- 14 Jul, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Michael Paquier authored
Some commands of ALTER TABLE could fail with the following error: ERROR: "tab" is of the wrong type This error is unexpected, as all the code paths leading to ATWrongRelkindError() should use a supported set of relkinds to generate correct error messages. This commit closes the gap with such mistakes, by adding all the missing relkind combinations. Tests are added to check all the problems found. Note that some combinations are not used, but these are left around as it could have an impact on applications relying on this code. 2ed532e has done a much larger refactoring on HEAD to make such error messages easier to manage in the long-term, so nothing is needed there. Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut, Ahsan Hadi, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210216.181415.368926598204753659.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com Backpatch-through: 11
-
- 26 Jun, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
When a partitioned tables contains foreign tables as partitions, it is not possible to implement unique or primary key indexes -- but when regular indexes are created, there is no reason to do anything other than ignoring such partitions. We were raising errors upon encountering the foreign partitions, which is unfriendly and doesn't protect against any actual problems. Relax this restriction so that index creation is allowed on partitioned tables containing foreign partitions, becoming a no-op on them. (We may later want to redefine this so that the FDW is told to create the indexes on the foreign side.) This applies to CREATE INDEX, as well as ALTER TABLE / ATTACH PARTITION and CREATE TABLE / PARTITION OF. Backpatch to 11, where indexes on partitioned tables were introduced. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15724-d5a58fa9472eef4f@postgresql.org Author: Álvaro Herrera Reviewed-by: Amit Langote
-
- 24 Mar, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Tom Lane authored
Now that the ordering of DROP messages ought to be stable everywhere, we should not need these kluges of hiding DETAIL output just to avoid unstable ordering. Hiding it's not great for test coverage, so let's undo that where possible. In a small number of places, it's necessary to leave it in, for example because the output might include a variable pg_temp_nnn schema name. I also left things alone in places where the details would depend on other regression test scripts, e.g. plpython_drop.sql. Perhaps buildfarm experience will show this to be a bad idea, but if so I'd like to know why. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1h6eep-0001Mw-Vd@gemulon.postgresql.org
-
- 22 Mar, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Peter Geoghegan authored
This is almost a straight revert of commit fff518d0, which itself was a revert of 7d3bf73a. It turns out that commit 8aa9dd74, which sorted dependent objects before deletion in DROP OWNED BY, was not sufficient to make all remaining unstable DETAIL output stable. Unstable DETAIL output from DROP ROLE was not affected, because that happens to use a different code path. It doesn't seem worthwhile to fix the other code path at this time. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6226.1553274783@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
- 21 Mar, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Peter Geoghegan authored
This should be superseded by commit 8aa9dd74.
-
- 20 Mar, 2019 2 commits
-
-
Peter Geoghegan authored
Unstable sort order related to changes to nbtree from commit dd299df8 can cause two lines of DETAIL output to be in opposite-of-expected order. Suppress the output using the same VERBOSITY hack that is used elsewhere in the foreign_data tests. Note that the same foreign_data.out DETAIL output was mechanically updated by commit dd299df8. Only a few such changes were required, though. Per buildfarm member batfish. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkCQ_MtKeOpzozj7QhhgP1unXsK8o9DMAFvDqQFEPpkYQ@mail.gmail.com
-
Peter Geoghegan authored
Make nbtree treat all index tuples as having a heap TID attribute. Index searches can distinguish duplicates by heap TID, since heap TID is always guaranteed to be unique. This general approach has numerous benefits for performance, and is prerequisite to teaching VACUUM to perform "retail index tuple deletion". Naively adding a new attribute to every pivot tuple has unacceptable overhead (it bloats internal pages), so suffix truncation of pivot tuples is added. This will usually truncate away the "extra" heap TID attribute from pivot tuples during a leaf page split, and may also truncate away additional user attributes. This can increase fan-out, especially in a multi-column index. Truncation can only occur at the attribute granularity, which isn't particularly effective, but works well enough for now. A future patch may add support for truncating "within" text attributes by generating truncated key values using new opclass infrastructure. Only new indexes (BTREE_VERSION 4 indexes) will have insertions that treat heap TID as a tiebreaker attribute, or will have pivot tuples undergo suffix truncation during a leaf page split (on-disk compatibility with versions 2 and 3 is preserved). Upgrades to version 4 cannot be performed on-the-fly, unlike upgrades from version 2 to version 3. contrib/amcheck continues to work with version 2 and 3 indexes, while also enforcing stricter invariants when verifying version 4 indexes. These stricter invariants are the same invariants described by "3.1.12 Sequencing" from the Lehman and Yao paper. A later patch will enhance the logic used by nbtree to pick a split point. This patch is likely to negatively impact performance without smarter choices around the precise point to split leaf pages at. Making these two mostly-distinct sets of enhancements into distinct commits seems like it might clarify their design, even though neither commit is particularly useful on its own. The maximum allowed size of new tuples is reduced by an amount equal to the space required to store an extra MAXALIGN()'d TID in a new high key during leaf page splits. The user-facing definition of the "1/3 of a page" restriction is already imprecise, and so does not need to be revised. However, there should be a compatibility note in the v12 release notes. Author: Peter Geoghegan Reviewed-By: Heikki Linnakangas, Alexander Korotkov Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkVb0Kom=R+88fDFb=JSxZMFvbHVC6Mn9LJ2n=X=kS-Uw@mail.gmail.com
-
- 21 Nov, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Andres Freund authored
Previously tables declared WITH OIDS, including a significant fraction of the catalog tables, stored the oid column not as a normal column, but as part of the tuple header. This special column was not shown by default, which was somewhat odd, as it's often (consider e.g. pg_class.oid) one of the more important parts of a row. Neither pg_dump nor COPY included the contents of the oid column by default. The fact that the oid column was not an ordinary column necessitated a significant amount of special case code to support oid columns. That already was painful for the existing, but upcoming work aiming to make table storage pluggable, would have required expanding and duplicating that "specialness" significantly. WITH OIDS has been deprecated since 2005 (commit ff02d0a05280e0). Remove it. Removing includes: - CREATE TABLE and ALTER TABLE syntax for declaring the table to be WITH OIDS has been removed (WITH (oids[ = true]) will error out) - pg_dump does not support dumping tables declared WITH OIDS and will issue a warning when dumping one (and ignore the oid column). - restoring an pg_dump archive with pg_restore will warn when restoring a table with oid contents (and ignore the oid column) - COPY will refuse to load binary dump that includes oids. - pg_upgrade will error out when encountering tables declared WITH OIDS, they have to be altered to remove the oid column first. - Functionality to access the oid of the last inserted row (like plpgsql's RESULT_OID, spi's SPI_lastoid, ...) has been removed. The syntax for declaring a table WITHOUT OIDS (or WITH (oids = false) for CREATE TABLE) is still supported. While that requires a bit of support code, it seems unnecessary to break applications / dumps that do not use oids, and are explicit about not using them. The biggest user of WITH OID columns was postgres' catalog. This commit changes all 'magic' oid columns to be columns that are normally declared and stored. To reduce unnecessary query breakage all the newly added columns are still named 'oid', even if a table's column naming scheme would indicate 'reloid' or such. This obviously requires adapting a lot code, mostly replacing oid access via HeapTupleGetOid() with access to the underlying Form_pg_*->oid column. The bootstrap process now assigns oids for all oid columns in genbki.pl that do not have an explicit value (starting at the largest oid previously used), only oids assigned later by oids will be above FirstBootstrapObjectId. As the oid column now is a normal column the special bootstrap syntax for oids has been removed. Oids are not automatically assigned during insertion anymore, all backend code explicitly assigns oids with GetNewOidWithIndex(). For the rare case that insertions into the catalog via SQL are called for the new pg_nextoid() function can be used (which only works on catalog tables). The fact that oid columns on system tables are now normal columns means that they will be included in the set of columns expanded by * (i.e. SELECT * FROM pg_class will now include the table's oid, previously it did not). It'd not technically be hard to hide oid column by default, but that'd mean confusing behavior would either have to be carried forward forever, or it'd cause breakage down the line. While it's not unlikely that further adjustments are needed, the scope/invasiveness of the patch makes it worthwhile to get merge this now. It's painful to maintain externally, too complicated to commit after the code code freeze, and a dependency of a number of other patches. Catversion bump, for obvious reasons. Author: Andres Freund, with contributions by John Naylor Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180930034810.ywp2c7awz7opzcfr@alap3.anarazel.de
-
- 20 Jun, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Michael Paquier authored
Since their introduction, partition trees have been a bit lossy regarding temporary relations. Inheritance trees respect the following patterns: 1) a child relation can be temporary if the parent is permanent. 2) a child relation can be temporary if the parent is temporary. 3) a child relation cannot be permanent if the parent is temporary. 4) The use of temporary relations also imply that when both parent and child need to be from the same sessions. Partitions share many similar patterns with inheritance, however the handling of the partition bounds make the situation a bit tricky for case 1) as the partition code bases a lot of its lookup code upon PartitionDesc which does not really look after relpersistence. This causes for example a temporary partition created by session A to be visible by another session B, preventing this session B to create an extra partition which overlaps with the temporary one created by A with a non-intuitive error message. There could be use-cases where mixing permanent partitioned tables with temporary partitions make sense, but that would be a new feature. Partitions respect 2), 3) and 4) already. It is a bit depressing to see those error checks happening in MergeAttributes() whose purpose is different, but that's left as future refactoring work. Back-patch down to 10, which is where partitioning has been introduced, except that default partitions do not apply there. Documentation also includes limitations related to the use of temporary tables with partition trees. Reported-by: David Rowley Author: Amit Langote, Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat, Amit Langote, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f94Ojk0og9GMkRHGt8wHTW=ijq5KzJKuoBoqWLwSVwGmw@mail.gmail.com
-
- 14 May, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
Creating indexes on foreign tables is already forbidden, but local partitioned indexes (commit 8b08f7d4) forgot to check for them. Add a preliminary check to prevent wasting time. Another school of thought says to allow the index to be created if it's not a unique index; but it's possible to do better in the future (enable indexing of foreign tables, somehow), so we avoid painting ourselves in a corner by rejecting all cases, to avoid future grief (a.k.a. backward incompatible changes). Reported-by: Arseny Sher Author: Amit Langote, Álvaro Herrera Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87sh71cakz.fsf@ars-thinkpad
-
- 15 Mar, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Tom Lane authored
Many of the objects we create during the regression tests are put in the public schema, so that using the same names in different regression tests creates a hazard of test failures if any two such scripts run concurrently. This patch cleans up a bunch of latent hazards of that sort, as well as two live hazards. The current situation in this regard is far worse than it was a year or two back, because practically all of the partitioning-related test cases have reused table names with enthusiasm. I despaired of cleaning up that mess within the five most-affected tests (create_table, alter_table, insert, update, inherit); fortunately those don't run concurrently. Other than partitioning problems, most of the issues boil down to using names like "foo", "bar", "tmp", etc, without thought for the fact that other test scripts might use similar names concurrently. I've made an effort to make all such names more specific. One of the live hazards was that commit 7421f4b8 caused with.sql to create a table named "test", conflicting with a similarly-named table in alter_table.sql; this was exposed in the buildfarm recently. The other one was that join.sql and transactions.sql both create tables named "foo" and "bar"; but join.sql's uses of those names date back only to December or so. Since commit 7421f4b8 was back-patched to v10, back-patch a minimal fix for that problem. The rest of this is just future-proofing. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4627.1521070268@sss.pgh.pa.us
-
- 15 Sep, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Robert Haas authored
Amit Langote, per a suggestion from Mark Dilger. Reviewed by Marc Dilger and Ashutosh Bapat. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFjFpReL0oeN7SCpnsEPbqJhB2Bp1wnH1uvbOF_w6KEuv6ZXvg@mail.gmail.com
-
- 07 Aug, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Noah Misch authored
Commit 3eefc510 claimed to make pg_user_mappings enforce the qualifications user_mapping_options had been enforcing, but its removal of a longstanding restriction left them distinct when the current user is the subject of a mapping yet has no server privileges. user_mapping_options emits no rows for such a mapping, but pg_user_mappings includes full umoptions. Change pg_user_mappings to show null for umoptions. Back-patch to 9.2, like the above commit. Reviewed by Tom Lane. Reported by Jeff Janes. Security: CVE-2017-7547
-
- 10 May, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Robert Haas authored
Thomas Munro, per off-list report from Prabhat Sabu. Changes to the message wording for consistency with the existing relkind check for partitioned tables by me. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=2xJFFpGM+N=gpWx-9Nft2q1oaFZX07_y23AHCrJQLt0g@mail.gmail.com
-
- 08 May, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Noah Misch authored
Both views replace the umoptions field with NULL when the user does not meet qualifications to see it. They used different qualifications, and pg_user_mappings documented qualifications did not match its implemented qualifications. Make its documentation and implementation match those of user_mapping_options. One might argue for stronger qualifications, but these have long, documented tenure. pg_user_mappings has always exhibited this problem, so back-patch to 9.2 (all supported versions). Michael Paquier and Feike Steenbergen. Reviewed by Jeff Janes. Reported by Andrew Wheelwright. Security: CVE-2017-7486
-
- 20 Mar, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Andrew Dunstan authored
There is still some inconsistency with the error messages surrounding foreign servers. Some use the word "foreign" and some don't. My inclination is to remove all such uses of "foreign" on the basis that the CREATE/ALTER/DROP SERVER commands don't use the word. However, that is left for another day. In this patch I have kept to the existing usage in the affected commands, which omits "foreign". Anastasia Lubennikova, reviewed by Arthur Zakirov and Ashtosh Bapat. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/7c2ab9b8-388a-1ce0-23a3-7acf2a0ed3c6@postgrespro.ru
-
- 08 Mar, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Robert Haas authored
Amit Langote, reviewed by Ashutosh Bapat Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/475dd52c-be4a-9b32-6d54-3044a00c93d9@lab.ntt.co.jp
-
- 17 Jul, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Tom Lane authored
To ensure that "make installcheck" can be used safely against an existing installation, we need to be careful about what global object names (database, role, and tablespace names) we use; otherwise we might accidentally clobber important objects. There's been a weak consensus that test databases should have names including "regression", and that test role names should start with "regress_", but we didn't have any particular rule about tablespace names; and neither of the other rules was followed with any consistency either. This commit moves us a long way towards having a hard-and-fast rule that regression test databases must have names including "regression", and that test role and tablespace names must start with "regress_". It's not completely there because I did not touch some test cases in rolenames.sql that test creation of special role names like "session_user". That will require some rethinking of exactly what we want to test, whereas the intent of this patch is just to hit all the cases in which the needed renamings are cosmetic. There is no enforcement mechanism in this patch either, but if we don't add one we can expect that the tests will soon be violating the convention again. Again, that's not such a cosmetic change and it will require discussion. (But I did use a quick-hack enforcement patch to find these cases.) Discussion: <16638.1468620817@sss.pgh.pa.us>
-
- 11 Dec, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Alvaro Herrera authored
As reported in bug #13809 by Alexander Ashurkov, the code for REASSIGN OWNED hadn't gotten word about user mappings. Deal with them in the same way default ACLs do, which is to ignore them altogether; they are handled just fine by DROP OWNED. The other foreign object cases are already handled correctly by both commands. Also add a REASSIGN OWNED statement to foreign_data test to exercise the foreign data objects. (The changes are just before the "cleanup" phase, so it shouldn't remove any existing live test.) Reported by Alexander Ashurkov, then independently by Jaime Casanova.
-
- 22 Mar, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Tom Lane authored
Foreign tables can now be inheritance children, or parents. Much of the system was already ready for this, but we had to fix a few things of course, mostly in the area of planner and executor handling of row locks. As side effects of this, allow foreign tables to have NOT VALID CHECK constraints (and hence to accept ALTER ... VALIDATE CONSTRAINT), and to accept ALTER SET STORAGE and ALTER SET WITH/WITHOUT OIDS. Continuing to disallow these things would've required bizarre and inconsistent special cases in inheritance behavior. Since foreign tables don't enforce CHECK constraints anyway, a NOT VALID one is a complete no-op, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't allow it. And it's possible that some FDWs might have use for SET STORAGE or SET WITH OIDS, though doubtless they will be no-ops for most. An additional change in support of this is that when a ModifyTable node has multiple target tables, they will all now be explicitly identified in EXPLAIN output, for example: Update on pt1 (cost=0.00..321.05 rows=3541 width=46) Update on pt1 Foreign Update on ft1 Foreign Update on ft2 Update on child3 -> Seq Scan on pt1 (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=1 width=46) -> Foreign Scan on ft1 (cost=100.00..148.03 rows=1170 width=46) -> Foreign Scan on ft2 (cost=100.00..148.03 rows=1170 width=46) -> Seq Scan on child3 (cost=0.00..25.00 rows=1200 width=46) This was done mainly to provide an unambiguous place to attach "Remote SQL" fields, but it is useful for inherited updates even when no foreign tables are involved. Shigeru Hanada and Etsuro Fujita, reviewed by Ashutosh Bapat and Kyotaro Horiguchi, some additional hacking by me
-
- 17 Dec, 2014 1 commit
-
-
Tom Lane authored
As with NOT NULL constraints, we consider that such constraints are merely reports of constraints that are being enforced by the remote server (or other underlying storage mechanism). Their only real use is to allow planner optimizations, for example in constraint-exclusion checks. Thus, the code changes here amount to little more than removal of the error that was formerly thrown for applying CHECK to a foreign table. (In passing, do a bit of cleanup of the ALTER FOREIGN TABLE reference page, which had accumulated some weird decisions about ordering etc.) Shigeru Hanada and Etsuro Fujita, reviewed by Kyotaro Horiguchi and Ashutosh Bapat.
-
- 10 Jul, 2014 1 commit
-
-
Tom Lane authored
This command provides an automated way to create foreign table definitions that match remote tables, thereby reducing tedium and chances for error. In this patch, we provide the necessary core-server infrastructure and implement the feature fully in the postgres_fdw foreign-data wrapper. Other wrappers will throw a "feature not supported" error until/unless they are updated. Ronan Dunklau and Michael Paquier, additional work by me
-
- 23 Mar, 2014 1 commit
-
-
Noah Misch authored
This covers all the SQL-standard trigger types supported for regular tables; it does not cover constraint triggers. The approach for acquiring the old row mirrors that for view INSTEAD OF triggers. For AFTER ROW triggers, we spool the foreign tuples to a tuplestore. This changes the FDW API contract; when deciding which columns to populate in the slot returned from data modification callbacks, writable FDWs will need to check for AFTER ROW triggers in addition to checking for a RETURNING clause. In support of the feature addition, refactor the TriggerFlags bits and the assembly of old tuples in ModifyTable. Ronan Dunklau, reviewed by KaiGai Kohei; some additional hacking by me.
-
- 12 Mar, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Tom Lane authored
There's still some discussion about exactly how postgres_fdw ought to handle this case, but there seems no debate that we want to allow defaults to be used for inserts into foreign tables. So remove the core-code restrictions that prevented it. While at it, get rid of the special grammar productions for CREATE FOREIGN TABLE, and instead add explicit FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED error checks for the disallowed cases. This makes the grammar a shade smaller, and more importantly results in much more intelligible error messages for unsupported cases. It's also one less thing to fix if we ever start supporting constraints on foreign tables.
-
- 15 May, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
pgindent and perltidy should clean up the rest.
-
- 06 Apr, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Tom Lane authored
ANALYZE now accepts foreign tables and allows the table's FDW to control how the sample rows are collected. (But only manual ANALYZEs will touch foreign tables, for the moment, since among other things it's not very clear how to handle remote permissions checks in an auto-analyze.) contrib/file_fdw is extended to support this. Etsuro Fujita, reviewed by Shigeru Hanada, some further tweaking by me.
-
- 27 Jan, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
Hitherto, the information schema only showed explicitly granted privileges that were visible in the *acl catalog columns. If no privileges had been granted, the implicit privileges were not shown. To fix that, add an SQL-accessible version of the acldefault() function, and use that inside the aclexplode() calls to substitute the catalog-specific default privilege set for null values. reviewed by Abhijit Menon-Sen
-
- 23 Jan, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Simon Riggs authored
e.g. ALTER FOREIGN TABLE IF EXISTS foo RENAME TO bar Pavel Stehule
-
- 15 Dec, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Robert Haas authored
Fixes an oversight in commit fc6d1006. Noted by Tom Lane.
-
- 09 Dec, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
-
- 18 Nov, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Robert Haas authored
This gets rid of an impressive amount of duplicative code, with only minimal behavior changes. DROP FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER now requires object ownership rather than superuser privileges, matching the documentation we already have. We also eliminate the historical warning about dropping a built-in function as unuseful. All operations are now performed in the same order for all object types handled by dropcmds.c. KaiGai Kohei, with minor revisions by me
-
- 10 Oct, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Robert Haas authored
This appears to be another case where the relative sort order of letters vs. numbers can throw things off. Pavel Stehule
-
- 25 Aug, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Robert Haas authored
Rather than dumping out the raw array as PostgreSQL represents it internally, we now print it out in a format similar to the one in which the user input it, which seems a lot more user friendly. Shigeru Hanada
-
- 05 Aug, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Robert Haas authored
Shigeru Hanada, with fairly minor editing by me.
-
- 04 Jul, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Peter Eisentraut authored
-
- 25 Apr, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Andrew Dunstan authored
Per Tom Lane's suggestion about my gripe about occasional errors noticed on the buildfarm.
-
- 01 Apr, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Robert Haas authored
This mostly involves making it work with the objectaddress.c framework, which does most of the heavy lifting. In that vein, change GetForeignDataWrapperOidByName to get_foreign_data_wrapper_oid and GetForeignServerOidByName to get_foreign_server_oid, to match the pattern we use for other object types. Robert Haas and Shigeru Hanada
-
- 19 Feb, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Tom Lane authored
Add a fdwhandler column to pg_foreign_data_wrapper, plus HANDLER options in the CREATE FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER and ALTER FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER commands, plus pg_dump support for same. Also invent a new pseudotype fdw_handler with properties similar to language_handler. This is split out of the "FDW API" patch for ease of review; it's all stuff we will certainly need, regardless of any other details of the FDW API. FDW handler functions will not actually get called yet. In passing, fix some omissions and infelicities in foreigncmds.c. Shigeru Hanada, Jan Urbanski, Heikki Linnakangas
-
- 06 Feb, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Robert Haas authored
If the foreign table's rowtype is being used as the type of a column in another table, we can't just up and change its data type. This was already checked for composite types and ordinary tables, but we previously failed to enforce it for foreign tables.
-
- 02 Jan, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Robert Haas authored
Foreign tables are a core component of SQL/MED. This commit does not provide a working SQL/MED infrastructure, because foreign tables cannot yet be queried. Support for foreign table scans will need to be added in a future patch. However, this patch creates the necessary system catalog structure, syntax support, and support for ancillary operations such as COMMENT and SECURITY LABEL. Shigeru Hanada, heavily revised by Robert Haas
-