Commit efa415da authored by Robert Haas's avatar Robert Haas

Refactor seclabel.c to use the new check_object_ownership function.

This avoids duplicate (and not-quite-matching) code, and makes the logic
for SECURITY LABEL match COMMENT and ALTER EXTENSION ADD/DROP.
parent b9cff97f
......@@ -26,13 +26,6 @@
#include "utils/memutils.h"
#include "utils/tqual.h"
/*
* For most object types, the permissions-checking logic is simple enough
* that it makes sense to just include it in CommentObject(). However,
* attributes require a bit more checking.
*/
static void CheckAttributeSecLabel(Relation relation);
typedef struct
{
const char *provider_name;
......@@ -98,52 +91,30 @@ ExecSecLabelStmt(SecLabelStmt *stmt)
address = get_object_address(stmt->objtype, stmt->objname, stmt->objargs,
&relation, ShareUpdateExclusiveLock);
/* Privilege and integrity checks. */
/* Require ownership of the target object. */
check_object_ownership(GetUserId(), stmt->objtype, address,
stmt->objname, stmt->objargs, relation);
/* Perform other integrity checks as needed. */
switch (stmt->objtype)
{
case OBJECT_SEQUENCE:
case OBJECT_TABLE:
case OBJECT_VIEW:
case OBJECT_FOREIGN_TABLE:
if (!pg_class_ownercheck(RelationGetRelid(relation), GetUserId()))
aclcheck_error(ACLCHECK_NOT_OWNER, ACL_KIND_CLASS,
RelationGetRelationName(relation));
break;
case OBJECT_COLUMN:
CheckAttributeSecLabel(relation);
break;
case OBJECT_TYPE:
if (!pg_type_ownercheck(address.objectId, GetUserId()))
aclcheck_error(ACLCHECK_NOT_OWNER, ACL_KIND_TYPE,
format_type_be(address.objectId));
break;
case OBJECT_AGGREGATE:
case OBJECT_FUNCTION:
if (!pg_proc_ownercheck(address.objectId, GetUserId()))
aclcheck_error(ACLCHECK_NOT_OWNER, ACL_KIND_PROC,
NameListToString(stmt->objname));
break;
case OBJECT_SCHEMA:
if (!pg_namespace_ownercheck(address.objectId, GetUserId()))
aclcheck_error(ACLCHECK_NOT_OWNER, ACL_KIND_NAMESPACE,
strVal(linitial(stmt->objname)));
break;
case OBJECT_LANGUAGE:
if (!superuser())
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
errmsg("must be superuser to comment on procedural language")));
break;
case OBJECT_LARGEOBJECT:
if (!pg_largeobject_ownercheck(address.objectId, GetUserId()))
/*
* Allow security labels only on columns of tables, views,
* composite types, and foreign tables (which are the only
* relkinds for which pg_dump will dump labels).
*/
if (relation->rd_rel->relkind != RELKIND_RELATION &&
relation->rd_rel->relkind != RELKIND_VIEW &&
relation->rd_rel->relkind != RELKIND_COMPOSITE_TYPE &&
relation->rd_rel->relkind != RELKIND_FOREIGN_TABLE)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
errmsg("must be owner of large object %u",
address.objectId)));
(errcode(ERRCODE_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE),
errmsg("\"%s\" is not a table, view, composite type, or foreign table",
RelationGetRelationName(relation))));
break;
default:
elog(ERROR, "unrecognized object type: %d",
(int) stmt->objtype);
break;
}
/* Provider gets control here, may throw ERROR to veto new label. */
......@@ -352,31 +323,6 @@ DeleteSecurityLabel(const ObjectAddress *object)
heap_close(pg_seclabel, RowExclusiveLock);
}
/*
* Check whether the user is allowed to comment on an attribute of the
* specified relation.
*/
static void
CheckAttributeSecLabel(Relation relation)
{
if (!pg_class_ownercheck(RelationGetRelid(relation), GetUserId()))
aclcheck_error(ACLCHECK_NOT_OWNER, ACL_KIND_CLASS,
RelationGetRelationName(relation));
/*
* Allow security labels only on columns of tables, views, and composite
* types (which are the only relkinds for which pg_dump will dump labels).
*/
if (relation->rd_rel->relkind != RELKIND_RELATION &&
relation->rd_rel->relkind != RELKIND_VIEW &&
relation->rd_rel->relkind != RELKIND_COMPOSITE_TYPE &&
relation->rd_rel->relkind != RELKIND_FOREIGN_TABLE)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE),
errmsg("\"%s\" is not a table, view, composite type, or foreign table",
RelationGetRelationName(relation))));
}
void
register_label_provider(const char *provider_name, check_object_relabel_type hook)
{
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment