Commit d9b9289c authored by Tom Lane's avatar Tom Lane

Suppress compiler warning.

Given the limited range of i, these shifts should not cause any
problem, but that apparently doesn't stop some compilers from
whining about them.

David Rowley
parent be44ed27
......@@ -234,7 +234,8 @@ ginvalidate(Oid opclassoid)
/* Check that the originally-named opclass is complete */
for (i = 1; i <= GINNProcs; i++)
{
if (opclassgroup && (opclassgroup->functionset & (1 << i)) != 0)
if (opclassgroup &&
(opclassgroup->functionset & (((uint64) 1) << i)) != 0)
continue; /* got it */
if (i == GIN_COMPARE_PARTIAL_PROC)
continue; /* optional method */
......
......@@ -254,7 +254,8 @@ gistvalidate(Oid opclassoid)
/* Check that the originally-named opclass is complete */
for (i = 1; i <= GISTNProcs; i++)
{
if (opclassgroup && (opclassgroup->functionset & (1 << i)) != 0)
if (opclassgroup &&
(opclassgroup->functionset & (((uint64) 1) << i)) != 0)
continue; /* got it */
if (i == GIST_DISTANCE_PROC || i == GIST_FETCH_PROC)
continue; /* optional methods */
......
......@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ spgvalidate(Oid opclassoid)
for (i = 1; i <= SPGISTNProc; i++)
{
if ((thisgroup->functionset & (1 << i)) != 0)
if ((thisgroup->functionset & (((uint64) 1) << i)) != 0)
continue; /* got it */
ereport(INFO,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_OBJECT_DEFINITION),
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment