Give a more specific error message than "xyz is not a table".

Also document in CREATE PUBLICATION which kinds of relations are not
supported.

based on patch by Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>

Commit 7c4f5240 allowed walsender to execute normal SQL commands
to support table sync feature in logical replication. Previously
while log_statement caused such SQL commands to be logged,
log_replication_commands caused them to be logged, too.
That is, such SQL commands were logged twice unexpectedly
when those settings were both enabled.

This commit forces log_replication_commands to log only replication
commands, to prevent normal SQL commands from being logged twice.

Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reported-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFDWh_Qr-q_GEMpD+qH=vYPMdVqw=ZOSY3kX_Pna9R9SA@mail.gmail.com

In pg_subscription, subconninfo, subslotname, subsynccommit and
subpublications are expected not to be NULL. Therefore this patch
adds BKI_FORCE_NOT_NULL markings to them.

This patch is basically unnecessary unless the code has a bug which
wrongly sets either of those columns to NULL. But it's good to have
this as a safeguard.

Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reported-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFDWh_Qr-q_GEMpD+qH=vYPMdVqw=ZOSY3kX_Pna9R9SA@mail.gmail.com

It's not safe to raise an error while holding spinlock. But previously
logical replication worker for table sync called the function which
reads the system catalog and may raise an error while it's holding
spinlock. Which could lead to the trouble where spinlock will never
be released and the server gets stuck infinitely.

Author: Petr Jelinek
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi and Fujii Masao
Reported-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFDWh_Qr-q_GEMpD+qH=vYPMdVqw=ZOSY3kX_Pna9R9SA@mail.gmail.com

Word "sends" was missing.

Jaime Casanova

is_parallel_safe() supposed that the only relevant property of a SubPlan
was the parallel safety of the referenced subplan tree.  This is wrong:
the testexpr or args subtrees might contain parallel-unsafe stuff, as
demonstrated by the test case added here.  However, just recursing into the
subtrees fails in a different way: we'll typically find PARAM_EXEC Params
representing the subplan's output columns in the testexpr.  The previous
coding supposed that any Param must be treated as parallel-restricted, so
that a naive attempt at fixing this disabled parallel pushdown of SubPlans
altogether.  We must instead determine, for any visited Param, whether it
is one that would be computed by a surrounding SubPlan node; if so, it's
safe to push down along with the SubPlan node.

We might later be able to extend this logic to cope with Params used for
correlated subplans and other cases; but that's a task for v11 or beyond.

Tom Lane and Amit Kapila

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7064.1492022469@sss.pgh.pa.us

Author: Masahiko Sawada, heavily modified by me
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwEKOw=SmPLxJzkBsH6wwDBgOnVz46QjHbtsiZ-d-2RGUg@mail.gmail.com

Since it appears that v10 is going to move the goalposts by some amount
in terms of where you can and can't invoke set-returning functions,
arrange for the executor's "set-valued function called in context that
cannot accept a set" errors to include a syntax position if possible,
pointing to the specific SRF that can't be called where it's located.

The main bit of infrastructure needed for this is to make the query source
text accessible in the executor; but it turns out that commit 4c728f38
already did that.  We just need a new function executor_errposition()
modeled on parser_errposition(), and we're ready to rock.

While experimenting with this, I noted that the error position wasn't
properly reported if it occurred in a plpgsql FOR-over-query loop,
which turned out to be because SPI_cursor_open_internal wasn't providing
an error context callback during PortalStart.  Fix that.

There's a whole lot more that could be done with this infrastructure
now that it's there, but this is not the right time in the development
cycle for that sort of work.  Hence, resist the temptation to plaster
executor_errposition() calls everywhere ... for the moment.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5263.1492471571@sss.pgh.pa.us

* Be sure to reset the launcher's pid (LogicalRepCtx->launcher_pid) to 0
  even when the launcher emits an error.

* Declare ApplyLauncherWakeup() as a static function because it's called
  only in launcher.c.

* Previously IsBackendPId() was used to check whether the launcher's pid
  was valid. IsBackendPid() was necessary because there was the bug where
  the launcher's pid was not reset to 0. But now it's fixed, so IsBackendPid()
  is not necessary and this patch removes it.

Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reported-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFDWh_Qr-q_GEMpD+qH=vYPMdVqw=ZOSY3kX_Pna9R9SA@mail.gmail.com

Previously DatumGetObjectId() was wrongly used for that.

Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reported-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFDWh_Qr-q_GEMpD+qH=vYPMdVqw=ZOSY3kX_Pna9R9SA@mail.gmail.com

Reported offlist by hubert depesz lubaczewski.

Discussion: <https://postgr.es/m/72335afb-969b-af84-3fcb-1739e3ed09a6@2ndQuadrant.com>

Per discussion, plain "scram" is confusing because we actually implement
SCRAM-SHA-256 rather than the original SCRAM that uses SHA-1 as the hash
algorithm. If we add support for SCRAM-SHA-512 or some other mechanism in
the SCRAM family in the future, that would become even more confusing.

Most of the internal files and functions still use just "scram" as a
shorthand for SCRMA-SHA-256, but I did change PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM to
PASSWORD_TYPE_SCRAM_SHA_256, as that could potentially be used by 3rd
party extensions that hook into the password-check hook.

Michael Paquier did this in an earlier version of the SCRAM patch set
already, but I didn't include that in the version that was committed.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/fde71ff1-5858-90c8-99a9-1c2427e7bafb@iki.fi

Reported-by: Amit Langote

Complex crash bug all started with this failure.
Diagnosed and fixed by Nikhil Sontakke, reviewed by me.

Reported-by: Jeff Janes
Author: Nikhil Sontakke
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1xBP8cqdS5eK8APHL=X6RHMMM2vG5g+QamduuTsyCwv9g@mail.gmail.com

Doing so allows various crash possibilities. Fix by avoiding
having PrescanPreparedTransactions() increment
ShmemVariableCache->nextXid when it has no 2PC files

Bug found by Jeff Janes, diagnosis and patch by Pavan Deolasee,
then patch re-designed for clarity and full accuracy by
Michael Paquier.

Reported-by: Jeff Janes
Author: Pavan Deolasee, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1zMLnH_i1-PVQ-biZzvNx7VcuatriquEnh7HNk6K8Ss3Q@mail.gmail.com

Amit Langote

Yugo Nagata

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170417180921.3047f3b0.nagata@sraoss.co.jp

Document more explicitly that the target table can have more columns
than the source table.
Reported-by: Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>

CopyFrom() needs a range table for formatting certain errors for
constraint violations.

This changes the mechanism of how the range table is passed to the
CopyFrom() executor state.  We used to generate the range table and one
entry for the relation manually inside DoCopy().  Now we use
addRangeTableEntryForRelation() to setup the range table and relation
entry for the ParseState, which is then passed down by BeginCopyFrom().

Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Reported-by: Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>

The new catalog reused a column prefix "sta" from pg_statistic, but this
is undesirable, so change the catalog to use prefix "stx" instead.
Also, rename the column that lists enabled statistic kinds as "stxkind"
rather than "enabled".

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f_2t5jhSN7huYRFH3w3rrHfG2QU7hiUHsu-Vdjd1rYT3w@mail.gmail.com

We were accepting creation of extended statistics only for regular
tables, but they can usefully be created for foreign tables, partitioned
tables, and materialized views, too.  Allow those cases.

While at it, make sure all the rejected cases throw a consistent error
message, and add regression tests for the whole thing.

Author: David Rowley, Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f-BmGo410bh5RSPZUvOO0LhmHL2NYmdrC_Jm8pk_FfyCA@mail.gmail.com

We were applying the use_physical_tlist optimization to all relation
scan plans, even those implemented by custom scan providers.  However,
that's a bad idea for a couple of reasons.  The custom provider might
be unable to provide columns that it hadn't expected to be asked for
(for example, the custom scan might depend on an index-only scan).
Even more to the point, there's no good reason to suppose that this
"optimization" is a win for a custom scan; whatever the custom provider
is doing is likely not based on simply returning physical heap tuples.
(As a counterexample, if the custom scan is an interface to a column store,
demanding all columns would be a huge loss.)  If it is a win, the custom
provider could make that decision for itself and insert a suitable
pathtarget into the path, anyway.

Per discussion with Dmitry Ivanov.  Back-patch to 9.5 where custom scan
support was introduced.  The argument that the custom provider can adjust
the behavior by changing the pathtarget only applies to 9.6+, but on
balance it seems more likely that use_physical_tlist will hurt custom
scans than help them.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e29ddd30-8ef9-4da5-a50b-2bb7b8c7198d@postgrespro.ru

This addresses the new warning types -Wformat-truncation
-Wformat-overflow that are part of -Wall, via -Wformat, in GCC 7.

Either because of a previous ALTER TABLE .. SET STATISTICS 0 or because
of being invoked with a partial column list, ANALYZE could fail to
acquire sufficient data to build extended statistics.  Previously, this
would draw an ERROR and fail to collect any statistics at all (extended
and regular).  Change things so that we raise a WARNING instead, and
remove a hint that was wrong in half the cases.

Reported by: David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f9Kk0NF6Fg7TA=JUXsjpS9kX6NVu27pb5QDCpOYAvb-Og@mail.gmail.com

This is necessary to be able to reproduce publication membership
correctly if tables are involved in inheritance.

Author: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>

Author: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>

Coverity complained because bgw.bgw_extra wasn't being filled in by
ApplyLauncherRegister().  The most future-proof fix is to memset the
whole BackgroundWorker struct to zeroes.  While at it, let's apply the
same coding rule to other places that set up BackgroundWorker structs;
four out of five had the same or related issues.

Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>

addRangeTableEntryForENR had a check for pstate != NULL, which Coverity
pointed out was rather useless since it'd already dereferenced pstate
before that.  More to the point, we'd established policy in commit
bc93ac12 that we'd require non-NULL pstate for all addRangeTableEntryFor*
functions; this test was evidently copied-and-pasted from some older
version of one of those functions.  Make it look more like the others.

In passing, make an elog message look more like the rest of the code,
too.

Michael Paquier

That way we make sure that initdb's time zone setting code is exercised.
This doesn't add an extra test, it just alters an existing test.

Discussion: <https://postgr.es/m/5807.1492229253@sss.pgh.pa.us>

In standard non-Windows builds, there's no particular reason to care what
address the kernel chooses to map the shared memory segment at.  However,
when building with EXEC_BACKEND, there's a risk that the chosen address
won't be available in all child processes.  Linux with ASLR enabled (which
it is by default) seems particularly at risk because it puts shmem segments
into the same area where it maps shared libraries.  We can work around
that by specifying a mapping address that's outside the range where
shared libraries could get mapped.  On x86_64 Linux, 0x7e0000000000
seems to work well.

This is only meant for testing/debugging purposes, so it doesn't seem
necessary to go as far as providing a GUC (or any user-visible
documentation, though we might change that later).  Instead, it's just
controlled by setting an environment variable PG_SHMEM_ADDR to the
desired attach address.

Back-patch to all supported branches, since the point here is to
remove intermittent buildfarm failures on EXEC_BACKEND animals.
Owners of affected animals will need to add a suitable setting of
PG_SHMEM_ADDR to their build_env configuration.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7036.1492231361@sss.pgh.pa.us

Seems to have been introduced in commit c219d9b0.  I think there indeed
was a "tupbasics.h" in some early drafts of that refactoring, but it
didn't survive into the committed version.

Amit Kapila

Not much point in defining test macros for the flag bits if we
don't use 'em.

Amit Kapila

This is consistent with how we refer to other Windows include files, and
prevents a failure when cross-compiling on a system with case sensitive
file names.

We'd already recognized that we can't pass function pointers across process
boundaries for functions in loadable modules, since a shared library could
get loaded at different addresses in different processes.  But actually the
practice doesn't work for functions in the core backend either, if we're
using EXEC_BACKEND.  This is the cause of recent failures on buildfarm
member culicidae.  Switch to passing a string function name in all cases.

Something like this needs to be back-patched into 9.6, but let's see
if the buildfarm likes it first.

Petr Jelinek, with a bunch of basically-cosmetic adjustments by me

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/548f9c1d-eafa-e3fa-9da8-f0cc2f654e60@2ndquadrant.com