>   [merge]
378a380
>   [merge]

< * Add MERGE command that does UPDATE/DELETE, or on failure, INSERT (rules,
<   triggers?)
> * Add SQL-standard MERGE command, typically used to merge two tables
>
>   This is similar to UPDATE, then for unmatched rows, INSERT.
>   Whether concurrent access allows modifications which could cause
>   row loss is implementation independent.
>
> * Add REPLACE or UPSERT command that does UPDATE, or on failure, INSERT

Also add a retry for Unixen returning EINTR, which hasn't been reported
as an issue but at least theoretically could be.  Patch by Qingqing Zhou,
some minor adjustments by me.

Michael Fuhr.

change errno.  No reported bugs here, but why take a chance?

#2075: consider an index redundant if any of its index conditions were already
used, rather than if all of them were.  Also, make the selectivity comparison
a bit fuzzy, so that very small differences in estimated selectivities don't
skew the results.

- Made several variables "const char *" instead of "char *" as proposed by Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>.
- Replaced all strdup() calls by ECPGstrdup().
- Set ecpg library version to 5.2.
- Set ecpg version to 4.2.1.

< #A hyphen, "-", marks changes that will appear in the upcoming 8.1 release.#
> #A hyphen, "-", marks changes that will appear in the upcoming 8.2 release.#

< * Remove Win32 rename/unlink looping if unnecessary

the executor.  This allows, for example, JDBC clients to use '?' bound
parameters in these commands.  Per gripe from Virag Saksena.

it's worth probing the outer relation for emptiness before building the
hash table.  To wit, if we're rescanning a join previously performed,
remember whether we found it nonempty the previous time, and don't bother
with the probe if it was nonempty.  This buys back the performance lost
in examples like Mario Weilguni's.

and IFNULL.

Backpatch to 8.1.X.

> * Allow COMMENT ON to accept an expression rather than just a string

After a proposal by Martijn van Oosterhout (not exactly his patch though).

Per suggestion from Tom Lane.

one child or the other had a problem: they did not leave the node in a
state that ExecReScanHashJoin would understand.  In particular it would
tend to fail to reset the child plans when needed.  Per report from
Mario Weilguni.

crash when analyzing tables with expressional indexes.

Per report from Frank van Vugt.

ScalarArrayOpExpr when possible, that is, whenever there is an array type
for the values of the expression list.  This completes the project I've
been working on to improve the speed of index searches with long IN lists,
as per discussion back in mid-October.

I did not force initdb, but until you do one you will see failures in the
"rules" regression test, because some of the standard system views use IN
and their compiled formats have changed.

they were broken-out AND or OR lists.  The least grotty way to do this
seemed to be to set up a general mechanism for handling nodes as though
they were ANDs or ORs.  There's no other immediate use for it, but perhaps
we might want to use the mechanism someday for things like BETWEEN
SYMMETRIC.

per buildfarm report from platypus, even though older versions let it pass.

"ctid IN (list)" will still work after we convert IN to ScalarArrayOpExpr.
Make some minor efficiency improvements while at it, such as ensuring that
multiple TIDs are fetched in physical heap order.  And fix EXPLAIN so that
it shows what's really going on for a TID scan.

a palloc or two in the OpExpr case.

heapgettup.

when we first read the page, rather than checking them one at a time.
This allows us to take and release the buffer content lock just once
per page, instead of once per tuple.  Since it's a shared lock the
contention penalty for holding the lock longer shouldn't be too bad.
We can safely do this only when using an MVCC snapshot; else the
assumption that visibility won't change over time is uncool.  Therefore
there are now two code paths depending on the snapshot type.  I also
made the same change in nodeBitmapHeapscan.c, where it can be done always
because we only support MVCC snapshots for bitmap scans anyway.
Also make some incidental cleanups in the APIs of these functions.
Per a suggestion from Qingqing Zhou.

qualification when the underlying operator is indexable and useOr is true.
That is, indexkey op ANY (ARRAY[...]) is effectively translated into an
OR combination of one indexscan for each array element.  This only works
for bitmap index scans, of course, since regular indexscans no longer
support OR'ing of scans.  There are still some loose ends to clean up
before changing 'x IN (list)' to translate as a ScalarArrayOpExpr;
for instance predtest.c ought to be taught about it.  But this gets the
basic functionality in place.

a TupleTableSlot: instead of calling ExecClearTuple, inline the needed
operations, so that we can avoid redundant steps.  In particular, when
the old and new tuples are both on the same disk page, avoid releasing
and re-acquiring the buffer pin --- this saves work in both the bufmgr
and ResourceOwner modules.  To make this improvement actually useful,
partially revert a change I made on 2004-04-21 that caused SeqNext
et al to call ExecClearTuple before ExecStoreTuple.  The motivation
for that, to avoid grabbing the BufMgrLock separately for releasing
the old buffer and grabbing the new one, no longer applies.  My
profiling says that this saves about 5% of the CPU time for an
all-in-memory seqscan.

<
> 	o Add -f to pg_dumpall

generate their output tuple descriptors from their target lists (ie, using
ExecAssignResultTypeFromTL()).  We long ago fixed things so that all node
types have minimally valid tlists, so there's no longer any good reason to
have two different ways of doing it.  This change is needed to fix bug
reported by Hayden James: the fix of 2005-11-03 to emit the correct column
names after optimizing away a SubqueryScan node didn't work if the new
top-level plan node used ExecAssignResultTypeFromOuterPlan to generate its
tupdesc, since the next plan node down won't have the correct column labels.

a SubLink expression into a rule query.  Pre-8.1 we essentially did this
unconditionally; 8.1 tries to do it only when needed, but was missing a
couple of cases.  Per report from Kyle Bateman.  Add some regression test
cases covering this area.

per David Fetter