1. 23 May, 2012 2 commits
  2. 22 May, 2012 12 commits
  3. 21 May, 2012 4 commits
  4. 19 May, 2012 5 commits
  5. 18 May, 2012 2 commits
    • Peter Eisentraut's avatar
    • Heikki Linnakangas's avatar
      Fix bug in gistRelocateBuildBuffersOnSplit(). · 1d27dcf5
      Heikki Linnakangas authored
      When we create a temporary copy of the old node buffer, in stack, we mustn't
      leak that into any of the long-lived data structures. Before this patch,
      when we called gistPopItupFromNodeBuffer(), it got added to the array of
      "loaded buffers". After gistRelocateBuildBuffersOnSplit() exits, the
      pointer added to the loaded buffers array points to garbage. Often that goes
      unnotied, because when we go through the array of loaded buffers to unload
      them, buffers with a NULL pageBuffer are ignored, which can often happen by
      accident even if the pointer points to garbage.
      
      This patch fixes that by marking the temporary copy in stack explicitly as
      temporary, and refrain from adding buffers marked as temporary to the array
      of loaded buffers.
      
      While we're at it, initialize nodeBuffer->pageBlocknum to InvalidBlockNumber
      and improve comments a bit. This isn't strictly necessary, but makes
      debugging easier.
      1d27dcf5
  6. 17 May, 2012 3 commits
  7. 16 May, 2012 3 commits
  8. 15 May, 2012 8 commits
  9. 14 May, 2012 1 commit
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Assert that WaitLatchOrSocket callers cannot wait only for writability. · e42a21b9
      Tom Lane authored
      Since we have chosen to report socket EOF and error conditions via the
      WL_SOCKET_READABLE flag bit, it's unsafe to wait only for
      WL_SOCKET_WRITEABLE; the caller would never be notified of the socket
      condition, and in some of these implementations WaitLatchOrSocket would
      busy-wait until something else happens.  Add this restriction to the API
      specification, and add Asserts to check that callers don't try to do that.
      
      At some point we might want to consider adjusting the API to relax this
      restriction, but until we have an actual use case for waiting on a
      write-only socket, it seems premature to design a solution.
      e42a21b9