Restore json{b}_populate_record{set}'s ability to take type info from AS.
If the record argument is NULL and has no declared type more concrete than RECORD, we can't extract useful information about the desired rowtype from it. In this case, see if we're in FROM with an AS clause, and if so extract the needed rowtype info from AS. It worked like this before v11, but commit 37a795a6 removed the behavior, reasoning that it was undocumented, inefficient, and utterly not self-consistent. If you want to take type info from an AS clause, you should be using the json_to_record() family of functions not the json_populate_record() family. Also, it was already the case that the "populate" functions would fail for a null-valued RECORD input (with an unfriendly "record type has not been registered" error) when there wasn't an AS clause at hand, and it wasn't obvious that that behavior wasn't OK when there was one. However, it emerges that some people were depending on this to work, and indeed the rather off-point error message you got if you left off AS encouraged slapping on AS without switching to the json_to_record() family. Hence, put back the fallback behavior of looking for AS. While at it, improve the run-time error you get when there's no place to obtain type info; we can do a lot better than "record type has not been registered". (We can't, unfortunately, easily improve the parse-time error message that leads people down this path in the first place.) While at it, I refactored the code a bit to avoid duplicating the same logic in several different places. Per bug #15940 from Jaroslav Sivy. Back-patch to v11 where the current coding came in. (The pre-v11 deficiencies in this area aren't regressions, so we'll leave those branches alone.) Patch by me, based on preliminary analysis by Dmitry Dolgov. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15940-2ab76dc58ffb85b6@postgresql.org
Showing
This diff is collapsed.
Please register or sign in to comment