This function was using the single-value-per-call mechanism, but the
code relied on a relcache entry that wasn't kept open across calls.
This manifested as weird errors in buildfarm during the short time that
the "brin-1" isolation test lived.

Backpatch to 9.5, where it was introduced.

These are emitted by the new ax_pthread.m4 script version. They are not
used for anything in PostgreSQL, but let's keep the generated header file
up-to-date.

Andres Freund

Found and fixed by Andres Freund.

As complained by clang, reported by Andres Freund.  Brown paper bag bug
in ccc4c074.

Add some comments, too.

Backpatch to 9.5, like that one.

One of the changes I made in commit 8703059c turns out not to have
been such a good idea: we still need the exception in join_is_legal() that
allows a join if both inputs already overlap the RHS of the special join
we're checking.  Otherwise we can miss valid plans, and might indeed fail
to find a plan at all, as in recent report from Andreas Seltenreich.

That code was added way back in commit c1711764, but I failed to
include a regression test case then; my bad.  Put it back with a better
explanation, and a test this time.  The logic does end up a bit different
than before though: I now believe it's appropriate to make this check
first, thereby allowing such a case whether or not we'd consider the
previous SJ(s) to commute with this one.  (Presumably, we already decided
they did; but it was confusing to have this consideration in the middle
of the code that was handling the other case.)

Back-patch to all active branches, like the previous patch.

In some corner cases, it is possible for the BRIN index relation to be
extended by brin_getinsertbuffer but the new page not be used
immediately for anything by its callers; when this happens, the page is
initialized and the FSM is updated (by brin_getinsertbuffer) with the
info about that page, but these actions are not WAL-logged.  A later
index insert/update can use the page, but since the page is already
initialized, the initialization itself is not WAL-logged then either.
Replay of this sequence of events causes recovery to fail altogether.

There is a related corner case within brin_getinsertbuffer itself, in
which we extend the relation to put a new index tuple there, but later
find out that we cannot do so, and do not return the buffer; the page
obtained from extension is not even initialized.  The resulting page is
lost forever.

To fix, shuffle the code so that initialization is not the
responsibility of brin_getinsertbuffer anymore, in normal cases;
instead, the initialization is done by its callers (brin_doinsert and
brin_doupdate) once they're certain that the page is going to be used.
When either those functions determine that the new page cannot be used,
before bailing out they initialize the page as an empty regular page,
enter it in FSM and WAL-log all this.  This way, the page is usable for
future index insertions, and WAL replay doesn't find trying to insert
tuples in pages whose initialization didn't make it to the WAL.  The
same strategy is used in brin_getinsertbuffer when it cannot return the
new page.

Additionally, add a new step to vacuuming so that all pages of the index
are scanned; whenever an uninitialized page is found, it is initialized
as empty and WAL-logged.  This closes the hole that the relation is
extended but the system crashes before anything is WAL-logged about it.
We also take this opportunity to update the FSM, in case it has gotten
out of date.

Thanks to Heikki Linnakangas for finding the problem that kicked some
additional analysis of BRIN page assignment code.

Backpatch to 9.5, where BRIN was introduced.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150723204810.GY5596@postgresql.org

Reported-By: Gurjeet Singh

In ff27db5d I missed that PQresultErrorField() may return NULL if
there's no sqlstate associated with an error.

Spotted-By: Coverity
Reported-By: Michael Paquier
Discussion: CAB7nPqQ3o10SY6NVdU4pjq85GQTN5tbbkq2gnNUh2fBNU3rKyQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 9.5, like ff27db5d

In 4b4b680c I passed a buffer index number (starting from 0) instead of
a proper Buffer id (which start from 1 for shared buffers) in two
places.

This wasn't noticed so far as one of those locations isn't compiled at
all (PrintPinnedBufs) and the other one (InvalidBuffer) requires a
unlikely, but possible, set of circumstances to trigger a symptom.

To reduce the likelihood of such incidents a bit also convert existing
open coded mappings from buffer descriptors to buffer ids with
BufferDescriptorGetBuffer().

