don't have more bugs like the quote-quote-quote-quote one.  Propagate
fix into ecpg lexer, too.

suite. This reduces the number of failures from 9 to 7.

Both ConnectionTest and JBuilderTest did not create their own
tables, which caused these test cases to fail with "relation ...
does not exist". It appears these test cases relied on tables
created by the example code elsewhere in the source tree. I've
added the necessary "create table" and "drop table" statements
to the test cases, using the column definitions from the example
code.

While working on that I modified the helper method createTable
in JDBC2Tests.java to take a table parameter, rather than using
table names passed via the properties in build.xml. I'm not sure
what that was good for, and in fact, except for the default
table name "jdbctest", this functionality wasn't used at all.

Ren? Pijlman

Here is a revised patch with Barry's suggestions implemented

Dave Cramer

Joseph Shraibman

discussion on pgsql-hackers (especially the frightening memory dump in
<12273.999562219@sss.pgh.pa.us>), we decided that it is best not to
use identifiers from an untrusted source at all.  Therefore, all
claims of the suitability of PQescapeString() for identifiers have
been removed.

Florian Weimer

table creation time.  Big deal you say - but this patch is the basis of the
next thing which is adding PRIMARY KEYs after table creation time.  (Which
is currently impossible without twiddling catalogs)

Rundown
-------

* I have made the makeObjectName function of analyze.c non-static, and
exported it in analyze.h

* I have included analyze.h and defrem.h into command.c, to support
makingObjectNames and creating indices

* I removed the 'case CONSTR_PRIMARY' clause so that it properly fails and
says you can't add primary keys, rather than just doing nothing and
reporting nothing!!!

* I have modified the docs.

Algorithm
---------

* If name specified is null, search for a new valid constraint name.  I'm
not sure if I should "lock" my generated name somehow tho - should I open
the relation before doing this step?

* Open relation in access exclusive mode

* Check that the constraint does not already exist

* Define the new index

* Warn if they're doubling up on an existing index

Christopher Kings-Lynne

>tcl-extension for postgreSQL.
>I'm currently using 7.0 and always getting a seg fault when I try to
>read from the database connection after issueing a "COPY table TO
>stdout;" (I'm using the connection handle, *not* the result handle).
>Maybe this is fixed in a later release.
>The README file in src/interfaces/libpgtcl tells me, that this should
>work, but unforunately it doesn't.

Yes, it seems broken. It is a bug in libpgtcl.  Are you running Tcl >= 8.3.2?
That's when the Tcl team changed the data structure for channel
callbacks.  The change itself was designed to be backward compatible, but I
suspect a related change made the code more sensitive to errors in the
structure (NULL pointers where functions are required).  Either that, or
nobody has tried to use libpgtcl with COPY in a long time.

First, I have to say I can't think of a good reason to use PostgreSQL's
COPY command from a Tcl application. I think it should only be used with
psql for importing data from another source into PostgreSQL, or for
exporting PostgreSQL data into another database (but why would anyone do
that?) If it was me, I would stick with SELECT and INSERT and be "SQL
Compliant".

OK, editorial is over. Try applying the patch below to fix
      src/interfaces/libpgtcl/pgtclId.c
and let us know if it works. I did little testing on it, but my test did
segfault before and ran fine (copy in and copy out) after the patch.  This
is for PostgreSQL-7.1.2 - since you are running older 7.0, I don't know if
this will work, but I suspect it will.

PS It's the absence of PgWatchProc which kills it. I didn't upgrade it
to the "V2" channel type structure, so it should be compatible with older
Tcl's. But aside from gets and puts, I doubt any other file operations
would work on the handle during a copy.

ljb

occur unconditionally, even if the rule should otherwise execute
conditionally.  This is more useful than giving an error, even though it's
not truly the correct behavior.  Per today's pghackers discussion.

the postmaster can kill the forked off processes when shutdown
is requested.

Jan

2) Keep FE/BE protocol more precisely.
3) Improve procedure calls.
4) A trial to avoid PREMATURE execution(#ifdef'd now).

Hiroshi Inoue

versions of gcc.  We don't really need to explicitly test the limits
anyway, just reverse-convert and see if we get the same answer.

coercing OID literals to OID in its queries.  Depending on the query
and the server version, this could cause failures for OIDs over 2 billion.

max_connections.

for them, and making them just wastes time during backend startup/shutdown.
Also, remove compile-time MAXBACKENDS limit per long-ago proposal.
You can now set MaxBackends as high as your kernel can stand without
any reconfiguration/recompilation.

>
>> On Mon, 3 Sep 2001 22:01:17 -0500, you wrote:
>>     public boolean isWritable(int column) throws SQLException
>>     {
>>         return !isReadOnly(column);
>>     }

Actually, I think this change has a consequence for this method
in the same class:

    public boolean isDefinitelyWritable(int column)
        throws SQLException
    {
        return isWritable(column);
    }

This is from the JDBC spec
(http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/docs/api/java/sql/ResultSetMetaData.html):

  isReadOnly() - Indicates whether the designated column is
definitely not writable.

  isWritable() - Indicates whether it is possible for a write on
the designated column to succeed.

  isDefinitelyWritable() - Indicates whether a write on the
designated column will definitely succeed.

At this time we don't really implement the fine semantics of
these methods. I would suggest the following defaults:

  isReadOnly()             false
  isWritable()             true
  isDefinitelyWritable()   false

And that would mean that your patch is correct, but
isDefinitelyWritable() would need to be patched accordingly:

    public boolean isDefinitelyWritable(int column)
        throws SQLException
    {
        return false;
    }

Again, both in jdbc1 and jdbc2.

Regards,
Ren? Pijlman <rene@lab.applinet.nl>

>public boolean isWritable(int column) throws SQLException
>{
>        if (isReadOnly(column))
>                return true;
>        else
>                return false;
>}

The author probably intended:

    public boolean isWritable(int column) throws SQLException
    {
        return !isReadOnly(column);
    }

And if he would have coded it this way he wouldn't have made
this mistake :-)

>hence, isWritable() will always return false. this is something
>of a problem :)

Why exactly? In a way, true is just as incorrect as false, and
perhaps it should throw "not implemented". But I guess that
would be too non-backwardly-compatible.

>let me know if i can provide further information.

Will you submit a patch?

Regards,
Ren? Pijlman <rene@lab.applinet.nl>