Don't reject ROW_MARK_REFERENCE rowmarks for materialized views.
We should allow this so that matviews can be referenced in UPDATE/DELETE statements in READ COMMITTED isolation level. The requirement for that is that a re-fetch by TID will see the same row version the query saw earlier, which is true of matviews, so there's no reason for the restriction. Per bug #9398. Michael Paquier, after a suggestion by me
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment