Commit dc957796 authored by Bruce Momjian's avatar Bruce Momjian

It seems like most people don't want automatic failover so I am removing

the item:

< 	o Automatic failover
<
< 	  The proper solution to this will probably the use of a master/slave
< 	  replication solution like Sloney and a connection pooling tool like
< 	  pgpool.
<
parent c76ff4bc
...@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ ...@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
TODO list for PostgreSQL TODO list for PostgreSQL
======================== ========================
Current maintainer: Bruce Momjian (pgman@candle.pha.pa.us) Current maintainer: Bruce Momjian (pgman@candle.pha.pa.us)
Last updated: Wed Feb 2 12:26:37 EST 2005 Last updated: Mon Feb 7 22:20:22 EST 2005
The most recent version of this document can be viewed at the PostgreSQL web The most recent version of this document can be viewed at the PostgreSQL web
site, http://www.PostgreSQL.org. site, http://www.PostgreSQL.org.
...@@ -115,12 +115,6 @@ Administration ...@@ -115,12 +115,6 @@ Administration
* Allow the PITR process to be debugged and data examined * Allow the PITR process to be debugged and data examined
* Allow a warm standby system to also allow read-only queries * Allow a warm standby system to also allow read-only queries
* Improve replication solutions * Improve replication solutions
o Automatic failover
The proper solution to this will probably the use of a master/slave
replication solution like Sloney and a connection pooling tool like
pgpool.
o Load balancing o Load balancing
You can use any of the master/slave replication servers to use a You can use any of the master/slave replication servers to use a
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment