- 31 Jul, 2020 3 commits
-
-
Michael Paquier authored
local_blks_dirtied tracks the number of local blocks dirtied, not shared ones. Author: Kirk Jamison Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OSBPR01MB2341760686DC056DE89D2AB9EF710@OSBPR01MB2341.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
-
Thomas Munro authored
Avoid repeatedly calling lseek(SEEK_END) during recovery by caching the size of each fork. For now, we can't use the same technique in other processes, because we lack a shared invalidation mechanism. Do this by generalizing the pre-existing caching used by FSM and VM to support all forks. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm%3D3SSw-Ty1DFcK%3D1rU-K6GSzYzfdD4d%2BZwapdN7dTa6%3DnQ%40mail.gmail.com
-
Michael Paquier authored
For pg_attribute, this allows to insert at once a full set of attributes for a relation (roughly 15% of WAL reduction in extreme cases). For pg_shdepend, this reduces the work done when creating new shared dependencies from a database template. The number of slots used for the insertion is capped at 64kB of data inserted for both, depending on the number of items to insert and the length of the rows involved. More can be done for other catalogs, like pg_depend. This part requires a different approach as the number of slots to use depends also on the number of entries discarded as pinned dependencies. This is also related to the rework or dependency handling for ALTER TABLE and CREATE TABLE, mainly. Author: Daniel Gustafsson Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190213182737.mxn6hkdxwrzgxk35@alap3.anarazel.de
-
- 30 Jul, 2020 7 commits
-
-
Tatsuo Ishii authored
In "High Availability, Load Balancing, and Replication" chapter, certain descriptions of Pgpool-II were not correct at this point. It does not need conflict resolution. Also "Multiple-Server Parallel Query Execution" is not supported anymore. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200726.230128.53842489850344110.t-ishii%40sraoss.co.jp Author: Tatsuo Ishii Reviewed-by: Bruce Momjian Backpatch-through: 9.5
-
Jeff Davis authored
Using pg_leftmost_one_post32() yields substantial performance benefits. Backpatching to version 13 because HLL is used for HashAgg improvements in 9878b643, which was also backpatched to 13. Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkGvDKVDo+0YvfvZ+1CE=iCi88DCOGFF3i1hTGGaxcKPw@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 13
-
Michael Paquier authored
The relkinds that support indexing are the same as the ones supporting VACUUM, so the code gets refactored a bit with the completion query used for CLUSTER, but there is no change for CLUSTER in this commit. Author: Justin Pryzby Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao, Michael Paquier, Masahiko Sawada Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200728170408.GI20393@telsasoft.com
-
Michael Paquier authored
Partitioned indexes are also registered in pg_inherits, but the description of this catalog did not reflect that. Author: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87k0ynj35y.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org Backpatch-through: 11
-
Thomas Munro authored
This avoids avoids some epoll/kqueue system calls for every wait. Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJAC4Oqao%3DqforhNey20J8CiG2R%3DoBPqvfR0vOJrFysGw%40mail.gmail.com
-
Thomas Munro authored
Previously, condition_variable.c created a long lived WaitEventSet to avoid extra system calls. WaitLatch() now uses something similar internally, so there is no point in wasting an extra kernel descriptor. Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJAC4Oqao%3DqforhNey20J8CiG2R%3DoBPqvfR0vOJrFysGw%40mail.gmail.com
-
Thomas Munro authored
Create LatchWaitSet at backend startup time, and use it to implement WaitLatch(). This avoids repeated epoll/kqueue setup and teardown system calls. Reorder SubPostmasterMain() slightly so that we restore the postmaster pipe and Windows signal emulation before we reach InitPostmasterChild(), to make this work in EXEC_BACKEND builds. Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJAC4Oqao%3DqforhNey20J8CiG2R%3DoBPqvfR0vOJrFysGw%40mail.gmail.com
-
- 29 Jul, 2020 8 commits
-
-
Peter Geoghegan authored
Add a GUC that acts as a multiplier on work_mem. It gets applied when sizing executor node hash tables that were previously size constrained using work_mem alone. The new GUC can be used to preferentially give hash-based nodes more memory than the generic work_mem limit. It is intended to enable admin tuning of the executor's memory usage. Overall system throughput and system responsiveness can be improved by giving hash-based executor nodes more memory (especially over sort-based alternatives, which are often much less sensitive to being memory constrained). The default value for hash_mem_multiplier is 1.0, which is also the minimum valid value. This means that hash-based nodes continue to apply work_mem in the traditional way by default. hash_mem_multiplier is generally useful. However, it is being added now due to concerns about hash aggregate performance stability for users that upgrade to Postgres 13 (which added disk-based hash aggregation in commit 1f39bce0). While the old hash aggregate behavior risked out-of-memory errors, it is nevertheless likely that many users actually benefited. Hash agg's previous indifference to work_mem during query execution was not just faster; it also accidentally made aggregation resilient to grouping estimate problems (at least in cases where this didn't create destabilizing memory pressure). hash_mem_multiplier can provide a certain kind of continuity with the behavior of Postgres 12 hash aggregates in cases where the planner incorrectly estimates that all groups (plus related allocations) will fit in work_mem/hash_mem. This seems necessary because hash-based aggregation is usually much slower when only a small fraction of all groups can fit. Even when it isn't possible to totally avoid hash aggregates that spill, giving hash aggregation more memory will reliably improve performance (the same cannot be said for external sort operations, which appear to be almost unaffected by memory availability provided it's at least possible to get a single merge pass). The PostgreSQL 13 release notes should advise users that increasing hash_mem_multiplier can help with performance regressions associated with hash aggregation. That can be taken care of by a later commit. Author: Peter Geoghegan Reviewed-By: Álvaro Herrera, Jeff Davis Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200625203629.7m6yvut7eqblgmfo@alap3.anarazel.de Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzmD%2Bi1pG6rc1%2BCjc4V6EaFJ_qSuKCCHVnH%3DoruqD-zqow%40mail.gmail.com Backpatch: 13-, where disk-based hash aggregation was introduced.
-
Fujii Masao authored
This commit makes pg_stat_statements track the total number of rows retrieved or affected by CREATE TABLE AS, SELECT INTO, CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW and FETCH commands. Suggested-by: Pascal Legrand Author: Fujii Masao Reviewed-by: Asif Rehman Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1584293755198-0.post@n3.nabble.com
-
Fujii Masao authored
When fast promotion was supported in 9.3, non-fast promotion became undocumented feature and it's basically not available for ordinary users. However we decided not to remove non-fast promotion at that moment, to leave it for a release or two for debugging purpose or as an emergency method because fast promotion might have some issues, and then to remove it later. Now, several versions were released since that decision and there is no longer reason to keep supporting non-fast promotion. Therefore this commit removes non-fast promotion. Author: Fujii Masao Reviewed-by: Hamid Akhtar, Kyotaro Horiguchi Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/76066434-648f-f567-437b-54853b43398f@oss.nttdata.com
-
Jeff Davis authored
Use HyperLogLog to estimate the group cardinality in a spilled partition. This estimate is used to choose the number of partitions if we recurse. The previous behavior was to use the number of tuples in a spilled partition as the estimate for the number of groups, which lead to overpartitioning. That could cause the number of batches to be much higher than expected (with each batch being very small), which made it harder to interpret EXPLAIN ANALYZE results. Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/a856635f9284bc36f7a77d02f47bbb6aaf7b59b3.camel@j-davis.com Backpatch-through: 13
-
Michael Paquier authored
Oid is unsigned, so %u needs to be used and not %d. The code path involved here is not normally reachable, so no backpatch is done. Author: Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200728015523.GA27308@telsasoft.com
-
Thomas Munro authored
Since the tableam.c code needs to make use of the syncscan.c routines itself, and since other block-oriented AMs might also want to use it one day, it didn't make sense for it to live under src/backend/access/heap. Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGLCnG%3DNEAByg6bk%2BCT9JZD97Y%3DAxKhh27Su9FeGWOKvDg%40mail.gmail.com
-
Peter Geoghegan authored
Missed by my commit 564ce621. Backpatch: 13-, where disk-based hash aggregation was introduced.
-
Peter Geoghegan authored
Oversight in commit 1f39bce0, which added disk-based hash aggregation. Backpatch: 13-, where disk-based hash aggregation was introduced.
-
- 28 Jul, 2020 6 commits
-
-
Peter Geoghegan authored
The planner is in fact willing to use hash aggregation when work_mem is not set high enough for everything to fit in memory. This has been the case since commit 1f39bce0, which added disk-based hash aggregation. There are a few remaining cases in which hash aggregation is avoided as a matter of policy when the planner surmises that spilling will be necessary. For example, callers of choose_hashed_setop() still conservatively avoid hash aggregation when spilling is anticipated. That doesn't seem like a good enough reason to mention hash aggregation in this context. Backpatch: 13-, where disk-based hash aggregation was introduced.
-
David Rowley authored
There were various unnecessary differences between Hash Agg's EXPLAIN ANALYZE output and Hash Join's. Here we modify the Hash Agg output so that it's better aligned to Hash Join's. The following changes have been made: 1. Start batches counter at 1 instead of 0. 2. Always display the "Batches" property, even when we didn't spill to disk. 3. Use the text "Batches" instead of "HashAgg Batches" for text format. 4. Use the text "Memory Usage" instead of "Peak Memory Usage" for text format. 5. Include "Batches" before "Memory Usage" in both text and non-text formats. In passing also modify the "Planned Partitions" property so that we show it regardless of if the value is 0 or not for non-text EXPLAIN formats. This was pointed out by Justin Pryzby and probably should have been part of 40efbf87. Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby, Jeff Davis Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrshRnA6C0VFnu7Fb9TVvgGo80PUMm5+2DiaS1gEkPvtw@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 13, where HashAgg batching was introduced
-
David Rowley authored
Per complaint from Scott Ribe. Based on wording suggestion from Tom Lane. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1956E806-1468-4417-9A9D-235AE1D5FE1A@elevated-dev.com Backpatch-through: 11, where pg_jit_available() was added
-
Amit Kapila authored
This adds seven methods to the output plugin API, adding support for streaming changes of large in-progress transactions. * stream_start * stream_stop * stream_abort * stream_commit * stream_change * stream_message * stream_truncate Most of this is a simple extension of the existing methods, with the semantic difference that the transaction (or subtransaction) is incomplete and may be aborted later (which is something the regular API does not really need to deal with). This also extends the 'test_decoding' plugin, implementing these new stream methods. The stream_start/start_stop are used to demarcate a chunk of changes streamed for a particular toplevel transaction. This commit simply adds these new APIs and the upcoming patch to "allow the streaming mode in ReorderBuffer" will use these APIs. Author: Tomas Vondra, Dilip Kumar, Amit Kapila Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila Tested-by: Neha Sharma and Mahendra Singh Thalor Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/688b0b7f-2f6c-d827-c27b-216a8e3ea700@2ndquadrant.com
-
Etsuro Fujita authored
In the case of range partitioning, get_steps_using_prefix() assumes that the passed-in prefix list contains at least one clause for each of the partition keys earlier than one specified in the passed-in step_lastkeyno, but the caller (ie, gen_prune_steps_from_opexps()) didn't take it into account, which led to a server crash or incorrect results when the list contained no clauses for such partition keys, as reported in bug #16500 and #16501 from Kobayashi Hisanori. Update the caller to call that function only when the list created there contains at least one clause for each of the earlier partition keys in the case of range partitioning. While at it, fix some other issues: * The list to pass to get_steps_using_prefix() is allowed to contain multiple clauses for the same partition key, as described in the comment for that function, but that function actually assumed that the list contained just a single clause for each of middle partition keys, which led to an assertion failure when the list contained multiple clauses for such partition keys. Update that function to match the comment. * In the case of hash partitioning, partition keys are allowed to be NULL, in which case the list to pass to get_steps_using_prefix() contains no clauses for NULL partition keys, but that function treats that case as like the case of range partitioning, which led to the assertion failure. Update the assertion test to take into account NULL partition keys in the case of hash partitioning. * Fix a typo in a comment in get_steps_using_prefix_recurse(). * gen_partprune_steps() failed to detect self-contradiction from strict-qual clauses and an IS NULL clause for the same partition key in some cases, producing incorrect partition-pruning steps, which led to incorrect results of partition pruning, but didn't cause any user-visible problems fortunately, as the self-contradiction is detected later in the query planning. Update that function to detect the self-contradiction. Per bug #16500 and #16501 from Kobayashi Hisanori. Patch by me, initial diagnosis for the reported issue and review by Dmitry Dolgov. Back-patch to v11, where partition pruning was introduced. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16500-d1613f2a78e1e090%40postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16501-5234a9a0394f6754%40postgresql.org
-
Peter Geoghegan authored
Note: This GUC was originally named enable_hashagg_disk when it appeared in commit 1f39bce0, which added disk-based hash aggregation. It was subsequently renamed in commit 92c58fd9. Author: Peter Geoghegan Reviewed-By: Jeff Davis, Álvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9d9d1e1252a52ea1bad84ea40dbebfd54e672a0f.camel%40j-davis.com Backpatch: 13-, where disk-based hash aggregation was introduced.
-
- 27 Jul, 2020 2 commits
-
-
Michael Paquier authored
A compressed stream may end with an empty packet. In this case decompression finishes before reading the empty packet and the remaining stream packet causes a failure in reading the following data. This commit makes sure to consume such extra data, avoiding a failure when decompression the data. This corner case was reproducible easily with a data length of 16kB, and existed since e94dd6ab. A cheap regression test is added to cover this case based on a random, incompressible string. The first attempt of this patch has allowed to find an older failure within the compression logic of pgcrypto, fixed by b9b61057. This involved SLES 15 with z390 where a custom flavor of libz gets used. Bonus thanks to Mark Wong for providing access to the specific environment. Reported-by: Frank Gagnepain Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16476-692ef7b84e5fb893@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 9.5
-
Michael Paquier authored
Some code paths dedicated to bytea used the structure for varchar. This did not lead to any actual bugs, as bytea and varchar have the same definition, but it could become a trap if one of these definitions changes for a new feature or a bug fix. Issue introduced by 050710b3. Author: Shenhao Wang Reviewed-by: Vignesh C, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/07ac7dee1efc44f99d7f53a074420177@G08CNEXMBPEKD06.g08.fujitsu.local Backpatch-through: 12
-
- 26 Jul, 2020 3 commits
-
-
Jeff Davis authored
Refactor hash lookups in nodeAgg.c to improve performance. Author: Andres Freund and Jeff Davis Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200612213715.op4ye4q7gktqvpuo%40alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch-through: 13
-
David Rowley authored
Previously we would allocate blocks to parallel workers during a parallel sequential scan 1 block at a time. Since other workers were likely to request a block before a worker returns for another block number to work on, this could lead to non-sequential I/O patterns in each worker which could cause the operating system's readahead to perform poorly or not at all. Here we change things so that we allocate consecutive "chunks" of blocks to workers and have them work on those until they're done, at which time we allocate another chunk for the worker. The size of these chunks is based on the size of the relation. Initial patch here was by Thomas Munro which showed some good improvements just having a fixed chunk size of 64 blocks with a simple ramp-down near the end of the scan. The revisions of the patch to make the chunk size based on the relation size and the adjusted ramp-down in powers of two was done by me, along with quite extensive benchmarking to determine the optimal chunk sizes. For the most part, benchmarks have shown significant performance improvements for large parallel sequential scans on Linux, FreeBSD and Windows using SSDs. It's less clear how this affects the performance of cloud providers. Tests done so far are unable to obtain stable enough performance to provide meaningful benchmark results. It is possible that this could cause some performance regressions on more obscure filesystems, so we may need to later provide users with some ability to get something closer to the old behavior. For now, let's leave that until we see that it's really required. Author: Thomas Munro, David Rowley Reviewed-by: Ranier Vilela, Soumyadeep Chakraborty, Robert Haas Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Kirk Jamison Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKGJ_EErDv41YycXcbMbCBkztA34+z1ts9VQH+ACRuvpxig@mail.gmail.com
-
Michael Paquier authored
The initial implementation of leader_pid in pg_stat_activity added by b025f32e took the approach to strictly print what a PGPROC entry includes. In short, if a backend has been involved in parallel query at least once, leader_pid would remain set as long as the backend is alive. For a parallel group leader, this means that the field would always be set after it participated at least once in parallel query, and after more discussions this could be confusing if using for example a connection pooler. This commit changes the data printed so as leader_pid becomes always NULL for a parallel group leader, showing up a non-NULL value only for the parallel workers, and actually as long as a parallel query is running as workers are shut down once the query has completed. This does not change the definition of any catalog, so no catalog bump is needed. Per discussion with Justin Pryzby, Álvaro Herrera, Julien Rouhaud and me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200721035145.GB17300@paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: 13
-
- 25 Jul, 2020 5 commits
-
-
Noah Misch authored
The loop to generate seed data will exit on RAND_status(), so we don't need to handle the case of RAND_poll() failing separately. Failures here are rare, so this a code cleanup, essentially. Daniel Gustafsson, reviewed by David Steele and Michael Paquier. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9B038FA5-23E8-40D0-B932-D515E1D8F66A@yesql.se
-
Noah Misch authored
OpenSSL deprecated RAND_cleanup(), and OpenSSL 1.1.0 made it into a no-op. Replace it with RAND_poll(), per an OpenSSL community recommendation. While this has no user-visible consequences under OpenSSL defaults, it might help under non-default settings. Daniel Gustafsson, reviewed by David Steele and Michael Paquier. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9B038FA5-23E8-40D0-B932-D515E1D8F66A@yesql.se
-
Tom Lane authored
At least on Linux and macOS, fread() turns out to have far higher per-call overhead than one could wish. Reading 64KB of data at a time and then parceling it out with our own memcpy logic makes binary COPY from a file significantly faster --- around 30% in simple testing for cases with narrow text columns (on Linux ... even more on macOS). In binary COPY from frontend, there's no per-call fread(), and this patch introduces an extra layer of memcpy'ing, but it still manages to eke out a small win. Apparently, the control-logic overhead in CopyGetData() is enough to be worth avoiding for small fetches. Bharath Rupireddy and Amit Langote, reviewed by Vignesh C, cosmetic tweaks by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACU5Bz06HWLwqSzNMN=Gupoj6Rcn_QVC+k070V4em9wu=A@mail.gmail.com
-
Tom Lane authored
Making these leakproof seems helpful since (for example) if you have a function f(int8) that is leakproof, you don't want it to effectively become non-leakproof when you apply it to an int4 or int2 column. But that's what happens today, since the implicit up-coercion will not be leakproof. Most of the coercion functions that visibly can't throw errors are functions that convert numeric datatypes to other, wider ones. Notable is that float4_numeric and float8_numeric can be marked leakproof; before commit a57d312a they could not have been. I also marked the functions that coerce strings to "name" as leakproof; that's okay today because they truncate silently, but if we ever reconsidered that behavior then they could no longer be leakproof. I desisted from marking rtrim1() as leakproof; it appears so right now, but the code seems a little too complex and perhaps subject to change, since it's shared with other SQL functions. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/459322.1595607431@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Amit Kapila authored
Commit 85c9d347 addressed a similar problem for Gather and Gather Merge nodes but forgot to account for nodes above parallel nodes. This still works for nodes above Gather node because we shut down the workers for Gather node as soon as there are no more tuples. We can do a similar thing for Gather Merge as well but it seems better to account for stats during nodes shutdown after completing the execution. Reported-by: Stéphane Lorek, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais Author: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila Backpatch-through: 10, where it was introduced Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200718160206.584532a2@firost
-
- 24 Jul, 2020 3 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
It's fairly silly that ignoring NOT subexpressions is TS_execute's default behavior. It's wrong on its face and it encourages errors of omission. Moreover, the only two remaining callers that aren't specifying CALC_NOT are in ts_headline calculations, and it's very arguable that those are bugs: if you've specified "!foo" in your query, why would you want to get a headline that includes "foo"? Hence, rip that out and change the default behavior to be to calculate NOT accurately. As a concession to the slim chance that there is still somebody somewhere who needs the incorrect behavior, provide a new SKIP_NOT flag to explicitly request that. Back-patch into v13, mainly because it seems better to change this at the same time as the previous commit's rejiggering of TS_execute related APIs. Any outside callers affected by this change are probably also affected by that one. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALT9ZEE-aLotzBg-pOp2GFTesGWVYzXA3=mZKzRDa_OKnLF7Mg@mail.gmail.com
-
Tom Lane authored
Text search sometimes failed to find valid matches, for instance '!crew:A'::tsquery might fail to locate 'crew:1B'::tsvector during an index search. The root of the issue is that TS_execute's callback functions were not changed to use ternary (yes/no/maybe) reporting when we made the search logic itself do so. It's somewhat annoying to break that API, but on the other hand we now see that any code using plain boolean logic is almost certainly broken since the addition of phrase search. There seem to be very few outside callers of this code anyway, so we'll just break them intentionally to get them to adapt. This allows removal of tsginidx.c's private re-implementation of TS_execute, since that's now entirely duplicative. It's also no longer necessary to avoid use of CALC_NOT in tsgistidx.c, since the underlying callbacks can now do something reasonable. Back-patch into v13. We can't change this in stable branches, but it seems not quite too late to fix it in v13. Tom Lane and Pavel Borisov Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALT9ZEE-aLotzBg-pOp2GFTesGWVYzXA3=mZKzRDa_OKnLF7Mg@mail.gmail.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
The new name has been preferred by Autoconf for a long time. Future versions of Autoconf will warn about the old name. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/e796c185-5ece-8569-248f-dd3799701be1%402ndquadrant.com
-
- 23 Jul, 2020 3 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
contrib/pgcrypto mishandled the case where deflate() does not consume all of the offered input on the first try. It reset the next_in pointer to the start of the input instead of leaving it alone, causing the wrong data to be fed to the next deflate() call. This has been broken since pgcrypto was committed. The reason for the lack of complaints seems to be that it's fairly hard to get stock zlib to not consume all the input, so long as the output buffer is big enough (which it normally would be in pgcrypto's usage; AFAICT the input is always going to be packetized into packets no larger than ZIP_OUT_BUF). However, IBM's zlibNX implementation for AIX evidently will do it in some cases. I did not add a test case for this, because I couldn't find one that would fail with stock zlib. When we put back the test case for bug #16476, that will cover the zlibNX situation well enough. While here, write deflate()'s second argument as Z_NO_FLUSH per its API spec, instead of hard-wiring the value zero. Per buildfarm results and subsequent investigation. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16476-692ef7b84e5fb893@postgresql.org
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
TLS 1.3 uses a different way of specifying ciphers and a different OpenSSL API. PostgreSQL currently does not support setting those ciphers. For now, just document this. In the future, support for this might be added somehow. Reviewed-by: Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
-
Thomas Munro authored
Remove extra space. Back-patch to all releases, like commit 7897e3bb. Author: Lu, Chenyang <lucy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/795d03c6129844d3803e7eea48f5af0d%40G08CNEXMBPEKD04.g08.fujitsu.local
-