- 04 Nov, 2020 12 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
The SQL spec calls out nonstandard syntax for certain function calls, for example substring() with numeric position info is supposed to be spelled "SUBSTRING(string FROM start FOR count)". We accept many of these things, but up to now would not print them in the same format, instead simplifying down to "substring"(string, start, count). That's long annoyed me because it creates an interoperability problem: we're gratuitously injecting Postgres-specific syntax into what might otherwise be a perfectly spec-compliant view definition. However, the real reason for addressing it right now is to support a planned change in the semantics of EXTRACT() a/k/a date_part(). When we switch that to returning numeric, we'll have the parser translate EXTRACT() to some new function name (might as well be "extract" if you ask me) and then teach ruleutils.c to reverse-list that per SQL spec. In this way existing calls to date_part() will continue to have the old semantics. To implement this, invent a new CoercionForm value COERCE_SQL_SYNTAX, and make the parser insert that rather than COERCE_EXPLICIT_CALL when the input has SQL-spec decoration. (But if the input has the form of a plain function call, continue to mark it COERCE_EXPLICIT_CALL, even if it's calling one of these functions.) Then ruleutils.c recognizes COERCE_SQL_SYNTAX as a cue to emit SQL call syntax. It can know which decoration to emit using hard-wired knowledge about the functions that could be called this way. (While this solution isn't extensible without manual additions, neither is the grammar, so this doesn't seem unmaintainable.) Notice that this solution will reverse-list a function call with SQL decoration only if it was entered that way; so dump-and-reload will not by itself produce any changes in the appearance of views. This requires adding a CoercionForm field to struct FuncCall. (I couldn't resist the temptation to rearrange that struct's field order a tad while I was at it.) FuncCall doesn't appear in stored rules, so that change isn't a reason for a catversion bump, but I did one anyway because the new enum value for CoercionForm fields could confuse old backend code. Possible future work: * Perhaps CoercionForm should now be renamed to DisplayForm, or something like that, to reflect its more general meaning. This'd require touching a couple hundred places, so it's not clear it's worth the code churn. * The SQLValueFunction node type, which was invented partly for the same goal of improving SQL-compatibility of view output, could perhaps be replaced with regular function calls marked with COERCE_SQL_SYNTAX. It's unclear if this would be a net code savings, however. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
-
Tom Lane authored
Gen_fmgrtab.pl treated aggregate functions the same as other built-in functions, which is wasteful because there is no real need to have entries for them in the fmgr_builtins[] table. Suppressing those entries saves about 3KB in the compiled table on my machine; which is not a lot but it's not nothing either, considering that that table is pretty "hot". The only outside code change needed is that ExecInitWindowAgg() can't be allowed to call fmgr_info_cxt() on a plain aggregate function. But that saves a few cycles anyway. Having done that, the aggregate_dummy() function is unreferenced and might as well be dropped. Using "aggregate_dummy" as the prosrc value for an aggregate is now just a documentation convention not something that matters. There was some discussion of using NULL instead to save a few bytes in pg_proc, but we'd have to remove prosrc's BKI_FORCE_NOT_NULL marking which doesn't seem a great idea. Anyway, it's possible there's client-side code that expects to see "aggregate_dummy" there, so I'm loath to change it without a strong reason. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/533989.1604263665@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Fujii Masao authored
Commit ac22929a changed recoveryWakeupLatch so that it's reset to NULL at the end of recovery. This change could cause a segmentation fault in the buildfarm member 'elver'. Previously the latch was reset to NULL after calling ShutdownWalRcv(). But there could be a window between ShutdownWalRcv() and the actual exit of walreceiver. If walreceiver set the latch during that window, the segmentation fault could happen. To fix the issue, this commit changes walreceiver so that it sets the latch only when the latch has not been reset to NULL yet. Author: Fujii Masao Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5c1f8a85-747c-7bf9-241e-dd467d8a3586@iki.fi
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
hash_array_extended() needs to pass PG_GET_COLLATION() to the hash function of the element type. Otherwise, the hash function of a collation-aware data type such as text will error out, since the introduction of nondeterministic collation made hash functions require a collation, too. The consequence of this is that before this change, hash partitioning using an array over text in the partition key would not work. Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/32c1fdae-95c6-5dc6-058a-a90330a3b621%40enterprisedb.com
-
Heikki Linnakangas authored
This makes the abstraction of a "source" server more clear, by introducing a common abstract class, borrowing the object-oriented programming term, that represents all the operations that can be done on the source server. There are two implementations of it, one for fetching via libpq, and another to fetch from a local directory. This adds some code, but makes it easier to understand what's going on. The copy_executeFileMap() and libpq_executeFileMap() functions contained basically the same logic, just calling different functions to fetch the source files. Refactor so that the common logic is in one place, in a new function called perform_rewind(). Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Soumyadeep Chakraborty Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/0c5b3783-af52-3ee5-f8fa-6e794061f70d%40iki.fi
-
Heikki Linnakangas authored
Now that simplehash can be used in frontend code, let's make use of it. Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Soumyadeep Chakraborty Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/0c5b3783-af52-3ee5-f8fa-6e794061f70d%40iki.fi
-
Heikki Linnakangas authored
Deciding what to do with each file is now a separate step after all the necessary information has been gathered. It is more clear that way. Previously, the decision-making was divided between process_source_file() and process_target_file(), and it was a bit hard to piece together what the overall rules were. Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Soumyadeep Chakraborty Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/0c5b3783-af52-3ee5-f8fa-6e794061f70d%40iki.fi
-
Heikki Linnakangas authored
For consistency. All the other low-level functions that operate on the target directory are in file_ops.c. Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/0c5b3783-af52-3ee5-f8fa-6e794061f70d%40iki.fi
-
Fujii Masao authored
This commit gets rid of the dedicated latch for signaling the startup process in favor of using its procLatch, since that comports better with possible generic signal handlers using that latch. Commit 1e53fe0e changed background processes so that they use standard SIGHUP handler. Like that, this commit also makes the startup process use standard SIGHUP handler to simplify the code. Author: Fujii Masao Reviewed-by: Bharath Rupireddy, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACXPorUqePswDtOeM_s82v9RW32E1fYmOPZ5NuE+TWKj_A@mail.gmail.com
-
Fujii Masao authored
Commit 1e53fe0e changed background processes so that they use standard SIGHUP handler. Like that, this commit makes syslogger use standard SIGHUP handler to simplify the code. Author: Bharath Rupireddy Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACXPorUqePswDtOeM_s82v9RW32E1fYmOPZ5NuE+TWKj_A@mail.gmail.com
-
Thomas Munro authored
Accept that we can't get versions for such locale names for now. Users will need to specify the newer language tag format to enable the collation versioning feature. It's not clear that we can do automatic conversion from the old style to the new style reliably enough for this purpose. Unfortunately, this means that collation versioning probably won't work for the default collation unless you provide something like en-US at initdb or CREATE DATABASE time (though, for reasons not yet understood, it does seem to work on some systems). It'd be nice to find a better solution, or document this quirk if we settle on it, but this should unbreak the 3 failing build farm animals in the meantime. Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm%3D0uEQCpfq_%2BLYFBdArCe4Ot98t1aR4eYiYTe%3DyavQygiQ%40mail.gmail.com
-
Michael Paquier authored
This reverts the following set of commits, following complaints about the lack of portability of the central part of the code in bufmgr.c as well as the use of partition mapping locks during page reads: c780a7a9 f2b88396 b787d4ce ce7f772c 60a51c6b Per discussion with Andres Freund, Robert Haas and myself. Bump catalog version. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201029181729.2nrub47u7yqncsv7@alap3.anarazel.de
-
- 03 Nov, 2020 13 commits
-
-
Tomas Vondra authored
Commit 6ee3b5fb cleaned up most of the long/int64 confusion related to incremental sort, but the sort debug messages were still using %ld for int64 variables. So fix that. Author: Haiying Tang Backpatch-through: 13, where the incremental sort code was added Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4250be9d350c4992abb722a76e288aef%40G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local
-
Tomas Vondra authored
When considering Incremental Sort below a Gather Merge, we need to be a bit more careful when matching pathkeys to EC members. It's not enough to find a member whose Vars are all in the current relation's target; volatile expressions in particular need to be contained in the target, otherwise it's too early to use the pathkey. Reported-by: Jaime Casanova Author: James Coleman Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra Backpatch-through: 13, where the incremental sort code was added Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJGNTeNaxpXgBVcRhJX%2B2vSbq%2BF2kJqGBcvompmpvXb7pq%2BoFA%40mail.gmail.com
-
Tom Lane authored
If the planner erroneously puts a non-parallel-safe SubPlan into a parallelized portion of the query tree, nodeSubplan.c will fail in the worker processes because it finds a null in es_subplanstates, which it's unable to cope with. It seems worth a test-and-elog to make that an error case rather than a core dump case. This probably should have been included in commit 16ebab68, which was responsible for allowing nulls to appear in es_subplanstates to begin with. So, back-patch to v10 where that came in. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/924226.1604422326@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Tom Lane authored
Clarify wording as per suggestion from Wolfgang Walther. No back-patch; this doesn't seem worth thrashing translatable strings in the back branches. Tom Lane and Stephen Frost Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/a5548a9f-89ee-3167-129d-162b5985fcf8@technowledgy.de
-
Tom Lane authored
The intention in commit 491c029d was to require superuserness to change the BYPASSRLS property, but the actual effect of the coding in AlterRole() was to require superuserness to change anything at all about a BYPASSRLS role. Other properties of a BYPASSRLS role should be changeable under the same rules as for a normal role, though. Fix that, and also take care of some documentation omissions related to BYPASSRLS and REPLICATION role properties. Tom Lane and Stephen Frost, per bug report from Wolfgang Walther. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/a5548a9f-89ee-3167-129d-162b5985fcf8@technowledgy.de
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
The current implementation cannot handle this correctly, so just forbid it for now. GENERATED clauses must be attached to the column definition and cannot be added later like DEFAULT, so if a child table has a generation expression that the parent does not have, the child column will necessarily be an attlocal column. So to implement ALTER TABLE ONLY / DROP EXPRESSION, we'd need extra code to update attislocal of the direct child tables, somewhat similar to how DROP COLUMN does it, so that the resulting state can be properly dumped and restored. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/15830.1575468847%40sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Remove old containment operators @ and ~ for built-in geometry data types. These have been deprecated; use <@ and @> instead. (Some contrib modules still contain the same deprecated operators. That will be dealt with separately.) Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20201027032511.GF9241@telsasoft.com
-
Magnus Hagander authored
Commit 3a9ae3d2 (back in 2006) deprecated TG_RELNAME in favor of TG_TABLE_NAME, but the existing usage in test cases has remained till today. Change to use TG_TABLE_NAME instead (TG_RELNAME is still covered by a test case).
-
Magnus Hagander authored
Commit d94c36a4 introduced error handling to sslinfo to handle OpenSSL errors gracefully. This ports this errorhandling to the backend TLS implementation. Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
-
Magnus Hagander authored
sslinfo was passing the Port->ssl member directly to OpenSSL in order to extract information regarding the connection. This breaks the API provided by the backend TLS implementation, as well as duplicates code for no benefit. Rewrite to make use of the backend API as much as possible. Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Switch @ to <@ and ~ to @> in gist-related tests. The old operator names have been deprecated and will eventually (possibly soon) be removed. Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20201027032511.GF9241@telsasoft.com
-
Amit Kapila authored
Author: Hou Zhijie Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/855a9421839d402b8b351d273c89a8f8@G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local
-
Tom Lane authored
fill_hba_line() thought it could get away with passing sizeof(struct sockaddr_storage) rather than the actual addrlen previously returned by getaddrinfo(). While that appears to work on many platforms, it does not work on FreeBSD 11: you get back a failure, which leads to the view showing NULL for the address and netmask columns in all rows. The POSIX spec for getnameinfo() is pretty clearly on FreeBSD's side here: you should pass the actual address length. So it seems plausible that there are other platforms where this coding also fails, and we just hadn't noticed. Also, IMO the fact that getnameinfo() failure leads to a NULL output is pretty bogus in itself. Our pg_getnameinfo_all() wrapper is careful to emit "???" on failure, and we should use that in such cases. NULL should only be emitted in rows that don't have IP addresses. Per bug #16695 from Peter Vandivier. Back-patch to v10 where this code was added. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16695-a665558e2f630be7@postgresql.org
-
- 02 Nov, 2020 13 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
make_ruledef() and make_viewdef() were coded to cope with possible null-ness of these columns, but they've been marked BKI_FORCE_NOT_NULL for some time. So there's not really any need to do more than what we do for the other columns of pg_rewrite, i.e. just Assert that we got non-null results. (There is a school of thought that says Asserts aren't the thing to do to check for corrupt data, but surely here is not the place to start if we want such a policy.) Also, remove long-dead-if-indeed-it-ever-wasn't-dead handling of an empty actions list in make_ruledef(). That's an error case and should be treated as such. (DO INSTEAD NOTHING is represented by a CMD_NOTHING Query, not an empty list; cf transformRuleStmt.) Kyotaro Horiguchi, some changes by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQApoA=tMTic6xEPYP_hsNZ8XtToVThK_0x7D_aFQYowq3w@mail.gmail.com
-
Tom Lane authored
Traditionally, the names of fmgroids.h macros for pg_proc OIDs have been constructed from the prosrc field. But sometimes the same C function underlies multiple pg_proc entries, forcing us to make an arbitrary choice of which OID to reference; the other entries are then not namable via fmgroids.h. Moreover, we could not have macros at all for pg_proc entries that aren't for C-coded functions. Instead, use the proname field, and append the proargtypes field (replacing inter-argument spaces with underscores) if proname is not unique. Special-casing unique entries such as F_OIDEQ removes the need to change a lot of code. Indeed, I can only find two places in the tree that need to be adjusted; while this changes quite a few existing entries in fmgroids.h, few of them are referenced from C code. With this patch, all entries in pg_proc.dat have macros in fmgroids.h. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/472274.1604258384@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Tom Lane authored
On detecting a corrupted match tag, pglz_decompress() should just summarily return -1. Breaking out of the loop, as I did in dfc79773, doesn't quite guarantee that will happen. Also, we can use unlikely() on that check, just in case it helps. Backpatch to v13, like the previous patch.
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Some places were using PG_GETARG_UINT32 where PG_GETARG_TRANSACTIONID would be more appropriate. (Of course, they are the same internally, so there is no externally visible effect.) To do that, export PG_GETARG_TRANSACTIONID outside of xid.c. We also export PG_RETURN_TRANSACTIONID for symmetry, even though there are currently no external users. Author: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@2ndquadrant.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/d8f6bdd536df403b9b33816e9f7e0b9d@G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local
-
Magnus Hagander authored
Author: David Johnston
-
Thomas Munro authored
Record the current version of dependent collations in pg_depend when creating or rebuilding an index. When accessing the index later, warn that the index may be corrupted if the current version doesn't match. Thanks to Douglas Doole, Peter Eisentraut, Christoph Berg, Laurenz Albe, Michael Paquier, Robert Haas, Tom Lane and others for very helpful discussion. Author: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> Author: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> (earlier versions) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm%3D0uEQCpfq_%2BLYFBdArCe4Ot98t1aR4eYiYTe%3DyavQygiQ%40mail.gmail.com
-
Thomas Munro authored
Provide a place for the version of referenced database objects to be recorded. A follow-up commit will use this to record dependencies on collation versions for indexes, but similar ideas for other kinds of objects have also been mooted. Author: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm%3D0uEQCpfq_%2BLYFBdArCe4Ot98t1aR4eYiYTe%3DyavQygiQ%40mail.gmail.com
-
Thomas Munro authored
This model couldn't be extended to cover the default collation, and didn't have any information about the affected database objects when the version changed. Remove, in preparation for a follow-up commit that will add a new mechanism. Author: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm%3D0uEQCpfq_%2BLYFBdArCe4Ot98t1aR4eYiYTe%3DyavQygiQ%40mail.gmail.com
-
Heikki Linnakangas authored
Most of the section and sub-section headers in the Queries chapter have the keywords literally stated, but neither "Sorting Rows" nor "Combining Rows" did. There's no rule that they must be, but it seems like a good practice. The keywords will ring a bell to anyone with with even a little bit of SQL experience. David G. Johnston, per suggestion by bilge@scriptfusion.com Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/159981394174.31338.7014519396749859167%40wrigleys.postgresql.org
-
David Rowley authored
This was broken recently by a929e17e. I'd failed to remember that parallel tests should have their EXPLAIN output run through the explain_parallel_append function so that the output is stable when parallel workers fail to start. fairywren was first to notice. Reported-by: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201102062951.GB15770@paquier.xyz
-
Michael Paquier authored
The documentation fixes are backpatched down to where they apply. Author: Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201031020801.GD3080@telsasoft.com Backpatch-through: 9.6
-
Amit Kapila authored
Logical replication protocol uses a single byte character to identify a message type in logical replication protocol. The code uses string literals for the same. Use Enum so that 1. All the string literals used can be found at a single place. This makes it easy to add more types without the risk of conflicts. 2. It's easy to locate the code handling a given message type. 3. When used with switch statements, it is easy to identify the missing cases using -Wswitch. Author: Ashutosh Bapat Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Andres Freund, Peter Smith and Amit Kapila Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAExHW5uPzQ7L0oAd_ENyvaiYMOPgkrAoJpE+ZY5-obdcVT6NPg@mail.gmail.com
-
David Rowley authored
Previously we only tagged on the required information to allow the executor to perform run-time partition pruning for Append/MergeAppend nodes belonging to base relations. It was thought that nested Append/MergeAppend nodes were just about always pulled up into the top-level Append/MergeAppend and that making the run-time pruning info for any sub Append/MergeAppend nodes was a waste of time. However, that was likely badly thought through. Some examples of cases we're unable to pullup nested Append/MergeAppends are: 1) Parallel Append nodes with a mix of parallel and non-parallel paths into a Parallel Append. 2) When planning an ordered Append scan a sub-partition which is unordered may require a nested MergeAppend path to ensure sub-partitions don't mix up the order of tuples being fed into the top-level Append. Unfortunately, it was not just as simple as removing the lines in createplan.c which were purposefully not building the run-time pruning info for anything but RELOPT_BASEREL relations. The code in add_paths_to_append_rel() was far too sloppy about which partitioned_rels it included for the Append/MergeAppend paths. The original code there would always assume accumulate_append_subpath() would pull each sub-Append and sub-MergeAppend path into the top-level path. While it does not appear that there were any actual bugs caused by having the additional partitioned table RT indexes recorded, what it did mean is that later in planning, when we built the run-time pruning info that we wasted effort and built PartitionedRelPruneInfos for partitioned tables that we had no subpaths for the executor to run-time prune. Here we tighten that up so that partitioned_rels only ever contains the RT index for partitioned tables which actually have subpaths in the given Append/MergeAppend. We can now Assert that every PartitionedRelPruneInfo has a non-empty present_parts. That should allow us to catch any weird corner cases that have been missed. In passing, it seems there is no longer a good reason to have the AppendPath and MergeAppendPath's partitioned_rel fields a List of IntList. We can simply have a List of Relids instead. This is more compact in memory and faster to add new members to. We still know which is the root level partition as these always have a lower relid than their children. Previously this field was used for more things, but run-time partition pruning now remains the only user of it and it has no need for a List of IntLists. Here we also get rid of the RelOptInfo partitioned_child_rels field. This is what was previously used to (sometimes incorrectly) set the Append/MergeAppend path's partitioned_rels field. That was the only usage of that field, so we can happily just remove it. I also couldn't resist changing some nearby code to make use of the newly added for_each_from macro so we can skip the first element in the list without checking if the current item was the first one on each iteration. A bug report from Andreas Kretschmer prompted all this work, however, after some consideration, I'm not personally classing this as a bug fix. So no backpatch. In Andreas' test case, it just wasn't that clear that there was a nested Append since the top-level Append just had a single sub-path which was pulled up a level, per 8edd0e79. Author: David Rowley Reviewed-by: Amit Langote Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/CAApHDvqSchs%2BubdybcfFaSPB%2B%2BEA7kqMaoqajtP0GtZvzOOR3g%40mail.gmail.com
-
- 01 Nov, 2020 2 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
pglz_maximum_compressed_size() potentially underestimated the amount of compressed data required to produce N bytes of decompressed data; this is a fault in commit 11a078cf. Separately from that, pglz_decompress() failed to protect itself against corrupt compressed data, particularly off == 0 in a match tag. Commit c60e520f turned such a situation into an infinite loop, where before it'd just have resulted in garbage output. The combination of these two bugs seems like it may explain bug #16694 from Tom Vijlbrief, though it's impossible to be quite sure without direct inspection of the failing session. (One needs to assume that the pglz_maximum_compressed_size() bug caused us to fail to fetch the second byte of a match tag, and what happened to be there instead was a zero. The reported infinite loop is hard to explain without off == 0, though.) Aside from fixing the bugs, rewrite associated comments for more clarity. Back-patch to v13 where both these commits landed. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16694-f107871e499ec114@postgresql.org
-