- 20 Oct, 2017 4 commits
-
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
IDs in SGML are case insensitive, and we have accumulated a mix of upper and lower case IDs, including different variants of the same ID. In XML, these will be case sensitive, so we need to fix up those differences. Going to all lower case seems most straightforward, and the current build process already makes all anchors and lower case anyway during the SGML->XML conversion, so this doesn't create any difference in the output right now. A future XML-only build process would, however, maintain any mixed case ID spellings in the output, so that is another reason to clean this up beforehand. Author: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
-
Tom Lane authored
Like the similar logic for arrays and records, it's necessary to examine the range's subtype to decide whether the range type can support hashing. We can omit checking the subtype for btree-defined operations, though, since range subtypes are required to have those operations. (Possibly that simplification for btree cases led us to overlook that it does not apply for hash cases.) This is only an issue if the subtype lacks hash support, which is not true of any built-in range type, but it's easy to demonstrate a problem with a range type over, eg, money: you can get a "could not identify a hash function" failure when the planner is misled into thinking that hash join or aggregation would work. This was born broken, so back-patch to all supported branches.
-
Tom Lane authored
The previous coding would report that an array type supports extended hashing if its element type supports regular hashing. This bug is only latent at the moment, since AFAICS there is not yet any code that depends on checking presence of extended-hashing support to make any decisions. (And in any case it wouldn't matter unless the element type has only regular hashing, which isn't true of any core data type.) But that doesn't make it less broken. Extend the cache_array_element_properties infrastructure to check this properly.
-
Robert Haas authored
Inspired by a patch from Julien Rouhaud, but I reworded it. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAOBaU_a8AH8=ypfqgHnDYu06ts+jWTUgh=VgCxA3yNV-K10j9w@mail.gmail.com
-
- 19 Oct, 2017 6 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
As noted by M. Justin. Also, to keep the HEAD and REL_10 versions of release-10.sgml in sync, back-patch the effects of c29c5789 on that file. We have a bigger problem there though :-( Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALtA7pmsQyTTD3fC2rmfUWgfivv5sCJJ84PHY0F_5t_SRc07Qg@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6d137bd0-eef6-1d91-d9b8-1a5e9195a899@2ndquadrant.com
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
This is preparation for a future patch to extensively change how reloptions work. Author: Nikolay Shaplov Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2615372.orqtEn8VGB@x200m
-
Magnus Hagander authored
David Rowley
-
Magnus Hagander authored
Masahiko Sawada
-
Magnus Hagander authored
Spotted by Piotr Stefaniak
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Otherwise the order depends on the Perl hash implementation, making it cumbersome to scan the output when debugging.
-
- 18 Oct, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
We say 'OWNER TO' in the synopsis; let's use that form elsewhere. There is a paragraph in the <note> section that refers to various subcommands very loosely (including OWNER); I didn't think it was an improvement to change that one. This is a fairly inconsequential change, so no backpatch. Author: Amit Langote Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/69ec7b51-03e5-f523-95ce-c070ee790e70@lab.ntt.co.jp
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
Author: David G. Johnston Discussion: https:/postgr.es/m/CAKFQuwaCsb-OKOjQXGeN0R7byxiRWvr7OtyKDbJoYgiF2vBG4Q@mail.gmail.com
-
- 17 Oct, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
For DocBook XML compatibility, don't use SGML empty tags (</>) anymore, replace by the full tag name. Add a warning option to catch future occurrences. Alexander Lakhin, Jürgen Purtz
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
Reported by: David G. Johnston Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKFQuwajWqjqEL9xc1xnnmTyBg32EdAZKJXijzigbosGSs_vag@mail.gmail.com
-
- 16 Oct, 2017 6 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
setTargetTable threw an error if the proposed target RangeVar's relname matched any visible CTE or ENR. This breaks backwards compatibility in the CTE case, since pre-v10 we never looked for a CTE here at all, so that CTE names did not mask regular tables. It does seem like a good idea to throw an error for the ENR case, though, thus causing ENRs to mask tables for this purpose; ENRs are new in v10 so we're not breaking existing code, and we may someday want to allow them to be the targets of DML. To fix that, replace use of getRTEForSpecialRelationTypes, which was overkill anyway, with use of scanNameSpaceForENR. A second problem was that the check neglected to verify null schemaname, so that a CTE or ENR could incorrectly be thought to match a qualified RangeVar. That happened because getRTEForSpecialRelationTypes relied on its caller to have checked for null schemaname. Even though the one remaining caller got it right, this is obviously bug-prone, so move the check inside getRTEForSpecialRelationTypes. Also, revert commit 18ce3a4a's extremely poorly thought out decision to add a NULL return case to parserOpenTable --- without either documenting that or adjusting any of the callers to check for it. The current bug seems to have arisen in part due to working around that bad idea. In passing, remove the one-line shim functions transformCTEReference and transformENRReference --- they don't seem to be adding any clarity or functionality. Per report from Hugo Mercier (via Julien Rouhaud). Back-patch to v10 where the bug was introduced. Thomas Munro, with minor editing by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOBaU_YdPVH+PTtiKSSLOiiW3mVDYsnNUekK+XPbHXiP=wrFLA@mail.gmail.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Flex generates a lot of functions that are not actually used. In order to avoid coverage figures being ruined by that, mark up the part of the .l files where the generated code appears by lcov exclusion markers. That way, lcov will typically only reported on coverage for the .l file, which is under our control, but not for the .c file. Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
-
Tom Lane authored
There is no reason to insist that direct arguments must match before we can merge transition states of two aggregate calls. They're only used during the finalfn call, so we can treat them as like the finalfn itself. This allows, eg, merging of select percentile_cont(0.25) within group (order by a), percentile_disc(0.5) within group (order by a) from ... This didn't matter (and could not have been tested) before we allowed state merging of OSAs otherwise. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAB4ELO5RZhOamuT9Xsf72ozbenDLLXZKSk07FiSVsuJNZB861A@mail.gmail.com
-
Tom Lane authored
The built-in OSAs all share the same transition function, so they can share transition state as long as the final functions cooperate to not do the sort step more than once. To avoid running the tuplesort object in randomAccess mode unnecessarily, add a bit of infrastructure to nodeAgg.c to let the aggregate functions find out whether the transition state is actually being shared or not. This doesn't work for the hypothetical aggregates, since those inject a hypothetical row that isn't traceable to the shared input state. So they remain marked aggfinalmodify = 'w'. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAB4ELO5RZhOamuT9Xsf72ozbenDLLXZKSk07FiSVsuJNZB861A@mail.gmail.com
-
Tom Lane authored
An aggregate's input expression(s) are not supposed to be evaluated at all for a row where its FILTER test fails ... but commit 8ed3f11b overlooked that requirement. Reshuffle so that aggregates having a filter clause evaluate their arguments separately from those without. This still gets the benefit of doing only one ExecProject in the common case of multiple Aggrefs, none of which have filters. While at it, arrange for filter clauses to be included in the common ExecProject evaluation, thus perhaps buying a little bit even when there are filters. Back-patch to v10 where the bug was introduced. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30065.1508161354@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
Simplify coding using a switch rather than nested if tests. Author: Álvaro Reviewed-by: Robert Haas, Amit Langote, Michaël Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171013163820.pai7djcaxrntaxtn@alvherre.pgsql
-
- 15 Oct, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
While poking around in the aggregate logic, I noticed that commit 8ed3f11b broke the logic in nodeAgg.c that purports to detect nested aggregates, by moving initialization of regular aggregate argument expressions out of the code segment that checks for that. You could argue that this check is unnecessary, but it's not much code so I'm inclined to keep it as a backstop against parser and planner bugs. However, there's certainly zero value in checking only some of the subexpressions. We can make the check complete again, and as a bonus make it a good deal more bulletproof against future mistakes of the same ilk, by moving it out to the outermost level of ExecInitAgg. This means we need to check only once per Agg node not once per aggregate, which also seems like a good thing --- if the check does find something wrong, it's not urgent that we report it before the plan node initialization finishes. Since this requires remembering the original length of the aggs list, I deleted a long-obsolete stanza that changed numaggs from 0 to 1. That's so old it predates our decision that palloc(0) is a valid operation, in (digs...) 2004, see commit 24a1e20f. In passing improve a few comments. Back-patch to v10, just in case.
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
-
- 14 Oct, 2017 3 commits
-
-
Tom Lane authored
Buildfarm member gaur says it wasn't there in 2.95.3. Guess that 3.0 and later have it.
-
Tom Lane authored
Up to now, there's been hard-wired assumptions that normal aggregates' final functions never modify their transition states, while ordered-set aggregates' final functions always do. This has always been a bit limiting, and in particular it's getting in the way of improving the built-in ordered-set aggregates to allow merging of transition states. Therefore, let's introduce catalog and CREATE AGGREGATE infrastructure that lets the finalfn's behavior be declared explicitly. There are now three possibilities for the finalfn behavior: it's purely read-only, it trashes the transition state irrecoverably, or it changes the state in such a way that no more transfn calls are possible but the state can still be passed to other, compatible finalfns. There are no examples of this third case today, but we'll shortly make the built-in OSAs act like that. This change allows user-defined aggregates to explicitly disclaim support for use as window functions, and/or to prevent transition state merging, if their implementations cannot handle that. While it was previously possible to handle the window case with a run-time error check, there was not any way to prevent transition state merging, which in retrospect is something commit 804163bc should have provided for. But better late than never. In passing, split out pg_aggregate.c's extern function declarations into a new header file pg_aggregate_fn.h, similarly to what we've done for some other catalog headers, so that pg_aggregate.h itself can be safe for frontend files to include. This lets pg_dump use the symbolic names for relevant constants. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4834.1507849699@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
In c3d9a660, the genhtml --prefix option was removed to get slightly better behavior for vpath builds. genhtml would then automatically pick a suitable prefix. However, for non-vpath builds, this makes the coverage output dependent on the length of the path where the source code happens to be, leading to confusingly arbitrary results. So put the --prefix option back for non-vpath builds.
-
- 13 Oct, 2017 10 commits
-
-
Joe Conway authored
A few command line options accepted by pg_regress were not being output by help(), including --help itself. Add that one, as well as --version and --bindir, and the corresponding short options for the first two. We could consider this for backpatching, but it did not seem worthwhile and no one else advocated for it, so apply only to master for now. Author: Joe Conway Reviewed-By: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/dd519469-06d7-2662-83ef-c926f6c4f0f1%40joeconway.com
-
Andres Freund authored
The following are the individual improvements: 1) Avoidance of FunctionCallInfo based function calls, replaced by more efficient functions with a native C argument interface. 2) Don't extract columns from a cache entry's tuple whenever matching entries - instead store them as a Datum array. This also allows to get rid of having to build dummy tuples for negative & list entries, and of a hack for dealing with cstring vs. text weirdness. 3) Reorder members of catcache.h struct, so imortant entries are more likely to be on one cacheline. 4) Allowing the compiler to specialize critical SearchCatCache for a specific number of attributes allows to unroll loops and avoid other nkeys dependant initialization. 5) Only initializing the ScanKey when necessary, i.e. catcache misses, greatly reduces cache unnecessary cpu cache misses. 6) Split of the cache-miss case from the hash lookup, reducing stack allocations etc in the common case. 7) CatCTup and their corresponding heaptuple are allocated in one piece. This results in making cache lookups themselves roughly three times as fast - full-system benchmarks obviously improve less than that. I've also evaluated further techniques: - replace open coded hash with simplehash - the list walk right now shows up in profiles. Unfortunately it's not easy to do so safely as an entry's memory location can change at various times, which doesn't work well with the refcounting and cache invalidation. - Cacheline-aligning CatCTup entries - helps some with performance, but the win isn't big and the code for it is ugly, because the tuples have to be freed as well. - add more proper functions, rather than macros for SearchSysCacheCopyN etc., but right now they don't show up in profiles. The reason the macro wrapper for syscache.c/h have to be changed, rather than just catcache, is that doing otherwise would require exposing the SysCache array to the outside. That might be a good idea anyway, but it's for another day. Author: Andres Freund Reviewed-By: Robert Haas Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170914061207.zxotvyopetm7lrrp@alap3.anarazel.de
-
Andres Freund authored
Forcing a function not to be inlined can be useful if it's the slow-path of a performance critical function, or should be visible in profiles to allow for proper cost attribution. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170914061207.zxotvyopetm7lrrp@alap3.anarazel.de
-
Andres Freund authored
Per buildfarm animal Hornet and followup manual testing by Noah Misch, it appears xlc miscompiles code using "restrict" in at least some cases. Allow disabling restrict usage with FORCE_DISABLE_RESTRICT=yes in template files, and do so for aix/xlc. Author: Andres Freund and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1820.1507918762@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Robert Haas authored
If a Parallel Bitmap Heap scan's chain of leftmost descendents includes a BitmapOr whose first child is a BitmapAnd, the prior coding would mistakenly create a non-shared TIDBitmap and then try to perform shared iteration. Report by Tomas Vondra. Patch by Dilip Kumar. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/50e89684-8ad9-dead-8767-c9545bafd3b6@2ndquadrant.com
-
Tom Lane authored
I (tgl) objected to the obscure implementation introduced in commit 1c497fa7. This one seems a bit less action-at-a-distance-y, at the price of repeating a few lines of code. Improve the comments about what the function is doing, too. Amit Khandekar, whacked around a bit more by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9egYTyHUH0nTMxm8-1m3RvdqEbaTyGC-CUNtYf7tKNDaQ@mail.gmail.com
-
Tom Lane authored
In each of the pq_writeintN functions, the three uses of sizeof() should surely all be consistent. I started out to make them all sizeof(ni), but on reflection let's make them sizeof(typename) instead. That's more like our usual style elsewhere, and it's just barely possible that the failures buildfarm member hornet has shown since 4c119fbc went in are caused by the compiler getting confused about sizeof() a parameter that it's optimizing away. In passing, improve a couple of comments. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1e2RML-0002do-Lc@gemulon.postgresql.org
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Apparently, an older spelling of LDAP_OPT_DIAGNOSTIC_MESSAGE is LDAP_OPT_ERROR_STRING, so fall back to that one.
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Diagnostic messages seem likely to help users diagnose root causes more easily, so let's report them as errdetail. Author: Thomas Munro Reviewed-By: Ashutosh Bapat, Christoph Berg, Alvaro Herrera, Peter Eisentraut Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=2_dA-SYpFdmNVwvKsEBXOUj=K4ooKovHmvj6jnMdt8dw@mail.gmail.com
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
After calling ldap_unbind_s() we probably shouldn't try to use the LDAP connection again to call ldap_get_option(), even if it failed. The OpenLDAP man page for ldap_unbind[_s] says "Once it is called, the connection to the LDAP server is closed, and the ld structure is invalid." Otherwise, as a general rule we should probably call ldap_unbind() before returning in all paths to avoid leaking resources. It is unlikely there is any practical leak problem since failure to authenticate currently results in the backend exiting soon afterwards. Author: Thomas Munro Reviewed-By: Alvaro Herrera, Peter Eisentraut Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170914141205.eup4kxzlkagtmfac%40alvherre.pgsql
-
- 12 Oct, 2017 5 commits
-
-
Andres Freund authored
Unfortunately using 'restrict' plainly causes problems with MSVC, which supports restrict only as '__restrict'. Defining 'restrict' to '__restrict' unfortunately causes a conflict with MSVC's usage of __declspec(restrict) in headers. Therefore define pg_restrict to the appropriate keyword instead, and replace existing usages. This replaces the temporary workaround introduced in 36b4b91b. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2656.1507830907@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
Robert Haas authored
Marginal efficiency and beautification hack. I'm not sure whether this case ever arises currently, but the pending patch for update tuple routing will cause it to arise. Amit Khandekar Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9cazfppe7-wwUbabPcQ4_0SubkiPFD1+0r5_DkVNWo5yg@mail.gmail.com
-
Robert Haas authored
The previous convention doesn't lend itself to creating ResultRelInfos lazily, as we already do in ExecGetTriggerResultRel. This patch doesn't make anything lazier than before, but the pending patch for UPDATE tuple routing proposes to do so (and there might be other opportunities as well). Amit Khandekar with some adjustments by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYPVP9Lyf6vUFA5DwxS4c--x6LOj2y36BsJaYtp62eXPQ@mail.gmail.com
-
Tom Lane authored
If we merge the transition calculations for two different aggregates, it's reasonable to assume that the transition function should not care which of those Aggref structs it gets from AggGetAggref(). It is not reasonable to make the same assumption about an aggregate final function, however. Commit 804163bc broke this, as it will pass whichever Aggref was first associated with the transition state in both cases. This doesn't create an observable bug so far as the core system is concerned, because the only existing uses of AggGetAggref() are in ordered-set aggregates that happen to not pay attention to anything but the input properties of the Aggref; and besides that, we disabled sharing of transition calculations for OSAs yesterday. Nonetheless, if some third-party code were using AggGetAggref() in a normal aggregate, they would be entitled to call this a bug. Hence, back-patch the fix to 9.6 where the problem was introduced. In passing, improve some of the comments about transition state sharing. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAB4ELO5RZhOamuT9Xsf72ozbenDLLXZKSk07FiSVsuJNZB861A@mail.gmail.com
-
Robert Haas authored
Commits 6476b261 and 14f67a8e didn't use quite the same error message for what is basically the same situation. Amit Langote, pared back a bit by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/54dc76d0-3b5b-ba5a-27dc-fb31a3975b61@lab.ntt.co.jp
-