Author: Qingqing Zhou
Reported-By: Qingqing Zhou
Discussion: CAJjS0u2ai9ooUisKtkV8cuVUtEkMTsbK8c7juNAjv8K11zeCQg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 9.5 where the private ref count infrastructure was introduced

newnfa() failed to set the regex error state when malloc() fails.
Several places in regcomp.c failed to check for an error after calling
subre().  Each of these mistakes could lead to null-pointer-dereference
crashes in memory-starved backends.

Report and patch by Andreas Seltenreich.  Back-patch to all branches.

Until now we computed these Param ID sets at the end of subquery_planner,
but that approach depends on subquery_planner returning a concrete Plan
tree.  We would like to switch over to returning one or more Paths for a
subquery, and in that representation the necessary details aren't fully
fleshed out (not to mention that we don't really want to do this work for
Paths that end up getting discarded).  Hence, refactor so that we can
compute the param ID sets at the end of planning, just before
set_plan_references is run.

The main change necessary to make this work is that we need to capture
the set of outer-level Param IDs available to the current query level
before exiting subquery_planner, since the outer levels' plan_params lists
are transient.  (That's not going to pose a problem for returning Paths,
since all the work involved in producing that data is part of expression
preprocessing, which will continue to happen before Paths are produced.)
On the plus side, this change gets rid of several existing kluges.

Eventually I'd like to get rid of SS_finalize_plan altogether in favor of
doing this work during set_plan_references, but that will require some
complex rejiggering because SS_finalize_plan needs to visit subplans and
initplans before the main plan.  So leave that idea for another day.

Trivial change to reduce exposure of rel.h.

Fix docs build failure introduced by commit 6fcd8851.
I failed to resist the temptation to rearrange the description of
pg_create_physical_replication_slot(), too.

When creating a physical slot it's often useful to immediately reserve
the current WAL position instead of only doing after the first feedback
message arrives. That e.g. allows slots to guarantee that all the WAL
for a base backup will be available afterwards.

Logical slots already have to reserve WAL during creation, so generalize
that logic into being usable for both physical and logical slots.

Catversion bump because of the new parameter.

Author: Gurjeet Singh
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund
Discussion: CABwTF4Wh_dBCzTU=49pFXR6coR4NW1ynb+vBqT+Po=7fuq5iCw@mail.gmail.com

These make the code a bit easier to read, and make it easier to add a
more explicit notion of a slot's type at some point in the future.

Author: Gurjeet Singh
Discussion: CABwTF4Wh_dBCzTU=49pFXR6coR4NW1ynb+vBqT+Po=7fuq5iCw@mail.gmail.com

Fix a bunch of typos, and remove two superflous includes.

Author: Gurjeet Singh
Discussion: CABwTF4Wh_dBCzTU=49pFXR6coR4NW1ynb+vBqT+Po=7fuq5iCw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 9.4

pg_dump produced fairly silly GRANT/REVOKE commands when dumping types from
pre-9.2 servers, and when dumping functions or procedural languages from
pre-7.3 servers.  Those server versions lack the typacl, proacl, and/or
lanacl columns respectively, and pg_dump substituted default values that
were in fact incorrect.  We ended up revoking all the owner's own
privileges for the object while granting all privileges to PUBLIC.
Of course the owner would then have those privileges again via PUBLIC, so
long as she did not try to revoke PUBLIC's privileges; which may explain
the lack of field reports.  Nonetheless this is pretty silly behavior.

The stakes were raised by my recent patch to make pg_dump dump shell types,
because 9.2 and up pg_dump would proceed to emit bogus GRANT/REVOKE
commands for a shell type if dumping from a pre-9.2 server; and the server
will not accept GRANT/REVOKE commands for a shell type.  (Perhaps it
should, but that's a topic for another day.)  So the resulting dump script
wouldn't load without errors.

The right thing to do is to act as though these objects have default
privileges (null ACL entries), which causes pg_dump to print no
GRANT/REVOKE commands at all for them.  That fixes the silly results
and also dodges the problem with shell types.

In passing, modify getProcLangs() to be less creatively different about
how to handle missing columns when dumping from older server versions.
Every other data-acquisition function in pg_dump does that by substituting
appropriate default values in the version-specific SQL commands, and I see
no reason why this one should march to its own drummer.  Its use of
"SELECT *" was likewise not conformant with anyplace else, not to mention
it's not considered good SQL style for production queries.

Back-patch to all supported versions.  Although 9.0 and 9.1 pg_dump don't
have the issue with typacl, they are more likely than newer versions to be
used to dump from ancient servers, so we ought to fix the proacl/lanacl
issues all the way back.

Apparently some versions of gcc prefer __sparc_v7__ and __sparc_v8__.
Per report from Waldemar Brodkorb.

Commit 85e5e222 turns out not to have taken
care of all cases of the partially-evaluatable-PlaceHolderVar problem found
by Andreas Seltenreich's fuzz testing.  I had set it up to check for risky
PHVs only in the event that we were making a star-schema-based exception to
the param_source_rels join ordering heuristic.  However, it turns out that
the problem can occur even in joins that satisfy the param_source_rels
heuristic, in which case allow_star_schema_join() isn't consulted.
Refactor so that we check for risky PHVs whenever the proposed join has
any remaining parameterization.

Back-patch to 9.2, like the previous patch (except for the regression test
case, which only works back to 9.3 because it uses LATERAL).

Note that this discovery implies that problems of this sort could've
occurred in 9.2 and up even before the star-schema patch; though I've not
tried to prove that experimentally.

Several versions of the perl that comes with the Msys DTK have been
found to have a bug that fails to recognize a ' before a multiline $ in
some circumstances. To work around the problem, use a character class
for the '. Another solution would have been to use \n instead of $, but
that would have changed the test semantics very slightly.

Commit 2834855c added a not-very-carefully-thought-out isolation test
to check a BRIN index bug fix.  The test depended on the availability
of the pageinspect contrib module, which meant it did not work in
several common testing scenarios such as "make check-world".  It's not
clear whether we want a core test depending on a contrib module like
that, but in any case, failing to deal with the possibility that the
module isn't present in the installation-under-test is not acceptable.

Remove that test pending some better solution.

There's no reason not to expose both restart_lsn and confirmed_flush
since they have rather distinct meanings. The former is the oldest WAL
still required and valid for both physical and logical slots, whereas
the latter is the location up to which a logical slot's consumer has
confirmed receiving data. Most of the time a slot will require older
WAL (i.e. restart_lsn) than the confirmed
position (i.e. confirmed_flush_lsn).

Author: Marko Tiikkaja, editorialized by me
Discussion: 559D110B.1020109@joh.to

XLogRecPtr was compared with InvalidTransactionId instead of
InvalidXLogRecPtr. As both are defined to the same value this doesn't
cause any actual problems, but it's still wrong.

Backpatch: 9.4-master, bug was introduced in 9.4

Immediately starting to stream after --create-slot is inconvenient in a
number of situations (e.g. when configuring a slot for use in
recovery.conf) and it's easy to just call pg_receivexlog twice in the
rest of the cases.

Author: Michael Paquier
Discussion: CAB7nPqQ9qEtuDiKY3OpNzHcz5iUA+DUX9FcN9K8GUkCZvG7+Ew@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 9.5, where the option was introduced

The allowed syntax for OVERLAPS, viz "row OVERLAPS row", is sufficiently
constrained that we don't actually need a precedence declaration for
OVERLAPS; indeed removing this declaration does not change the generated
gram.c file at all.  Let's remove it to avoid confusion about whether
OVERLAPS has precedence or not.  If we ever generalize what we allow for
OVERLAPS, we might need to put back a precedence declaration for it,
but we might want some other level than what it has today --- and leaving
the declaration there would just risk confusion about whether that would
be an incompatible change.

Likewise, remove OVERLAPS from the documentation's precedence table.

Per discussion with Noah Misch.  Back-patch to 9.5 where we hacked up some
nearby precedence decisions.

Reported by William Meitzen

commit 9043Fe390f4f0b4586cfe59cbd22314b9c3e2957 broke multibyte
regression tests because the commit removes the warning message when
temporary hash indexes is created, which has been added by commit
07af5238.

Back patched to 9.5 stable tree.

Report by Dean Rasheed

Patch by Dean Rasheed

Backpatch through 9.5

Report by Robert Haas, Andres Freund

Backpatch through 9.5

In de6fd1c8 I moved the the work around from 53f73879 into the aix
template. The previous location was removed in the former commit, and I
thought that it would be nice to emit a warning when running configure.

That didn't turn out to work because at the point the template is
included we don't know whether we're compiling a 32/64 bit binary and
it's possible to install compilers for both on a 64 bit kernel/OS.

So go back to a less ambitious approach and define
PG_FORCE_DISABLE_INLINE in port/aix.h, without emitting a warning. We
could try a more fancy approach, but it doesn't seem worth it.

This requires moving the check for PG_FORCE_DISABLE_INLINE in c.h to
after including the system headers included from therein which isn't
perfect, as it seems slightly more robust to include all system headers
in a similar environment. Oh well.

Discussion: 20150807132000.GC13310@awork2.anarazel.de

A removed check in ba3deeef made all threads but the main one busy-loop
when -P was used. All threads computed the time to the next time the
progress report should be printed, but only the main thread did so and
re-scheduled it only for the future.

Reported-By: Jesper Pedersen
Discussion: 55C4E190.3050104@redhat.com

A new test case from Andreas Seltenreich showed that we were still a bit
confused about removing PlaceHolderVars during join removal.  Specifically,
remove_rel_from_query would remove a PHV that was used only underneath
the removable join, even if the place where it's used was the join partner
relation and not the join clause being deleted.  This would lead to a
"too late to create a new PlaceHolderInfo" error later on.  We can defend
against that by checking ph_eval_at to see if the PHV could possibly be
getting used at some partner rel.

Also improve some nearby LATERAL-related logic.  I decided that the check
on ph_lateral needed to take precedence over the check on ph_needed, in
case there's a lateral reference underneath the join being considered.
(That may be impossible, but I'm not convinced of it, and it's easy enough
to defend against the case.)  Also, I realized that remove_rel_from_query's
logic for updating LateralJoinInfos is dead code, because we don't build
those at all until after join removal.

Back-patch to 9.3.  Previous versions didn't have the LATERAL issues, of
course, and they also didn't attempt to remove PlaceHolderInfos during join
removal.  (I'm starting to wonder if changing that was really such a great
idea.)

Spotted by Antonin Houska.

Some frontend code like e.g. pg_xlogdump or pg_resetxlog, has to use
backend headers. Unfortunately until now that code includes most of the
locking code. It's generally not nice to expose such low level details,
but de6fd1c8 made that a hard problem. We fall back to defining
'inline' away if the compiler doesn't support it - that can cause linker
errors like on buildfarm animal pademelon if a inline function
references backend only code.

To fix that problem separate definitions from lock.h that are required
from frontend code into lockdefs.h and use it in the relevant
places. I've only removed the minimal amount of necessary definitions
for now - it might turn out that we want more for other reasons.

To avoid such details being exposed again put some checks against being
included from frontend code into atomics.h, lock.h, lwlock.h and
s_lock.h. It's otherwise fairly easy to indirectly include these
headers.

Discussion: 20150806070902.GE12214@awork2.anarazel.de

Amit reviewed the replication origins patch and made some good
points. Address them. This fixes typos in error messages, docs and
comments and adds a missing error check (although in a
should-never-happen scenario).

Discussion: CAA4eK1JqUBVeWWKwUmBPryFaje4190ug0y-OAUHWQ6tD83V4xg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 9.5, where replication origins were introduced.

Report by Andres Freund and Jeff Janes

Backpatch through 9.5

Commit 9e7e29c7 introduced an Assert that
join removal didn't reduce the eval_at set of any PlaceHolderVar to empty.
At first glance it looks like join_is_removable ensures that's true --- but
actually, the loop in join_is_removable skips PlaceHolderVars that are not
referenced above the join due to be removed.  So, if we don't want any
empty eval_at sets, the right thing to do is to delete any now-unreferenced
PlaceHolderVars from the data structure entirely.

Per fuzz testing by Andreas Seltenreich.  Back-patch to 9.3 where the
aforesaid Assert was added.