Correctino, add URL on :

* Add estimated_count(*) to return an estimate of COUNT(*) > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-11/msg00943.php

Correctino, add URL on :
* Add estimated_count(*) to return an estimate of COUNT(*) > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-11/msg00943.php
9601745d · Bruce Momjian · 2b1ccefe · 9601745d · 9601745d
Commit 9601745d authored Oct 24, 2006 by Bruce Momjian
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side

Showing with 4 additions and 4 deletions

doc/TODO doc/TODO +2 -2

doc/src/FAQ/TODO.html doc/src/FAQ/TODO.html +2 -2

No files found.
--- a/doc/TODO
+++ b/doc/TODO
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 PostgreSQL TODO List
 ====================
 Current maintainer:	Bruce Momjian (bruce@momjian.us)
-Last updated:		Mon Oct 23 22:41:16 EDT 2006
+Last updated:		Mon Oct 23 22:42:19 EDT 2006

 The most recent version of this document can be viewed at
 http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.TODO.html.
@@ -960,12 +960,12 @@ Cache Usage
  get a count directly from a unique index, but for this to be
  faster than a sequential scan it must avoid access to the heap
  to obtain tuple visibility information.
-  http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-11/msg00943.php

 * Add estimated_count(*) to return an estimate of COUNT(*)

  This would use the planner ANALYZE statistics to return an estimated
  count.
+  http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-11/msg00943.php

 * Allow data to be pulled directly from indexes


--- a/doc/src/FAQ/TODO.html
+++ b/doc/src/FAQ/TODO.html
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000" link="#FF0000" vlink="#A00000" alink="#0000FF">
 <h1><a name="section_1">PostgreSQL TODO List</a></h1>
 <p>Current maintainer:     Bruce Momjian (<a href="mailto:bruce@momjian.us">bruce@momjian.us</a>)<br/>
-Last updated:           Mon Oct 23 22:41:16 EDT 2006
+Last updated:           Mon Oct 23 22:42:19 EDT 2006
 </p>
 <p>The most recent version of this document can be viewed at<br/>
 <a href="http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.TODO.html">http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.TODO.html</a>.
@@ -867,11 +867,11 @@ first.
  get a count directly from a unique index, but for this to be
  faster than a sequential scan it must avoid access to the heap
  to obtain tuple visibility information.
-  <a href="http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-11/msg00943.php">http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-11/msg00943.php</a>
 </p>
  </li><li>Add estimated_count(*) to return an estimate of COUNT(*)
 <p>  This would use the planner ANALYZE statistics to return an estimated
  count.
+  <a href="http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-11/msg00943.php">http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-11/msg00943.php</a>
 </p>
  </li><li>Allow data to be pulled directly from indexes
 <p>  Currently indexes do not have enough tuple visibility information