Fix failure to check for open() or fsync() failures.
While it seems OK to not be concerned about fsync() failure for a pre-existing signal file, it's not OK to not even check for open() failure. This at least causes complaints from static analyzers, and I think on some platforms passing -1 to fsync() or close() might trigger assertion-type failures. Also add (void) casts to make clear that we're ignoring fsync's result intentionally. Oversights in commit 2dedf4d9, noted by Coverity.
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment