Commit ac218aa4 authored by Andres Freund's avatar Andres Freund

Update pg_upgrade test for reg* to include regrole and regnamespace.

When the regrole (0c90f676) and regnamespace (cb9fa802) types were
added in 9.5, pg_upgrade's check for reg* types wasn't updated. While
regrole currently is safe, regnamespace is not.

It seems unlikely that anybody uses regnamespace inside catalog tables
across a pg_upgrade, but the tests should be correct nevertheless.

While at it, reorder the types checked in the query to be
alphabetical. Otherwise it's annoying to compare existing and tested
for types.

Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/037e152a-cb25-3bcb-4f35-bdc9988f8204@2ndQuadrant.com
Backpatch: 9.5-, as regrole/regnamespace
parent 7a9d6779
......@@ -1015,14 +1015,17 @@ check_for_reg_data_type_usage(ClusterInfo *cluster)
"WHERE c.oid = a.attrelid AND "
" NOT a.attisdropped AND "
" a.atttypid IN ( "
" 'pg_catalog.regproc'::pg_catalog.regtype, "
" 'pg_catalog.regprocedure'::pg_catalog.regtype, "
/* regclass.oid is preserved, so 'regclass' is OK */
" 'pg_catalog.regconfig'::pg_catalog.regtype, "
" 'pg_catalog.regdictionary'::pg_catalog.regtype, "
" 'pg_catalog.regnamespace'::pg_catalog.regtype, "
" 'pg_catalog.regoper'::pg_catalog.regtype, "
" 'pg_catalog.regoperator'::pg_catalog.regtype, "
/* regclass.oid is preserved, so 'regclass' is OK */
" 'pg_catalog.regproc'::pg_catalog.regtype, "
" 'pg_catalog.regprocedure'::pg_catalog.regtype "
/* regrole.oid is preserved, so 'regrole' is OK */
/* regtype.oid is preserved, so 'regtype' is OK */
" 'pg_catalog.regconfig'::pg_catalog.regtype, "
" 'pg_catalog.regdictionary'::pg_catalog.regtype) AND "
" ) AND "
" c.relnamespace = n.oid AND "
" n.nspname NOT IN ('pg_catalog', 'information_schema')");
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment