Commit 9e945f86 authored by Peter Eisentraut's avatar Peter Eisentraut

Fix Latin spelling

"c.f." should be "cf.".
parent f50c80db
...@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ IsCatalogClass(Oid relid, Form_pg_class reltuple) ...@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ IsCatalogClass(Oid relid, Form_pg_class reltuple)
* this is noticeably cheaper and doesn't require catalog access. * this is noticeably cheaper and doesn't require catalog access.
* *
* This test is safe since even an oid wraparound will preserve this * This test is safe since even an oid wraparound will preserve this
* property (c.f. GetNewObjectId()) and it has the advantage that it works * property (cf. GetNewObjectId()) and it has the advantage that it works
* correctly even if a user decides to create a relation in the pg_catalog * correctly even if a user decides to create a relation in the pg_catalog
* namespace. * namespace.
* ---- * ----
......
...@@ -1611,7 +1611,7 @@ contain_leaked_vars_walker(Node *node, void *context) ...@@ -1611,7 +1611,7 @@ contain_leaked_vars_walker(Node *node, void *context)
* WHERE CURRENT OF doesn't contain leaky function calls. * WHERE CURRENT OF doesn't contain leaky function calls.
* Moreover, it is essential that this is considered non-leaky, * Moreover, it is essential that this is considered non-leaky,
* since the planner must always generate a TID scan when CURRENT * since the planner must always generate a TID scan when CURRENT
* OF is present -- c.f. cost_tidscan. * OF is present -- cf. cost_tidscan.
*/ */
return false; return false;
......
...@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ ...@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
* all our platforms, but it also simplifies memory ordering concerns * all our platforms, but it also simplifies memory ordering concerns
* between the remote and local lsn. We use a lwlock instead of a spinlock * between the remote and local lsn. We use a lwlock instead of a spinlock
* so it's less harmful to hold the lock over a WAL write * so it's less harmful to hold the lock over a WAL write
* (c.f. AdvanceReplicationProgress). * (cf. AdvanceReplicationProgress).
* *
* --------------------------------------------------------------------------- * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/ */
......
...@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ ...@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
* they are written to the WAL and is responsible to reassemble them into * they are written to the WAL and is responsible to reassemble them into
* toplevel transaction sized pieces. When a transaction is completely * toplevel transaction sized pieces. When a transaction is completely
* reassembled - signalled by reading the transaction commit record - it * reassembled - signalled by reading the transaction commit record - it
* will then call the output plugin (c.f. ReorderBufferCommit()) with the * will then call the output plugin (cf. ReorderBufferCommit()) with the
* individual changes. The output plugins rely on snapshots built by * individual changes. The output plugins rely on snapshots built by
* snapbuild.c which hands them to us. * snapbuild.c which hands them to us.
* *
...@@ -1752,7 +1752,7 @@ ReorderBufferForget(ReorderBuffer *rb, TransactionId xid, XLogRecPtr lsn) ...@@ -1752,7 +1752,7 @@ ReorderBufferForget(ReorderBuffer *rb, TransactionId xid, XLogRecPtr lsn)
/* /*
* Execute invalidations happening outside the context of a decoded * Execute invalidations happening outside the context of a decoded
* transaction. That currently happens either for xid-less commits * transaction. That currently happens either for xid-less commits
* (c.f. RecordTransactionCommit()) or for invalidations in uninteresting * (cf. RecordTransactionCommit()) or for invalidations in uninteresting
* transactions (via ReorderBufferForget()). * transactions (via ReorderBufferForget()).
*/ */
void void
......
...@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ ...@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
* catalog in a transaction. During normal operation this is achieved by using * catalog in a transaction. During normal operation this is achieved by using
* CommandIds/cmin/cmax. The problem with that however is that for space * CommandIds/cmin/cmax. The problem with that however is that for space
* efficiency reasons only one value of that is stored * efficiency reasons only one value of that is stored
* (c.f. combocid.c). Since ComboCids are only available in memory we log * (cf. combocid.c). Since ComboCids are only available in memory we log
* additional information which allows us to get the original (cmin, cmax) * additional information which allows us to get the original (cmin, cmax)
* pair during visibility checks. Check the reorderbuffer.c's comment above * pair during visibility checks. Check the reorderbuffer.c's comment above
* ResolveCminCmaxDuringDecoding() for details. * ResolveCminCmaxDuringDecoding() for details.
......
...@@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ ProcArrayApplyRecoveryInfo(RunningTransactions running) ...@@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ ProcArrayApplyRecoveryInfo(RunningTransactions running)
/* /*
* latestObservedXid is at least set to the point where SUBTRANS was * latestObservedXid is at least set to the point where SUBTRANS was
* started up to (c.f. ProcArrayInitRecovery()) or to the biggest xid * started up to (cf. ProcArrayInitRecovery()) or to the biggest xid
* RecordKnownAssignedTransactionIds() was called for. Initialize * RecordKnownAssignedTransactionIds() was called for. Initialize
* subtrans from thereon, up to nextXid - 1. * subtrans from thereon, up to nextXid - 1.
* *
......
...@@ -2511,7 +2511,7 @@ RelationClearRelation(Relation relation, bool rebuild) ...@@ -2511,7 +2511,7 @@ RelationClearRelation(Relation relation, bool rebuild)
/* /*
* This shouldn't happen as dropping a relation is intended to be * This shouldn't happen as dropping a relation is intended to be
* impossible if still referenced (c.f. CheckTableNotInUse()). But * impossible if still referenced (cf. CheckTableNotInUse()). But
* if we get here anyway, we can't just delete the relcache entry, * if we get here anyway, we can't just delete the relcache entry,
* as it possibly could get accessed later (as e.g. the error * as it possibly could get accessed later (as e.g. the error
* might get trapped and handled via a subtransaction rollback). * might get trapped and handled via a subtransaction rollback).
......
...@@ -1722,7 +1722,7 @@ describeOneTableDetails(const char *schemaname, ...@@ -1722,7 +1722,7 @@ describeOneTableDetails(const char *schemaname,
/* /*
* In 9.0+, we have column comments for: relations, views, composite * In 9.0+, we have column comments for: relations, views, composite
* types, and foreign tables (c.f. CommentObject() in comment.c). * types, and foreign tables (cf. CommentObject() in comment.c).
*/ */
if (tableinfo.relkind == RELKIND_RELATION || if (tableinfo.relkind == RELKIND_RELATION ||
tableinfo.relkind == RELKIND_VIEW || tableinfo.relkind == RELKIND_VIEW ||
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment