If there are no objects of a certain type, there is no need to do an
allocation for a set of DumpableObject items.  The previous coding did
an allocation of 1 byte instead as per the fallback of pg_malloc() in
the event of an allocation size of zero.  This assigns NULL instead for
a set of dumpable objects.

A similar rule already applied to findObjectByOid(), so this makes the
code more defensive as we would just fail with a pointer dereference
instead of attempting to use some incorrect data if a non-existing,
positive, OID is given by a caller of this function.

Author: Daniel Gustafsson
Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud, Ranier Vilela
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/26C43E58-BDD0-4F1A-97CC-4A07B52E32C5@yesql.se

transformCreateStmt() adjusts the transformed statement's RangeVar
to specify the target schema explicitly, for the express reason
of making sure that auxiliary statements derived by parse
transformation operate on the right table.  But the refactoring
I did in commit 50289819 got this wrong and passed the untransformed
RangeVar to expandTableLikeClause().  This could lead to assertion
failures or weird misbehavior if the wrong table was accessed.

Per report from Alexander Lakhin.  Like the previous patch, back-patch
to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/05051f9d-b32b-cb35-6735-0e9f2ab86b5f@gmail.com

We use the timestamp of the global statfile if we are not able to
determine it for a particular database in case the entry for that database
doesn't exist. However, we were using it even when the statfile is
corrupt.

As there is no user reported issue and it is not clear if there is any
impact of this on actual application so decided not to backpatch.

Reported-by: Amit Kapila
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Sawada Masahiko, Magnus Hagander and Alvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1J3oTJKyVq6v7K4d3jD+vtnruG9fHRib6UuWWsrwAR6Aw@mail.gmail.com

In the passing, fix a typo in pgoutput.c.

Reported-by: Tomas Vondra
Author: Tomas Vondra
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200909084353.pncuclpbwlr7vylh@development

The preallocation logic is only useful for HashAgg, so disable it when
sorting.

Also, adjust an out-of-date comment.

Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzn_o7tE2+hRVvwSFghRb75AJ5g-nqGzDUqLYMexjOAe=g@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13

The bgwriter, checkpointer, walwriter, and walreceiver processes
claimed to allow SIGQUIT "at all times".  In reality SIGQUIT
would get re-blocked during error recovery, because we didn't
update the actual signal mask immediately, so sigsetjmp() would
save and reinstate a mask that includes SIGQUIT.

This appears to be simply a coding oversight.  There's never a
good reason to hold off SIGQUIT in these processes, because it's
going to just call _exit(2) which should be safe enough, especially
since the postmaster is going to tear down shared memory afterwards.
Hence, stick in PG_SETMASK() calls to install the modified BlockSig
mask immediately.

Also try to improve the comments around sigsetjmp blocks.  Most of
them were just referencing postgres.c, which is misleading because
actually postgres.c manages the signals differently.

No back-patch, since there's no evidence that this is causing any
problems in the field.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm1d1hHPZUg3xU4XjtWBOLCrA+-2cJcLpw-cePZ=GgDVfA@mail.gmail.com

The stats target can be set since commit d06215d0, but wasn't shown by
psql.

Author: Justin Pryzby <justin@telsasoft.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200831050047.GG5450@telsasoft.comReviewed-by: Georgios Kokolatos <gkokolatos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro.yamada.tf@nttcom.co.jp>

Currently, no useful trace is left in the logs when the postmaster
is forced to use SIGKILL to shut down children that failed to respond
to SIGQUIT.  Some questions were raised about how often that scenario
happens in the buildfarm, so let's add a LOG-level message showing
that it happened.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1850884.1599601164@sss.pgh.pa.us

Although 58c6fecc fixed the case for SIGQUIT, we were still calling
proc_exit() from signal handlers for SIGTERM and timeout failures in
ProcessStartupPacket.  Fortunately, at the point where that code runs,
we haven't yet connected to shared memory in any meaningful way, so
there is nothing we need to undo in shared memory.  This means it
should be safe to use _exit(1) here, ie, not run any atexit handlers
but also inform the postmaster that it's not a crash exit.

To make sure nobody breaks the "nothing to undo" expectation, add
a cross-check that no on-shmem-exit or before-shmem-exit handlers
have been registered yet when we finish using these signal handlers.

This change is simple enough that maybe it could be back-patched,
but I won't risk that right now.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1850884.1599601164@sss.pgh.pa.us

Thinko in 40b3e2c2.
Reported-by: "Wang, Shenhao" <wangsh.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ed98706b82694b57a8c0d339a10732aa@G08CNEXMBPEKD06.g08.fujitsu.local

We were decoding empty transactions via streaming APIs added in commit
45fdc973 even when the user used the option 'skip-empty-xacts'. The APIs
makes no effort to skip empty xacts under the assumption that we will
never try to stream such transactions. However, that is not true because
we can pick to stream a transaction that has change messages for
REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_INTERNAL_SNAPSHOT and we don't send such messages to
downstream rather they are just to update the internal state. So, we need
to skip such xacts when plugin uses the option 'skip-empty-xacts'.

Diagnosed-By: Amit Kapila
Author: Dilip Kumar
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1+OqgFNZkf7=ETe_y5ntjgDk3T0wcdkd4Sot_u1hySGfw@mail.gmail.com

This helps debuggability when looking at WAL streams containing logical
messages.

Author: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@2ndquadrant.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAExHW5sWx49rKmXbg5H1Xc1t+nRv9PaYKQmgw82HPt6vWDVmDg@mail.gmail.com

Bring the signal handling for startup-packet collection into line
with the policy established in commits bedadc73 and 8e19a826,
namely don't risk running atexit callbacks when handling SIGQUIT.

Ideally, we'd not do so for SIGTERM or timeout interrupts either,
but that change seems a bit too risky for the back branches.
For now, just improve the comments in this area to describe the risk.

Also relocate where BackendInitialize re-disables these interrupts,
to minimize the code span where they're active.  This doesn't buy
a whole lot of safety, but it can't hurt.

In passing, rename startup_die() to remove confusion about whether
it is for the startup process.

Like the previous commits, back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1850884.1599601164@sss.pgh.pa.us

Sometimes it happens that the visibility information for a tuple
becomes corrupted, either due to bugs in the database software or
external factors. Provide a function heap_force_kill() that can
be used to truncate such dead tuples to dead line pointers, and
a function heap_force_freeze() that can be used to overwrite the
visibility information in such a way that the tuple becomes
all-visible.

These functions are unsafe, in that you can easily use them to
corrupt a database that was not previously corrupted, and you can
use them to further corrupt an already-corrupted database or to
destroy data. The documentation accordingly cautions against
casual use. However, in some cases they permit recovery of data
that would otherwise be very difficult to recover, or to allow a
system to continue to function when it would otherwise be difficult
to do so.

Because we may want to add other functions for performing other
kinds of surgery in the future, the new contrib module is called
pg_surgery rather than something specific to these functions. I
proposed back-patching this so that it could be more easily used
by people running existing releases who are facing these kinds of
problems, but that proposal did not attract enough support, so
no back-patch for now.

Ashutosh Sharma, reviewed and tested by Andrey M. Borodin,
M. Beena Emerson, Masahiko Sawada, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi,
Asim Praveen, and Mark Dilger, and somewhat revised by me.

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZW1fsU-QUNCRUQMGUygBDPVeOTLCqRdQZch=EYZnctSA@mail.gmail.com

Apparently, this was never used when
introduced (3dad73e7).

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/511bb100-f829-ba21-2f10-9f952ec06ead%402ndquadrant.com

Add libssl and libcrypto to libpq.pc's Requires.private.  This allows
static linking to work if those libssl or libcrypto themselves have
dependencies in their *.private fields, such as -lz in some cases.
Reported-by: Sandro Mani <manisandro@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/837d1dcf-2fca-ee6e-0d7e-6bce1a1bac75@gmail.com

We have had multiple reports that point to the
'@colReorder=latn-digit' collation customization being buggy.  We have
reported this to ICU and are waiting for a fix.  In the meantime,
remove references to this from the documentation and replace it by
another reordering example.  Apparently, many users have been picking
up this example specifically from the documentation.

Author: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/153201618542.1404.3611626898935613264%40wrigleys.postgresql.org

EXTRACT of date type is implemented as a wrapper around EXTRACT of
timestamp, so the code is already tested there.  But the externally
visible behavior of EXTRACT on date is not recorded anywhere.  Since
there is some discussion about reimplementing or refactoring some of
this, add some more explicit tests of EXTRACT on date, similar in
structure to existing EXTRACT tests on other data types.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu

Reported-by: Robert Kahlert
Author: Daniel Gustafsson

Do some minor cleanup for commit c8434d64: 1) remove a useless
assignment (in normal builds) and 2) improve comments a little.

Back-patch to v13 where the aforementioned commit went in.

Author: Etsuro Fujita
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK16yCd2R4=bQ4g8N2dT9TtA5ZU+qNmJ3LPc_nypbNy4_2A@mail.gmail.com

Some comments are fixed while on it.

Author: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200818171702.GK17022@telsasoft.com
Backpatch-through: 9.6

Move applicable code out of RelationBuildDesc(), which nailed relations
bypass.  Non-assert builds experienced no known problems.  Back-patch to
v13, where commit c6b92041 introduced
rd_firstRelfilenodeSubid.

Kyotaro Horiguchi.  Reported by Justin Pryzby.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200907023737.GA7158@telsasoft.com

Commit 8e19a826 changed the SIGQUIT handlers of almost all server
processes not to run atexit callbacks.  The archiver process was
skipped, perhaps because it's not connected to shared memory; but
it's just as true here that running atexit callbacks in a signal
handler is unsafe.  So let's make it work like the rest.

In HEAD and v13, we can use the common SignalHandlerForCrashExit
handler.  Before that, just tweak pgarch_exit to use _exit(2)
explicitly.

Like the previous commit, back-patch to all supported branches.

Kyotaro Horiguchi, back-patching by me

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1850884.1599601164@sss.pgh.pa.us

Existing callers had to take complicated detours via
DirectFunctionCall1().  This simplifies a lot of code.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu

Commit 15cb2bd2 neglected to make the running text match the
tables, leaving the reader with the strong impression that
we cannot count.  Also, don't drop an unrelated para between
a table and the para describing it.

Alexander Lakhin

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ce7debdd-c943-d7a7-9b41-687107b27831@gmail.com

Mistake in commit 68b603e1.

Reported-by: Ian Barwick

max(numeric) wasn't tested at all, min(numeric) was only used by some
unrelated tests.  Add explicit tests with the other numeric aggregate
functions.

Partitioning tuple route code assumes that the partition chosen while
descending the partition hierarchy is always the correct one.  This is
true except when the partition is the default partition and another
partition has been added concurrently: the partition constraint changes
and we don't recheck it.  This can lead to tuples mistakenly being added
to the default partition that should have been rejected.

Fix by rechecking the default partition constraint while descending the
hierarchy.

An isolation test based on the reproduction steps described by Hao Wu
(with tweaks for extra coverage) is included.

Backpatch to 12, where this bug came in with 898e5e32.

Reported by: Hao Wu <hawu@vmware.com>
Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqFqBmcSSap4sFnCBUEL_VfOMmEKaQ3gwUhyfa4c7J_-nA@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/DM5PR0501MB3910E97A9EDFB4C775CF3D75A42F0@DM5PR0501MB3910.namprd05.prod.outlook.com

Historically, cancel_before_shmem_exit() just silently did nothing
if the specified callback wasn't the top-of-stack.  The folly of
ignoring this case was exposed by the bugs fixed in 30364019 and
bab15004, so let's make it throw elog(ERROR) instead.

There is a decent argument to be made that PG_ENSURE_ERROR_CLEANUP
should use some separate infrastructure, so it wouldn't break if
something inside the guarded code decides to register a new
before_shmem_exit callback.  However, a survey of the surviving
uses of before_shmem_exit() and PG_ENSURE_ERROR_CLEANUP doesn't
show any plausible conflicts of that sort today, so for now we'll
forgo the extra complexity.  (It will almost certainly become
necessary if anyone ever wants to wrap PG_ENSURE_ERROR_CLEANUP
around arbitrary user-defined actions, though.)

No backpatch, since this is developer support not a production issue.

Bharath Rupireddy, per advice from Andres Freund, Robert Haas, and myself

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACWk7j4F2v2fxxYfrroOF=AdFNPr1WsV+AGtHAFQOqm_pw@mail.gmail.com

The problem is caused by me (Andres) having ProcSleep() look at the
wrong PGPROC entry in 5788e258.

Unfortunately it seems hard to write a reliable test for autovacuum
cancellations. Perhaps somebody will come up with a good approach, but
it seems worth fixing the issue even without a test.
Reported-By: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Author: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1wH2aUy+wDRDz+5RZALdcUnEofV1t9PzXS_gBJO9vZZ0Q@mail.gmail.com

This essentially reverts a micro-optimization I made years ago,
as part of the much larger commit d72f6c75.  It's doubtful
that there was any hard evidence for it being helpful even then,
and the case is even more dubious now that modern compilers
are so much smarter about inlining memset().

The proximate reason for undoing it is to get rid of the type punning
inherent in MemSet, for fear that that may cause problems now that
we're applying additional optimization switches to numeric.c.
At the very least this'll silence some warnings from a few old
buildfarm animals.

(It's probably past time for another look at whether MemSet is still
worth anything at all, but I do not propose to tackle that question
right now.)

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9evtA_vBo+WMYMyT-u=keHX7-r8p2w7OSRfXf42LTwCZQ@mail.gmail.com

Otherwise just printing an empty string makes the memory context debug
output slightly confusing.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/ccb353ef-89ff-09b3-8046-1d2514624b9c%402ndquadrant.com

unused since f0d6f202

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/511bb100-f829-ba21-2f10-9f952ec06ead%402ndquadrant.com

The isolation test added by a6642b3a is proving to be unstable, as once
the first transaction holding a lock on the top-most partitioned table
or on a partition commits, the commit order of the follow-up DROP TABLE
and REINDEX could become reversed depending on the timing.

The only part of the test that could be entirely reliable is the one
using a SHARE lock, allowing REINDEX to commit first, but it is the
least interesting of the set.

Per buildfarm members rorqual and mylodon.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1kFSBj-00062c-Mu@gemulon.postgresql.org

Until now, REINDEX was not able to work with partitioned tables and
indexes, forcing users to reindex partitions one by one.  This extends
REINDEX INDEX and REINDEX TABLE so as they can accept a partitioned
index and table in input, respectively, to reindex all the partitions
assigned to them with physical storage (foreign tables, partitioned
tables and indexes are then discarded).

This shares some logic with schema and database REINDEX as each
partition gets processed in its own transaction after building a list of
relations to work on.  This choice has the advantage to minimize the
number of invalid indexes to one partition with REINDEX CONCURRENTLY in
the event a cancellation or failure in-flight, as the only indexes
handled at once in a single REINDEX CONCURRENTLY loop are the ones from
the partition being working on.

Isolation tests are added to emulate some cases I bumped into while
developing this feature, particularly with the concurrent drop of a
leaf partition reindexed.  However, this is rather limited as LOCK would
cause REINDEX to block in the first transaction building the list of
partitions.

Per its multi-transaction nature, this new flavor cannot run in a
transaction block, similarly to REINDEX SCHEMA, SYSTEM and DATABASE.

Author: Justin Pryzby, Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Lubennikova
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/db12e897-73ff-467e-94cb-4af03705435f.adger.lj@alibaba-inc.com

Tomas Vondra observed that the IO behavior for HashAgg tends to be
worse than for Sort. Penalize HashAgg IO costs accordingly.

Also, account for the CPU effort of spilling the tuples and reading
them back.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200906212112.nzoy5ytrzjjodpfh@development
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra
Backpatch-through: 13

Some of the pre-existing comments were vague about whether they
referred to all polymorphic types or only the old-style ones.

Also be more consistent about using the "family 1" vs "family 2"
terminology.

Himanshu Upadhyaya and Tom Lane

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPF61jBUg9XoMPNuLpoZ+h6UZ2VxKdNt3rQL1xw1GOBwjWzAXQ@mail.gmail.com

Experimentation shows that clang will auto-vectorize the critical
multiplication loop if the termination condition is written "i2 < limit"
rather than "i2 <= limit".  This seems unbelievably stupid, but I've
reproduced it on both clang 9.0.1 (RHEL8) and 11.0.3 (macOS Catalina).
gcc doesn't care, so tweak the code to do it that way.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9evtA_vBo+WMYMyT-u=keHX7-r8p2w7OSRfXf42LTwCZQ@mail.gmail.com