When inserting a view referencing a foreign table that has WITH CHECK
OPTION constraints, in single-insert mode postgres_fdw retrieves the
data that was actually inserted on the remote side so that the WITH
CHECK OPTION constraints are enforced with the data locally, but in
batch-insert mode it cannot currently retrieve the data (except for the
row first inserted through the view), resulting in enforcing the WITH
CHECK OPTION constraints with the data passed from the core (except for
the first-inserted row), which led to incorrect results when inserting
into a view referencing a foreign table in which a remote BEFORE ROW
INSERT trigger changes the rows inserted through the view so that they
violate the view's WITH CHECK OPTION constraint.  Also, the query
inserting into the view caused an assertion failure in assert-enabled
builds.

Fix these by disabling batch insertion when inserting into such a view.

Back-patch to v14 where batch insertion was added.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK17LpbTZs4m4a_6THP54UBeK9fHvX8aVVA%2BC6yEZDZwQcg%40mail.gmail.com

Using ATSimpleRecursion() in ATPrepCmd() to do so as bbb927b4 did is
not correct, because ATPrepCmd() can't distinguish between triggers that
may be cloned and those that may not, so would wrongly try to recurse
for the latter category of triggers.

So this commit restores the code in EnableDisableTrigger() that
86f57594 had added to do the recursion, which would do it only for
triggers that may be cloned, that is, row-level triggers.  This also
changes tablecmds.c such that ATExecCmd() is able to pass the value of
ONLY flag down to EnableDisableTrigger() using its new 'recurse'
parameter.

This also fixes what seems like an oversight of 86f57594 that the
recursion to partition triggers would only occur if EnableDisableTrigger()
had actually changed the trigger.  It is more apt to recurse to inspect
partition triggers even if the parent's trigger didn't need to be
changed: only then can we be certain that all descendants share the same
state afterwards.

Backpatch all the way back to 11, like bbb927b4.  Care is taken not
to break ABI compatibility (and that no catversion bump is needed.)
Co-authored-by: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Koval <d.koval@postgrespro.ru>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqG-cZT3XzGAnEgZQLoQbyfJApVwOTQaCaas1mhpf+4V5A@mail.gmail.com

Ordinarily the functions called in this loop ought to have plenty
of CFIs themselves; but we've now seen a case where no such CFI is
reached, making the loop uninterruptible.  Even though that's from
a recently-introduced bug, it seems prudent to install a CFI at
the loop level in all branches.

Per discussion of bug #17558 from Andrew Kesper (an actual fix for
that bug will follow).

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17558-3f6599ffcf52fd4a@postgresql.org

Remove the test case added by commit fac1b470, which never actually
worked to expose the problem it claimed to test.  Replace it with
a case that does expose the problem, and also covers the SRF-not-
at-the-top deficiency repaired in 1aa8dad41.

Richard Guo, with some editorialization by me

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17564-c7472c2f90ef2da3@postgresql.org

Erik Rijkers and Justin Pryzby

Backpatch to v14

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b79bfeff-d0e3-29a3-2576-0e325848dede%40xs4all.nl

Per suggestion from Robert Haas

Backpatch to v14

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoZ1QvHquYHLkMy1oHKqz4-E7QQctj6e0ocq_GP1B5%2B9bA%40mail.gmail.com

Commit fac1b470 thought we could check for set-returning functions
by testing only the top-level node in an expression tree.  This is
wrong in itself, and to make matters worse it encouraged others
to make the same mistake, by exporting tlist.c's special-purpose
IS_SRF_CALL() as a widely-visible macro.  I can't find any evidence
that anyone's taken the bait, but it was only a matter of time.

Use expression_returns_set() instead, and stuff the IS_SRF_CALL()
genie back in its bottle, this time with a warning label.  I also
added a couple of cross-reference comments.

After a fair amount of fooling around, I've despaired of making
a robust test case that exposes the bug reliably, so no test case
here.  (Note that the test case added by fac1b470 is itself
broken, in that it doesn't notice if you remove the code change.
The repro given by the bug submitter currently doesn't fail either
in v15 or HEAD, though I suspect that may indicate an unrelated bug.)

Per bug #17564 from Martijn van Oosterhout.  Back-patch to v13,
as the faulty patch was.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17564-c7472c2f90ef2da3@postgresql.org

The sto_using_cursor and sto_using_select tests were coded to exercise
every permutation of their test steps, but AFAICS there is no value in
exercising more than one.  This matters because each permutation costs
about six seconds, thanks to the "pg_sleep(6)".  Perhaps we could
reduce that, but the useless permutations seem worth getting rid of
in any case.  (Note that sto_using_hash_index got it right already.)

While here, clean up some other sloppiness such as an unused table.

This doesn't make too much difference in interactive testing, since the
wasted time is typically masked by parallelization with other tests.
However, the buildfarm runs this as a serial step, which means we can
expect to shave ~40 seconds from every buildfarm run.  That makes it
worth back-patching.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2515192.1659454702@sss.pgh.pa.us

We've heard a couple of reports of people having trouble with
multi-gigabyte-sized query-texts files.  It occurred to me that on
32-bit platforms, there could be an issue with integer overflow
of calculations associated with the total query text size.
Address that with several changes:

1. Limit pg_stat_statements.max to INT_MAX / 2 not INT_MAX.
The hashtable code will bound it to that anyway unless "long"
is 64 bits.  We still need overflow guards on its use, but
this helps.

2. Add a check to prevent extending the query-texts file to
more than MaxAllocHugeSize.  If it got that big, qtext_load_file
would certainly fail, so there's not much point in allowing it.
Without this, we'd need to consider whether extent, query_offset,
and related variables shouldn't be off_t not size_t.

3. Adjust the comparisons in need_gc_qtexts() to be done in 64-bit
arithmetic on all platforms.  It appears possible that under duress
those multiplications could overflow 32 bits, yielding a false
conclusion that we need to garbage-collect the texts file, which
could lead to repeatedly garbage-collecting after every hash table
insertion.

Per report from Bruno da Silva.  I'm not convinced that these
issues fully explain his problem; there may be some other bug that's
contributing to the query-texts file becoming so large in the first
place.  But it did get that big, so #2 is a reasonable defense,
and #3 could explain the reported performance difficulties.

(See also commit 8bbe4cbd, which addressed some related bugs.
The second Discussion: link is the thread that led up to that.)

This issue is old, and is primarily a problem for old platforms,
so back-patch.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAB+Nuk93fL1Q9eLOCotvLP07g7RAv4vbdrkm0cVQohDVMpAb9A@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5601D354.5000703@BlueTreble.com

I thought commit fd96d14d9 had plugged all the holes of this sort,
but no, function RTEs could produce oversize tuples too, either
via long coldeflists or just from multiple functions in one RTE.
(I'm pretty sure the other variants of base RTEs aren't a problem,
because they ultimately refer to either a table or a sub-SELECT,
whose widths are enforced elsewhere.  But we explicitly allow join
RTEs to be overwidth, as long as you don't try to form their
tuple result.)

Per further discussion of bug #17561.  As before, patch all branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17561-80350151b9ad2ad4@postgresql.org

errno was not reported correctly after attempting to clone a file,
leading to incorrect error reports.  While scanning through the code, I
have not noticed any similar mistakes.

Error introduced in 3a769d82.

Author: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220731134135.GY15006@telsasoft.com
Backpatch-through: 12

The code tried to access ARR_DIMS(v)[0] and ARR_LBOUND(v)[0]
whether or not those values exist.  This made the range check
on the "n" argument unstable --- it might or might not fail, and
if it did it would report garbage for the allowed upper limit.
These bogus accesses would probably annoy Valgrind, and if you
were very unlucky even lead to SIGSEGV.

Report and fix by Martin Kalcher.  Back-patch to v14 where this
function was added.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/baaeb413-b8a8-4656-5757-ef347e5ec11f@aboutsource.net

The new test is from commit 9e4f914b5e.

With this setting messages have SQL error numbers included, so that
needs to be provided for in the pattern looked for.

Backpatch to all live branches like the original.

A RowExpr with more than MaxTupleAttributeNumber columns would fail at
execution anyway, since we cannot form a tuple datum with more than that
many columns.  While heap_form_tuple() has a check for too many columns,
it emerges that there are some intermediate bits of code that don't
check and can be driven to failure with sufficiently many columns.
Checking this at parse time seems like the most appropriate place to
install a defense, since we already check SELECT list length there.

While at it, make the SELECT-list-length error use the same errcode
(TOO_MANY_COLUMNS) as heap_form_tuple does, rather than the generic
PROGRAM_LIMIT_EXCEEDED.

Per bug #17561 from Egor Chindyaskin.  The given test case crashes
in all supported branches (and probably a lot further back),
so patch all.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17561-80350151b9ad2ad4@postgresql.org

On FreeBSD, the new test fails due to a WAL file being removed before
the standby has had the chance to copy it.  Fix by adding a replication
slot to prevent the removal until after the standby has connected.

Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEze2Wj5nau_qpjbwihvmXLfkAWOZ5TKdbnqOc6nKSiRJEoPyQ@mail.gmail.com

Crash recovery on standby may encounter missing directories
when replaying database-creation WAL records.  Prior to this
patch, the standby would fail to recover in such a case;
however, the directories could be legitimately missing.
Consider the following sequence of commands:

    CREATE DATABASE
    DROP DATABASE
    DROP TABLESPACE

If, after replaying the last WAL record and removing the
tablespace directory, the standby crashes and has to replay the
create database record again, crash recovery must be able to continue.

A fix for this problem was already attempted in 49d9cfc68bf4, but it
was reverted because of design issues.  This new version is based
on Robert Haas' proposal: any missing tablespaces are created
during recovery before reaching consistency.  Tablespaces
are created as real directories, and should be deleted
by later replay.  CheckRecoveryConsistency ensures
they have disappeared.

The problems detected by this new code are reported as PANIC,
except when allow_in_place_tablespaces is set to ON, in which
case they are WARNING.  Apart from making tests possible, this
gives users an escape hatch in case things don't go as planned.

Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Author: Asim R Praveen <apraveen@pivotal.io>
Author: Paul Guo <paulguo@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav@gmail.com> (older versions)
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> (older versions)
Reviewed-by: Michaël Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Diagnosed-by: Paul Guo <paulguo@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEET0ZGx9AvioViLf7nbR_8tH9-=27DN5xWJ2P9-ROH16e4JUA@mail.gmail.com

On Windows with MSVC, get_dirent_type() was recently made to return
DT_LNK for junction points by commit 9d3444dc, which fixed some
defective dirent.c code.

On Windows with Cygwin, get_dirent_type() already worked for symlinks,
as it does on POSIX systems, because Cygwin has its own fake symlinks
that behave like POSIX (on closer inspection, Cygwin's dirent has the
BSD d_type extension but it's probably always DT_UNKNOWN, so we fall
back to lstat(), which understands Cygwin symlinks with S_ISLNK()).

On Windows with MinGW/MSYS, we need extra code, because the MinGW
runtime has its own readdir() without d_type, and the lstat()-based
fallback has no knowledge of our convention for treating junctions as
symlinks.

Back-patch to 14, where get_dirent_type() landed.
Reported-by: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b9ddf605-6b36-f90d-7c30-7b3e95c46276%40dunslane.net

This is a backpatch to branches 10-14 of the following commits:

7170f2159fb2 Allow "in place" tablespaces.
c6f2f01611d4 Fix pg_basebackup with in-place tablespaces.
f6f0db4d6240 Fix pg_tablespace_location() with in-place tablespaces
7a7cd84893e0 doc: Remove mention to in-place tablespaces for pg_tablespace_location()
5344723755bd Remove unnecessary Windows-specific basebackup code.

In-place tablespaces were introduced as a testing helper mechanism, but
they are going to be used for a bugfix in WAL replay to be backpatched
to all stable branches.

I (Álvaro) had to adjust some code to account for lack of
get_dirent_type() in branches prior to 14.

Author: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Author: Michaël Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220722081858.omhn2in5zt3g4nek@alvherre.pgsql

We have a few commands that "can't run in a transaction block",
meaning that if they complete their processing but then we fail
to COMMIT, we'll be left with inconsistent on-disk state.
However, the existing defenses for this are only watertight for
simple query protocol.  In extended protocol, we didn't commit
until receiving a Sync message.  Since the client is allowed to
issue another command instead of Sync, we're in trouble if that
command fails or is an explicit ROLLBACK.  In any case, sitting
in an inconsistent state while waiting for a client message
that might not come seems pretty risky.

This case wasn't reachable via libpq before we introduced pipeline
mode, but it's always been an intended aspect of extended query
protocol, and likely there are other clients that could reach it
before.

To fix, set a flag in PreventInTransactionBlock that tells
exec_execute_message to force an immediate commit.  This seems
to be the approach that does least damage to existing working
cases while still preventing the undesirable outcomes.

While here, add some documentation to protocol.sgml that explicitly
says how to use pipelining.  That's latent in the existing docs if
you know what to look for, but it's better to spell it out; and it
provides a place to document this new behavior.

Per bug #17434 from Yugo Nagata.  It's been wrong for ages,
so back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17434-d9f7a064ce2a88a3@postgresql.org

It incorrectly used GetBufferDescriptor instead of
GetLocalBufferDescriptor, causing it to not find the correct buffer in
most cases, and performing an out-of-bounds memory read in the corner
case that temp_buffers > shared_buffers.

It also bumped the usage-count on the buffer, even if it was
previously pinned. That won't lead to crashes or incorrect results,
but it's different from what the shared-buffer case does, and
different from the usual code in LocalBufferAlloc. Fix that too, and
make the code ordering match LocalBufferAlloc() more closely, so that
it's easier to verify that it's doing the same thing.

Currently, ReadRecentBuffer() is only used with non-temp relations, in
WAL redo, so the broken code is currently dead code. However, it could
be used by extensions.

Backpatch-through: 14
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2d74b46f-27c9-fb31-7f99-327a87184cc0%40iki.fi
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro, Zhang Mingli, Richard Guo

We didn't explicitly say that random() uses a randomly-chosen seed
if you haven't called setseed().  Do so.

Also, remove ref/set.sgml's no-longer-accurate (and never very
relevant) statement that the seed value is multiplied by 2^31-1.

Back-patch to v12 where set.sgml's claim stopped being true.
The claim that we use a source of random bits as seed was debatable
before 4203842a, too, so v12 seems like a good place to stop.

Per question from Carl Sopchak.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f37bb937-9d99-08f0-4de7-80c91a3cfc2e@sopchak.me

Commit 87e6ed7c added code that intended to report Windows "junction
points" as DT_LNK (the same way we report symlinks on Unix).  Windows
junction points are *also* directories according to the Windows
attributes API, and we were reporting them as as DT_DIR.  Change the
order we check the attribute flags, to prioritize DT_LNK.

If at some point we start using Windows' recently added real symlinks
and need to distinguish them from junction points, we may need to
rethink this, but for now this continues the tradition of wrapper
functions that treat junction points as symlinks.

Back-patch to 14, where get_dirent_type() landed.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGLzLK4PUPx0_AwXEWXOYAejU%3D7XpxnYE55Y%2Be7hB2N3FA%40mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220721111751.x7hod2xgrd76xr5c%40alvherre.pgsql

When postgres_fdw begins an asynchronous data fetch, it submits FETCH query
by using PQsendQuery(). If PQsendQuery() fails and returns 0, postgres_fdw
should report an error. But, previously, postgres_fdw reported an error
only when the return value is less than 0, though PQsendQuery() never return
the values other than 0 and 1. Therefore postgres_fdw could not handle
the failure to send FETCH query in an asynchronous data fetch.

This commit fixes postgres_fdw so that it reports an error
when PQsendQuery() returns 0.

Back-patch to v14 where asynchronous execution was supported in postgres_fdw.

Author: Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Japin Li, Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b187a7cf-d4e3-5a32-4d01-8383677797f3@oss.nttdata.com

Reported-by: axel.kluener@gmail.com

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/164736074430.660.3645615289283943146@wrigleys.postgresql.org

Backpatch-through: 11

This is true even for acronyms that are usually upper case, like LDAP.

Reported-by: Alvaro Herrera

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202205141521.2nodjabmsour@alvherre.pgsql

Backpatch-through: 10

Due to lack of concern for the case in the dependency code, it's
possible to drop a column of a composite type even though stored
queries have references to the dropped column via functions-in-FROM
that return the composite type.  There are "soft" references,
namely FROM-clause aliases for such columns, and "hard" references,
that is actual Vars referring to them.  The right fix for hard
references is to add dependencies preventing the drop; something
we've known for many years and not done (and this commit still doesn't
address it).  A "soft" reference shouldn't prevent a drop though.
We've been around on this before (cf. 9b35ddce, 2c4debbd), but
nobody had noticed that the current behavior can result in dump/reload
failures, because ruleutils.c can print more column aliases than the
underlying composite type now has.  So we need to rejigger the
column-alias-handling code to treat such columns as dropped and not
print aliases for them.

Rather than writing new code for this, I used expandRTE() which already
knows how to figure out which function result columns are dropped.
I'd initially thought maybe we could use expandRTE() in all cases, but
that fails for EXPLAIN's purposes, because the planner strips a lot of
RTE infrastructure that expandRTE() needs.  So this patch just uses it
for unplanned function RTEs and otherwise does things the old way.

If there is a hard reference (Var), then removing the column alias
causes us to fail to print the Var, since there's no longer a name
to print.  Failing seems less desirable than printing a made-up
name, so I made it print "?dropped?column?" instead.

Per report from Timo Stolz.  Back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5c91267e-3b6d-5795-189c-d15a55d61dbb@nullachtvierzehn.de

When a non-exclusive backup is canceled, do_pg_abort_backup() is called
and resets some variables set by pg_backup_start (pg_start_backup in v14
or before). But previously it forgot to reset the session state indicating
whether a non-exclusive backup is in progress or not in this session.

This issue could cause an assertion failure when the session running
BASE_BACKUP is terminated after it executed pg_backup_start and
pg_backup_stop (pg_stop_backup in v14 or before). Also it could cause
a segmentation fault when pg_backup_stop is called after BASE_BACKUP
in the same session is canceled.

This commit fixes the issue by making do_pg_abort_backup reset
that session state.

Back-patch to all supported branches.

Author: Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Masahiko Sawada, Michael Paquier, Robert Haas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3374718f-9fbf-a950-6d66-d973e027f44c@oss.nttdata.com

Multiple non-exclusive backups are able to be run conrrently in different
sessions. But, in the same session, only one non-exclusive backup can be
run at the same moment. If pg_backup_start (pg_start_backup in v14 or before)
is called in the middle of another non-exclusive backup in the same session,
an error is thrown.

However, previously, in logical replication walsender mode, even if that
walsender session had already called pg_backup_start and started
a non-exclusive backup, it could execute BASE_BACKUP command and
start another non-exclusive backup. Which caused subsequent pg_backup_stop
to throw an error because BASE_BACKUP unexpectedly reset the session state
marked by pg_backup_start.

This commit prevents BASE_BACKUP command in the middle of another
non-exclusive backup in the same session.

Back-patch to all supported branches.

Author: Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Masahiko Sawada, Michael Paquier, Robert Haas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3374718f-9fbf-a950-6d66-d973e027f44c@oss.nttdata.com

This fixes an ABI break introduced by
60465188.

Author: Markus Wanner <markus.wanner@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/defd749a-8410-841d-1126-21398686d63d@enterprisedb.com

The patch that added regcollation doesn't seem to have been too
thorough about supporting it everywhere that other reg* types
are supported.  Fix that.  (The find_expr_references omission
is moderately serious, since it could result in missing expression
dependencies.  The others are less exciting.)

Noted while fixing bug #17483.  Back-patch to v13 where
regcollation was added.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1423433.1652722406@sss.pgh.pa.us

The motivation for this is to ensure successful transmission of the
values of constants of regconfig and other reg* types.  The remote
will be reading them with search_path = 'pg_catalog', so schema
qualification is necessary when referencing objects in other schemas.

Per bug #17483 from Emmanuel Quincerot.  Back-patch to all supported
versions.  (There's some other stuff to do here, but it's less
back-patchable.)

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1423433.1652722406@sss.pgh.pa.us

Commit 4518c798 blocks signals for a short region of code, but it
assumed that whatever called it had the signal mask set to UnBlockSig on
entry.  That may be true today (or may even not be, in extensions in the
wild), but it would be better not to make that assumption.  We should
save-and-restore the caller's signal mask.

The PG_SETMASK() portability macro couldn't be used for that, which is
why it wasn't done before.  But... considering that commit a65e0864
established back in 9.6 that supported POSIX systems have sigprocmask(),
and that this is POSIX-only code, there is no reason not to use standard
sigprocmask() directly to achieve that.

Back-patch to all supported releases, like 4518c798 and 80845b7c.
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGKx6Biq7_UuV0kn9DW%2B8QWcpJC1qwhizdtD9tN-fn0H0g%40mail.gmail.com

Add link to the description of lock levels to avoid confusing "shared locks"
with SHARE locks.

Florin Irion

Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera, Tom Lane, and Nathan Bossart
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/d0f30cc2-3c76-1d43-f291-7c4b2872d653@gmail.com

This is a backpatch of 4e2e8d71f, applied through version 14

Reported-by: Nitin Jadhav

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMm1aWbmTHwHKC2PERH0CCaFVPoxrtLeS8=wNuoge94qdSp3vA@mail.gmail.com

Author: Nitin Jadhav

Backpatch-through: 13

Clarify that functions/procedures are dropped when any extension that
depends on them is dropped.

Reported-by: David G. Johnston

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKFQuwbPSHMDGkisRUmewopweC1bFvytVqB=a=X4GFg=4ZWxPA@mail.gmail.com

Backpatch-through: 13

Reported-by: Nikhil Shetty

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFpL5Vxastip0Jei-K-=7cKXTg=5sahSe5g=om=x68NOX8+PUA@mail.gmail.com

Backpatch-through: 10

Reported-by: Takeshi Ideriha

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TYCPR01MB7041A157067208327D8DAAF9EAA59@TYCPR01MB7041.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com

Backpatch-through: 11

Original patch by David G. Johnston.

Reported-by: David G. Johnston

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKFQuwYQCxSSuSL18skCWG8QHFswOJ3hjovHsOZUE346i4OpVQ@mail.gmail.com

Backpatch-through: 10

Original patch by David G. Johnston.

Reported-by: David G. Johnston

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKFQuwa4J0+WuO7kW1PLbjoEvzPN+Q_j+P2bXxNnCLaszY7ZdQ@mail.gmail.com

Backpatch-through: 10