hashname() asserted that the key string it is given is shorter than
NAMEDATALEN.  That should surely always be true if the input is in fact a
regular value of type "name".  However, for reasons of coding convenience,
we allow plain old C strings to be treated as "name" values in many places.
Some SQL functions accept arbitrary "text" inputs, convert them to C
strings, and pass them otherwise-untransformed to syscache lookups for name
columns, allowing an overlength input value to trigger hashname's Assert.

This would be a DOS problem, except that it only happens in assert-enabled
builds which aren't recommended for production.  In a production build,
you'll just get a name lookup error, since regardless of the hash value
computed by hashname, the later equality comparison checks can't match.
Likewise, if the catalog lookup is done by seqscan or indexscan searches,
there will just be a lookup error, since the name comparison functions
don't contain any similar length checks, and will see an overlength input
as unequal to any stored entry.

After discussion we concluded that we should simply remove this Assert.
It's inessential to hashname's own functionality, and having such an
assertion in only some paths for name lookup is more of a foot-gun than
a useful check.  There may or may not be a case for the affected callers
to do something other than let the name lookup fail, but we'll consider
that separately; in any case we probably don't want to change such
behavior in the back branches.

Per report from Tushar Ahuja.  Back-patch to all supported branches.

Report: https://postgr.es/m/7d0809ee-6f25-c9d6-8e74-5b2967830d49@enterprisedb.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17691.1482523168@sss.pgh.pa.us

\crosstabview's complaint about multiple entries for the same crosstab
cell quoted the wrong row and/or column values.  It would accidentally
appear to work if the data had been in strcmp() order to start with,
which probably explains how we missed noticing this during development.

This could be fixed in more than one way, but the way I chose was to
hang onto both result pointers from bsearch() and use those to get at
the value names.

In passing, avoid casting away const in the bsearch comparison functions.
No bug there, just poor style.

Per bug #14476 from Tomonari Katsumata.  Back-patch to 9.6 where
\crosstabview was introduced.

Report: https://postgr.es/m/20161225021519.10139.45460@wrigleys.postgresql.org

The -v/--verbose option was not included in the output from --help for
pg_dumpall even though it's in the pg_dumpall documentation and has
apparently been around since pg_dumpall was reimplemented in C in 2002.

Fix that by adding it.

Pointed out by Daniel Westermann.

Back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2020970042.4589542.1482482101585.JavaMail.zimbra%40dbi-services.com

When providing tab completion for ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES, we are
including the list of roles as possible options for completion after the
GRANT or REVOKE.  Further, we accept FOR ROLE/IN SCHEMA at the same time
and in either order, but the tab completion was only working for one or
the other.  Lastly, we weren't using the actual list of allowed kinds of
objects for default privileges for completion after the 'GRANT X ON' but
instead were completeing to what 'GRANT X ON' supports, which isn't the
ssame at all.

Address these issues by improving the forward tab-completion for ALTER
DEFAULT PRIVILEGES and then constrain and correct how the tail
completion is done when it is for ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES.

Back-patch the forward/tail tab-completion to 9.6, where we made it easy
to handle such cases.

For 9.5 and earlier, correct the initial tab-completion to at least be
correct as far as it goes and then add a check for GRANT/REVOKE to only
tab-complete when the GRANT/REVOKE is the start of the command, so we
don't try to do tab-completion after we get to the GRANT/REVOKE part of
the ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES command, which is better than providing
incorrect completions.

Initial patch for master and 9.6 by Gilles Darold, though I cleaned it
up and added a few comments.  All bugs in the 9.5 and earlier patch are
mine.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1614593c-e356-5b27-6dba-66320a9bc68b@dalibo.com

Now that it has only INH_NO and INH_YES values, it's just weird that
it's not a plain bool, so make it that way.

Also rename RangeVar.inhOpt to "inh", to be like RangeTblEntry.inh.
My recollection is that we gave it a different name specifically because
it had a different representation than the derived bool value, but it
no longer does.  And this is a good forcing function to be sure we
catch any places that are affected by the change.

Bump catversion because of possible effect on stored RangeVar nodes.
I'm not exactly convinced that we ever store RangeVar on disk, but
we have a readfuncs function for it, so be cautious.  (If we do do so,
then commit e13486eb was in error not to bump catversion.)

Follow-on to commit e13486eb.

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYe+EG7LdYX6pkcNxr4ygkP4+A=jm9o-CPXyOvRiCNwaQ@mail.gmail.com

makeNode() is already a macro that has the right result pointer type, so
casting it again to the same type is unnecessary.

We had an index entry for "median" attached to the percentile_cont function
entry, which was pretty useless because a person following the link would
never realize that that function was the one they were being hinted to use.

Instead, make the index entry point at the example in syntax-aggregates,
and add a <seealso> link to "percentile".

Also, since that example explicitly claims to be calculating the median,
make it use percentile_cont not percentile_disc.  This makes no difference
in terms of the larger goals of that section, but so far as I can find,
nearly everyone thinks that "median" means the continuous not discrete
calculation.

Per gripe from Steven Winfield.  Back-patch to 9.4 where we introduced
percentile_cont.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20161223102056.25614.1166@wrigleys.postgresql.org

I got a little annoyed by reading documentation paragraphs containing
both spellings within a few lines of each other.  My dictionary says
"descendant" is the preferred spelling, and it's certainly the majority
usage in our tree, so standardize on that.

For one usage in parallel.sgml, I thought it better to rewrite to avoid
the term altogether.

There was code that attempted to check whether the sequence name stored
inside the sequence was the same as the name in pg_class.  But that code
was already ifdef'ed out, and now that the sequence no longer stores its
own name, it's altogether obsolete, so remove it.

This backward-compatibility GUC is long overdue for removal.

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYe+EG7LdYX6pkcNxr4ygkP4+A=jm9o-CPXyOvRiCNwaQ@mail.gmail.com

This is basically for the same reasons I got rid of _hash_wrtbuf()
in commit 25216c98: it's not
convenient to have a function which encapsulates MarkBufferDirty(),
especially as we move towards having hash indexes be WAL-logged.

Patch by me, reviewed (but not entirely endorsed) by Amit Kapila.

Documentation for pg_restore said COPY TO does not support row security
when in fact it should say COPY FROM. Fix that.

While at it, make it clear that "COPY FROM" does not allow RLS to be
enabled and INSERT should be used instead. Also that SELECT policies
will apply to COPY TO statements.

Back-patch to 9.5 where RLS first appeared.

Author: Joe Conway
Reviewed-By: Dean Rasheed and Robert Haas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5744FA24.3030008%40joeconway.com

The previous coding failed to work correctly when we have a
multi-level partitioned hierarchy where tables at successive levels
have different attribute numbers for the partition key attributes.  To
fix, have each PartitionDispatch object store a standalone
TupleTableSlot initialized with the TupleDesc of the corresponding
partitioned table, along with a TupleConversionMap to map tuples from
the its parent's rowtype to own rowtype.  After tuple routing chooses
a leaf partition, we must use the leaf partition's tuple descriptor,
not the root table's.  To that end, a dedicated TupleTableSlot for
tuple routing is now allocated in EState.

Amit Langote

When we are altering a text search configuration, we are getting the
tuple from pg_ts_config and using its OID, so use TSConfigRelationId
when invoking any post-alter hooks and setting the object address.

Further, in the functions called from AlterTSConfiguration(), we're
saving information about the command via
EventTriggerCollectAlterTSConfig(), so we should be setting
commandCollected to true.  Also add a regression test to
test_ddl_deparse for ALTER TEXT SEARCH CONFIGURATION.

Author: Artur Zakirov, a few additional comments by me
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/57a71eba-f2c7-e7fd-6fc0-2126ec0b39bd%40postgrespro.ru

Back-patch the fix for the InvokeObjectPostAlterHook() call to 9.3 where
it was introduced, and the fix for the ObjectAddressSet() call and
setting commandCollected to true to 9.5 where those changes to
ProcessUtilitySlow() were introduced.

Having a WITH OIDS specification should result in the creation of an OID
column, but commit b943f502 broke that in the case that there were LIKE
tables without OIDS.  Commentary in that patch makes it look like this was
intentional, but if so it was based on a faulty reading of what inheritance
does: the parent tables can add an OID column, but they can't subtract one.
AFAICS, the behavior ought to be that you get an OID column if any of the
inherited tables, LIKE tables, or WITH clause ask for one.

Also, revert that patch's unnecessary split of transformCreateStmt's loop
over the tableElts list into two passes.  That seems to have been based on
a misunderstanding as well: we already have two-pass processing here,
we don't need three passes.

Per bug #14474 from Jeff Dafoe.  Back-patch to 9.6 where the misbehavior
was introduced.

Report: https://postgr.es/m/20161222145304.25620.47445@wrigleys.postgresql.org

When the input value to a CoerceToDomain expression node is a read-write
expanded datum, we should pass a read-only pointer to any domain CHECK
expressions and then return the original read-write pointer as the
expression result.  Previously we were blindly passing the same pointer to
all the consumers of the value, making it possible for a function in CHECK
to modify or even delete the expanded value.  (Since a plpgsql function
will absorb a passed-in read-write expanded array as a local variable
value, it will in fact delete the value on exit.)

A similar hazard of passing the same read-write pointer to multiple
consumers exists in domain_check() and in ExecEvalCase, so fix those too.

The fix requires adding MakeExpandedObjectReadOnly calls at the appropriate
places, which is simple enough except that we need to get the data type's
typlen from somewhere.  For the domain cases, solve this by redefining
DomainConstraintRef.tcache as okay for callers to access; there wasn't any
reason for the original convention against that, other than not wanting the
API of typcache.c to be any wider than it had to be.  For CASE, there's
no good solution except to add a syscache lookup during executor start.

Per bug #14472 from Marcos Castedo.  Back-patch to 9.5 where expanded
values were introduced.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15225.1482431619@sss.pgh.pa.us

Some background activity (like checkpoints, archive timeout, standby
snapshots) is not supposed to happen on an idle system. Unfortunately
so far it was not easy to determine when a system is idle, which
defeated some of the attempts to avoid redundant activity on an idle
system.

To make that easier, allow to make individual WAL insertions as not
being "important". By checking whether any important activity happened
since the last time an activity was performed, it now is easy to check
whether some action needs to be repeated.

Use the new facility for checkpoints, archive timeout and standby
snapshots.

The lack of a facility causes some issues in older releases, but in my
opinion the consequences (superflous checkpoints / archived segments)
aren't grave enough to warrant backpatching.

Author: Michael Paquier, editorialized by Andres Freund
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund, David Steele, Amit Kapila, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Bug: #13685
Discussion:
    https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20151016203031.3019.72930@wrigleys.postgresql.org
    https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqQcPqxEM3S735Bd2RzApNqSNJVietAC=6kfkYv_45dKwA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: -

You can't just cast a HashMetaPage to a Page, because the meta page
data is stored after the page header, not at offset 0.  Fortunately,
this didn't break anything because it happens to find hashm_bsize
at the offset at which it expects to find pd_pagesize_version, and
the values are close enough to the same that this works out.

Still, it's a bug, so back-patch to all supported versions.

Mithun Cy, revised a bit by me.

When libpq encounters a connection-level error, e.g. runs out of memory
while forming a result, there will be no error associated with PGresult,
but a message will be placed into PGconn's error buffer. postgres_fdw
takes care to use the PGconn error message when PGresult does not have
one, but dblink has been negligent in that regard. Modify dblink to mirror
what postgres_fdw has been doing.

Back-patch to all supported branches.

Author: Joe Conway
Reviewed-By: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/02fa2d90-2efd-00bc-fefc-c23c00eb671e%40joeconway.com

Amit Langote.  Most of this reported by Álvaro Herrera.

When dblink uses a postgres_fdw server name for its connection, it
is possible for the connection to have options that are invalid
with dblink (e.g. "updatable"). The recommended way to avoid this
problem is to use dblink_fdw servers instead. However there are use
cases for using postgres_fdw, and possibly other FDWs, for dblink
connection options, therefore protect against trying to use any
options that do not apply by using is_valid_dblink_option() when
building the connection string from the options.

Back-patch to 9.3. Although 9.2 supports FDWs for connection info,
is_valid_dblink_option() did not yet exist, and neither did
postgres_fdw, at least in the postgres source tree. Given the lack
of previous complaints, fixing that seems too invasive/not worth it.

Author: Corey Huinker
Reviewed-By: Joe Conway
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADkLM%3DfWyXVEyYcqbcRnxcHutkP45UHU9WD7XpdZaMfe7S%3DRwA%40mail.gmail.com

No more indirect blocks. The blocks form a linked list instead.

This saves some memory, because we don't need to have a buffer in memory to
hold the indirect block (or blocks). To reflect that, TAPE_BUFFER_OVERHEAD
is reduced from 3 to 1 buffer, which allows using more memory for building
the initial runs.

Reviewed by Peter Geoghegan and Robert Haas.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/34678beb-938e-646e-db9f-a7def5c44ada%40iki.fi

Before commit b8cc8f94, it was possible to build contrib/uuid-ossp without
having told configure you meant to; you could just cd into that directory
and "make".  That no longer works because the code depends on configure to
have done header and library probes, but the ensuing error messages are
not so easy to interpret if you're not an old C hand.  We've gotten a
couple of complaints recently from people trying to do this the low-tech
way, so add an explicit #error directing the user to use --with-uuid.

(In principle we might want to do something similar in the other
optionally-built contrib modules; but I don't think any of the others have
ever worked without preconfiguration, so there are no bad habits to break
people of.)

Back-patch to 9.4 where the previous commit came in.

Report: https://postgr.es/m/CAHeEsBf42AWTnk=1qJvFv+mYgRFm07Knsfuc86Ono8nRjf3tvQ@mail.gmail.com
Report: https://postgr.es/m/CAKYdkBrUaZX+F6KpmzoHqMtiUqCtAW_w6Dgvr6F0WTiopuGxow@mail.gmail.com

output file naming.

Patch by Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>

When dblink or postgres_fdw detects an error on the remote side of the
connection, it will try to construct a local error message as best it
can using libpq's PQresultErrorField(). When no primary message is
available, it was bailing out with an unhelpful "unknown error". Make
that message better and more style guide compliant. Per discussion
on hackers.

Backpatch to 9.2 except postgres_fdw which didn't exist before 9.3.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19872.1482338965%40sss.pgh.pa.us

The U&'...' and U&"..." syntaxes silently discarded a surrogate pair
start (that is, a code between U+D800 and U+DBFF) if it occurred at
the very end of the string.  This seems like an obvious oversight,
since we throw an error for every other invalid combination of surrogate
characters, including the very same situation in E'...' syntax.

This has been wrong since the pair processing was added (in 9.0),
so back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19113.1482337898@sss.pgh.pa.us

In an attempt to simplify the tsquery matching engine, the original
phrase search patch invented rewrite rules that would rearrange a
tsquery so that no AND/OR/NOT operator appeared below a PHRASE operator.
But this approach had numerous problems.  The rearrangement step was
missed by ts_rewrite (and perhaps other places), allowing tsqueries
to be created that would cause Assert failures or perhaps crashes at
execution, as reported by Andreas Seltenreich.  The rewrite rules
effectively defined semantics for operators underneath PHRASE that were
buggy, or at least unintuitive.  And because rewriting was done in
tsqueryin() rather than at execution, the rearrangement was user-visible,
which is not very desirable --- for example, it might cause unexpected
matches or failures to match in ts_rewrite.

As a somewhat independent problem, the behavior of nested PHRASE operators
was only sane for left-deep trees; queries like "x <-> (y <-> z)" did not
behave intuitively at all.

To fix, get rid of the rewrite logic altogether, and instead teach the
tsquery execution engine to manage AND/OR/NOT below a PHRASE operator
by explicitly computing the match location(s) and match widths for these
operators.

This requires introducing some additional fields into the publicly visible
ExecPhraseData struct; but since there's no way for third-party code to
pass such a struct to TS_phrase_execute, it shouldn't create an ABI problem
as long as we don't move the offsets of the existing fields.

Another related problem was that index searches supposed that "!x <-> y"
could be lossily approximated as "!x & y", which isn't correct because
the latter will reject, say, "x q y" which the query itself accepts.
This required some tweaking in TS_execute_ternary along with the main
tsquery engine.

Back-patch to 9.6 where phrase operators were introduced.  While this
could be argued to change behavior more than we'd like in a stable branch,
we have to do something about the crash hazards and index-vs-seqscan
inconsistency, and it doesn't seem desirable to let the unintuitive
behaviors induced by the rewriting implementation stand as precedent.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/28215.1481999808@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/26706.1482087250@sss.pgh.pa.us

The ALTER TABLE documentation wasn't terribly clear when it came to
which commands could be combined together and what it meant when they
were.

In particular, SET TABLESPACE *can* be combined with other commands,
when it's operating against a single table, but not when multiple tables
are being moved with ALL IN TABLESPACE.  Further, the actions are
applied together but not really in 'parallel', at least today.

Pointed out by: Amit Langote

Improved wording from Tom.

Back-patch to 9.4, where the ALL IN TABLESPACE option was added.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/14c535b4-13ef-0590-1b98-76af355a0763%40lab.ntt.co.jp

In pg_dump.c dumpCast() and dumpTransform(), we would happily ignore the
cast or transform if it happened to use a built-in function because we
weren't including the information about built-in functions when querying
pg_proc from getFuncs().

Modify the query in getFuncs() to also gather information about
functions which are used by user-defined casts and transforms (where
"user-defined" means "has an OID >= FirstNormalObjectId").  This also
adds to the TAP regression tests for 9.6 and master to cover these
types of objects.

Back-patch all the way for casts, back to 9.5 for transforms.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20160504183952.GE10850%40tamriel.snowman.net

We didn't start ensuring that all built-in objects had OIDs less than
16384 until 8.1, so for 8.0 servers we still need to query the value out
of pg_database.  We need this, in particular, to distinguish which casts
were built-in and which were user-defined.

For HEAD, we only worry about going back to 8.0, for the back-branches,
we also ensure that 7.0-7.4 work.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20160504183952.GE10850%40tamriel.snowman.net

When CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW acts on an existing view, don't update the
view options until after the view query has been updated.

This is necessary in the case where CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW is used on
an existing view that is not updatable, and the new view is updatable
and specifies the WITH CHECK OPTION. In this case, attempting to apply
the new options to the view before updating its query fails, because
the options are applied using the ALTER TABLE infrastructure which
checks that WITH CHECK OPTION is only applied to an updatable view.

If new columns are being added to the view, that is also done using
the ALTER TABLE infrastructure, but it is important that that still be
done before updating the view query, because the rules system checks
that the query columns match those on the view relation. Added a
comment to explain that, in case someone is tempted to move that to
where the view options are now being set.

Back-patch to 9.4 where WITH CHECK OPTION was added.

Report: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCUp%3Dz%3Ds4SzZjr14bfct_bdJNwMPi-gFi3Xc5k1ntbsAgQ%40mail.gmail.com

It's not entirely clear that we should log a message here at all, but
it's certainly wrong to use elog() for a message that should clearly
be translatable.

Amit Langote

Amit Langote

If we do not reset the FD_READ event, WaitForMultipleObjects won't
return it again again unless we've meanwhile read from the socket,
which is generally true but not guaranteed.  WaitEventSetWaitBlock
itself may fail to return the event to the caller if the latch is
also set, and even if we changed that, the caller isn't obliged to
handle all returned events at once.  On non-Windows systems, the
socket-read event is purely level-triggered, so this issue does
not exist.  To fix, make Windows reset the event when needed.

This bug was introduced by 98a64d0b,
and causes hangs when trying to use the pldebugger extension.

Patch by Amit Kapial.  Reported and tested by Ashutosh Sharma, who
also provided some analysis.  Further analysis by Michael Paquier.

This shouldn't change the set of paths that get generated in any
way, but it is preparatory work for further changes to allow a
partial path to be merge-joined witih a non-partial path to produce
a partial join path.

Dilip Kumar, with cosmetic adjustments by me.

On AIX, doubles are aligned at 4 bytes, but int64 is aligned at 8 bytes.
Our code assumes that doubles have alignment that can also be applied to
int64, but that fails in this case.  One effect is that
heap_form_tuple() writes tuples in a different layout than
Form_pg_sequence expects.

Rather than rewrite the whole alignment code, work around the issue by
reordering the columns in pg_sequence so that the first int64 column
naturally comes out at an 8-byte boundary.

Commit 56c7d8d4 allowed pg_basebackup
to stream WAL in tar mode. But there is the restriction that WAL
streaming in tar mode works only when the value - (dash) is not
specified as output directory. This means that the combination of
three options "-D -", "-F t" and "-X stream" is invalid. However,
previously, even when those options were specified at the same time,
pg_basebackup background process unexpectedly started streaming WAL.
And then it exited with an error.

This commit changes pg_basebackup so that it errors out on such
invalid combination of options at the beginning.

Reviewed by Magnus Hagander, and patch by me.

aggstate->evalproj is always set up by ExecInitAgg, so there's no
need to test.  Doing so led Coverity to think that we might be
intending "slot" to be possibly NULL here, and it quite properly
complained that the rest of combine_aggregates() wasn't prepared
for that.

Also fix a couple of obvious thinkos in Asserts checking that
"inputoff" isn't past the end of the slot.

Errors introduced in commit 8ed3f11b, so no need for back-patch.