- 27 Mar, 2017 10 commits
-
-
Robert Haas authored
The previous logic was wrong when the value was NULL but there was no partition for NULL. Amit Langote, reviewed by Jeevan Ladhe Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/d64f8498-70eb-3c88-b56d-c54fd3b0500f@lab.ntt.co.jp
-
Robert Haas authored
ON CONFLICT .. DO UPDATE still doesn't work, for lack of a way of enforcing uniqueness across partitions, but we can still allow this case. Amit Langote, per discussion with Peter Geoghegan. Additional wordsmithing by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAA-aLv7Z4uygtq-Q5CvDi9Y=VZxUyEnuWjL=EwCfOof=L04hgg@mail.gmail.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
The previous default 'pg_log' might have indicated by its "pg_" prefix that it is an internal system directory. The new default is more in line with the typical naming of directories with user-facing log files. Together with the renaming of pg_clog and pg_xlog, this should clear up that difference. Author: Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
-
Robert Haas authored
When creating an unshared TIDBitmap, we pass MCXT_ALLOC_HUGE to allow allocations >1GB, so by analogy we pass DSA_ALLOC_HUGE for a shared TIDBitmap. Bug introduced by commit 98e6e890. Report by Rafia Sabih, fix by Dilip Kumar, adjusted by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAOGQiiPpSnkuKq+oUK_bvQFg2EPGFPN8RwgxTgBa6HU_kQa3EA@mail.gmail.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Fix all perlcritic warnings of severity level 5, except in src/backend/utils/Gen_dummy_probes.pl, which is automatically generated. Reviewed-by: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
-
Andrew Gierth authored
Per buildfarm members dromedary and arapaima.
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
There was a thinko whereby we tested the wrong tuple after fetching it from cache; avoid that by using generate_relation_name instead, which is simpler. Also, the statistics name was not qualified, so add that. (It could be argued that qualification should be conditional on the schema not being on search path. We can add that later, but at least this form is correct.) Author: David Rowley, Álvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f8RjLeVZJ2+93pdQGuZJeBF-ifsHaFMR-q-6-Z0qxA8cA@mail.gmail.com
-
Andrew Gierth authored
This extends the Aggregate node with two new features: HashAggregate can now run multiple hashtables concurrently, and a new strategy MixedAggregate populates hashtables while doing sorted grouping. The planner will now attempt to save as many sorts as possible when planning grouping sets queries, while not exceeding work_mem for the estimated combined sizes of all hashtables used. No SQL-level changes are required. There should be no user-visible impact other than the new EXPLAIN output and possible changes to result ordering when ORDER BY was not used (which affected a few regression tests). The enable_hashagg option is respected. Author: Andrew Gierth Reviewers: Mark Dilger, Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87vatszyhj.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
-
Robert Haas authored
Cut-and-paste led to something silly. Ashutosh Sharma, reviewed by Amit Kapila and by me Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAE9k0PmUbvQSBY7kwN_OkuqBYyHRXBX-c1ZkuAgR5vgF0GeWzQ@mail.gmail.com
-
Robert Haas authored
Previously, auxiliary processes and background workers not connected to a database (such as the logical replication launcher) weren't shown. Include them, so that we can see the associated wait state information. Add a new column to identify the processes type, so that people can filter them out easily using SQL if they wish. Before this patch was written, there was discussion about whether we should expose this information in a separate view, so as to avoid contaminating pg_stat_activity with things people might not want to see. But putting everything in pg_stat_activity was a more popular choice, so that's what the patch does. Kuntal Ghosh, reviewed by Amit Langote and Michael Paquier. Some revisions and bug fixes by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYES5nhkEGw9nZXU8_FhA8XEm8NTm3-SO+3ML1B81Hkww@mail.gmail.com
-
- 26 Mar, 2017 13 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
In commit b8d7f053, we needed to fix ExecEvalWholeRowVar to not change the state of the slot it's copying. The initial quick hack at that required two rounds of tuple construction, which is not very nice. To fix, add another primitive to tuptoaster.c that does precisely what we need. (I initially tried to do this by refactoring one of the existing functions into two pieces; but it looked like that might hurt performance for the existing case, and the amount of code that could be shared is not very large, so I gave up on that.) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/26088.1490315792@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Structure tag cannot be the same as a typedef that is a pointer to that struct.
-
Tom Lane authored
Change one more place where ExecInitCheck/ExecPrepareCheck's insistence on getting implicit-AND-format quals wasn't really helpful, because the caller had to do make_ands_implicit() for no reason that it cared about. Using ExecPrepareExpr directly simplifies the code and saves cycles. The only remaining use of these functions is to process resultRelInfo->ri_PartitionCheck quals. However, implicit-AND format does seem to be what we want for that, so leave it alone.
-
Tom Lane authored
The compiler is entitled to store a char[] local variable with no particular alignment requirement. Our RADIUS code cavalierly took such a local variable and cast its address to a struct type that does have alignment requirements. On an alignment-picky machine this would lead to bus errors. To fix, declare the local variable honestly, and then cast its address to char * for use in the I/O calls. Given the lack of field complaints, there must be very few if any people affected; but nonetheless this is a clear portability issue, so back-patch to all supported branches. Noted while looking at a Coverity complaint in the same code.
-
Tom Lane authored
Failure to free serveraddrs pointed out by Coverity, failure to close socket noted by code-reading. These bugs seem to be quite old, but given the low probability of taking these error-exit paths and the minimal consequences of the leaks (since the process would presumably exit shortly anyway), it doesn't seem worth back-patching. Michael Paquier and Tom Lane
-
Tom Lane authored
Both Andres and I were happy with "*op->resvalue = *op->resvalue;", but Coverity isn't; and it has a point, because some compilers might not be smart enough to elide that. So remove it. In passing, also avoid doing unnecessary assignments to *op->resnull when it's already known to have the right value.
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
"xref to REFSECT1 unsupported" with the DSSSL stylesheets. Reported-by: Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org>
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
In the DSSSL stylesheets, we had an extensive customization of the bibliography rendering. Since the bibliography isn't that used much, it doesn't seem worth doing an elaborate porting of that to XSLT. So this just moves some things around, removes some unused things, and does some minimal XSLT stylesheet customizations to make things look clean.
-
Tom Lane authored
Fix a few stray references to expression eval functions that don't exist anymore or don't take the same input representation they used to.
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
Noticed by Coverity
-
Andres Freund authored
-
Andres Freund authored
Due to b8d7f053 some permission checks are now happening even on empty tables, and some of the checks move around. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/95bdb608-093c-160f-c6be-983a36ccd7f9@joeconway.com
-
- 25 Mar, 2017 15 commits
-
-
Andres Freund authored
The previous code still contained expression evaluation time support for CaseExprs without a defresult. But transformCaseExpr() creates a default expression if necessary. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4834.1490480275@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Andres Freund authored
This replaces the old, recursive tree-walk based evaluation, with non-recursive, opcode dispatch based, expression evaluation. Projection is now implemented as part of expression evaluation. This both leads to significant performance improvements, and makes future just-in-time compilation of expressions easier. The speed gains primarily come from: - non-recursive implementation reduces stack usage / overhead - simple sub-expressions are implemented with a single jump, without function calls - sharing some state between different sub-expressions - reduced amount of indirect/hard to predict memory accesses by laying out operation metadata sequentially; including the avoidance of nearly all of the previously used linked lists - more code has been moved to expression initialization, avoiding constant re-checks at evaluation time Future just-in-time compilation (JIT) has become easier, as demonstrated by released patches intended to be merged in a later release, for primarily two reasons: Firstly, due to a stricter split between expression initialization and evaluation, less code has to be handled by the JIT. Secondly, due to the non-recursive nature of the generated "instructions", less performance-critical code-paths can easily be shared between interpreted and compiled evaluation. The new framework allows for significant future optimizations. E.g.: - basic infrastructure for to later reduce the per executor-startup overhead of expression evaluation, by caching state in prepared statements. That'd be helpful in OLTPish scenarios where initialization overhead is measurable. - optimizing the generated "code". A number of proposals for potential work has already been made. - optimizing the interpreter. Similarly a number of proposals have been made here too. The move of logic into the expression initialization step leads to some backward-incompatible changes: - Function permission checks are now done during expression initialization, whereas previously they were done during execution. In edge cases this can lead to errors being raised that previously wouldn't have been, e.g. a NULL array being coerced to a different array type previously didn't perform checks. - The set of domain constraints to be checked, is now evaluated once during expression initialization, previously it was re-built every time a domain check was evaluated. For normal queries this doesn't change much, but e.g. for plpgsql functions, which caches ExprStates, the old set could stick around longer. The behavior around might still change. Author: Andres Freund, with significant changes by Tom Lane, changes by Heikki Linnakangas Reviewed-By: Tom Lane, Heikki Linnakangas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20161206034955.bh33paeralxbtluv@alap3.anarazel.de
-
Tom Lane authored
As explained at the head of parallel_schedule, we place an arbitrary limit of 20 test cases per parallel group. Commit c7a9fa39 overlooked this. Least messy solution seems to be to move the "comments" test to the next group, since it doesn't really belong in a group of datatype tests anyway.
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
-
Simon Riggs authored
If the upstream walsender is using a physical replication slot, store the catalog_xmin in the slot's catalog_xmin field. If the upstream doesn't use a slot and has only a PGPROC entry behaviour doesn't change, as we store the combined xmin and catalog_xmin in the PGPROC entry. Author: Craig Ringer
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Reported-by: Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Author: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
These tests require the test database to be in UTF8 encoding. Until there is a better solution, take them out of the default test set and treat them like the existing collate.linux.utf8 test, meaning it has to be selected manually.
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
The test would hang if a sufficient ~/.psqlrc was present. Fix by using psql -X.
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Add necessary include files for things used in the header.
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Add more tests for various variants of subscription DDL commands, based on code coverage report. Fix a small bug discovered by that.
-
- 24 Mar, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
Because tuple packing is different (because of the MAXALIGN difference), the expected costs of a seqscan is different. The commonly used trick of eliding costs in EXPLAIN output (COSTS OFF) would make the tests completely pointless. Instead, add an alternative expected file.
-