Commit e4514aaf authored by Etsuro Fujita's avatar Etsuro Fujita

Fix thinko in comment.

This comment has been wrong since its introduction in commit 0d5f05cd;
backpatch to v12 where that came in.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK14VGf-xQjGQN4o1QyAbXAaxugU5%3DqfcmTDh1iufUDnV_w%40mail.gmail.com
parent be032619
...@@ -729,8 +729,8 @@ CopyFrom(CopyFromState cstate) ...@@ -729,8 +729,8 @@ CopyFrom(CopyFromState cstate)
* For partitioned tables we can't support multi-inserts when there * For partitioned tables we can't support multi-inserts when there
* are any statement level insert triggers. It might be possible to * are any statement level insert triggers. It might be possible to
* allow partitioned tables with such triggers in the future, but for * allow partitioned tables with such triggers in the future, but for
* now, CopyMultiInsertInfoFlush expects that any before row insert * now, CopyMultiInsertInfoFlush expects that any after row insert and
* and statement level insert triggers are on the same relation. * statement level insert triggers are on the same relation.
*/ */
insertMethod = CIM_SINGLE; insertMethod = CIM_SINGLE;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment