Commit 81c52728 authored by Peter Eisentraut's avatar Peter Eisentraut

doc: Remove claim about large shared_buffers on Windows

Testing has shown that it is no longer correct.

From: Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: default avataramul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
Discussion: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F5EE995@G01JPEXMBYT05/
parent 2f0c7ff4
...@@ -1316,11 +1316,6 @@ include_dir 'conf.d' ...@@ -1316,11 +1316,6 @@ include_dir 'conf.d'
<para> <para>
On systems with less than 1GB of RAM, a smaller percentage of RAM is On systems with less than 1GB of RAM, a smaller percentage of RAM is
appropriate, so as to leave adequate space for the operating system. appropriate, so as to leave adequate space for the operating system.
Also, on Windows, large values for <varname>shared_buffers</varname>
aren't as effective. You may find better results keeping the setting
relatively low and using the operating system cache more instead. The
useful range for <varname>shared_buffers</varname> on Windows systems
is generally from 64MB to 512MB.
</para> </para>
</listitem> </listitem>
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment