When specified, WITH NO DATA does not insert any data into the relation
created, so skip checking for the insert permissions.  With WITH DATA or
WITH NO DATA, it is always required for the user to have CREATE
privileges on the schema targeted for the relation.

Note that plain CREATE TABLE AS or CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW queries have
begun to work accidentally without INSERT privilege checks as of
874fe3ae, while using EXECUTE or EXPLAIN ANALYZE would fail with the ACL
check, so this makes the behavior for all the command flavors consistent
with each other.  This is arguably a bug fix, but there have been no
complaints about the current behavior either so stable branches are not
changed.

While on it, document properly the privileges requirements for each
commands with more tests for all the scenarios possible, and avoid a
useless bulk-insert allocation when using WITH NO DATA.

Author: Bharath Rupireddy
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Lubennikova, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACWc3N8j0_9nMPz9wcAUnVcdKHzFdDZJ3hVFNEbqtcyG9w@mail.gmail.com

These flags should be independent: in particular an index AM should
be able to say that it supports include columns without necessarily
supporting multiple key columns.  The included-columns patch got
this wrong, possibly aided by the fact that it didn't bother to
update the documentation.

While here, clarify some text about amcanreturn, which was a little
vague about what should happen when amcanreturn reports that only
some of the index columns are returnable.

Noted while reviewing the SP-GiST included-columns patch, which
quite incorrectly (and unsafely) changed SP-GiST to claim
amcanmulticol = true as a workaround for this bug.

Backpatch to v11 where included columns were introduced.

Only a basic logic bug in a _bt_insertonpg() caller could lead to a
violation of this invariant (index corruption won't do it).  A "can't
happen" error seems inappropriate (it is arbitrary at best).

Demote the error to a simple assertion.  This matches similar nearby
sanity checks.

Buildfarm members that lack both HAVE_LOCALE_T and USE_ICU have been
complaining about pg_newlocale_from_collation's collcollate variable.
This is evidently fallout from commit 7d1297df, which removed the
only usage outside those two #ifdef'd code paths.  Mark the variable
pg_attribute_unused(), like its sibling collctype, which has been that
way for a long time.

The test inserts a row in primary server, waits until the insertion has
been replicated to a cascaded standby, and checks that it's visible there
by querying the cascaded standby. In order for that to work reliably, the
test needs to wait until the insertion WAL record has been fully replayed.

This should fix the occasional buildfarm failures. Diagnosis by Tom Lane.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/606796.1605424022@sss.pgh.pa.us

Author: Erik Rijkers
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/159fba265fe7c37334640fdc0444cc4b%40xs4all.nl

Obviously, in order to equality operator be satisfiable, target string must
contain all the trigrams of the search string.  On this base, we implement
equality operator in GiST/GIN indexes with recheck.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOBaU_YWwtT7tdggtROacjdOdeYHCz-tmSwuC-j-TOG-g97J0w%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Julien Rouhaud
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Alexander Korotkov, Georgios Kokolatos, Erik Rijkers

This is mostly straightforward.  However, we disallow replacing
constraint triggers or changing the is-constraint property; perhaps
that can be added later, but the complexity versus benefit tradeoff
doesn't look very good.

Also, no special thought is taken here for whether replacing an
existing trigger should result in changes to queued-but-not-fired
trigger actions.  We just document that if you're surprised by the
results, too bad, don't do that.  (Note that any such pending trigger
activity would have to be within the current session.)

Takamichi Osumi, reviewed at various times by Surafel Temesgen,
Peter Smith, and myself

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0DDF369B45A1B44B8A687ED43F06557C010BC362@G01JPEXMBYT03

This started with the intent to explain that range upper bounds
are exclusive, which previously you could only find out by reading
the CREATE TABLE man page.  But I soon found that section 5.11
really could stand a fair amount of editorial attention.  It's
apparently been revised several times without much concern for
overall flow, nor careful copy-editing.

Back-patch to v11, which is as far as the patch goes easily.

Per gripe from Edson Richter.  Thanks to David Johnston for review.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/DM6PR13MB3988736CF8F5DC5720440231CFE60@DM6PR13MB3988.namprd13.prod.outlook.com

Author: Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/C36ADFDF-D09A-4EE5-B186-CB46C3653F4C@yesql.se

This provides a handy way to get, say, the last field of the string.
Use of a negative index in this way has precedent in the nearby
left() and right() functions.

The implementation scans the string twice when N < -1, but it seems
likely that N = -1 will be the huge majority of actual use cases,
so I'm not really excited about adding complexity to avoid that.

Nikhil Benesch, reviewed by Jacob Champion; cosmetic tweakage by me

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cbb7f861-6162-3a51-9823-97bc3aa0b638@gmail.com

Apparently double-quotes are not allowed in filenames on Windows, either.

Per buildfarm.

These files are in compiled directories and install directories.

Reported-by: e.indrupskaya@postgrespro.ru

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/160379609706.24746.7506163279454026608@wrigleys.postgresql.org

Backpatch-through: 9.5

Expression indexes can't benefit from pre-computed statistics on
columns.

Reported-by: Nikolay Samokhvalov

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANNMO++5rw9RDA=p40iMVbMNPaW6O=S0AFzTU=KpYHRpCd1voA@mail.gmail.com

Author: Nikolay Samokhvalov, modified

Backpatch-through: 9.5

This was marked as BYTEA, but is more like TEXT, which is how we already
pass the history timeline file name.  Internally, we don't do any
encoding or bytea escape handling, but TEXT seems closest.  This should
cause no behavioral change.

Reported-by: Brar Piening

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6a1b9cd9-17e3-df67-be55-86102af6bdf5@gmx.de

Backpatch-through: master

On Windows, a filename cannot contain backslashes, because a backslash
is used directory separator. Remove tests I added in commit 9c4f5192
that tried to do that. We could perhaps use a SKIP block to only skip
them on Windows, but I'm not sure how exactly to formulate that, so just
remove the tests to make the buildfarm green again.

Per buildfarm.

Whether from size overflow in gistSplit or from secondary splits,
picksplit is (rarely) called with exactly two items to split.

Formerly, due to special-case handling of the last item, this would
lead to access to an uninitialized cache entry; prior to PG 13 this
might have been harmless or at worst led to an incorrect union datum,
but in 13 onwards it can cause a backend crash from using an
uninitialized pointer.

Repair by removing the special case, which was deemed not to have been
appropriate anyway. Backpatch all the way, because this bug has
existed since pg_trgm was added.

Per report on IRC from user "ftzdomino". Analysis and testing by me,
patch from Alexander Korotkov.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87k0usfdxg.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk

Using a hot standby server as the source has not been possible, because
pg_rewind creates a temporary table in the source system, to hold the
list of file ranges that need to be fetched. Refactor it to queue up the
file fetch requests in pg_rewind's memory, so that the temporary table
is no longer needed.

Also update the logic to compute 'minRecoveryPoint' correctly, when the
source is a standby server.

Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Soumyadeep Chakraborty
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/0c5b3783-af52-3ee5-f8fa-6e794061f70d%40iki.fi

Various rules for optional keywords contained unnecessary rules and
type declarations.  Remove those, thus making the output a tiny bit
smaller.
Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/e9eed669-e32d-6919-fed4-acc0daea857b%40enterprisedb.com

Backpatch-through: 13

Commit 1e53fe0e changed background processes so that they use
standard SIGHUP handler. Like that, this commit makes walreceiver
use standard SIGHUP and SIGTERM handlers, to simplify the code.

As the side effect of this commit, walreceiver can wake up and process
the configuration files promptly when receiving SIGHUP. Because the
standard SIGHUP handler sets the latch. On the other hand, previously
there could be a time lag between the receipt of SIGHUP and
the process of configuration files since the dedicated handler didn't
set the latch.

Author: Bharath Rupireddy, tweaked by Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACXPorUqePswDtOeM_s82v9RW32E1fYmOPZ5NuE+TWKj_A@mail.gmail.com

911e7020 has introduced the opclass parameters including signature length
for a set of GiST opclasses.  Due to copy-pasting, macro for getting the
signature length in trgm_gist.c was named LTREE_GET_ASIGLEN().  Fix that by
renaming this macro to just GET_SIGLEN().

Backpatch-through: 13

Commit 6023b7ea allowed pg_stat_statements to track the number
of rows retrieved or affected by some utility commands including
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW. However it did not track the rowcount
of REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW. This commit allows pg_stat_statements
to track that.

To track that, this commit changes the query completion for
REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW so that it saves the rowcount. But note that
the rowcount is still not displayed in the command completion tag output.
That is, the display_rowcount flag of CMDTAG_REFRESH_MATERIALIZED_VIEW
command tag is left false in cmdtaglist.h. Otherwise, the change of
completion tag output might break applications using it.

Author: Katsuragi Yuta, Seino Yuki
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/71f6bc72f8bbaa06e701f8bd2562c347@oss.nttdata.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aadbfba9-e4bb-9531-6b3a-d13c31c8f4fe@oss.nttdata.com

Attempting to take a base backup with Postgres linking to a build of
OpenSSL with FIPS enabled currently fails with or even without a backup
manifest requested because of this mandatory SHA256 initialization used
for the manifest file itself.  However, there is no need to do this
initialization at all if backup manifests are not needed because there
is no data to append to the manifest.

Note that being able to use backup manifests with OpenSSL+FIPS requires
a switch of the SHA2 implementation to use EVP, which would cause an ABI
breakage so this cannot be backpatched to 13 as it has been already
released, but at least avoiding this SHA256 initialization gives users
the possibility to take a base backup even when specifying --no-manifest
with pg_basebackup.

Author: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201110020014.GE1887@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 13

Commit 8bf74967 moved some of the code from brin_new_memtuple to
brin_memtuple_initialize, but this resulted in some of the code being
duplicate. Fix by removing the duplicate lines and backpatch to 10.

Author: Tomas Vondra
Backpatch-through: 10
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5eb50c97-9a8e-b691-8c40-1b2a55611c4c%40enterprisedb.com

This step was only there to test the script when we generated those, but
commit 8f113698 removed those scripts, so it's not needed anymore.

Reported-By: Peter Eisentraut
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ea403f46-2b33-a7de-618e-9cab35a698c8@enterprisedb.com

Especially for the list API such as lappend() forgetting to assign the
return value is a common problem.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/e3753562-99cd-b65f-5aca-687dfd1ec2fc@2ndquadrant.com

pg_nodiscard means the compiler should warn if the result of a
function call is ignored.  The name "nodiscard" is chosen in alignment
with (possibly future) C and C++ standards.  It maps to the GCC
attribute warn_unused_result.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/e3753562-99cd-b65f-5aca-687dfd1ec2fc@2ndquadrant.com

Two cases violated list APIs by throwing away the return value.  While
the code was technically correct, it relied on internal knowledge of
the list implementation, and the code wasn't really gaining anything
that way.  It is planned to make this a compiler warning in the
future, so just fix these cases by assigning the return value
properly.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/e3753562-99cd-b65f-5aca-687dfd1ec2fc@2ndquadrant.com

Introduce TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds() to simplify callers
that would rather have the difference in milliseconds, instead of
the select()-oriented seconds-and-microseconds format.  This gets
rid of at least one integer division per call, and it eliminates
some apparently-easy-to-mess-up arithmetic.

Two of these call sites were in fact wrong:

* pg_prewarm's autoprewarm_main() forgot to multiply the seconds
by 1000, thus ending up with a delay 1000X shorter than intended.
That doesn't quite make it a busy-wait, but close.

* postgres_fdw's pgfdw_get_cleanup_result() thought it needed to compute
microseconds not milliseconds, thus ending up with a delay 1000X longer
than intended.  Somebody along the way had noticed this problem but
misdiagnosed the cause, and imposed an ad-hoc 60-second limit rather
than fixing the units.  This was relatively harmless in context, because
we don't care that much about exactly how long this delay is; still,
it's wrong.

There are a few more callers of TimestampDifference() that don't
have a direct need for seconds-and-microseconds, but can't use
TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds() either because they do need
microsecond precision or because they might possibly deal with
intervals long enough to overflow 32-bit milliseconds.  It might be
worth inventing another API to improve that, but that seems outside
the scope of this patch; so those callers are untouched here.

Given the fact that we are fixing some bugs, and the likelihood
that future patches might want to back-patch code that uses this
new API, back-patch to all supported branches.

Alexey Kondratov and Tom Lane

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3b1c053a21c07c1ed5e00be3b2b855ef@postgrespro.ru

Was wrong in commit 1a9388bd.

Reported-by: Tom Lane, Justin Pryzby

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201102063333.GE22691@telsasoft.com

Backpatch-through: 9.5

Summarily changing the STYPE of regression-test aggregates that
depend on array_append or array_cat is an issue for the buildfarm's
cross-version-upgrade tests, because those aggregates (as defined
in the back branches) now won't load into HEAD.  Although this seems
like only a minimal risk for genuine user-defined aggregates, we
need to do something for the buildfarm.  Hence, adjust the aggregate
definitions, in both HEAD and the back branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1401824.1604537031@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1kaQ2c-0005lx-Eg@gemulon.postgresql.org

It's entirely possible to see WAL for a relation that doesn't exist in
the target anymore. That happens when the relation was dropped later.
The refactoring in commit eb00f1d4 broke that case, by sanity-checking
the file type in the target before checking the flag forwhether it
exists there at all.

I noticed this during manual testing. Modify the 001_basic.pl test so
that it covers this case.

This option was declared obsolete many years ago.

Reviewed-By: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABUevEyOE=9CQwZm2j=vwP5+6OLCSoxn9pBjK8gyRdkTzMfqtQ@mail.gmail.com

LLVM 12, to be released in a few months, made some breaking changes to
the Orc JIT interface. OrcV2 eventually will make it easier to support
features like concurrent JIT compilation, but this commit only allows
to compile against LLVM 12.

This commit is a bit bigger than desirable. That partially is because
the V2 interface is more granular than V1 interface, but also because
I chose to make some minor changes to < LLVM 12 code to keep the code
somewhat readable.

The LLVM 12 support will need to be backpatched. I plan to do so after
the patch stewed on the buildfarm for a few days.

Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201016011244.pmyvr3ee2gbzplq4@alap3.anarazel.de

After studying the code, NULLIF is a lot more subtle than you might
have guessed.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/160486028730.25500.15740897403028593550@wrigleys.postgresql.org