- 26 Jun, 2021 3 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
Commit c0cb87fb unwisely introduced a dependency on the StringInfo machinery in fe-connect.c. We must not use that in libpq, because it will do a summary exit(1) if it hits OOM, and that is not appropriate behavior for a general-purpose library. The goal of allowing arbitrary line lengths in service files doesn't seem like it's worth a lot of effort, so revert back to the previous method of using a stack-allocated buffer and failing on buffer overflow. This isn't an exact revert though. I kept that patch's refactoring to have a single exit path, as that seems cleaner than having each error path know what to do to clean up. Also, I made the fixed-size buffer 1024 bytes not 256, just to push off the need for an expandable buffer some more. There is more to do here; in particular the lack of any mechanical check for this type of mistake now seems pretty hazardous. But this fix gets us back to the level of robustness we had in v13, anyway. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/daeb22ec6ca8ef61e94d766a9b35fb03cabed38e.camel@vmware.com
-
Michael Paquier authored
The version string is grabbed from PACKAGE_VERSION in pg_config.h in the MSVC build since 8f4fb4c6, but an error message referenced a variable that existed before that. This had no consequences except if one messes up enough with the version number of the build. Author: Anton Voloshin Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/af79ee1b-9962-b299-98e1-f90a289e19e6@postgrespro.ru Backpatch-through: 13
-
Michael Paquier authored
002_pgbench_no_server was printing some array pointers instead of the actual contents of those arrays for the expected outputs of stdout and stderr for a tested command. This does not add any new information that can help with debugging as the test names allow to track failure locations, if any. This commit simply removes those logs as the rest of the printed information is redundant with command_checks_all(). Per discussion with Andrew Dunstan and Álvaro Herrera. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YNXNFaG7IgkzZanD@paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: 11
-
- 25 Jun, 2021 10 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
It's not really necessary for this function to open or lock the relation associated with the pg_policy entry it's modifying. The error checks it's making on the rel are if anything counterproductive (e.g., if we don't want to allow installation of policies on system catalogs, here is not the place to prevent that). In particular, it seems just wrong to insist on an ownership check. That has the net effect of forcing people to use superuser for DROP OWNED BY, which surely is not an effect we want. Also there is no point in rebuilding the dependencies of the policy expressions, which aren't being changed. Lastly, locking the table also seems counterproductive; it's not helping to prevent race conditions, since we failed to re-read the pg_policy row after acquiring the lock. That means that concurrent DDL would likely result in "tuple concurrently updated/deleted" errors; which is the same behavior this code will produce, with less overhead. Per discussion of bug #17062. Back-patch to all supported versions, as the failure cases this eliminates seem just as undesirable in 9.6 as in HEAD. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1573181.1624220108@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Tom Lane authored
Now that this has been back-patched, it's no longer a new feature for v14.
-
Michael Paquier authored
This fixes a couple of problems within the so-said code of this commit subject: - Replace the use of open() with slurp_file(), fixing an issue reported by buildfarm member fairywren whose perl installation keep around CRLF characters, causing the matching patterns for the logs to fail. - Remove the eval block, which is not really necessary. This set of issues has come into light after fixing a different issue with c13585fe, and this is wrong since this code has been introduced. Reported-by: Andrew Dunstan, and buildfarm member fairywren Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0f49303e-7784-b3ee-200b-cbf67be2eb9e@dunslane.net Backpatch-through: 11
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
ALTER SUBSCRIPTION DROP PUBLICATION does not actually support copy_data option, so remove it from tab completion. Also, reword the error message that is thrown when all the publications from a subscription are specified to be dropped. Also, made few doc and cosmetic adjustments. Author: Vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddy@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CALDaNm21RwsDzs4xj14ApteAF7auyyomHNnp+NEL-sH8m-jMvQ@mail.gmail.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Use "floating point" rather than "float4", like everywhere else in this context. Author: Shinya11.Kato@nttdata.com Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/TYAPR01MB28965989AF84B57FC351B97BC40F9@TYAPR01MB2896.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
In gistinitpage, pageSize variable looks redundant, instead just pass BLCKSZ. This will be consistent with its peers BloomInitPage, brin_page_init and SpGistInitPage. Author: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddy@enterprisedb.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CALj2ACWj=V1k5591eeZK2sOg2FYuBUp6azFO8tMkBtGfXf8PMQ@mail.gmail.com
-
Amit Kapila authored
Author: Guillaume Lelarge Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAECtzeXf3_oZoU6mgFCOy5+pDZ5n4XtH0Da4a5n_KacraVWiHQ@mail.gmail.com
-
Michael Paquier authored
This adds MITM and SNI as acronyms, as the documentation already had them marked up with <acronym>. While on it, make sure to spell man-in-the-middle with dashes consistently, and add acronyms for those new terms where appropriate. Author: Daniel Gustafsson Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CE12DD5C-4BB3-4166-BC9A-39779568734C@yesql.se
-
Michael Paquier authored
fairywren is not happy with the pattern checks introduced by c13585fe. I am not sure if this outlines a bug in pgbench or if the regex patterns used in the tests are too restrictive for this buildfarm member's environment. This adds more debugging information to show the log entries that do not match with the expected pattern, to help in finding out what's happening. That seems like a good addition in the long-term anyway as that may not be the only issue in this area. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YNUad2HvgW+6eXyo@paquier.xyz
-
- 24 Jun, 2021 8 commits
-
-
Michael Paquier authored
The main goal of this option is to allow inspecting temporary files for debugging purposes, so moving the parameter there is natural. Oversight in cd91de0d. Reported-by: Justin Pryzby Author: Euler Taveira Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210612004347.GP16435@telsasoft.com
-
Thomas Munro authored
LLVM 13 (due out in September) has changed the semantics of LLVMOrcAbsoluteSymbols(), so we need to bump some reference counts to avoid a double-free that causes crashes and bad query results. A proactive change seems necessary to avoid having a window of time where our respective latest releases would interact badly. It's possible that the situation could change before then, though. Thanks to Fabien Coelho for monitoring bleeding edge LLVM and Andres Freund for tracking down the change. Back-patch to 11, where the JIT code arrived. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGLEy8mgtN7BNp0ooFAjUedDTJj5dME7NxLU-m91b85siA%40mail.gmail.com
-
Michael Paquier authored
The logic checking for the format of per-thread logs used grep() with directly "$re", which would cause the test to consider all the logs as a match without caring about their format at all. Using "/$re/" makes grep() perform a regex test, which is what we want here. While on it, improve some of the tests to be more picky with the patterns expected and add more comments to describe the tests. Issue discovered while digging into a separate patch. Author: Fabien Coelho, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YNPsPAUoVDCpPOGk@paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: 11
-
Tom Lane authored
The queries involving ft1_nopw don't stably return the same row anymore. I surmise that an autovacuum hitting "S 1"."T 1" right after the updates introduced by f61db909/5843659d freed some space, changing where subsequent insertions get stored. It's only by good luck that these results were stable before, though, since a LIMIT without ORDER BY isn't well defined, and it's not like we've ever treated that table as append-only in this test script. Since we only really care whether these commands succeed or not, just replace "SELECT *" with "SELECT 1". Report: https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=crake&dt=2021-06-23%2019%3A52%3A08
-
Heikki Linnakangas authored
In previous commit, I missed that relmap_redo() was also not acquiring the RelationMappingLock. Thanks to Thomas Munro for pointing that out. Backpatch-through: 9.6, like previous commit. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BhUKGLev%3DPpOSaL3WRZgOvgk217et%2BbxeJcRr4eR-NttP1F6Q%40mail.gmail.com
-
Heikki Linnakangas authored
Contrary to the comment here, POSIX does not guarantee atomicity of a read(), if another process calls write() concurrently. Or at least Linux does not. Add locking to load_relmap_file() to avoid the race condition. Fixes bug #17064. Thanks to Alexander Lakhin for the report and test case. Backpatch-through: 9.6, all supported versions. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/17064-bb0d7904ef72add3@postgresql.org
-
Amit Kapila authored
Commits 9de77b54 and ac4645c0 missed to update the logical replication message formats section in the docs. Author: Brar Piening Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cc70956c-e578-e54f-49e6-b5d68c89576f@gmx.de
-
Amit Kapila authored
Reported-by: Simon Riggs Author: Takamichi Osumi Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila Backpatch-through: 9.6 Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210222222847.tpnb6eg3yiykzpky@alap3.anarazel.de
-
- 23 Jun, 2021 6 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
For no obvious reason, isolationtester has always insisted that session and step names be written with double quotes. This is fairly tedious and does little for test readability, especially since the names that people actually choose almost always look like normal identifiers. Hence, let's tweak the lexer to allow SQL-like identifiers not only double-quoted strings. (They're SQL-like, not exactly SQL, because I didn't add any case-folding logic. Also there's no provision for U&"..." names, not that anyone's likely to care.) There is one incompatibility introduced by this change: if you write "foo""bar" with no space, that used to be taken as two identifiers, but now it's just one identifier with an embedded quote mark. I converted all the src/test/isolation/ specfiles to remove unnecessary double quotes, but stopped there because my eyes were glazing over already. Like 741d7f10, back-patch to all supported branches, so that this isn't a stumbling block for back-patching isolation test changes. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/759113.1623861959@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Tom Lane authored
The syntax summaries for CREATE FUNCTION and allied commands made it look like LEAKPROOF is an alternative to IMMUTABLE/STABLE/VOLATILE, when of course it is an orthogonal option. Improve that. Per gripe from aazamrafeeque0. Thanks to David Johnston for suggestions. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/162444349581.694.5818572718530259025@wrigleys.postgresql.org
-
Tom Lane authored
Our uses of gss_display_status() and gss_display_name() assumed that the gss_buffer_desc strings returned by those functions are null-terminated. It appears that they generally are, given the lack of field complaints up to now. However, the available documentation does not promise this, and some man pages for gss_display_status() show examples that rely on the gss_buffer_desc.length field instead of expecting null termination. Also, we now have a report that on some implementations, clang's address sanitizer is of the opinion that the byte after the specified length is undefined. Hence, change the code to rely on the length field instead. This might well be cosmetic rather than fixing any real bug, but it's hard to be sure, so back-patch to all supported branches. While here, also back-patch the v12 changes that made pg_GSS_error deal honestly with multiple messages available from gss_display_status. Per report from Sudheer H R. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5372B6D4-8276-42C0-B8FB-BD0918826FC3@tekenlight.com
-
Tom Lane authored
Previously, isolationtester displayed SQL query results using some ad-hoc code that clearly hadn't had much effort expended on it. Field values longer than 14 characters weren't separated from the next field, and usually caused misalignment of the columns too. Also there was no visual separation of a query's result from subsequent isolationtester output. This made test result files confusing and hard to read. To improve matters, let's use libpq's PQprint() function. Although that's long since unused by psql, it's still plenty good enough for the purpose here. Like 741d7f10, back-patch to all supported branches, so that this isn't a stumbling block for back-patching isolation test changes. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/582362.1623798221@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
The code to signal a running walsender when its reserved WAL size grows too large is completely uncovered before this commit; this adds coverage for that case. This test involves sending SIGSTOP to walsender and walreceiver, then advancing enough WAL for a checkpoint to trigger, then sending SIGCONT. There's no precedent for STOP signalling in Perl tests, and my reading of relevant manpages says it's likely to fail on Windows. Because of this, this test is always skipped on that platform. This version fixes a couple of rarely hit race conditions in the previous attempt 09126984; most notably, both LOG string searches are loops, not just the second one; we acquire the start-of-log position before STOP-signalling; and reference the correct process name in the test description. All per Tom Lane. Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202106102202.mjw4huiix7lo@alvherre.pgsql
-
Tom Lane authored
We've long contended with isolation test results that aren't entirely stable. Some test scripts insert long delays to try to force stable results, which is not terribly desirable; but other erratic failure modes remain, causing unrepeatable buildfarm failures. I've spent a fair amount of time trying to solve this by improving the server-side support code, without much success: that way is fundamentally unable to cope with diffs that stem from chance ordering of arrival of messages from different server processes. We can improve matters on the client side, however, by annotating the test scripts themselves to show the desired reporting order of events that might occur in different orders. This patch adds three types of annotations to deal with (a) test steps that might or might not complete their waits before the isolationtester can see them waiting; (b) test steps in different sessions that can legitimately complete in either order; and (c) NOTIFY messages that might arrive before or after the completion of a step in another session. We might need more annotation types later, but this seems to be enough to deal with the instabilities we've seen in the buildfarm. It also lets us get rid of all the long delays that were previously used, cutting more than a minute off the runtime of the isolation tests. Back-patch to all supported branches, because the buildfarm instabilities affect all the branches, and because it seems desirable to keep isolationtester's capabilities the same across all branches to simplify possible future back-patching of tests. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/327948.1623725828@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
- 22 Jun, 2021 2 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
Commits 84f5c290 et al missed the need to cover plpgsql's "simple expression" code path. If the first thing we execute after a COMMIT/ROLLBACK is one of those, rather than a full-fledged SPI command, we must explicitly do EnsurePortalSnapshotExists() to make sure we have an outer snapshot. Note that it wouldn't be good enough to just push a snapshot for the duration of the expression execution: what comes back might be toasted, so we'd better have a snapshot protecting it. The test case demonstrating this fact cheats a bit by marking a SQL function immutable even though it fetches from a table. That's nothing that users haven't been seen to do, though. Per report from Jim Nasby. Back-patch to v11, like the previous fix. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/378885e4-f85f-fc28-6c91-c4d1c080bf26@amazon.com
-
Peter Geoghegan authored
Add a .git-blame-ignore-revs file with a list of pgindent, pgperlyidy, and reformat-dat-files commit hashes. Postgres hackers that configure git to use the ignore file will get git-blame output that avoids attributing line changes to the ignored indent commits. This makes git-blame output much easier to work with in practice. Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> Reviewed-By: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=cVh3GHTP6SdLU-Gnmt2zRdF8vZkcrFdSzXQ=WhbWm9Q@mail.gmail.com
-
- 21 Jun, 2021 9 commits
-
-
Joe Conway authored
-
Andres Freund authored
In dc7420c2 I (Andres) accidentally used RelationIsAccessibleInLogicalDecoding() as the sole condition to use the non-shared catalog horizon in GetOldestNonRemovableTransactionId(). That is incorrect, as RelationIsAccessibleInLogicalDecoding() checks whether wal_level is logical. The correct check, as done e.g. in GlobalVisTestFor(), is to check IsCatalogRelation() and RelationIsAccessibleInLogicalDecoding(). The observed misbehavior of this bug was that there could be an endless loop in lazy_scan_prune(), because the horizons used in heap_page_prune() and the individual tuple liveliness checks did not match. Likely there are other potential consequences as well. A later commit will unify the determination which horizon has to be used, and add additional assertions to make it easier to catch a bug like this. Reported-By: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> Diagnosed-By: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com> Author: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEze2Wg32Y9+WJfw=aofkRx1ZRFt_Ev6bNPc4PSaz7PjSFtZgQ@mail.gmail.com
-
David Rowley authored
linitial_node() fails in assert enabled builds if the given pointer is not of the specified type. Here the type is IntList. The code thought it should be expecting List, but it was wrong. In the existing tests which run this code the initial list element is always NIL. Since linitial_node() allows NULL, we didn't trigger any assert failures in the existing regression tests. There is still some discussion as to whether we need a few more tests in this area, but for now, since beta2 is looming, fix the bug first. Bug: #17067 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17067-665d50fa321f79e0@postgresql.org Reported-by: Yaoguang Chen
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Source-Git-URL: git://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git Source-Git-Hash: 70796ae860c444c764bb591c885f22cac1c168ec
-
Noah Misch authored
Jie Zhang Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TYWPR01MB767844835390EDD8DB276D75F90A9@TYWPR01MB7678.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Code comments were claiming that verify_heapam() was checking privileges on the relation it was operating on, but it didn't actually do that. Perhaps earlier versions of the patch did that, but now the access is regulated by privileges on the function. Remove the wrong comments.
-
Bruce Momjian authored
-
Bruce Momjian authored
Reported-by: Masahiko Sawada Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoCTHyouoGv-xt1qNjjvPbGMErLi0AJncByTvr66Nq7j8g@mail.gmail.com
-
Peter Geoghegan authored
The failsafe can trigger when index processing is already disabled. This can happen when VACUUM's INDEX_CLEANUP parameter is "off" and the failsafe happens to trigger. Remove assertions that assume that index processing is directly tied to the failsafe. Oversight in commit c242baa4, which made it possible for the failsafe to trigger in a two-pass strategy VACUUM that has yet to make its first call to lazy_vacuum_all_indexes().
-
- 20 Jun, 2021 2 commits
-
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
This reverts commit 09126984; the test case added there failed once in circumstances that remain mysterious. It seems better to remove the test for now so that 14beta2 doesn't have random failures built in.
-
Tom Lane authored
Buildfarm members ayu and tern have sometimes shown a different plan than expected for this query. I'd been unable to reproduce that before today, but I finally realized what is happening. If there is a concurrent open transaction (probably an autovacuum run in the buildfarm, but this can also be arranged manually), then the index entries for the rows removed by the DELETE a few lines up are not killed promptly, causing a change in the planner's estimate of the extremal value of ft2.c1, which moves the rowcount estimate for "c1 > 1100" by enough to change the join plan from nestloop to hash. To fix, change the query condition to "c1 > 1000", causing the hash plan to be preferred whether or not a concurrent open transaction exists. Since this UPDATE is tailored to be a no-op, nothing else changes. Report: https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=ayu&dt=2021-06-09%2022%3A45%3A48 Report: https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=ayu&dt=2021-06-13%2022%3A38%3A18 Report: https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=tern&dt=2021-06-20%2004%3A55%3A36
-