Skip to content

P
Postgres FD Implementation
Switch branch/tag
  1. 29 Oct, 2020 2 commits
  3. 28 Oct, 2020 10 commits
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Doc: clean up pg_relation_check_pages() documentation. · b787d4ce
      Tom Lane authored 
      Commit f2b88396 did not get the memo about the new formatting
style for tables documenting built-in functions.  I noticed because
of a PDF build warning about an overwidth table.
      b787d4ce
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Doc: clean up verify_heapam() documentation. · 4c49d8fc
      Tom Lane authored 
      I started with the intention of just suppressing a PDF build warning
by removing the example output, but ended up doing more: correcting
factual errors in the function's signature, moving a bunch of
generalized handwaving into the "Using amcheck Effectively" section
which seemed a better place for it, and improving wording and markup
a little bit.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/732904.1603728748@sss.pgh.pa.us
      4c49d8fc
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Use mode "r" for popen() in psql's evaluate_backtick(). · 66f8687a
      Tom Lane authored 
      In almost all other places, we use plain "r" or "w" mode in popen()
calls (the exceptions being for COPY data).  This one has been
overlooked (possibly because it's buried in a ".l" flex file?),
but it's using PG_BINARY_R.

Kensuke Okamura complained in bug #16688 that we fail to strip \r
when stripping the trailing newline from a backtick result string.
That's true enough, but we'd also fail to convert embedded \r\n
cleanly, which also seems undesirable.  Fixing the popen() mode
seems like the best way to deal with this.

It's been like this for a long time, so back-patch to all supported
branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16688-c649c7b69cd7e6f8@postgresql.org
      66f8687a
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Calculate extraUpdatedCols in query rewriter, not parser. · ad77039f
      Tom Lane authored 
      It's unsafe to do this at parse time because addition of generated
columns to a table would not invalidate stored rules containing
UPDATEs on the table ... but there might now be dependent generated
columns that were not there when the rule was made.  This also fixes
an oversight that rewriteTargetView failed to update extraUpdatedCols
when transforming an UPDATE on an updatable view.  (Since the new
calculation is downstream of that, rewriteTargetView doesn't actually
need to do anything; but before, there was a demonstrable bug there.)

In v13 and HEAD, this leads to easily-visible bugs because (since
commit c6679e4f) we won't recalculate generated columns that aren't
listed in extraUpdatedCols.  In v12 this bitmap is mostly just used
for trigger-firing decisions, so you'd only notice a problem if a
trigger cared whether a generated column had been updated.

I'd complained about this back in May, but then forgot about it
until bug #16671 from Michael Paul Killian revived the issue.

Back-patch to v12 where this field was introduced.  If existing
stored rules contain any extraUpdatedCols values, they'll be
ignored because the rewriter will overwrite them, so the bug will
be fixed even for existing rules.  (But note that if someone were
to update to 13.1 or 12.5, store some rules with UPDATEs on tables
having generated columns, and then downgrade to a prior minor version,
they might observe issues similar to what this patch fixes.  That
seems unlikely enough to not be worth going to a lot of effort to fix.)

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10206.1588964727@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16671-2fa55851859fb166@postgresql.org
      ad77039f
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Don't use custom OID symbols in pg_proc.dat. · 36b93121
      Tom Lane authored 
      We have a perfectly good convention for OID macros for built-in functions
already, so making custom symbols is just introducing unnecessary
deviation from the convention.  Remove the one case that had snuck in,
and add an error check in genbki.pl to discourage future instances.

Although this touches pg_proc.dat, there's no need for a catversion
bump since the actual catalog data isn't changed.

John Naylor

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFBsxsHpCbjfoddNGpnnnY5pHwckWfiYkMYSF74PmP1su0+ZOw@mail.gmail.com
      36b93121
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Fix foreign-key selectivity estimation in the presence of constants. · ad1c36b0
      Tom Lane authored 
      get_foreign_key_join_selectivity() looks for join clauses that equate
the two sides of the FK constraint.  However, if we have a query like
"WHERE fktab.a = pktab.a and fktab.a = 1", it won't find any such join
clause, because equivclass.c replaces the given clauses with "fktab.a
= 1 and pktab.a = 1", which can be enforced at the scan level, leaving
nothing to be done for column "a" at the join level.

We can fix that expectation without much trouble, but then a new problem
arises: applying the foreign-key-based selectivity rule produces a
rowcount underestimate, because we're effectively double-counting the
selectivity of the "fktab.a = 1" clause.  So we have to cancel that
selectivity out of the estimate.

To fix, refactor process_implied_equality() so that it can pass back the
new RestrictInfo to its callers in equivclass.c, allowing the generated
"fktab.a = 1" clause to be saved in the EquivalenceClass's ec_derives
list.  Then it's not much trouble to dig out the relevant RestrictInfo
when we need to adjust an FK selectivity estimate.  (While at it, we
can also remove the expensive use of initialize_mergeclause_eclasses()
to set up the new RestrictInfo's left_ec and right_ec pointers.
The equivclass.c code can set those basically for free.)

This seems like clearly a bug fix, but I'm hesitant to back-patch it,
first because there's some API/ABI risk for extensions and second because
we're usually loath to destabilize plan choices in stable branches.

Per report from Sigrid Ehrenreich.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1019549.1603770457@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AM6PR02MB5287A0ADD936C1FA80973E72AB190@AM6PR02MB5287.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com
      ad1c36b0
    • Michael Paquier's avatar
      Use correct GetDatum() in pg_relation_check_pages() · ce7f772c
      Michael Paquier authored 
      UInt32GetDatum() was getting used, while the result needs
Int64GetDatum().  Oversight in f2b88396.

Per buildfarm member florican.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1226629.1603859189@sss.pgh.pa.us
      ce7f772c
    • Michael Paquier's avatar
      Add pg_relation_check_pages() to check on-disk pages of a relation · f2b88396
      Michael Paquier authored 
      This makes use of CheckBuffer() introduced in c780a7a9, adding a SQL
wrapper able to do checks for all the pages of a relation.  By default,
all the fork types of a relation are checked, and it is possible to
check only a given relation fork.  Note that if the relation given in
input has no physical storage or is temporary, then no errors are
generated, allowing full-database checks when coupled with a simple scan
of pg_class for example.  This is not limited to clusters with data
checksums enabled, as clusters without data checksums can still apply
checks on pages using the page headers or for the case of a page full of
zeros.

This function returns a set of tuples consisting of:
- The physical file where a broken page has been detected (without the
segment number as that can be AM-dependent, which can be guessed from
the block number for heap).  A relative path from PGPATH is used.
- The block number of the broken page.

By default, only superusers have an access to this function but
execution rights can be granted to other users.

The feature introduced here is still minimal, and more improvements
could be done, like:
- Addition of a start and end block number to run checks on a range
of blocks, which would apply only if one fork type is checked.
- Addition of some progress reporting.
- Throttling, with configuration parameters in function input or
potentially some cost-based GUCs.

Regression tests are added for positive cases in the main regression
test suite, and TAP tests are added for cases involving the emulation of
page corruptions.

Bump catalog version.

Author: Julien Rouhaud, Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada, Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOBaU_aVvMjQn=ge5qPiJOPMmOj5=ii3st5Q0Y+WuLML5sR17w@mail.gmail.com
      f2b88396
    • Michael Paquier's avatar
      Add CheckBuffer() to check on-disk pages without shared buffer loading · c780a7a9
      Michael Paquier authored 
      CheckBuffer() is designed to be a concurrent-safe function able to run
sanity checks on a relation page without loading it into the shared
buffers.  The operation is done using a lock on the partition involved
in the shared buffer mapping hashtable and an I/O lock for the buffer
itself, preventing the risk of false positives due to any concurrent
activity.

The primary use of this function is the detection of on-disk corruptions
for relation pages.  If a page is found in shared buffers, the on-disk
page is checked if not dirty (a follow-up checkpoint would flush a valid
version of the page if dirty anyway), as it could be possible that a
page was present for a long time in shared buffers with its on-disk
version corrupted.  Such a scenario could lead to a corrupted cluster if
a host is plugged off for example.  If the page is not found in shared
buffers, its on-disk state is checked.  PageIsVerifiedExtended() is used
to apply the same sanity checks as when a page gets loaded into shared
buffers.

This function will be used by an upcoming patch able to check the state
of on-disk relation pages using a SQL function.

Author: Julien Rouhaud, Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by:  Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOBaU_aVvMjQn=ge5qPiJOPMmOj5=ii3st5Q0Y+WuLML5sR17w@mail.gmail.com
      c780a7a9
    • Amit Kapila's avatar
      Minor improvements in description of spilled counters in pg_stat_replication_slots view. · 9e0f87a4
      Amit Kapila authored 
      Per a suggestion by Justin Pryzby.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+fd4k5_pPAYRTDrO2PbtTOe0eHQpBvuqmCr8ic39uTNmR49Eg@mail.gmail.com
      9e0f87a4
  5. 27 Oct, 2020 11 commits
  7. 26 Oct, 2020 4 commits
  9. 25 Oct, 2020 2 commits
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Fix corner case for a BEFORE ROW UPDATE trigger returning OLD. · ba9f18ab
      Tom Lane authored 
      If the old row has any "missing" attributes that are supposed to
be retrieved from an associated tuple descriptor, the wrong things
happened because the trigger result is shoved directly into an
executor slot that lacks the missing-attribute data.  Notably,
CHECK-constraint verification would incorrectly see those columns
as NULL, and so would RETURNING-list evaluation.

Band-aid around this by forcibly expanding the tuple before passing
it to the trigger function.  (IMO it was a fundamental misdesign to
put the missing-attribute data into tuple constraints, which so
much of the system considers to be optional.  But we're probably
stuck with that now, and will have to continue to apply band-aids
as we find other places with similar issues.)

Back-patch to v12.  v11 would also have the issue, except that
commit 920311ab1 already applied a similar band-aid.  That forced
expansion in more cases than seem really necessary, though, so
this isn't a directly equivalent fix.

Amit Langote, with some cosmetic changes by me

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16644-5da7ef98a7ac4545@postgresql.org
      ba9f18ab
    • David Rowley's avatar
      Fix incorrect parameter name in a function header comment · e83c9f91
      David Rowley authored 
      Author: Zhijie Hou
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/14cd74ea00204cc8a7ea5d738ac82cd1@G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local
Backpatch-through: 12, where the mistake was introduced
      e83c9f91
  11. 24 Oct, 2020 3 commits
  13. 23 Oct, 2020 8 commits