When the regrole (0c90f676) and regnamespace (cb9fa802) types were
added in 9.5, pg_upgrade's check for reg* types wasn't updated. While
regrole currently is safe, regnamespace is not.

It seems unlikely that anybody uses regnamespace inside catalog tables
across a pg_upgrade, but the tests should be correct nevertheless.

While at it, reorder the types checked in the query to be
alphabetical. Otherwise it's annoying to compare existing and tested
for types.

Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/037e152a-cb25-3bcb-4f35-bdc9988f8204@2ndQuadrant.com
Backpatch: 9.5-, as regrole/regnamespace