This grammar has no effect as there are no dependencies on statistics,
but it is supported by the parser.  This is more consistent with the
other DROP commands.

Author: Vignesh C
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm1LA=yNmzcSfy+0oe6CEAgsxXRf_-UutE3ZncFi8QkFNQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 10

It has been spotted that multiranges lack of ability to decompose them into
individual ranges.  Subscription and proper expanded object representation
require substantial work, and it's too late for v14.  This commit
provides the implementation of unnest(multirange), which is quite trivial.
unnest(multirange) is defined as a polymorphic procedure.

Catversion is bumped.

Reported-by: Jonathan S. Katz
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/60258efe-bd7e-4886-82e1-196e0cac5433%40postgresql.org
Author: Alexander Korotkov
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby, Jonathan S. Katz, Zhihong Yu, Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera

The new test code added in ead9e51e8236 is racy -- it hinges on
shared-memory state, which changes before the WARNING message is logged.
Put it the other way around.

Backpatch to 13.

Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202107161809.zclasccpfcg3@alvherre.pgsql

We had documentation of default_transaction_isolation et al,
but for some reason not of transaction_isolation et al.
AFAICS this is just an ancient oversight, so repair.

Per bug #17077 from Yanliang Lei.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17077-ade8e166a01e1374@postgresql.org

pg_dump failed to preserve the 'enabled' flag (which can be not only
disabled, but also REPLICA or ALWAYS) for partitions which had it
changed from their respective parents.  Attempt to handle that by
including a definition for such triggers in the dump, but replace the
standard CREATE TRIGGER line with an ALTER TRIGGER line.

Backpatch to 11, where these triggers can exist.  In branches 11 and 12,
pick up a few test lines from commit b9b408c4 to verify that
pg_upgrade is okay with these arrangements.
Co-authored-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200930223450.GA14848@telsasoft.com

When triggers are cloned from partitioned tables to their partitions,
the 'tgenabled' flag (origin/replica/always/disable) was not propagated.
Make it so that the flag on the trigger on partition is initially set to
the same value as on the partitioned table.

Add a test case to verify the behavior.

Backpatch to 11, where this appeared in commit 86f57594.

Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reported-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200930223450.GA14848@telsasoft.com

When some slots are invalidated due to the max_slot_wal_keep_size limit,
the old segment horizon should move forward to stay within the limit.
However, in commit c6550776 we forgot to call KeepLogSeg again to
recompute the horizon after invalidating replication slots.  In cases
where other slots remained, the limits would be recomputed eventually
for other reasons, but if all slots were invalidated, the limits would
not move at all afterwards.  Repair.

Backpatch to 13 where the feature was introduced.

Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Marcin Krupowicz <mk@071.ovh>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17103-004130e8f27782c9@postgresql.org

Ensure to properly mark up function parameters in text with <parameter>,
avoid using <acronym> for terms which aren't acronyms and properly place
the ", and" in a value list. The acronym removal is a follow-up to commit
fb72a7b8 which removed it for minmax-multi.  In passing, also fix an
incorrectly cased word.

Author: Ekaterina Kiryanova <e.kiryanova@postgrespro.ru>
Reviewed-by: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c050ecbc-80b2-b360-3c1d-9fe6a6a11bb5@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch-through: v14

Autoconf's AC_CHECK_DECLS() always defines HAVE_DECL_whatever
as 1 or 0, but some of the entries in msvc/Solution.pm showed
such symbols as "undef" instead of 0.  Fix that for consistency.
There's no live bug in current usages AFAICS, but it's not hard
to imagine one creeping in if more-complex #if tests get added.

Back-patch to v13, which is as far back as Solution.pm contains
this data.  The inconsistency still exists in the manually-filled
pg_config_ext.h.win32 files of older branches; but as long as the
problem is only latent, it doesn't seem worth the trouble to
clean things up there.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3185430.1626133592@sss.pgh.pa.us

This commit fixes the description of a couple of multirange operators and
oprjoin for another multirange operator.  The change of oprjoin is more
cosmetic since both old and new functions return the same constant.

These cosmetic changes don't worth catalog incompatibility between 14beta2
and 14beta3.  So, catversion isn't bumped.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdv9OZEuZDqOQoUKpXhq%3Dmc-qa4gKCPmcgG5Vvesu7%3Ds1w%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-throgh: 14

A code path asserted that the archiver was dead, but a check made that
impossible to happen.

Author: Bharath Rupireddy
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACW=CYE1ars+2XyPTEPq0wQvru4c0dPZ=Nrn3EqNBkksvQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-throgh: 14

Reported-By: Peter Eisentraut
Backpatch-through: 14
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8f5e63b8-e8ed-0f80-d8c4-68222624c200@enterprisedb.com

Some commands of ALTER TABLE could fail with the following error:
ERROR:  "tab" is of the wrong type

This error is unexpected, as all the code paths leading to
ATWrongRelkindError() should use a supported set of relkinds to generate
correct error messages.  This commit closes the gap with such mistakes,
by adding all the missing relkind combinations.  Tests are added to
check all the problems found.  Note that some combinations are not used,
but these are left around as it could have an impact on applications
relying on this code.

2ed532e has done a much larger refactoring on HEAD to make such error
messages easier to manage in the long-term, so nothing is needed there.

Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut, Ahsan Hadi, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210216.181415.368926598204753659.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 11

"Result Cache" was never a great name for this node, but nobody managed
to come up with another name that anyone liked enough.  That was until
David Johnston mentioned "Node Memoization", which Tom Lane revised to
just "Memoize".  People seem to like "Memoize", so let's do the rename.

Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210708165145.GG1176@momjian.us
Backpatch-through: 14, where Result Cache was introduced

The name introduced by commit 4656e3d6 was agreed to be unreasonably
long.  To match this change, rename initdb's recently-added
--clobber-cache option to --discard-caches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1374320.1625430433@sss.pgh.pa.us

41469253e went to the trouble of removing a theoretical bug from
free_sort_tuple by checking if the tuple was NULL before freeing it. Let's
make this a little more robust by also setting the tuple to NULL so that
should we be called again we won't end up doing a pfree on the already
pfree'd tuple. Per advice from Tom Lane.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3188192.1626136953@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 9.6, same as 41469253e

This fixes a theoretical bug in tuplesort.c which, if a bounded sort was
used in combination with a byval Datum sort (tuplesort_begin_datum), when
switching the sort to a bounded heap in make_bounded_heap(), we'd call
free_sort_tuple().  The problem was that when sorting Datums of a byval
type, the tuple is NULL and free_sort_tuple() would free the memory for it
regardless of that.  This would result in a crash.

Here we fix that simply by adding a check to see if the tuple is NULL
before trying to disassociate and free any memory belonging to it.

The reason this bug is only theoretical is that nowhere in the current
code base do we do tuplesort_set_bound() when performing a Datum sort.
However, let's backpatch a fix for this as if any extension uses the code
in this way then it's likely to cause problems.

Author: Ronan Dunklau
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpdoqNC5FjDb3KUTSMs5dg6f+XxH4Bg_dVcLi8UYAG3EQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.6, oldest supported version

Apple's mechanism for dealing with functions that are available
in only some OS versions confuses AC_CHECK_FUNCS, and therefore
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS.  We can use AC_CHECK_DECLS instead, so long as
we enable -Werror=unguarded-availability-new.  This allows people
compiling for macOS to control whether or not preadv/pwritev are
used by setting MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET, rather than supplying
a back-rev SDK.  (Of course, the latter still works, too.)

James Hilliard

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210122193230.25295-1-james.hilliard1@gmail.com

This should have been removed in commit 7e30c186, which split the loop
into two. Only the first loop uses the 'from' variable; updating it in
the second loop is bogus. It was never read after the first loop, so this
was harmless and surely optimized away by the compiler, but let's be tidy.

Backpatch to all supported versions.

Author: Ranier Vilela
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEudQAoWq%2BAL3BnELHu7gms2GN07k-np6yLbukGaxJ1vY-zeiQ%40mail.gmail.com

Two tsquery-related release note entries had inaccuracies in the
before and after examples.  Clean that up.

This reverts commit 54fb8c7, as per the issues reported by fairywren
when it comes to MinGW because of the lack of microsoft_native_stat()
there.  Using just stat() for MSVC is not sufficient to take care of the
concurrency problems with files pending on deletion.  It may be possible
to paint some __MINGW64__ in the code to switch to a different
implementation of stat() in this build context, but I am not sure either
if relying on the implementation of stat() in MinGW to take care of the
problems we are trying to fix is enough or not.  So this needs more
study.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YOvOlfRrIO0yGtgw@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 14

The code introduced by bed90759 to enhance the stat() implementation on
Windows for file sizes larger than 4GB fails to properly detect files
pending for deletion with its method based on NtQueryInformationFile()
or GetFileInformationByHandleEx(), as proved by Alexander Lakhin in a
custom TAP test of his own.

The method used in the implementation of open() to sleep and loop when
when failing on ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED (EACCES) is showing much more
stability, so switch to this method.  This could still lead to issues if
the permission problem stays around for much longer than the timeout of
1 second used, but that should (hopefully) never happen in
performance-critical paths.  Still, there could be a point in increasing
the timeouts for the sake of machines that handle heavy loads.

Note that WIN32's open() now uses microsoft_native_stat() as it should
be similar to stat() when working around issues with concurrent file
deletions.

I have spent some time testing this patch with pgbench in combination
of the SQL functions from genfile.c, as well as running the TAP test
provided on the thread with MSVC builds, and this looks much more
stable than the previous method.

Author: Alexander Lakhin
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Michael Paquier,	Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c3427edf-d7c0-ff57-90f6-b5de3bb62709@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14

Although we were careful to lock the object being added or dropped,
we failed to get any sort of lock on the extension itself.  This
allowed the ALTER to proceed in parallel with a DROP EXTENSION,
which is problematic for a couple of reasons.  If both commands
succeeded we'd be left with a dangling link in pg_depend, which
would cause problems later.  Also, if the ALTER failed for some
reason, it might try to print the extension's name, and that could
result in a crash or (in older branches) a silly error message
complaining about extension "(null)".

Per bug #17098 from Alexander Lakhin.  Back-patch to all
supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17098-b960f3616c861f83@postgresql.org

Commit 547f04e7 changed pgbench to use microsecond accounting, but
introduced a couple of logging and aggregation bugs:

1.  We print Unix epoch timestamps so that you can correlate them with
other logs, but these were inadvertently changed to use a
system-dependent reference epoch.  Compute Unix timestamps, and begin
aggregation intervals on the boundaries of whole Unix epoch seconds, as
before.

2.  The user-supplied aggregation interval needed to be scaled.

Back-patch to 14.

Author: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Author: Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reported-by: YoungHwan Joo <rulyox@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Gregory Smith <gregsmithpgsql@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAF7igB1r6wRfSCEAB-iZBKxkowWY6%2BdFF2jObSdd9%2BiVK%2BvHJg%40mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHLJuCW_8Vpcr0%3Dt6O_gozrg3wXXWXZXDioYJd3NhvKriqgpfQ%40mail.gmail.com

If an error occurred in the wrong place, it was possible to leave an
unintialized entry in the hash table, leading to a crash. Fixed.

Also, be more careful about the order of operations so that an
allocation error doesn't leak memory in CacheMemoryContext or
unnecessarily advance NextRecordTypmod.

Backpatch through version 11. Earlier versions (prior to 35ea7563)
do not exhibit the problem, because an uninitialized hash entry
contains a valid empty list.

Author: Sait Talha Nisanci <Sait.Nisanci@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/HE1PR8303MB009069D476225B9A9E194B8891779@HE1PR8303MB0090.EURPRD83.prod.outlook.com
Backpatch-through: 11

Sigh ... I was expecting AC_CHECK_LIB to do something it didn't,
namely update LIBS.  This led to not finding ldap_initialize.
Fix by moving the probe for ldap_initialize.  In some sense this
is more correct anyway, since (at least for now) we care about
whether ldap_initialize exists in libldap not libldap_r.

Per buildfarm member elver and local testing.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17083-a19190d9591946a7@postgresql.org

This fixes an overflow error when using the numeric * operator if the
result has more than 16383 digits after the decimal point by rounding
the result. Overflow errors should only occur if the result has too
many digits *before* the decimal point.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCUmeFWCrq2dNzZpRj5+6LfN85jYiDoqm+ucSXhb9U2TbA@mail.gmail.com

I incorrectly diagnosed the reason why hoverfly is unhappy.
Looking closer, it appears that it fails to link libldap
unless libssl is also present; so the problem was my
idea of clearing LIBS before making the check.  Revert
to essentially the original coding, except that instead
of failing when libldap_r isn't there, use libldap.

Per buildfarm member hoverfly.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17083-a19190d9591946a7@postgresql.org

When sending queries in pipeline mode, we were careless about leaving
the connection in the right state so that PQgetResult would behave
correctly; trying to read further results after sending a query after
having read a result with an error would sometimes hang.  Fix by
ensuring internal libpq state is changed properly.  All the state
changes were being done by the callers of pqAppendCmdQueueEntry(); it
would have become too repetitious to have this logic in each of them, so
instead put it all in that function and relieve callers of the
responsibility.

Add a test to verify this case.  Without the code fix, this new test
hangs sometimes.

Also, document that PQisBusy() would return false when no queries are
pending result.  This is not intuitively obvious, and NULL would be
obtained by calling PQgetResult() at that point, which is confusing.
Wording by Boris Kolpackov.

In passing, fix bogus use of "false" to mean "0", per Ranier Vilela.

Backpatch to 14.

Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reported-by: Boris Kolpackov <boris@codesynthesis.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/boris.20210624103805@codesynthesis.com

In commit d0a02bdb8, I'd supposed that uniformly probing for
ldap_bind would make the intent clearer.  However, that seems
not to work on AIX, for obscure reasons (maybe it's a macro
there?).  Revert to the former behavior of probing
ldap_simple_bind for thread-safe cases and ldap_bind otherwise.

Per buildfarm member hoverfly.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17083-a19190d9591946a7@postgresql.org

Commit 7266d099 added code to pull up simple constant function
results, converting the RTE_FUNCTION RTE to a dummy RTE_RESULT
RTE since it no longer need be scanned.  But I forgot to clear
the LATERAL flag if the RTE has it set.  If the function reduced
to a constant, it surely contains no lateral references so this
simplification is logically OK.  It's needed because various other
places will Assert that RESULT RTEs aren't LATERAL.

Per bug #17097 from Yaoguang Chen.  Back-patch to v13 where the
faulty code came in.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17097-3372ef9f798fc94f@postgresql.org

The separate libldap_r is gone and libldap itself is now always
thread-safe.  Unfortunately there seems no easy way to tell by
inspection whether libldap is thread-safe, so we have to take
it on faith that libldap is thread-safe if there's no libldap_r.
That should be okay, as it appears that libldap_r was a standard
part of the installation going back at least 20 years.

Report and patch by Adrian Ho.  Back-patch to all supported
branches, since people might try to build any of them with
a newer OpenLDAP.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17083-a19190d9591946a7@postgresql.org

Since the executor can't cope with a utility statement appearing
as a node of a plan tree, we can't support cases where a rewrite
rule inserts a NOTIFY into an INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE command appearing
in a WITH clause of a larger query.  (One can imagine ways around
that, but it'd be a new feature not a bug fix, and so far there's
been no demand for it.)  RewriteQuery checked for this, but it
missed the case where the DML command rewrites to *only* a NOTIFY.
That'd lead to crashes later on in planning.  Add the missed check,
and improve the level of testing of this area.

Per bug #17094 from Yaoguang Chen.  It's been busted since WITH
was introduced, so back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17094-bf15dff55eaf2e28@postgresql.org

Commit 6753333f stopped using semaphores as the sleep/wake mechanism for
heavyweight locks, but some obsolete references to that scheme remained
in comments.  As with similar commit 25b93a29, back-patch all the way.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGLafjB1uzXcy%3D%3D2L3cy7rjHkqOVn7qRYGBjk%3D%3DtMJE7Yg%40mail.gmail.com

Due to how pg_size_pretty(bigint) was implemented, it's possible that when
given a negative number of bytes that the returning value would not match
the equivalent positive return value when given the equivalent positive
number of bytes.  This was due to two separate issues.

1. The function used bit shifting to convert the number of bytes into
larger units.  The rounding performed by bit shifting is not the same as
dividing.  For example -3 >> 1 = -2, but -3 / 2 = -1.  These two
operations are only equivalent with positive numbers.

2. The half_rounded() macro rounded towards positive infinity.  This meant
that negative numbers rounded towards zero and positive numbers rounded
away from zero.

Here we fix #1 by dividing the values instead of bit shifting.  We fix #2
by adjusting the half_rounded macro always to round away from zero.

Additionally, adjust the pg_size_pretty(numeric) function to be more
explicit that it's using division rather than bit shifting.  A casual
observer might have believed bit shifting was used due to a static
function being named numeric_shift_right.  However, that function was
calculating the divisor from the number of bits and performed division.
Here we make that more clear.  This change is just cosmetic and does not
affect the return value of the numeric version of the function.

Here we also add a set of regression tests both versions of
pg_size_pretty() which test the values directly before and after the
function switches to the next unit.

This bug was introduced in 8a1fab36. Prior to that negative values were
always displayed in bytes.

Author: Dean Rasheed, David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCXnNW4HsmZnxhfezR5FuiGgp+mkY4AzcL5eRGO4fuadWg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.6, where the bug was introduced.

Backpatch-through: 14 only

Backpatch-through: 14 only