for updates. Backpatch to 13. Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Reported-by: Phillip Menke <pg@pmenke.de> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16794-350a655580fbb9ae@postgresql.org
-
Tom Lane authored
perform_pruning_combine_step() was not taught about the number of partition indexes used in hash partitioning; more embarrassingly, get_matching_hash_bounds() also had it wrong. These errors are masked in the common case where all the partitions have the same modulus and no partition is missing. However, with missing or unequal-size partitions, we could erroneously prune some partitions that need to be scanned, leading to silently wrong query answers. While a minimal-footprint fix for this could be to export get_partition_bound_num_indexes and make the incorrect functions use it, I'm of the opinion that that function should never have existed in the first place. It's not reasonable data structure design that PartitionBoundInfoData lacks any explicit record of the length of its indexes[] array. Perhaps that was all right when it could always be assumed equal to ndatums, but something should have been done about it as soon as that stopped being true. Putting in an explicit "nindexes" field makes both partition_bounds_equal() and partition_bounds_copy() simpler, safer, and faster than before, and removes explicit knowledge of the number-of-partition-indexes rules from some other places too. This change also makes get_hash_partition_greatest_modulus obsolete. I left that in place in case any external code uses it, but no core code does anymore. Per bug #16840 from Michał Albrycht. Back-patch to v11 where the hash partitioning code came in. (In the back branches, add the new field at the end of PartitionBoundInfoData to minimize ABI risks.) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16840-571a22976f829ad4@postgresql.org
-
Tom Lane authored
We had "short *mdy" in the extern declarations, but "short mdy[3]" in the actual function definitions. Per C99 these are equivalent, but recent versions of gcc have started to issue warnings about the inconsistency. Clean it up before the warnings get any more widespread. Back-patch, in case anyone wants to build older PG versions with bleeding-edge compilers. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2401575.1611764534@sss.pgh.pa.us
-