Fix incorrect merge in ECPG code with DECLARE
The same condition was repeated twice when comparing the connection used by existing declared statement with the one coming from a fresh DECLARE statement. This had no consequences, but let's keep the code clean. Oversight in f576de1. Author: Shenhao Wang Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OSBPR01MB42149653BC0AB0A49D23C1B8F2C69@OSBPR01MB4214.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com Backpatch-through: 14
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment