- 13 Sep, 2019 7 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
Add the comments that I griped were missing. Also re-order tests so that parallelism-related tests aren't randomly separated from each other. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAaqYe9GD__4Crm=ddz+-XXcNhfY_V5gFYdLdmkFNq=2VHO56Q@mail.gmail.com
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
Most WAL records are ignored in early SnapBuild snapshot build phases. But it's critical to process some of them, so that later messages have the correct transaction state after the snapshot is completely built; in particular, XLOG_XACT_ASSIGNMENT messages are critical in order for sub-transactions to be correctly assigned to their parent transactions, or at least one assert misbehaves, as reported by Ildar Musin. Diagnosed-by: Masahiko Sawada Author: Masahiko Sawada Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAONYFtOv+Er1p3WAuwUsy1zsCFrSYvpHLhapC_fMD-zNaRWxYg@mail.gmail.com
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
Lack of parens in the definitions could cause a statement using these macros to have unexpected semantics. In current code no bug is apparent, but best to fix the definitions to avoid problems down the line. Reported-by: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19795.1568400476@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
The progress state was being clobbered once the first index completed being rebuilt, causing the final phases of the operation not show anything in the progress view. This was inadvertently broken in 03f9e5cb, which added progress tracking for REINDEX. (The reason this bugfix is this small is that I had already noticed this problem when writing monitoring for CREATE INDEX, and had already worked around it, as can be seen in discussion starting at https://postgr.es/m/20190329150218.GA25010@alvherre.pgsql Fixing the problem is just a matter of fixing one place touched by the REINDEX monitoring.) Reported by: Álvaro Herrera Author: Álvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190801184333.GA21369@alvherre.pgsql
-
Alexander Korotkov authored
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEkD-mDUZrRE%3Dk-FznEg4Ed2VdjpZCyHoyo%2Bp0%2B8KvHqR%3DpNVQ%40mail.gmail.com Author: Liudmila Mantrova, Alexander Lakhin Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov, Alvaro Herrera Backpatch-through: 12
-
Alexander Korotkov authored
Besides cosmetic improvements it removes statement that operators necessary need to be separated from operands with spaces, which is not really true. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEkD-mDUZrRE%3Dk-FznEg4Ed2VdjpZCyHoyo%2Bp0%2B8KvHqR%3DpNVQ%40mail.gmail.com Author: Liudmila Mantrova, Alexander Lakhin Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov, Alvaro Herrera Backpatch-through: 12
-
Fujii Masao authored
Author: Shenhao Wang Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/63580B24E208E3429D94153A03C68E0901AA8002D5@G08CNEXMBPEKD02.g08.fujitsu.local
-
- 12 Sep, 2019 8 commits
-
-
Peter Geoghegan authored
Include newitemoff in rmgr desc output for nbtree page split records. In passing, correct an obsolete comment that claimed that newitemoff is only logged for _L variant nbtree page split WAL records. Both issues were oversights in commit 2c03216d, which revamped the WAL format. Author: Peter Geoghegan Backpatch: 9.5-, where the WAL format was revamped.
-
Tom Lane authored
Since WITH CHECK OPTION was introduced, ExecInitModifyTable has initialized WCO expressions with the wrong plan node as parent -- that is, it passed its input subplan not the ModifyTable node itself. Up to now we thought this was harmless, but bug #16006 from Vinay Banakar shows it's not: if the input node is a SubqueryScan then ExecInitWholeRowVar can get confused into doing the wrong thing. (The fact that ExecInitWholeRowVar contains such logic is certainly a horrid kluge that doesn't deserve to live, but figuring out another way to do that is a task for some other day.) Andres had already noticed the wrong-parent mistake and fixed it in commit 148e632c, but not being aware of any user-visible consequences, he quite reasonably didn't back-patch. This patch is simply a back-patch of 148e632c, plus addition of a test case based on bug #16006. I also added the test case to v12/HEAD, even though the bug is already fixed there. Back-patch to all supported branches. 9.4 lacks RLS policies so the new test case doesn't work there, but I'm pretty sure a test could be devised based on using a whole-row Var in a plain WITH CHECK OPTION condition. (I lack the cycles to do so myself, though.) Andres Freund and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16006-99290d2e4642cbd5@postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181205225213.hiwa3kgoxeybqcqv@alap3.anarazel.de
-
Peter Geoghegan authored
Make the function prototype order consistent with the definition order in nbtinsert.c.
-
Peter Geoghegan authored
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
Authored by Tom Lane, after a gripe from James Coleman. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAaqYe9GD__4Crm=ddz+-XXcNhfY_V5gFYdLdmkFNq=2VHO56Q@mail.gmail.com
-
Amit Kapila authored
The example used to explain 'Looping Through Query Results' uses pseudo-materialized views. Replace it with a more up-to-date example which does the same thing with actual materialized views, which have been available since PostgreSQL 9.3. In the passing, change '%' as format specifier instead of '%s' as is used in other examples in plpgsql.sgml. Reported-by: Ian Barwick Author: Ian Barwick Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila Backpatch-through: 9.4 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9a70d393-7904-4918-c97c-649f6d114b6a@2ndquadrant.com
-
Michael Paquier authored
Flags of t_infomask and t_infomask2 for each tuple are already included in the information returned by heap_page_items as integers, and we lacked a way to make that information human-readable. Per discussion, the function includes an option which controls if combined flags should be decomposed or not. The default is false, to not decompose combined flags. The module is bumped to version 1.8. Author: Craig Ringer, Sawada Masahiko Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan, Robert Haas, Álvaro Herrera, Moon Insung, Amit Kapila, Michael Paquier, Tomas Vondra Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMsr+YEY7jeaXOb+oX+RhDyOFuTMdmHjGsBxL=igCm03J0go9Q@mail.gmail.com
-
Michael Paquier authored
This adds tests to cover more code paths to ignore backslash commands in false branches when using \if|\elif|\else, and improves the coverage of \elif. Author: Fabien Coelho Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/alpine.DEB.2.21.1908281618520.28828@lancre
-
- 11 Sep, 2019 4 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
This is a second try at what commit 57431a91 tried to do, namely, launch the syslogger before we open postmaster sockets so that our messages about the sockets end up in the syslogger files. That commit fell foul of a bunch of subtle issues caused by trying to launch a postmaster child process before creating shared memory. Rather than messing with that interaction, let's postpone opening the sockets till after we launch the syslogger. This would not have been terribly safe before commit 7de19fbc, because we relied on socket opening to detect whether any competing postmasters were using the same port number. But now that we choose IPC keys without regard to the port number, there's no interaction to worry about. Also delay creation of the external PID file (if requested) till after the sockets are open, since external code could plausibly be relying on that ordering of events. And postpone most of the work of RemovePgTempFiles() so that that potentially-slow processing still happens after we make the external PID file. We have to be a bit careful about that last though: as noted in the discussion subsequent to bug #15804, EXEC_BACKEND builds still have to clear the parameter-file temp dir before launching the syslogger. Patch by me; thanks to Michael Paquier for review/testing. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15804-3721117bf40fb654@postgresql.org
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
The previous wording was a bit too terse, too vague on the subject of 'host' and 'hostaddr' in connection specifications, which has caused people to waste time trying to conform to rules because of misunderstanding the whole thing; this small change should make things clearer. Author: Robert Haas, stemming from Fabien Coelho's complaints Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/alpine.DEB.2.21.1808201323020.13832@lancre
-
Michael Paquier authored
Procedures are supported since v11 and \dfp can be used since this version, but it was not mentioned as a supported option in the description of describeFunctions() which handles \df in psql. Extracted from a larger patch. Author: Fabien Coelho Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/alpine.DEB.2.21.1908281618520.28828@lancre
-
Michael Paquier authored
Depending on the system used, t/*.pl may not be expanded into a list of tests which can be consumed by prove when attempting to run TAP tests on a given path. Fix that by using glob() directly in the script, to make sure that a complete list of tests is provided. This has not proved to be an issue with MSVC as the list was properly expanded, but it is on Linux with perl's system(). This is extracted from a larger patch. Author: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6628.1567958876@sss.pgh.pa.us Backpatch-through: 9.4
-
- 10 Sep, 2019 4 commits
-
-
Tomas Vondra authored
When building statistics, we need to decide how many rows to sample and how accurate the resulting statistics should be. Until now, it was not possible to explicitly define statistics target for extended statistics objects, the value was always computed from the per-attribute targets with a fallback to the system-wide default statistics target. That's a bit inconvenient, as it ties together the statistics target set for per-column and extended statistics. In some cases it may be useful to require larger sample / higher accuracy for extended statics (or the other way around), but with this approach that's not possible. So this commit introduces a new command, allowing to specify statistics target for individual extended statistics objects, overriding the value derived from per-attribute targets (and the system default). ALTER STATISTICS stat_name SET STATISTICS target_value; When determining statistics target for an extended statistics object we first look at this explicitly set value. When this value is -1, we fall back to the old formula, looking at the per-attribute targets first and then the system default. This means the behavior is backwards compatible with older PostgreSQL releases. Author: Tomas Vondra Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190618213357.vli3i23vpkset2xd@development Reviewed-by: Kirk Jamison, Dean Rasheed
-
Tom Lane authored
Up to now, async.c scanned its whole array of per-backend state whenever it needed to find listening backends. That's expensive if MaxBackends is large, so extend the data structure with list links that thread the active entries together. A downside of this change is that asyncQueueUnregister (unregister a listening backend at backend exit) now requires exclusive not shared lock, and it can take awhile if there are many other listening backends. We could improve the latter issue by using a doubly- not singly-linked list, but it's probably not worth the storage space; typical usage patterns for LISTEN/NOTIFY have fairly long-lived listeners. In return for that, Exec_ListenPreCommit (initially register a listening backend), SignalBackends, and asyncQueueAdvanceTail get significantly faster when MaxBackends is much larger than the number of listening backends. If most of the potential backend slots are listening, we don't win, but that's a case where the actual interprocess-signal overhead is going to swamp these considerations anyway. Martijn van Oosterhout, hacked a bit more by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADWG95vtRBFDdrx1JdT1_9nhOFw48KaeTev6F_LtDQAFVpSPhA@mail.gmail.com
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
As originally coded, the script would fail on Windows 10 and Python 3 because stdout would not be switched to UTF-8 only for Python 2. This patch makes that apply to both versions. Also add python 2 compatibility markers so that we know what to remove once we drop support for that. Also use a "with" clause to ensure file descriptor is closed promptly. Author: Hugh Ranalli, Ramanarayana Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKm4Xs7_61XMyOWmHs3n0mmkS0O4S0pvfWk=7cQ5P0gs177f7A@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15548-cef1b3f8de190d4f@postgresql.org
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
There was some duplicate code to run SHOW transaction_read_only to determine whether the server is read-write or read-only. Reduce it by adding another state to the state machine. Author: Hari Babu Kommi Reviewed-by: Takayuki Tsunakawa, Álvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJrrPGe_qgdbbN+yBgEVpd+YLHXXjTruzk6RmTMhqrFig+32ag@mail.gmail.com
-
- 09 Sep, 2019 6 commits
-
-
Peter Geoghegan authored
Assert that _bt_binsrch() binary searches with scantid set in insertion scankey cannot be performed on leaf pages. Leaf-level binary searches where scantid is set must use _bt_binsrch_insert() instead. _bt_binsrch_insert() is likely to have additional responsibilities in the future, such as searching within GIN-style posting lists using scantid. It seems like a good idea to tighten things up now.
-
Tom Lane authored
Don't just assume that the next port is free; it might not be, or if we're really unlucky it might even be out of the TCP range. Do it honestly with two get_free_port() calls instead. This is surely a pretty low-probability problem, but I think it explains a buildfarm failure seen today, so let's fix it. Back-patch to v11 where this script was added. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/25124.1568052346@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Andrew Dunstan authored
Modern versions of msys2 have changed the treatment of "cmd /c" so that the runtime will try to convert the switch to a native file path. This patch adds a setting to inhibit that behaviour. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3227042f-cfcc-745a-57dd-fb8c471f8ddf@2ndQuadrant.com Backpatch to all live branches.
-
Andres Freund authored
In ad0bda5d I changed the EvalPlanQual machinery to store substitution tuples in slot, instead of using plain HeapTuples. The main motivation for that was that using HeapTuples will be inefficient for future tableams. But it turns out that that conversion was buggy for non-locking rowmarks - the wrong tuple descriptor was used to create the slot. As a secondary issue 5db6df0c changed ExecLockRows() to begin EPQ earlier, to allow to fetch the locked rows directly into the EPQ slots, instead of having to copy tuples around. Unfortunately, as Tom complained, that forces some expensive initialization to happen earlier. As a third issue, the test coverage for EPQ was clearly insufficient. Fixing the first issue is unfortunately not trivial: Non-locked row marks were fetched at the start of EPQ, and we don't have the type information for the rowmarks available at that point. While we could change that, it's not easy. It might be worthwhile to change that at some point, but to fix this bug, it seems better to delay fetching non-locking rowmarks when they're actually needed, rather than eagerly. They're referenced at most once, and in cases where EPQ fails, might never be referenced. Fetching them when needed also increases locality a bit. To be able to fetch rowmarks during execution, rather than initialization, we need to be able to access the active EPQState, as that contains necessary data. To do so move EPQ related data from EState to EPQState, and, only for EStates creates as part of EPQ, reference the associated EPQState from EState. To fix the second issue, change EPQ initialization to allow use of EvalPlanQualSlot() to be used before EvalPlanQualBegin() (but obviously still requiring EvalPlanQualInit() to have been done). As these changes made struct EState harder to understand, e.g. by adding multiple EStates, significantly reorder the members, and add a lot more comments. Also add a few more EPQ tests, including one that fails for the first issue above. More is needed. Reported-By: yi huang Author: Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHU7rYZo_C4ULsAx_LAj8az9zqgrD8WDd4hTegDTMM1LMqrBsg@mail.gmail.com https://postgr.es/m/24530.1562686693@sss.pgh.pa.us Backpatch: 12-, where the EPQ changes were introduced
-
Alexander Korotkov authored
f2e40380 introduces support of non-key attributes in GiST indexes. Then if get_index_column_opclass() is asked by gistproperty() to get an opclass of non-key column, it returns garbage past oidvector value. This commit fixes that by making get_index_column_opclass() return InvalidOid in this case. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190902231948.GA5343%40alvherre.pgsql Author: Nikita Glukhov, Alexander Korotkov Backpatch-through: 12
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Tweak the tests so that we're not just testing the default setting of transaction_read_only. Reported-by: fn ln <emuser20140816@gmail.com>
-
- 08 Sep, 2019 6 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
Some of these are quite old, but that doesn't make them not bugs. We'd rather report a failure via elog than SIGSEGV. While at it, uniformly spell the error check as !RelationIsValid(rel) rather than a bare rel == NULL test. The machine code is the same but it seems better to be consistent. Coverity complained about this today, not sure why, because the mistake is in fact old.
-
Alexander Korotkov authored
In order to implement NULL LAST semantic GiST previously assumed distance to the NULL value to be Inf. However, our distance functions can return Inf and NaN for non-null values. In such cases, NULL LAST semantic appears to be broken. This commit fixes that by introducing separate array of null flags for distances. Backpatch to all supported versions. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdsNvNdA0DBS%2BwMpFrgwT6C3-q50sFVGLSiuWnV3FqOJuQ%40mail.gmail.com Author: Alexander Korotkov Backpatch-through: 9.4
-
Alexander Korotkov authored
Previously plain float comparison was used in GiST pairing heap. Such comparison doesn't provide proper ordering for value sets containing Inf and Nan values. This commit fixes that by usage of float8_cmp_internal(). Note, there is remaining problem with NULL distances, which are represented as Inf in pairing heap. It would be fixes in subsequent commit. Backpatch to all supported versions. Reported-by: Andrey Borodin Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdsNvNdA0DBS%2BwMpFrgwT6C3-q50sFVGLSiuWnV3FqOJuQ%40mail.gmail.com Author: Alexander Korotkov Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas Backpatch-through: 9.4
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
When using COMMIT AND CHAIN or ROLLBACK AND CHAIN not in an explicit transaction block, the previous implementation would leave a transaction block active in the ROLLBACK case but not the COMMIT case. To fix for now, error out when using these commands not in an explicit transaction block. This restriction could be lifted if a sensible definition and implementation is found. Bug: #15977 Author: fn ln <emuser20140816@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Note: Following existing practice, titles of formalpara and step are not titlecased.
-
- 07 Sep, 2019 2 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
Commit 6f6b99d1 stuck an INFO message into the fast path for checking partition constraints, for no very good reason except that it made it easy for the regression tests to verify that that path was taken. Assorted later patches did likewise, increasing the unsuppressable-chatter level from ALTER TABLE even more. This isn't good for the user experience, so let's drop these messages down to DEBUG1 where they belong. So as not to have a loss of test coverage, create a TAP test that runs the relevant queries with client_min_messages = DEBUG1 and greps for the expected messages. This testing method is a bit brute-force --- in particular, it duplicates the execution of a fair amount of the core create_table and alter_table tests. We experimented with other solutions, but running any significant amount of standard testing with client_min_messages = DEBUG1 seems to have a lot of output-stability pitfalls, cf commits bbb96c37 and 5655565c. Possibly at some point we'll look into whether we can reduce the amount of test duplication. Backpatch into v12, because some of these messages are new in v12 and we don't really want to ship it that way. Sergei Kornilov Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/81911511895540@web58j.yandex.ru Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4859321552643736@myt5-02b80404fd9e.qloud-c.yandex.net
-
Tom Lane authored
As a result of some long-ago quick hacks, the SIMILAR TO operator and the corresponding flavor of substring() interpreted "ESCAPE NULL" as selecting the default escape character '\'. This is both surprising and not per spec: the standard is clear that these functions should return NULL for NULL input. Additionally, because of inconsistency of the strictness markings of 3-argument substring() and similar_escape(), the planner could not inline the SQL definition of substring(), resulting in a substantial performance penalty compared to the underlying POSIX substring() function. The simplest fix for this would be to change the strictness marking of similar_escape(), but if we do that we risk breaking existing views that depend on that function. Hence, leave similar_escape() as-is as a compatibility function, and instead invent a new function similar_to_escape() that comes in two strict variants. There are a couple of other behaviors in this area that are also not per spec, but they are documented and seem generally at least as sane as the spec's definition, so leave them alone. But improve the documentation to describe them fully. Patch by me; thanks to Álvaro Herrera and Andrew Gierth for review and discussion. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/14047.1557708214@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
- 06 Sep, 2019 3 commits
-
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
-