Commit f46edf47 authored by Tom Lane's avatar Tom Lane

Fix pg_get_functiondef() to print a function's LEAKPROOF property.

Seems to have been an oversight in the original leakproofness patch.
Per report and patch from Jeevan Chalke.

In passing, prettify some awkward leakproof-related code in AlterFunction.
parent aa9eac45
......@@ -1190,11 +1190,11 @@ AlterFunction(AlterFunctionStmt *stmt)
procForm->prosecdef = intVal(security_def_item->arg);
if (leakproof_item)
{
if (intVal(leakproof_item->arg) && !superuser())
procForm->proleakproof = intVal(leakproof_item->arg);
if (procForm->proleakproof && !superuser())
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
errmsg("only superuser can define a leakproof function")));
procForm->proleakproof = intVal(leakproof_item->arg);
}
if (cost_item)
{
......
......@@ -1985,6 +1985,8 @@ pg_get_functiondef(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
appendStringInfoString(&buf, " STRICT");
if (proc->prosecdef)
appendStringInfoString(&buf, " SECURITY DEFINER");
if (proc->proleakproof)
appendStringInfoString(&buf, " LEAKPROOF");
/* This code for the default cost and rows should match functioncmds.c */
if (proc->prolang == INTERNALlanguageId ||
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment