Author: Stas Kelvich <s.kelvich@postgrespro.ru>
Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Reported-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>

for commit 887227a1

This also changes default behaviour of subscription workers to
synchronous_commit = off.

Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>

The result of TextDatumGetCString is already palloc'ed.

Author: Alexander Law <exclusion@gmail.com>

Author: Alexander Law <exclusion@gmail.com>

Add necessary include files for things used in the header.  (signal.h
needed for sig_atomic_t.)

This was introduced as part of the patch to add --no-role-passwords, but
while it's an unusual combination, there is no actual reason to prevent
it.

regexport.c thought it could just ignore LACON arcs, but the correct
behavior is to treat them as satisfiable while consuming zero input
(rather reminiscently of commit 9f1e642d).  Otherwise, the emitted
simplified-NFA representation may contain no paths leading from initial
to final state, which unsurprisingly confuses pg_trgm, as seen in
bug #14623 from Jeff Janes.

Since regexport's output representation has no concept of an arc that
consumes zero input, recurse internally to find the next normal arc(s)
after any LACON transitions.  We'd be forced into changing that
representation if a LACON could be the last arc reaching the final
state, but fortunately the regex library never builds NFAs with such
a configuration, so there always is a next normal arc.

Back-patch to 9.3 where this logic was introduced.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170413180503.25948.94871@wrigleys.postgresql.org

Fixes commit 4f3b87ab

This contains some protocol changes to SASL authentiation (which is new
in v10):

* For future-proofing, in the AuthenticationSASL message that begins SASL
  authentication, provide a list of SASL mechanisms that the server
  supports, for the client to choose from. Currently, it's always just
  SCRAM-SHA-256.

* Add a separate authentication message type for the final server->client
  SASL message, which the client doesn't need to respond to. This makes
  it unambiguous whether the client is supposed to send a response or not.
  The SASL mechanism should know that anyway, but better to be explicit.

Also, in the server, support clients that don't send an Initial Client
response in the first SASLInitialResponse message. The server is supposed
to first send an empty request in that case, to which the client will
respond with the data that usually comes in the Initial Client Response.
libpq uses the Initial Client Response field and doesn't need this, and I
would assume any other sensible implementation to use Initial Client
Response, too, but let's follow the SASL spec.

Improve the documentation on SASL authentication in protocol. Add a
section describing the SASL message flow, and some details on our
SCRAM-SHA-256 implementation.

Document the different kinds of PasswordMessages that the frontend sends
in different phases of SASL authentication, as well as GSS/SSPI
authentication as separate message formats. Even though they're all 'p'
messages, and the exact format depends on the context, describing them as
separate message formats makes the documentation more clear.

Reviewed by Michael Paquier and Álvaro Hernández Tortosa.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqS-aFg0iM3AQOJwKDv_0WkAedRjs1W2X8EixSz+sKBXCQ@mail.gmail.com

Move the responsibility of reading the data from the authentication request
message from PQconnectPoll() to pg_fe_sendauth(). This way, PQconnectPoll()
doesn't need to know about all the different authentication request types,
and we don't need the extra fields in the pg_conn struct to pass the data
from PQconnectPoll() to pg_fe_sendauth() anymore.

Reviewed by Michael Paquier.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6490b975-5ee1-6280-ac1d-af975b19fb9a%40iki.fi

Formerly, the bootstrap backend looked up the OIDs corresponding to
names in regproc catalog entries using brute-force searches of pg_proc.
It was somewhat remarkable that that worked at all, since it was used
while populating other pretty-fundamental catalogs like pg_operator.
And it was also quite slow, and getting slower as pg_proc gets bigger.

This patch moves the lookup work into genbki.pl, so that the values in
postgres.bki for regproc columns are always numeric OIDs, an option
that regprocin() already supported.  Perl isn't the world's speediest
language, so this about doubles the time needed to run genbki.pl (from
0.3 to 0.6 sec on my machine).  But we only do that at most once per
build.  The time needed to run initdb drops significantly --- on my
machine, initdb --no-sync goes from 1.8 to 1.3 seconds.  So this is
a small net win even for just one initdb per build, and it becomes
quite a nice win for test sequences requiring many initdb runs.

Strip out the now-dead code for brute-force catalog searching in
regprocin.  We'd also cargo-culted similar logic into regoperin
and some (not all) of the other reg*in functions.  That is all
dead code too since we currently have no need to load such values
during bootstrap.  I removed it all, reasoning that if we ever
need such functionality it'd be much better to do it in a similar
way to this patch.

There might be some simplifications possible in the backend now that
regprocin doesn't require doing catalog reads so early in bootstrap.
I've not looked into that, though.

Andreas Karlsson, with some small adjustments by me

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30896.1492006367@sss.pgh.pa.us

This removes the pg_dump option --no-subscription-connect and makes it
the default.  Dumping a subscription so that it activates right away
when restored is not very useful, because the state of the publication
server is unclear.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e4fbfad5-c6ac-fd50-6777-18c84b34eb2f@2ndquadrant.com

Dump subscriptions if the current user is a superuser, otherwise write a
warning and skip them.  Remove the pg_dump option
--include-subscriptions.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e4fbfad5-c6ac-fd50-6777-18c84b34eb2f@2ndquadrant.com

Add a missing comma in the synopsis after the XMLNAMESPACES clause.
Also, add an example illustrating the use of that clause.

Author: Arjen Nienhuis and Pavel Stěhule

Free each SASL message after sending it. It's not a lot of wasted memory,
and it's short-lived, but the authentication code in general tries to
pfree() stuff, so let's follow the example.

Adding the pfree() revealed a little bug in build_server_first_message().
It attempts to keeps a copy of the sent message, but it was missing a
pstrdup(), so the pointer started to dangle, after adding the pfree()
into CheckSCRAMAuth().

Reword comments and debug messages slightly, while we're at it.

Reviewed by Michael Paquier.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6490b975-5ee1-6280-ac1d-af975b19fb9a@iki.fi

It was created as equivalent of pg_stats, but since the code underlying
pg_statistic_ext is more convenient than the one for pg_statistic,
pg_stats_ext is no longer useful.

Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f9zAkPUf9nQrqpFBAsrOHvb5eYa2FVNsmCJy1wegcO_TQ@mail.gmail.com

Amit Langote, additional line by me

Previously the description about pg_stat_progress_vacuum was in the table
of "Collected Statistics Views" in the doc. But since it repors dynamic
information, i.e., the current progress of VACUUM, its description should be
in the table of "Dynamic Statistics Views".

Back-patch to 9.6 where pg_stat_progress_vacuum was added.

Author: Amit Langote
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/7ab51b59-8d4d-6193-c60a-b75f222efb12@lab.ntt.co.jp

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoC32YgtateNqTFXzTJmHHe6hXs4cpJTND3n-Ts8f-aMqw@mail.gmail.com

Author: Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoC32YgtateNqTFXzTJmHHe6hXs4cpJTND3n-Ts8f-aMqw@mail.gmail.com

Commit f5ab0a14 made this test take substantially longer than it used
to.  With a bit more care, we can get the runtime back down while
achieving the same, or even a bit better, code coverage.

Mithun Cy

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD__Ouh-qaEb+rD7Uy-4g3xQYOrhPzHs-a_TrFAjiQ5azAW5+w@mail.gmail.com

Commit 5e6d8d2b allowed parallel workers to execute parallel-safe
subplans, but it transmitted the query's entire list of subplans to
the worker(s).  Since execMain.c blindly does ExecInitNode and later
ExecEndNode on every list element, this resulted in parallel-unsafe plan
nodes nonetheless getting started up and shut down in parallel workers.
That seems mostly harmless as far as core plan node types go (but
maybe not so much for Gather?).  But it resulted in postgres_fdw
opening and then closing extra remote connections, and it's likely
that other non-parallel-safe FDWs or custom scan providers would have
worse reactions.

To fix, just make ExecSerializePlan replace parallel-unsafe subplans
with NULLs in the cut-down plan tree that it transmits to workers.
This relies on ExecInitNode and ExecEndNode to do nothing on NULL
input, but they do anyway.  If anything else is touching the dropped
subplans in a parallel worker, that would be a bug to be fixed.
(This thus provides a strong guarantee that we won't try to do
something with a parallel-unsafe subplan in a worker.)

This is, I think, the last fix directly occasioned by Andreas Seltenreich's
bug report of a few days ago.

Tom Lane and Amit Kapila

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87tw5x4vcu.fsf@credativ.de

Tweak CSS a bit to match latest similar changes to web site style.  Also
move some CSS out of the HTML to the stylesheet so that the web site
stylesheet can override it.  This should ensure that notes and such are
back to being centered.

Specifically, use '--summary' with 'git show'.

We'd managed to avoid doing this so far, but it seems pretty obvious
that it would be forced on us some day, and this is much the cleanest
way of approaching the open problem that parallel-unsafe subplans are
being transmitted to parallel workers.  Anyway there's no space cost
due to alignment considerations, and the time cost is pretty minimal
since we're just copying the flag from the corresponding Path node.
(At least in most cases ... some of the klugier spots in createplan.c
have to work a bit harder.)

In principle we could perhaps get rid of SubPlan.parallel_safe,
but I thought it better to keep that in case there are reasons to
consider a SubPlan unsafe even when its child plan is parallel-safe.

This patch doesn't actually do anything with the new flags, but
I thought I'd commit it separately anyway.

Note: although this touches outfuncs/readfuncs, there's no need for
a catversion bump because Plan trees aren't stored on disk.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87tw5x4vcu.fsf@credativ.de

This is not handled uniformly throughout the code, but at least nearby
code can be consistent.

Hash indexes can contain both pages which are all-zeroes (i.e.
PageIsNew()) and pages which have been initialized but currently
aren't used.  The latter category can happen either when a page
has been reserved but not yet used or when it is used for a time
and then freed.  pgstattuple was only prepared to deal with the
pages that are actually-zeroes, which it called zero_pages.
Rename the column to unused_pages (extension version 1.5 is
as-yet-unreleased) and make it count both kinds of unused pages.

Along the way, slightly tidy up the way we test for pages of
various types.

Robert Haas and Ashutosh Sharma, reviewed by Amit Kapila

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAE9k0PkTtKFB3YndOyQMjwuHx+-FtUP1ynK8E-nHtetoow3NtQ@mail.gmail.com

validateCheckConstraint() shouldn't try to access the storage for
a partitioned table, because it no longer has any.  Creating a
_RETURN table on a partitioned table shouldn't be allowed, both
because there's no value in it and because trying to do so would
involve a validation scan against its nonexistent storage.

Amit Langote, reviewed by Tom Lane.  Regression test outputs
updated to pass by me.

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/e5c3cbd3-1551-d6f8-c9e2-51777d632fd2@lab.ntt.co.jp

While at it also update the comments in walmethods.h to make it less
likely for mistakes like this to appear in the future (thanks to Tom for
improvements to the comments).

And finally, in passing change the return type of walmethod.getlasterror
to being const, also per suggestion from Tom.

Commit a4777f35 was a shade too mechanical: we don't want to override
MSVC's own definition of _MSC_VER, as that breaks tests on its numerical
value.  Per buildfarm.

Commit 0bf3ae88 encountered a need to pass the finally chosen remote qual
conditions forward from postgresGetForeignPlan to postgresPlanDirectModify.
It solved that by sticking them into the plan node's fdw_private list,
which in hindsight was a pretty bad idea.  In the first place, there's no
use for those qual trees either in EXPLAIN or execution; indeed they could
never safely be used for any post-planning purposes, because they would not
get processed by setrefs.c.  So they're just dead weight to carry around in
the finished plan tree, plus being an attractive nuisance for somebody who
might get the idea that they could be used that way.  Secondly, because
those qual trees (sometimes) contained RestrictInfos, they created a
plan-transmission hazard for parallel query, which is how come we noticed a
problem.  We dealt with that symptom in commit 28b04787, but really a more
straightforward and more efficient fix is to pass the data through in a new
field of struct PgFdwRelationInfo.  So do it that way.  (There's no need
to revert 28b04787, as it has sufficient reason to live anyway.)

Per fuzz testing by Andreas Seltenreich.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87tw5x4vcu.fsf@credativ.de

Commit f0e44751 should have updated
this code, but did not.

Amit Langote

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/52d9c443-ec78-5c8a-7a77-0f34aad12b82@lab.ntt.co.jp

To prevent future bugs along the lines of the one corrected by commit
8ff51869, or find any that remain
in the current code, add an Assert() that the difference between
parallel_register_count and parallel_terminate_count is in a sane
range.

Kuntal Ghosh, with considerable tidying-up by me, per a suggestion
from Neha Khatri.  Reviewed by Tomas Vondra.

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFO0U+-E8yzchwVnvn5BeRDPgX2z9vZUxQ8dxx9c0XFGBC7N1Q@mail.gmail.com