The docs had some typos and grammar mistakes, and its indentation was
inconsistent.

Author: Amit Langote, Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200116151930.GM26045@telsasoft.com

Author: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200113004542.GA26045@telsasoft.com

This test case was sketched in commit message 4c870109 to explain an
ancient bug; it translates to a coverage increase, so add it to the BRIN
regression tests.

Detection of WAL records having references to invalid pages
during recovery causes PostgreSQL to raise a PANIC-level error,
aborting the recovery. Setting ignore_invalid_pages to on causes
the system to ignore those WAL records (but still report a warning),
and continue recovery. This behavior may cause crashes, data loss,
propagate or hide corruption, or other serious problems.
However, it may allow you to get past the PANIC-level error,
to finish the recovery, and to cause the server to start up.

Author: Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHGQGwHCK6f77yeZD4MHOnN+PaTf6XiJfEB+Ce7SksSHjeAWtg@mail.gmail.com

In commit 40d964ec, we changed the way memory is allocated for dead
tuples but forgot to update the place where we compute the maximum
number of dead tuples.  This could lead to invalid memory requests.

Reported-by: Andres Freund
Diagnosed-by: Andres Freund
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila and Dilip Kumar
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200121060020.e3cr7s7fj5rw4lok@alap3.anarazel.de

Attempting to use CREATE INDEX, DROP INDEX or REINDEX with CONCURRENTLY
on a temporary relation with ON COMMIT actions triggered unexpected
errors because those operations use multiple transactions internally to
complete their work.  Here is for example one confusing error when using
ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS:
ERROR:  index "foo" already contains data

Issues related to temporary relations and concurrent indexing are fixed
in this commit by enforcing the non-concurrent path to be taken for
temporary relations even if using CONCURRENTLY, transparently to the
user.  Using a non-concurrent path does not matter in practice as locks
cannot be taken on a temporary relation by a session different than the
one owning the relation, and the non-concurrent operation is more
effective.

The problem exists with REINDEX since v12 with the introduction of
CONCURRENTLY, and with CREATE/DROP INDEX since CONCURRENTLY exists for
those commands.  In all supported versions, this caused only confusing
error messages to be generated.  Note that with REINDEX, it was also
possible to issue a REINDEX CONCURRENTLY for a temporary relation owned
by a different session, leading to a server crash.

The idea to enforce transparently the non-concurrent code path for
temporary relations comes originally from Andres Freund.

Reported-by: Manuel Rigger
Author: Michael Paquier, Heikki Linnakangas
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Álvaro Herrera, Heikki Linnakangas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+u7OA6gP7YAeCguyseusYcc=uR8+ypjCcgDDCTzjQ+k6S9ksQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.4

The behavior of something like

ALTER TABLE transactions
  ADD COLUMN status varchar(30) DEFAULT 'old',
  ALTER COLUMN status SET default 'current';

is to fill existing table rows with 'old', not 'current'.  That's
intentional and desirable for a couple of reasons:

* It makes the behavior the same whether you merge the sub-commands
into one ALTER command or give them separately;

* If we applied the new default while filling the table, there would
be no way to get the existing behavior in one SQL command.

The same reasoning applies in cases that add a column and then
manipulate its GENERATED/IDENTITY status in a second sub-command,
since the generation expression is really just a kind of default.
However, that wasn't very obvious (at least not to me; earlier in
the referenced discussion thread I'd thought it was a bug to be
fixed).  And it certainly wasn't documented.

Hence, add documentation, code comments, and a test case to clarify
that this behavior is all intentional.

In passing, adjust ATExecAddColumn's defaults-related relkind check
so that it matches up exactly with ATRewriteTables, instead of being
effectively (though not literally) the negated inverse condition.
The reasoning can be explained a lot more concisely that way, too
(not to mention that the comment now matches the code, which it
did not before).

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10365.1558909428@sss.pgh.pa.us

The code checking whether an aggregate transition value needs to be
reparented into the current context has always only compared the
transition return value with the previous transition value by datum,
i.e. without regard for NULLness.  This normally works, because when
the transition function returns NULL (via fcinfo->isnull), it'll
return a value that won't be the same as its input value.

But there's no hard requirement that that's the case. And it turns
out, it's possible to hit this case (see discussion or reproducers),
leading to a non-null transition value not being reparented, followed
by a crash caused by that.

Instead of adding another comparison of NULLness, instead have
ExecAggTransReparent() ensure that pergroup->transValue ends up as 0
when the new transition value is NULL. That avoids having to add an
additional branch to the much more common cases of the transition
function returning the old transition value (which is a pointer in
this case), and when the new value is different, but not NULL.

In branches since 69c3936a, also deduplicate the reparenting code
between the expression evaluation based transitions, and the path for
ordered aggregates.

Reported-By: Teodor Sigaev, Nikita Glukhov
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/bd34e930-cfec-ea9b-3827-a8bc50891393@sigaev.ru
Backpatch: 9.4-, this issue has existed since at least 7.4

This helps integration of extensions with Windows.  The following
parameters are changed:
- idle_in_transaction_session_timeout (9.6 and newer versions)
- lock_timeout
- statement_timeout
- track_activities
- track_counts
- track_functions

Author: Pascal Legrand
Reviewed-by: Amit Kamila, Julien Rouhaud, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1579298868581-0.post@n3.nabble.com
Backpatch-through: 9.4

Some buildfarm members were still warning about this, because in
9c679a08 I'd missed decorating one of the ereport() code paths
with a dummy return.

Also, adjust the error messages to be more in line with project
style guide.

sigTermHandler() tried to be careful to invoke only operations that
are safe to do in a signal handler.  But for some reason we forgot
that exit(3) is not among those, because it calls atexit handlers
that might do various random things.  (pg_dump itself installs no
atexit handlers, but e.g. OpenSSL does.)  That led to crashes or
lockups when attempting to terminate a parallel dump or restore
via a signal.

Fix by calling _exit() instead.

Per bug #16199 from Raúl Marín.  Back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16199-cb2f121146a96f9b@postgresql.org

The BRIN add_value() and union() functions need to make a longer-lived
copy of the argument, if they want to store it in the BrinValues struct
also passed as argument. The functions for the "inclusion operator
classes" used with box, range and inet types didn't take into account
that the union helper function might return its argument as is, without
making a copy. Check for that case, and make a copy if necessary. That
case arises at least with the range_union() function, when one of the
arguments is an 'empty' range:

CREATE TABLE brintest (n numrange);
CREATE INDEX brinidx ON brintest USING brin (n);
INSERT INTO brintest VALUES ('empty');
INSERT INTO brintest VALUES (numrange(0, 2^1000::numeric));
INSERT INTO brintest VALUES ('(-1, 0)');

SELECT brin_desummarize_range('brinidx', 0);
SELECT brin_summarize_range('brinidx', 0);

Backpatch down to 9.5, where BRIN was introduced.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e6e1d6eb-0a67-36aa-e779-bcca59167c14%40iki.fi
Reviewed-by: Emre Hasegeli, Tom Lane, Alvaro Herrera

This feature allows the vacuum to leverage multiple CPUs in order to
process indexes.  This enables us to perform index vacuuming and index
cleanup with background workers.  This adds a PARALLEL option to VACUUM
command where the user can specify the number of workers that can be used
to perform the command which is limited by the number of indexes on a
table.  Specifying zero as a number of workers will disable parallelism.
This option can't be used with the FULL option.

Each index is processed by at most one vacuum process.  Therefore parallel
vacuum can be used when the table has at least two indexes.

The parallel degree is either specified by the user or determined based on
the number of indexes that the table has, and further limited by
max_parallel_maintenance_workers.  The index can participate in parallel
vacuum iff it's size is greater than min_parallel_index_scan_size.

Author: Masahiko Sawada and Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar, Amit Kapila, Robert Haas, Tomas Vondra,
Mahendra Singh and Sergei Kornilov
Tested-by: Mahendra Singh and Prabhat Sahu
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoDTPMgzSkV4E3SFo1CH_x50bf5PqZFQf4jmqjk-C03BWg@mail.gmail.com
https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1J-VoR9gzS5E75pcD-OH0mEyCdp8RihcwKrcuw7J-Q0+w@mail.gmail.com

ecpg_build_params() would crash on a null pointer dereference if
realloc() failed, due to updating the persistent "stmt" struct
too aggressively.  (Even without the crash, this would've leaked
the old storage that we were trying to realloc.)

Per Coverity.  This seems to have been broken in commit 0cc05079,
so back-patch into v12.

Ensure that ClassifyUtilityCommandAsReadOnly() has defined behavior
even if TransactionStmt.kind has a value that's not one of the
declared values for its enum.

Suppress warnings from compilers that don't know that elog(ERROR)
doesn't return, in ClassifyUtilityCommandAsReadOnly() and
jsonb_set_lax().

Per Coverity and buildfarm.

This data was only in separate files because it was the most convenient
way to handle it with a shell script. Now that we use a general-purpose
programming language, it's easy to assemble the data into the same format
as the rest of the catalogs and output it into postgres.bki. This allows
removal of some special-purpose code from initdb.c.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CACPNZCtVFtjHre6hg9dput0qRPp39pzuyA2A6BT8wdgrRy%2BQdA%40mail.gmail.com
Author: John Naylor

Clarify the description related to the use of characters which can be
encoded, and add an example.

Author: Jobin Augustine
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut, Alvaro Herrera, Heikki Linnakangas,
Michael Paquier, Alex Shulgin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANaTPsrYgSgE2fuj3=4x=Jmx1c+NgkEDzftNknZbrMuqL+aBhQ@mail.gmail.com

Rather than intermixing the discussion of text-string and binary-string
functions, make a clean break, moving all discussion of binary-string
operations into section 9.5.  This involves some duplication of
function descriptions between 9.4 and 9.5, but it seems cleaner on the
whole since the individual descriptions are clearer (and on the other
side of the coin, it gets rid of some duplicated descriptions, too).

Move the convert*/encode/decode functions to a separate table, because
they don't quite seem to fit under the heading of "binary string
functions".

Also provide full documentation of the textual formats supported by
encode() and decode() (which was the original goal of this patch
series, many moons ago).

Also move the table of built-in encoding conversions out of section 9.4,
where it no longer had any relevance whatsoever, and put it into section
23.3 about character sets.  I chose to put both that and table 23.2
(multibyte-translation-table) into a new <sect2> so as not to break up
the flow of discussion in 23.3.3.

Also do a bunch of minor copy-editing on the function descriptions
in 9.4 and 9.5.

Karl Pinc, reviewed by Fabien Coelho, further hacking by me

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190304163347.7bca4897@slate.meme.com

Mixing incorrect bounds set in the SSL context leads to confusing error
messages generated by OpenSSL which are hard to act on.  New checks are
added within the GUC machinery to improve the user experience as they
apply to any SSL implementation, not only OpenSSL, and doing the checks
beforehand avoids the creation of a SSL during a reload (or startup)
which we know will never be used anyway.

Backpatch down to 12, as those parameters have been introduced by
e73e67c7.

Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200114035420.GE1515@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 12

The strategy of GIN index scan is driven by opclass-specific extract_query
method.  This method that needed search mode is GIN_SEARCH_MODE_ALL.  This
mode means that matching tuple may contain none of extracted entries.  Simple
example is '!term' tsquery, which doesn't need any term to exist in matching
tsvector.

In order to handle such scan key GIN calculates virtual entry, which contains
all TIDs of all entries of attribute.  In fact this is full scan of index
attribute.  And typically this is very slow, but allows to handle some queries
correctly in GIN.  However, current algorithm calculate such virtual entry for
each GIN_SEARCH_MODE_ALL scan key even if they are multiple for the same
attribute.  This is clearly not optimal.

This commit improves the situation by introduction of "exclude only" scan keys.
Such scan keys are not capable to return set of matching TIDs.  Instead, they
are capable only to filter TIDs produced by normal scan keys.  Therefore,
each attribute should contain at least one normal scan key, while rest of them
may be "exclude only" if search mode is GIN_SEARCH_MODE_ALL.

The same optimization might be applied to the whole scan, not per-attribute.
But that leads to NULL values elimination problem.  There is trade-off between
multiple possible ways to do this.  We probably want to do this later using
some cost-based decision algorithm.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOBaU_YGP5-BEt5Cc0%3DzMve92vocPzD%2BXiZgiZs1kjY0cj%3DXBg%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Nikita Glukhov, Alexander Korotkov, Tom Lane, Julien Rouhaud
Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud, Tomas Vondra, Tom Lane

Commit 9b63c13f turns out to have been fundamentally misguided:
the parent node's subPlan list is by no means the only way in which
a child SubPlan node can be hooked into the outer execution state.
As shown in bug #16213 from Matt Jibson, we can also get short-lived
tuple table slots added to the outer es_tupleTable list.  At this point
I have little faith that there aren't other possible connections as
well; the long time it took to notice this problem shows that this
isn't a heavily-exercised situation.

Therefore, revert that fix, returning to the coding that passed a
NULL parent plan pointer down to the transiently-built subexpressions.
That gives us a pretty good guarantee that they won't hook into the
outer executor state in any way.  But then we need some other solution
to make SubPlans work.  Adopt the solution speculated about in the
previous commit's log message: do expression initialization at plan
startup for just those VALUES rows containing SubPlans, abandoning the
goal of reclaiming memory intra-query for those rows.  In practice it
seems unlikely that queries containing a vast number of VALUES rows
would be using SubPlans in them, so this should not give up much.

(BTW, this test case also refutes my claim in connection with the prior
commit that the issue only arises with use of LATERAL.  That was just
wrong: some variants of SubLink always produce SubPlans.)

As with previous patch, back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16213-871ac3bc208ecf23@postgresql.org

... specifically, set it incrementally as each individual change is
spilled down to disk.  This way, it is set correctly when the
transaction disappears without trace, ie. without leaving an XACT_ABORT
wal record.  (This happens when the server crashes midway through a
transaction.)

Failing to have final_lsn prevents ReorderBufferRestoreCleanup() from
working, since it needs the final_lsn in order to know the endpoint of
its iteration through spilled files.

Commit df9f682c already tried to fix the problem, but it didn't set
the final_lsn in all cases.  Revert that, since it's no longer needed.

Author: Vignesh C
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Dilip Kumar
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm2CLk+K9JDwjYST0sPbGg5AQdvhUt0jbKyX_HdAE0jk3A@mail.gmail.com

The bitmap used by SlabCheck to cross-check free chunks in a block used
to be allocated for each SlabCheck call, and was never freed. The memory
leak could be fixed by simply adding a pfree call, but it's actually a
bad idea to do any allocations in SlabCheck at all as it assumes the
state of the memory management as a whole is sane.

So instead we allocate the bitmap as part of SlabContext, which means
we don't need to do any allocations in SlabCheck and the bitmap goes
away together with the SlabContext.

Backpatch to 10, where the Slab context was introduced.

Author: Tomas Vondra
Reported-by: Andres Freund
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Backpatch-through: 10
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200116044119.g45f7pmgz4jmodxj%40alap3.anarazel.de

jsonb_set_lax() is the same as jsonb_set, except that it takes and extra
argument that specifies what to do if the value argument is NULL. The
default is 'use_json_null'. Other possibilities are 'raise_exception',
'return_target' and 'delete_key', all these behaviours having been
suggested as reasonable by various users.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/375873e2-c957-3a8d-64f9-26c43c2b16e7@2ndQuadrant.com

Reviewed by: Pavel Stehule

Two routines have been added in OpenSSL 1.1.0 to set the protocol bounds
allowed within a given SSL context:
- SSL_CTX_set_min_proto_version
- SSL_CTX_set_max_proto_version

As Postgres supports OpenSSL down to 1.0.1 (as of HEAD), equivalent
replacements exist in the tree, which are only available for the
backend.  A follow-up patch is planned to add control of the SSL
protocol bounds for libpq, so move those routines to src/common/ so as
libpq can use them.

Author: Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4F246AE3-A7AE-471E-BD3D-C799D3748E03@yesql.se

Move all the backend-only code that'd crept into wchar.c and encnames.c
into mbutils.c.

To remove the last few #ifdef dependencies from wchar.c and encnames.c,
also make the following changes:

* Adjust get_encoding_name_for_icu to return NULL, not throw an error,
for unsupported encodings.  Its sole caller can perfectly well throw an
error instead.  (While at it, I also made this function and its sibling
is_encoding_supported_by_icu proof against out-of-range encoding IDs.)

* Remove the overlength-name error condition from pg_char_to_encoding.
It's completely silly not to treat that just like any other
the-name-is-not-in-the-table case.

Also, get rid of pg_mic_mblen --- there's no obvious reason why
conv.c shouldn't call pg_mule_mblen instead.

Other than that, this is just code movement and comment-polishing with
no functional changes.  Notably, I reordered declarations in pg_wchar.h
to show which functions are frontend-accessible and which are not.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYO8oq-iy8E02rD8eX25T-9SmyxKWqqks5OMHxKvGXpXQ@mail.gmail.com

Bring these into common style (including having proper copyright
notices) and adjust their self-declaration of where they live.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYO8oq-iy8E02rD8eX25T-9SmyxKWqqks5OMHxKvGXpXQ@mail.gmail.com

Formerly, various frontend directories symlinked these two sources
and then built them locally.  That's an ancient, ugly hack, and
we now have a much better way: put them into libpgcommon.
So do that.  (The immediate motivation for this is the prospect
of having to introduce still more symlinking if we don't.)

This commit moves these two files absolutely verbatim, for ease of
reviewing the git history.  There's some follow-on work to be done
that will modify them a bit.

Robert Haas, Tom Lane

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYO8oq-iy8E02rD8eX25T-9SmyxKWqqks5OMHxKvGXpXQ@mail.gmail.com

Previously, check_xact_readonly() was responsible for determining
which types of queries could not be run in a read-only transaction,
standard_ProcessUtility() was responsibility for prohibiting things
which were allowed in read only transactions but not in recovery, and
utility commands were basically prohibited in bulk in parallel mode by
calls to CommandIsReadOnly() in functions.c and spi.c.  This situation
was confusing and error-prone. Accordingly, move all the checks to a
new function ClassifyUtilityCommandAsReadOnly(), which determines the
degree to which a given statement is read only.

In the old code, check_xact_readonly() inadvertently failed to handle
several statement types that actually should have been prohibited,
specifically T_CreatePolicyStmt, T_AlterPolicyStmt, T_CreateAmStmt,
T_CreateStatsStmt, T_AlterStatsStmt, and T_AlterCollationStmt.  As a
result, thes statements were erroneously allowed in read only
transactions, parallel queries, and standby operation. Generally, they
would fail anyway due to some lower-level error check, but we
shouldn't rely on that.  In the new code structure, future omissions
of this type should cause ClassifyUtilityCommandAsReadOnly() to
complain about an unrecognized node type.

As a fringe benefit, this means we can allow certain types of utility
commands in parallel mode, where it's safe to do so. This allows
ALTER SYSTEM, CALL, DO, CHECKPOINT, COPY FROM, EXPLAIN, and SHOW.
It might be possible to allow additional commands with more work
and thought.

Along the way, document the thinking process behind the current set
of checks, as per discussion especially with Peter Eisentraut. There
is some interest in revising some of these rules, but that seems
like a job for another patch.

Patch by me, reviewed by Tom Lane, Stephen Frost, and Peter
Eisentraut.

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZ_rLqJt5sYkvh+JpQnfX0Y+B2R+qfi820xNih6x-FQOQ@mail.gmail.com

Remove duplicated code (apparently introduced by commit c8ea87e4).
Also get rid of some PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY variables we don't
really need to have.

Li Japin, Tom Lane

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/PS1PR0601MB3770A5595B6E5E3FD6F35724B6360@PS1PR0601MB3770.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com

We've had numerous bug reports about how (1) IF NOT EXISTS clauses in
ALTER TABLE don't behave as-expected, and (2) combining certain actions
into one ALTER TABLE doesn't work, though executing the same actions as
separate statements does.  This patch cleans up all of the cases so far
reported from the field, though there are still some oddities associated
with identity columns.

The core problem behind all of these bugs is that we do parse analysis
of ALTER TABLE subcommands too soon, before starting execution of the
statement.  The root of the bugs in group (1) is that parse analysis
schedules derived commands (such as a CREATE SEQUENCE for a serial
column) before it's known whether the IF NOT EXISTS clause should cause
a subcommand to be skipped.  The root of the bugs in group (2) is that
earlier subcommands may change the catalog state that later subcommands
need to be parsed against.

Hence, postpone parse analysis of ALTER TABLE's subcommands, and do
that one subcommand at a time, during "phase 2" of ALTER TABLE which
is the phase that does catalog rewrites.  Thus the catalog effects
of earlier subcommands are already visible when we analyze later ones.
(The sole exception is that we do parse analysis for ALTER COLUMN TYPE
subcommands during phase 1, so that their USING expressions can be
parsed against the table's original state, which is what we need.
Arguably, these bugs stem from falsely concluding that because ALTER
COLUMN TYPE must do early parse analysis, every other command subtype
can too.)

This means that ALTER TABLE itself must deal with execution of any
non-ALTER-TABLE derived statements that are generated by parse analysis.
Add a suitable entry point to utility.c to accept those recursive
calls, and create a struct to pass through the information needed by
the recursive call, rather than making the argument lists of
AlterTable() and friends even longer.

Getting this to work correctly required a little bit of fiddling
with the subcommand pass structure, in particular breaking up
AT_PASS_ADD_CONSTR into multiple passes.  But otherwise it's mostly
a pretty straightforward application of the above ideas.

Fixing the residual issues for identity columns requires refactoring of
where the dependency link from an identity column to its sequence gets
set up.  So that seems like suitable material for a separate patch,
especially since this one is pretty big already.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10365.1558909428@sss.pgh.pa.us

This uses the progress reporting infrastructure added by c16dc1ac,
adding support for ANALYZE.
Co-authored-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Co-authored-by: Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro.yamada.tf@nttcom.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud, Robert Haas, Anthony Nowocien, Kyotaro Horiguchi,
	Vignesh C, Amit Langote

For historical reasons, libpq used a separate libpq.rc file for the
Windows builds while all other components use a common file
win32ver.rc.  With a bit of tweaking, the libpq build can also use the
win32ver.rc file.  This removes a bit of duplicative code.
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/ad505e61-a923-e114-9f38-9867d161073f@2ndquadrant.com

The logic introduced in this routine as of 246a6c8f would report an
incorrect result when a session calls it to check if the temporary
namespace owned by the session is in use or not.  It is possible to
optimize more the routine in this case to avoid a PGPROC lookup, but
let's keep the logic simple.  As this routine is used only by autovacuum
for now, there were no live bugs, still let's be correct for any future
code involving it.

Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200113093703.GA41902@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 11

Introduce new fields amusemaintenanceworkmem and amparallelvacuumoptions
in IndexAmRoutine for parallel vacuum.  The amusemaintenanceworkmem tells
whether a particular IndexAM uses maintenance_work_mem or not.  This will
help in controlling the memory used by individual workers as otherwise,
each worker can consume memory equal to maintenance_work_mem.  The
amparallelvacuumoptions tell whether a particular IndexAM participates in
a parallel vacuum and if so in which phase (bulkdelete, vacuumcleanup) of
vacuum.

Author: Masahiko Sawada and Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar, Amit Kapila, Tomas Vondra and Robert Haas
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoDTPMgzSkV4E3SFo1CH_x50bf5PqZFQf4jmqjk-C03BWg@mail.gmail.com
https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1LmcD5aPogzwim5Nn58Ki+74a6Edghx4Wd8hAskvHaq5A@mail.gmail.com

On 64-bit Windows, pid_t is long long int, so a %d format isn't
enough.

The new wording was determined to be more accurate.  Also, update
release note links that reference these sections.

Reported-by: rirans@comcast.net

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/157742545062.1149.11052653770497832538@wrigleys.postgresql.org

Backpatch-through: 9.6

This reverts part of commit 7559d8eb.  The copyright script has
already been updated to skip *.key files.

Reported-by: Alvaro Herrera

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200102184059.GA25435@alvherre.pgsql

Backpatch-through: master

Reported-by: Alvaro Herrera

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200102184059.GA25435@alvherre.pgsql

Backpatch-through: master